(14 May 2018, 3:22 pm)GuyParkRoyal wrote Go North East have been providing a shuttle service at Port of Tyne for the Norwegian Jade a cruise ship with a capacity of 2402 passengers and 1037 crew. The morning peak move of people after breakfast was covered by 5335, 4969, 5329, 4981, 5251 & 5274.
(14 May 2018, 11:31 am)Dan wrote Martijn Gilbert appointed as Go North East MD from August 2018
https://twitter.com/MartRDG/status/995987857385885697
(14 May 2018, 3:53 pm)S813 FVK wrote Very good news, although I hope Reading manage to appoint somebody new just as good to replace him there.
I have no idea what Go-Ahead's social media policy is, but I would love to see a continuation of the current twitter activities. Some of the conversations carried out by himself (or other MDs on social media) are very engaging and demonstrates great customer relations, even if some people may feel the need to bypass customer services and go straight to him because their bus is running 30 seconds late.
(14 May 2018, 12:38 pm)Indigo701 wrote I wonder what the new MD can do up here, reading buses is completely different to GNE, do you think the new MD will bring concepts like the flat fare areas and the more simplistic branding?
(14 May 2018, 5:39 pm)Wybus wrote I expect printed timetables will return, he’s been vocal on Twitter in the past saying that there is still a place for such things even in the digital age.
(14 May 2018, 8:34 pm)S813 FVK wrote The has been a Passenger Panel survey issued in the last week and the was a question on printed timetables. There were questions about the website and app too. In fact I forgot to include a suggestion for the website at the end of it now I look back.Not just devils advocating, I genuinely like the spreadsheet style where I can consume all relevant info in one quick sweep. One fix was needed - to alternate row colour, but since that was fixed - I can't fault them. I don't like the Arriva styled ones which are like books. Takes forever to locate information and not practical for quick access.
If printed timetables were to be reintroduced, I would like to see them redesigned. I have never been a fan of the massive open-out ones, even if they are cheaper for the company to have printed on a mass scale.
(14 May 2018, 8:44 pm)Jamie M wrote Not just devils advocating, I genuinely like the spreadsheet style where I can consume all relevant info in one quick sweep. One fix was needed - to alternate row colour, but since that was fixed - I can't fault them. I don't like the Arriva styled ones which are like books. Takes forever to locate information and not practical for quick access.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
(14 May 2018, 9:15 pm)L469 YVK wrote I hope that Buzzfare is axed when the new MD comes and changes to the following:So basically everywhere? [emoji14]
- Tyne & Wear
- Blyth, Cramlington & Wansbeck
- Tyne Valley
- Central & West Durham
- East Durham
- Teesside
(14 May 2018, 8:55 pm)S813 FVK wrote Nothing wrong with that - each to their own I guess!Stagecoach are the worst offenders, look like flippin chip shop flyers!
I prefer the booklet type, but I am not a massive fan of the Arriva timetables. I picked up a timetable for Sapphire services X3/X4 at some point last year just out of curiosity, and noticed that they had gone downhill by a long way compared to the last time I picked up a timetable for the same services (which, at the time, included the 5/5A too). Did not suggest 'premium' at all.
(15 May 2018, 5:32 pm)Michael wrote Looks like the Omnidekka's might be joining the fleet permanently as they've been giving the fleet numbers 6162-6179Eeee man quoting untrustworthy news sources! [emoji1]
The ex London deckers will only be retained if Go North East is awarded Miscellaneous Works Nexus contracts from September 2018.
Source: the news
(15 May 2018, 5:50 pm)Jamie M wrote Eeee man quoting unreliable sources!
I think GNE scholars are renowned for doing well and being a professional standard. I would like to see GNE take over more of those, help the bairns have a reliable trip to school in a good environment. Some of the current operations by smaller operators are an embarrassment and I think it sets a poor example of what the young'ns see of a bus operator. Would like to see that put right.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
(14 May 2018, 3:11 pm)G-CPTN wrote Last Friday I travelled on two Arriva the Shires 17 reg Alexander Dennis Enviro 400MMC buses - which 'cut-out' immediately at every stop - restarting again to drive off of course - which seemed to be placing unnecessary additional stress on the starter motor - I wonder how long they will last?
(15 May 2018, 6:55 pm)Andreos1 wrote I meant to reply to this when you posted.
The original hybrids on the 21 (now on the 1) are like this.
From a passenger perspective, I didnt enjoy riding them at all.
The replacements seem slightly different.
On my first ride, the engine didnt cut out at all.
On a subsequent one, the engine cut out on occassions.
Keeping an eagle eye and ear out since, I'm wondering if there is some sort of 'over-ride' function.
The ride is a lot more pleasant when it doesn't cut out.
(14 May 2018, 8:55 pm)S813 FVK wrote Nothing wrong with that - each to their own I guess!
I prefer the booklet type, but I am not a massive fan of the Arriva timetables. I picked up a timetable for Sapphire services X3/X4 at some point last year just out of curiosity, and noticed that they had gone downhill by a long way compared to the last time I picked up a timetable for the same services (which, at the time, included the 5/5A too). Did not suggest 'premium' at all.
(17 May 2018, 6:43 pm)Adrian wrote I'd prefer something similar to what they had in the 70s and 80s. One A5 size book with all the company's timetables in by area. If they published these annually, I'd be more than happy to pay a couple of quid to have one.The timetables change too often. It would only be worth having as a hard copy for weeks from any given point, and then wouldnt be worth printing out imo.
(17 May 2018, 6:53 pm)Jamie M wrote The timetables change too often. It would only be worth having as a hard copy for weeks from any given point, and then wouldnt be worth printing out imo.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
(17 May 2018, 7:05 pm)Andreos1 wrote Or they do the unthinkable and leave the network alone for a while.I do think there has been a few too many changes within the past few months. Fair enough if they're merging routes or whatever finding what works and what doesn't work, but I gather any situation is like this if it involves public as the stakeholder. We're in a huge claim culture right now where people complain about everything and anything, so I can see it may start being a little bit more confusing.
A stable network with timetables that aren't tinkered with or routes changed/merged/amalgamated and passengers having a clue about what number their bus is and the time it is due...
Might be on to something there!
(17 May 2018, 7:12 pm)Jamie M wrote I do think there has been a few too many changes within the past few months. Fair enough if they're merging routes or whatever finding what works and what doesn't work, but I gather any situation is like this if it involves public as the stakeholder. We're in a huge claim culture right now where people complain about everything and anything, so I can see it may start being a little bit more confusing.
If you run public transport as an Autocratic Dictatorship and blissfully ignored said complaints, you may manage to run services to a sensible time and price -- however, it would no longer be called "Go North East", rather "RyanBus bus" or any other 4th class passenger travel model. Seat or buggy as optional extras on fares and buses anybody?
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
(17 May 2018, 7:35 pm)Andreos1 wrote Nobody needs to have an autocratic dictatorship, least of all a public transport organisation which uses that model.
A network wide annual or bi-annual review of services and changes taking place on scheduled dates is all it takes to ensure passengers needs are met and bus operations meet requirements.
Each sector/area will have review periods, so why not tie it all together with the timetable Adrian suggests?