(04 Jan 2016, 6:17 pm)Dan Nothing wrong with a refresh, keeping the fleet smart and tidy, is there?
If you ask me; it's about time we saw quality being treated as a primary focus, amongst bus operators in the North East.
(04 Jan 2016, 6:17 pm)Dan Nothing wrong with a refresh, keeping the fleet smart and tidy, is there?
If you ask me; it's about time we saw quality being treated as a primary focus, amongst bus operators in the North East.
(04 Jan 2016, 6:17 pm)Dan Nothing wrong with a refresh, keeping the fleet smart and tidy, is there?
If you ask me; it's about time we saw quality being treated as a primary focus, amongst bus operators in the North East.
(04 Jan 2016, 6:17 pm)Dan Nothing wrong with a refresh, keeping the fleet smart and tidy, is there?
If you ask me; it's about time we saw quality being treated as a primary focus, amongst bus operators in the North East.
(04 Jan 2016, 7:04 pm)Michael Anyone else think its daft that the Tynedale Links is going use MPDs and Solo's along with the Scania?
Why didn't GNE just replace all the MPDs on the Tynedale Links?
(04 Jan 2016, 7:10 pm)Michael Well instead of buying Solo's for the North Tyne Links they could of just bought them for the Tynedale Links and just replace the NTL MPD's in future.
(04 Jan 2016, 7:10 pm)Michael Well instead of buying Solo's for the North Tyne Links they could of just bought them for the Tynedale Links and just replace the NTL MPD's in future.
(04 Jan 2016, 7:04 pm)Michael Anyone else think its daft that the Tynedale Links is going use MPDs and Solo's along with the Scania?
Why didn't GNE just replace all the MPDs on the Tynedale Links?
(04 Jan 2016, 7:04 pm)Michael Anyone else think its daft that the Tynedale Links is going use MPDs and Solo's along with the Scania?
Why didn't GNE just replace all the MPDs on the Tynedale Links?
(04 Jan 2016, 7:10 pm)Michael Well instead of buying Solo's for the North Tyne Links they could of just bought them for the Tynedale Links and just replace the NTL MPD's in future.
(04 Jan 2016, 7:10 pm)Michael Well instead of buying Solo's for the North Tyne Links they could of just bought them for the Tynedale Links and just replace the NTL MPD's in future.
(04 Jan 2016, 7:13 pm)Jimmi How many Solos is the Tynedale Links services getting again and what is the PVR required for them services?
Can only assume that some will be kept there as spares instead of having spare Solo SR's. Can't see where the Tynedale Links would be as big in terms of money making as the likes of the Venture and IndiGo services are, perhaps a full Solo allocation was unjustifiable. Then of course you will still have a Venture Solo SR going round on Tynedale Links services between runs on the once a day service 689.
(04 Jan 2016, 7:13 pm)Jimmi How many Solos is the Tynedale Links services getting again and what is the PVR required for them services?
Can only assume that some will be kept there as spares instead of having spare Solo SR's. Can't see where the Tynedale Links would be as big in terms of money making as the likes of the Venture and IndiGo services are, perhaps a full Solo allocation was unjustifiable. Then of course you will still have a Venture Solo SR going round on Tynedale Links services between runs on the once a day service 689.
(04 Jan 2016, 7:12 pm)citaro5284 No they couldn't.....more to these decisions than you lot ever see
(04 Jan 2016, 7:13 pm)R852 PRG You've got to consider the shelf lives of these buses though, Michael. There are a couple at Hexham that are a couple of years younger than the others, which are all 53-reg. At Percy Main; all of those MPDs date from 2003 if memory serves. Their expected lifetime is up, so they're being replaced.
(04 Jan 2016, 7:13 pm)R852 PRG You've got to consider the shelf lives of these buses though, Michael. There are a couple at Hexham that are a couple of years younger than the others, which are all 53-reg. At Percy Main; all of those MPDs date from 2003 if memory serves. Their expected lifetime is up, so they're being replaced.
(04 Jan 2016, 7:17 pm)Michael , i still don't see why half of the passengers should benefit from new buses and the rest don't, like you said we don't the decisions made.
(04 Jan 2016, 7:17 pm)Michael , i still don't see why half of the passengers should benefit from new buses and the rest don't, like you said we don't the decisions made.
(04 Jan 2016, 7:20 pm)MurdnunoC You can please some of the people some of the time but not all of the people all of the time.
I suspect the other half of passengers will benefit when the time is right.
(04 Jan 2016, 7:20 pm)MurdnunoC You can please some of the people some of the time but not all of the people all of the time.
I suspect the other half of passengers will benefit when the time is right.
We must remember that some of the services at Hexham are only contracted services, which Go North East may not be awarded with in future. Indeed; it's a possibility that Northumberland County Council may decide in the future that they cannot afford to offer the current level of service in the long-term, and terminate the contract after five years (which, to my memory, is the length for the contract for services 680 and 682)! I suppose it'd be difficult to justify spending a large amount of money to buy new buses, when there's uncertainty of the future for the services the bus would operate on?
The minibus PVR at Hexham is 7 vehicles (with one spare - presumably one of the AD122 branded examples which haven't been de-branded):
1. 682
2. 683
3. 74, 686, 687
4. 74, 686, 688
5. 112, 74, 686
6. 185, 681, X81
7. 141, 688
The seventh must be operated by a vehicle with seatbelts (and at the moment the only minibus with seatbelts at Hexham is 618), owing to a contractual requirement on the 141 scholars service. The 680 service is operated by a Scania L94/Wright Eclipse Solar. I cannot see either of these allocations changing, especially when Go North East went to the expense of refurbishing and retrofitting 618 with seatbelts, specifically for use on the aforementioned contract.
(04 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm)Dan We must remember that some of the services at Hexham are only contracted services, which Go North East may not be awarded with in future. Indeed; it's a possibility that Northumberland County Council may decide in the future that they cannot afford to offer the current level of service in the long-term, and terminate the contract after five years (which, to my memory, is the length for the contract for services 680 and 682)! I suppose it'd be difficult to justify spending a large amount of money to buy new buses, when there's uncertainty of the future for the services the bus would operate on?
The minibus PVR at Hexham is 7 vehicles:
1. 682
2. 683
3. 74, 686, 687
4. 74, 686, 688
5. 112, 74, 686
6. 185, 681, X81
7. 141, 688
The seventh must be operated by a vehicle with seatbelts (and at the moment the only minibus with seatbelts at Hexham is 618), owing to a contractual requirement on the 141 scholars service. The 680 service is operated by a Scania L94/Wright Eclipse Solar. I cannot see either of these allocations changing, especially when Go North East went to the expense of refurbishing and retrofitting 618 with seatbelts, specifically for use on the aforementioned contract.
(04 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm)Dan We must remember that some of the services at Hexham are only contracted services, which Go North East may not be awarded with in future. Indeed; it's a possibility that Northumberland County Council may decide in the future that they cannot afford to offer the current level of service in the long-term, and terminate the contract after five years (which, to my memory, is the length for the contract for services 680 and 682)! I suppose it'd be difficult to justify spending a large amount of money to buy new buses, when there's uncertainty of the future for the services the bus would operate on?
The minibus PVR at Hexham is 7 vehicles:
1. 682
2. 683
3. 74, 686, 687
4. 74, 686, 688
5. 112, 74, 686
6. 185, 681, X81
7. 141, 688
The seventh must be operated by a vehicle with seatbelts (and at the moment the only minibus with seatbelts at Hexham is 618), owing to a contractual requirement on the 141 scholars service. The 680 service is operated by a Scania L94/Wright Eclipse Solar. I cannot see either of these allocations changing, especially when Go North East went to the expense of refurbishing and retrofitting 618 with seatbelts, specifically for use on the aforementioned contract.
(04 Jan 2016, 8:06 pm)pdiddy Still no sign of #### at Crook!
We could do with it asap to replace 6021, which still hasn't been replaced lol