Menu
 
North East Buses Local Bus Scene Go North East Go North East: Latest News & Discussion - August 2015

Go North East: Latest News & Discussion - August 2015

Go North East: Latest News & Discussion - August 2015

 
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
 
Pages (62) Previous 121 22 2362 Next
S813 FVK



6,030
09 Aug 2015, 6:31 pm #421
(09 Aug 2015, 6:29 pm)danpick Was sure both were going to Hexham.

Up until that photo was uploaded, it was never said on this forum by anybody that 619 was definitely going to Hexham. It was predicted that it would though by a couple of people.
S813 FVK
09 Aug 2015, 6:31 pm #421

(09 Aug 2015, 6:29 pm)danpick Was sure both were going to Hexham.

Up until that photo was uploaded, it was never said on this forum by anybody that 619 was definitely going to Hexham. It was predicted that it would though by a couple of people.

Michael



19,175
09 Aug 2015, 6:36 pm #422
(09 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm)Dan It's been confirmed on Flickr, so I suppose it can be confirmed on here now too..!

MPD 619 is to join 618 at Hexham Depot.

https://flic.kr/p/wbEAV9

Taking a guess at the rest...

564,565, 573, 574 to Deptford to replace 542,544, 547,548.

560 to Riverside?

Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.
Michael
09 Aug 2015, 6:36 pm #422

(09 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm)Dan It's been confirmed on Flickr, so I suppose it can be confirmed on here now too..!

MPD 619 is to join 618 at Hexham Depot.

https://flic.kr/p/wbEAV9

Taking a guess at the rest...

564,565, 573, 574 to Deptford to replace 542,544, 547,548.

560 to Riverside?


Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.

S813 FVK



6,030
09 Aug 2015, 6:38 pm #423
(09 Aug 2015, 6:36 pm)Michael Taking a guess at the rest...

564,565, 573, 574 to Deptford to replace 542,544, 547,548.

560 to Riverside?

Was 543 ever replaced? 560 could go there (if it was required).
S813 FVK
09 Aug 2015, 6:38 pm #423

(09 Aug 2015, 6:36 pm)Michael Taking a guess at the rest...

564,565, 573, 574 to Deptford to replace 542,544, 547,548.

560 to Riverside?

Was 543 ever replaced? 560 could go there (if it was required).

Malarkey



6,064
09 Aug 2015, 6:39 pm #424
(09 Aug 2015, 6:36 pm)Michael Taking a guess at the rest...

564,565, 573, 574 to Deptford to replace 542,544, 547,548.

560 to Riverside?

Send it to Washington Depot to as a Spare to further prevent a B7TL being allocated to the 82/82A/85 & 86.
Malarkey
09 Aug 2015, 6:39 pm #424

(09 Aug 2015, 6:36 pm)Michael Taking a guess at the rest...

564,565, 573, 574 to Deptford to replace 542,544, 547,548.

560 to Riverside?

Send it to Washington Depot to as a Spare to further prevent a B7TL being allocated to the 82/82A/85 & 86.

Michael



19,175
09 Aug 2015, 6:42 pm #425
(09 Aug 2015, 6:39 pm)Malarkey Send it to Washington Depot to as a Spare to further prevent a B7TL being allocated to the 82/82A/85 & 86.

Aye would be better forgot about Washington haha

Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.
Michael
09 Aug 2015, 6:42 pm #425

(09 Aug 2015, 6:39 pm)Malarkey Send it to Washington Depot to as a Spare to further prevent a B7TL being allocated to the 82/82A/85 & 86.

Aye would be better forgot about Washington haha


Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.

park5354



406
09 Aug 2015, 6:44 pm #426
(09 Aug 2015, 6:42 pm)Michael Aye would be better forgot about Washington haha

send 560 to Hexham, allowing 8273 to return to Deptford.

or

send 560 to Washington, allowing 570 to Crook as an OK way spare.
Edited 09 Aug 2015, 6:46 pm by park5354.
park5354
09 Aug 2015, 6:44 pm #426

(09 Aug 2015, 6:42 pm)Michael Aye would be better forgot about Washington haha

send 560 to Hexham, allowing 8273 to return to Deptford.

or

send 560 to Washington, allowing 570 to Crook as an OK way spare.

Jimmi



10,972
09 Aug 2015, 6:54 pm #427
(09 Aug 2015, 6:44 pm)park5354 send 560 to Hexham, allowing 8273 to return to Deptford.

or

send 560 to Washington, allowing 570 to Crook as an OK way spare.

Not much call for a spare MPD for The OK Way I feel, I think it's easier to have Presidents spare at Crook so they can do both the 18 and X21, it's better having a President on the 18 than a MPD on the X21.
Jimmi
09 Aug 2015, 6:54 pm #427

(09 Aug 2015, 6:44 pm)park5354 send 560 to Hexham, allowing 8273 to return to Deptford.

or

send 560 to Washington, allowing 570 to Crook as an OK way spare.

Not much call for a spare MPD for The OK Way I feel, I think it's easier to have Presidents spare at Crook so they can do both the 18 and X21, it's better having a President on the 18 than a MPD on the X21.

S813 FVK



6,030
09 Aug 2015, 6:58 pm #428
(09 Aug 2015, 6:54 pm)Jimmi Not much call for a spare MPD for The OK Way I feel, I think it's easier to have Presidents spare at Crook so they can do both the 18 and X21, it's better having a President on the 18 than a MPD on the X21.

But if having an OK Way spare will reduce the chances of 6038 being taken up on the 18 and instead being a spare for the X21 rather than an MPD.
S813 FVK
09 Aug 2015, 6:58 pm #428

(09 Aug 2015, 6:54 pm)Jimmi Not much call for a spare MPD for The OK Way I feel, I think it's easier to have Presidents spare at Crook so they can do both the 18 and X21, it's better having a President on the 18 than a MPD on the X21.

But if having an OK Way spare will reduce the chances of 6038 being taken up on the 18 and instead being a spare for the X21 rather than an MPD.

busmanT



934
09 Aug 2015, 7:28 pm #429
(09 Aug 2015, 6:44 pm)park5354 send 560 to Hexham, allowing 8273 to return to Deptford.

or

send 560 to Washington, allowing 570 to Crook as an OK way spare.

I predict it will be the former, as Hexham needs more minibuses but fewer full size buses.
busmanT
09 Aug 2015, 7:28 pm #429

(09 Aug 2015, 6:44 pm)park5354 send 560 to Hexham, allowing 8273 to return to Deptford.

or

send 560 to Washington, allowing 570 to Crook as an OK way spare.

I predict it will be the former, as Hexham needs more minibuses but fewer full size buses.

busmanT



934
09 Aug 2015, 7:29 pm #430
(09 Aug 2015, 6:36 pm)Michael Taking a guess at the rest...

564,565, 573, 574 to Deptford to replace 542,544, 547,548.

560 to Riverside?

564/565 & 573/574 will need a repaint into red fleet livery - I can see them doing the repaints straight away.
busmanT
09 Aug 2015, 7:29 pm #430

(09 Aug 2015, 6:36 pm)Michael Taking a guess at the rest...

564,565, 573, 574 to Deptford to replace 542,544, 547,548.

560 to Riverside?

564/565 & 573/574 will need a repaint into red fleet livery - I can see them doing the repaints straight away.

pdiddy



264
09 Aug 2015, 7:41 pm #431
(09 Aug 2015, 6:58 pm)S813 FVK But if having an OK Way spare will reduce the chances of 6038 being taken up on the 18 and instead being a spare for the X21 rather than an MPD.

No need for it at Crook... send to Chester then could come to Crook if 571 or 572 have probs. In meantime it could be spare for 34s etc
pdiddy
09 Aug 2015, 7:41 pm #431

(09 Aug 2015, 6:58 pm)S813 FVK But if having an OK Way spare will reduce the chances of 6038 being taken up on the 18 and instead being a spare for the X21 rather than an MPD.

No need for it at Crook... send to Chester then could come to Crook if 571 or 572 have probs. In meantime it could be spare for 34s etc

Si1989



47
09 Aug 2015, 9:18 pm #432
Seen two b10s going though low fell with private hire on the front. Does anybody know what they where used for
Si1989
09 Aug 2015, 9:18 pm #432

Seen two b10s going though low fell with private hire on the front. Does anybody know what they where used for

LeeCalder



1,928
09 Aug 2015, 9:49 pm #433
(09 Aug 2015, 9:18 pm)Si1989 Seen two b10s going though low fell with private hire on the front. Does anybody know what they where used for

Private Hire....
LeeCalder
09 Aug 2015, 9:49 pm #433

(09 Aug 2015, 9:18 pm)Si1989 Seen two b10s going though low fell with private hire on the front. Does anybody know what they where used for

Private Hire....

Adrian



9,586
10 Aug 2015, 6:44 am #434
665 is already out on the 204.

Now that I've seen the branding for myself, I still find it has no appeal to me. Probably one of my least favourite examples in all the years of GNE branding.

The base colour is nice though.

Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook
Adrian
10 Aug 2015, 6:44 am #434

665 is already out on the 204.

Now that I've seen the branding for myself, I still find it has no appeal to me. Probably one of my least favourite examples in all the years of GNE branding.

The base colour is nice though.


Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook

10 Aug 2015, 8:13 am #435
(10 Aug 2015, 6:44 am)aureolin 665 is already out on the 204.

Now that I've seen the branding for myself, I still find it has no appeal to me. Probably one of my least favourite examples in all the years of GNE branding.

The base colour is nice though.

Are all of them out today, or just a few?
Jackamcardle
10 Aug 2015, 8:13 am #435

(10 Aug 2015, 6:44 am)aureolin 665 is already out on the 204.

Now that I've seen the branding for myself, I still find it has no appeal to me. Probably one of my least favourite examples in all the years of GNE branding.

The base colour is nice though.

Are all of them out today, or just a few?

Adrian



9,586
10 Aug 2015, 8:16 am #436
(10 Aug 2015, 8:13 am)Jackamcardle Are all of them out today, or just a few?
Only seen the one, but it was about 20 past 7 I was up the bus station.

Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook
Adrian
10 Aug 2015, 8:16 am #436

(10 Aug 2015, 8:13 am)Jackamcardle Are all of them out today, or just a few?
Only seen the one, but it was about 20 past 7 I was up the bus station.


Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook

Jimmi



10,972
10 Aug 2015, 8:32 am #437
(10 Aug 2015, 8:16 am)aureolin Only seen the one, but it was about 20 past 7 I was up the bus station.
656 has just entered Durham Bus Station as a 208.

Just wish I knew what it is going out as. Fingers crossed for 265! Dammit 547 on the 265
Edited 10 Aug 2015, 8:33 am by Jimmi.
Jimmi
10 Aug 2015, 8:32 am #437

(10 Aug 2015, 8:16 am)aureolin Only seen the one, but it was about 20 past 7 I was up the bus station.
656 has just entered Durham Bus Station as a 208.

Just wish I knew what it is going out as. Fingers crossed for 265! Dammit 547 on the 265

10 Aug 2015, 10:01 am #438
IndiGo is a pretty poor livery, but See it Do it Sunderland is an absolutely rubbish brand name; also not an attractive livery as the circles with the infantile scribbled images don't match the gold colour.
Greg in Weardale
10 Aug 2015, 10:01 am #438

IndiGo is a pretty poor livery, but See it Do it Sunderland is an absolutely rubbish brand name; also not an attractive livery as the circles with the infantile scribbled images don't match the gold colour.

Michael



19,175
10 Aug 2015, 10:07 am #439
(10 Aug 2015, 10:01 am)Greg in Weardale IndiGo is a pretty poor livery, but See it Do it Sunderland is an absolutely rubbish brand name; also not an attractive livery as the circles with the infantile scribbled images don't match the gold colour.

Seen the Indigo brand in person i quite like it.

See it, do it Sunderland is a promotion brand for Sunderland which the council use to promote Sunderland... would of said GNE got the design from them?

Your worse than me for moaning... its not end of the world

Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.
Michael
10 Aug 2015, 10:07 am #439

(10 Aug 2015, 10:01 am)Greg in Weardale IndiGo is a pretty poor livery, but See it Do it Sunderland is an absolutely rubbish brand name; also not an attractive livery as the circles with the infantile scribbled images don't match the gold colour.

Seen the Indigo brand in person i quite like it.

See it, do it Sunderland is a promotion brand for Sunderland which the council use to promote Sunderland... would of said GNE got the design from them?

Your worse than me for moaning... its not end of the world


Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.

Michael



19,175
10 Aug 2015, 10:09 am #440
Passengers who are getting on the 265 are praising the new buses.

Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.
Michael
10 Aug 2015, 10:09 am #440

Passengers who are getting on the 265 are praising the new buses.


Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.

Pages (62) Previous 121 22 2362 Next
 
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average