Menu
 
North East Buses Local Bus Scene Go North East Go North East: Latest News & Discussion - February 2015

Go North East: Latest News & Discussion - February 2015

Go North East: Latest News & Discussion - February 2015

 
  • 1 Vote(s) - 2 Average
 
Pages (35) Previous 1 2 335 Next
Tom



6,138
01 Feb 2015, 6:06 pm #21
(01 Feb 2015, 6:02 pm)aureolin Shame that we'll see the back of all the Renowns by the end of the year, but I can't say I'll be sorry to see the back of the Lolynes in 2017. Smile

Really? I think the Lolynes are really nice!
Tom
01 Feb 2015, 6:06 pm #21

(01 Feb 2015, 6:02 pm)aureolin Shame that we'll see the back of all the Renowns by the end of the year, but I can't say I'll be sorry to see the back of the Lolynes in 2017. Smile

Really? I think the Lolynes are really nice!

Michael



19,160
01 Feb 2015, 6:07 pm #22
(01 Feb 2015, 5:58 pm)Dan 67x Volvo B10BLE/Wright Renown (to be disposed of prior to 1 January 2016)
10x Volvo Olympian/Northern Counties Palatine 2 (to be disposed of prior to 1 January 2017)
27x Dennis Trident/East Lancs Lolyne (to be disposed of prior to 1 January 2017)

This financial year will see the withdrawal of some of these vehicles. Any single deckers remaining at the end of this financial year will have to be withdrawn in the next financial year instead. One would naturally assume that there will be a staggering number of new vehicles to enter the fleet in 2015 to assist in the withdrawal of the above vehicles.

Cheers, i thought it was something like that, =)

Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.
Michael
01 Feb 2015, 6:07 pm #22

(01 Feb 2015, 5:58 pm)Dan 67x Volvo B10BLE/Wright Renown (to be disposed of prior to 1 January 2016)
10x Volvo Olympian/Northern Counties Palatine 2 (to be disposed of prior to 1 January 2017)
27x Dennis Trident/East Lancs Lolyne (to be disposed of prior to 1 January 2017)

This financial year will see the withdrawal of some of these vehicles. Any single deckers remaining at the end of this financial year will have to be withdrawn in the next financial year instead. One would naturally assume that there will be a staggering number of new vehicles to enter the fleet in 2015 to assist in the withdrawal of the above vehicles.

Cheers, i thought it was something like that, =)


Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.

Michael



19,160
01 Feb 2015, 6:09 pm #23
(01 Feb 2015, 6:06 pm)Tom Really? I think the Lolynes are really nice!

I hope your being sarcastic! 

Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.
Michael
01 Feb 2015, 6:09 pm #23

(01 Feb 2015, 6:06 pm)Tom Really? I think the Lolynes are really nice!

I hope your being sarcastic! 


Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.

Tom



6,138
01 Feb 2015, 6:10 pm #24
(01 Feb 2015, 6:09 pm)Michael I hope your being sarcastic! 

No I'm not!
They are actually nice in my opinion.
Tom
01 Feb 2015, 6:10 pm #24

(01 Feb 2015, 6:09 pm)Michael I hope your being sarcastic! 

No I'm not!
They are actually nice in my opinion.

Dan

Site Administrator

18,114
01 Feb 2015, 6:12 pm #25
(01 Feb 2015, 6:07 pm)Michael Cheers, i thought it was something like that, =)

No problem.

(01 Feb 2015, 6:09 pm)Michael I hope your being sarcastic! 

Never understood what the fuss has been about on this forum about the Tridents. Pretty poor reliability-wise, but think they provide a decent journey... Prefer them to Volvo B7TLs.
Dan
01 Feb 2015, 6:12 pm #25

(01 Feb 2015, 6:07 pm)Michael Cheers, i thought it was something like that, =)

No problem.

(01 Feb 2015, 6:09 pm)Michael I hope your being sarcastic! 

Never understood what the fuss has been about on this forum about the Tridents. Pretty poor reliability-wise, but think they provide a decent journey... Prefer them to Volvo B7TLs.

Michael



19,160
01 Feb 2015, 6:14 pm #26
You can't beat the B10's though, the ones which are/were on the Lime =D

Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.
Michael
01 Feb 2015, 6:14 pm #26

You can't beat the B10's though, the ones which are/were on the Lime =D


Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.

Adrian



9,583
01 Feb 2015, 6:14 pm #27
The seats always feel really low for me, and you get hit with that damp smell as soon as you board.

Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook
Adrian
01 Feb 2015, 6:14 pm #27

The seats always feel really low for me, and you get hit with that damp smell as soon as you board.


Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook

Jimmi



10,969
01 Feb 2015, 6:27 pm #28
(01 Feb 2015, 6:06 pm)Tom Really? I think the Lolynes are really nice!

I actually don't mind a ride on a Lolyne, always nice to see one turn up on the X21 and X22 in place of Plaxton President's.

Not the best reliability wise though.
Jimmi
01 Feb 2015, 6:27 pm #28

(01 Feb 2015, 6:06 pm)Tom Really? I think the Lolynes are really nice!

I actually don't mind a ride on a Lolyne, always nice to see one turn up on the X21 and X22 in place of Plaxton President's.

Not the best reliability wise though.

nk55



372
01 Feb 2015, 6:29 pm #29
(01 Feb 2015, 6:12 pm)Dan No problem.


Never understood what the fuss has been about on this forum about the Tridents. Pretty poor reliability-wise, but think they provide a decent journey... Prefer them to Volvo B7TLs.

Try driving them!!. B7 for me any day.
nk55
01 Feb 2015, 6:29 pm #29

(01 Feb 2015, 6:12 pm)Dan No problem.


Never understood what the fuss has been about on this forum about the Tridents. Pretty poor reliability-wise, but think they provide a decent journey... Prefer them to Volvo B7TLs.

Try driving them!!. B7 for me any day.

Davie

Banned

2,783
01 Feb 2015, 6:30 pm #30
(01 Feb 2015, 6:10 pm)Tom No I'm not!
They are actually nice in my opinion.

I agree Tom, I like Loynes
Davie
01 Feb 2015, 6:30 pm #30

(01 Feb 2015, 6:10 pm)Tom No I'm not!
They are actually nice in my opinion.

I agree Tom, I like Loynes

S813 FVK



6,030
01 Feb 2015, 6:55 pm #31
I like the lolynes too. I cant say i have many buses that i hate but i dont like the B7 Presidents and Vykings and i would like to say i dont like the omnicities either.
S813 FVK
01 Feb 2015, 6:55 pm #31

I like the lolynes too. I cant say i have many buses that i hate but i dont like the B7 Presidents and Vykings and i would like to say i dont like the omnicities either.

Davie

Banned

2,783
01 Feb 2015, 7:25 pm #32
(01 Feb 2015, 6:55 pm)Robert I like the lolynes too. I cant say i have many buses that i hate but i dont like the B7 Presidents and Vykings and i would like to say i dont like the omnicities either.

Robert, I thought I was the only bus enthusiasts who had that opinion
Davie
01 Feb 2015, 7:25 pm #32

(01 Feb 2015, 6:55 pm)Robert I like the lolynes too. I cant say i have many buses that i hate but i dont like the B7 Presidents and Vykings and i would like to say i dont like the omnicities either.

Robert, I thought I was the only bus enthusiasts who had that opinion

gtom

Banned

1,316
01 Feb 2015, 7:59 pm #33
Passenger wise I preferred the Lolynes when they were on the 21 to the current kit. I struggle with the legroom on the B7s (aside that driver side seat behind the stairs)

I don't find the B5's particularly comfortable at all tbh. I particularly hate the back 'mini row' on them

I quite liked the Vykings and they probably would have been more popular if they hadn't have persisted with the 2 door policy that never ever worked
gtom
01 Feb 2015, 7:59 pm #33

Passenger wise I preferred the Lolynes when they were on the 21 to the current kit. I struggle with the legroom on the B7s (aside that driver side seat behind the stairs)

I don't find the B5's particularly comfortable at all tbh. I particularly hate the back 'mini row' on them

I quite liked the Vykings and they probably would have been more popular if they hadn't have persisted with the 2 door policy that never ever worked

nk55



372
01 Feb 2015, 8:03 pm #34
The dual door B7s couldn't be converted to single door because the ramp is located at the centre door and if i remember its either down to the fact the area near the front door wasn't wide enough to allow a wheelchair through or the cost.
nk55
01 Feb 2015, 8:03 pm #34

The dual door B7s couldn't be converted to single door because the ramp is located at the centre door and if i remember its either down to the fact the area near the front door wasn't wide enough to allow a wheelchair through or the cost.

Kuyoyo



6,853
01 Feb 2015, 8:04 pm #35
(01 Feb 2015, 7:59 pm)gtom Passenger wise I preferred the Lolynes when they were on the 21 to the current kit.  I struggle with the legroom on the B7s (aside that driver side seat behind the stairs)

I don't find the B5's particularly comfortable at all tbh.  I particularly hate the back 'mini row' on them

I quite liked the Vykings and they probably would have been more popular if they hadn't have persisted with the 2 door policy that never ever worked

If they'd had to covert them to single door, I don't think they would have come here - given the quoted cost of their refurbishment without the single door conversion (£20k a vehicle).
Kuyoyo
01 Feb 2015, 8:04 pm #35

(01 Feb 2015, 7:59 pm)gtom Passenger wise I preferred the Lolynes when they were on the 21 to the current kit.  I struggle with the legroom on the B7s (aside that driver side seat behind the stairs)

I don't find the B5's particularly comfortable at all tbh.  I particularly hate the back 'mini row' on them

I quite liked the Vykings and they probably would have been more popular if they hadn't have persisted with the 2 door policy that never ever worked

If they'd had to covert them to single door, I don't think they would have come here - given the quoted cost of their refurbishment without the single door conversion (£20k a vehicle).

Adrian



9,583
01 Feb 2015, 8:16 pm #36
(01 Feb 2015, 7:59 pm)gtom Passenger wise I preferred the Lolynes when they were on the 21 to the current kit.  I struggle with the legroom on the B7s (aside that driver side seat behind the stairs)

I don't find the B5's particularly comfortable at all tbh.  I particularly hate the back 'mini row' on them

I quite liked the Vykings and they probably would have been more popular if they hadn't have persisted with the 2 door policy that never ever worked

See, I think the Geminis are comfortable, and I can seem to sit anywhere without struggling for leg room. I can't say the same about Lolynes or the ex-London Presidents. On the latter, I always end up with pins and needles in my legs on longer journeys, due to how cramped the spacing between seats can be. 

The Vykings were alright, but again, the legroom is pretty poor. I used to try and sit either side of the first raised seats on the lower deck, but found you always slid off the seats, due to a mixture of the seating style and heavy braking.

The two door policy wouldn't have been so bad, if they were a) supported by the council in terms of infrastructure, and b) people understood the basics of a one way system.

Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook
Adrian
01 Feb 2015, 8:16 pm #36

(01 Feb 2015, 7:59 pm)gtom Passenger wise I preferred the Lolynes when they were on the 21 to the current kit.  I struggle with the legroom on the B7s (aside that driver side seat behind the stairs)

I don't find the B5's particularly comfortable at all tbh.  I particularly hate the back 'mini row' on them

I quite liked the Vykings and they probably would have been more popular if they hadn't have persisted with the 2 door policy that never ever worked

See, I think the Geminis are comfortable, and I can seem to sit anywhere without struggling for leg room. I can't say the same about Lolynes or the ex-London Presidents. On the latter, I always end up with pins and needles in my legs on longer journeys, due to how cramped the spacing between seats can be. 

The Vykings were alright, but again, the legroom is pretty poor. I used to try and sit either side of the first raised seats on the lower deck, but found you always slid off the seats, due to a mixture of the seating style and heavy braking.

The two door policy wouldn't have been so bad, if they were a) supported by the council in terms of infrastructure, and b) people understood the basics of a one way system.


Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook

gtom

Banned

1,316
01 Feb 2015, 8:36 pm #37
(01 Feb 2015, 8:16 pm)aureolin The two door policy wouldn't have been so bad, if they were a) supported by the council in terms of infrastructure, and b) people understood the basics of a one way system.

The infrastructure was there from Gateshead Council, can't speak for the rest. They retrofitted a lot of bus stops
gtom
01 Feb 2015, 8:36 pm #37

(01 Feb 2015, 8:16 pm)aureolin The two door policy wouldn't have been so bad, if they were a) supported by the council in terms of infrastructure, and b) people understood the basics of a one way system.

The infrastructure was there from Gateshead Council, can't speak for the rest. They retrofitted a lot of bus stops

Adrian



9,583
01 Feb 2015, 8:40 pm #38
(01 Feb 2015, 8:36 pm)gtom The infrastructure was there from Gateshead Council, can't speak for the rest.  They retrofitted a lot of bus stops

Durham had quite a few stops where the stickers appeared, which led to quite a bit confusion. You often had people queueing up at the middle doors to get off, only to be told to go out the front doors. 

Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook
Adrian
01 Feb 2015, 8:40 pm #38

(01 Feb 2015, 8:36 pm)gtom The infrastructure was there from Gateshead Council, can't speak for the rest.  They retrofitted a lot of bus stops

Durham had quite a few stops where the stickers appeared, which led to quite a bit confusion. You often had people queueing up at the middle doors to get off, only to be told to go out the front doors. 


Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook

gtom

Banned

1,316
01 Feb 2015, 9:00 pm #39
(01 Feb 2015, 8:40 pm)aureolin Durham had quite a few stops where the stickers appeared, which led to quite a bit confusion. You often had people queueing up at the middle doors to get off, only to be told to go out the front doors. 

Oddly enough the only time I was ever told to get off at the middle doors was on an X22 working!
gtom
01 Feb 2015, 9:00 pm #39

(01 Feb 2015, 8:40 pm)aureolin Durham had quite a few stops where the stickers appeared, which led to quite a bit confusion. You often had people queueing up at the middle doors to get off, only to be told to go out the front doors. 

Oddly enough the only time I was ever told to get off at the middle doors was on an X22 working!

01 Feb 2015, 9:10 pm #40
(01 Feb 2015, 8:16 pm)aureolin See, I think the Geminis are comfortable, and I can seem to sit anywhere without struggling for leg room. I can't say the same about Lolynes or the ex-London Presidents. On the latter, I always end up with pins and needles in my legs on longer journeys, due to how cramped the spacing between seats can be. 

The Vykings were alright, but again, the legroom is pretty poor. I used to try and sit either side of the first raised seats on the lower deck, but found you always slid off the seats, due to a mixture of the seating style and heavy braking.

The two door policy wouldn't have been so bad, if they were a) supported by the council in terms of infrastructure, and b) people understood the basics of a one way system.

I think Vykings are alright for short hops. I wouldn't like to drive one on one of those 4 hour 21 boards! Wink
R852 PRG
01 Feb 2015, 9:10 pm #40

(01 Feb 2015, 8:16 pm)aureolin See, I think the Geminis are comfortable, and I can seem to sit anywhere without struggling for leg room. I can't say the same about Lolynes or the ex-London Presidents. On the latter, I always end up with pins and needles in my legs on longer journeys, due to how cramped the spacing between seats can be. 

The Vykings were alright, but again, the legroom is pretty poor. I used to try and sit either side of the first raised seats on the lower deck, but found you always slid off the seats, due to a mixture of the seating style and heavy braking.

The two door policy wouldn't have been so bad, if they were a) supported by the council in terms of infrastructure, and b) people understood the basics of a one way system.

I think Vykings are alright for short hops. I wouldn't like to drive one on one of those 4 hour 21 boards! Wink

Pages (35) Previous 1 2 335 Next
 
  • 1 Vote(s) - 2 Average