09 Jul 2016, 10:51 am
#126
(09 Jul 2016, 10:44 am)Dan As Adrian said - two services which share a common route have been grouped together by having a similar brand name, albeit on a different base coat. This gives Go North East some clear messages to sell to people in Gateshead and Newcastle, and allows the company to present things such as combined frequencies etc to key points along the route (ie Metrocentre).
This concept is not new, but it's something which appears to becoming more of a common trend now so perhaps we'll see more of it in the future in other areas. One of the first times this was used was of course with the Fab56 and Fab57, but in its current form, service 57 was actually linked more to service 58 than to service 56, which is why these services are now grouped together under the "Citylink" brand.
I'm sure Go North East could have come up with something else if they so wished, but it's clear to me that marketing the links to the more successful 97 service is of greater importance to the company than coming up with a random brand name to encompass the new 11 service. Regardless of what the service is actually branded as, it's a huge step up for the current 96 service. Having route branding on this service allows potential for growth, and it brings it on the hierarchy of receiving newer vehicles in future.
Both the passengers of the 17/17A and 96 are getting better buses, which is good, will they be launching new ticketing for the route?, such as: Blue Arrow day/week tickets.
If its successful, wouldn't be surprised to see new buses on the 11/11A in the next few years, hopefully we see new buses on the 2/2A and 61 this year.
Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.
