Menu
 
North East Buses Other Forms of Transport Railways Tyne and Wear Metro

Tyne and Wear Metro

Tyne and Wear Metro

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
 
Pages (146) Previous 1119 120 121146 Next
Michael



19,175
22 Nov 2017, 1:37 pm #2,381
(22 Nov 2017, 1:09 pm)G-CPTN New rolling stock promised in the budget.

Good, did they say a date for them?

Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.
Michael
22 Nov 2017, 1:37 pm #2,381

(22 Nov 2017, 1:09 pm)G-CPTN New rolling stock promised in the budget.

Good, did they say a date for them?


Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.

Andreos1



14,236
22 Nov 2017, 2:00 pm #2,382
(22 Nov 2017, 1:09 pm)G-CPTN New rolling stock promised in the budget.

Or certainly a big chunk of the funding anyway. 

It will be interesting to see what conditions are attached (franchise of system to DB was a previous proviso for funding).

Edit: https://twitter.com/BBCRichardMoss/statu...0650209280

NECA to make up balance.
Edited 22 Nov 2017, 10:40 pm by Andreos1.

'Illegitimis non carborundum'
Andreos1
22 Nov 2017, 2:00 pm #2,382

(22 Nov 2017, 1:09 pm)G-CPTN New rolling stock promised in the budget.

Or certainly a big chunk of the funding anyway. 

It will be interesting to see what conditions are attached (franchise of system to DB was a previous proviso for funding).

Edit: https://twitter.com/BBCRichardMoss/statu...0650209280

NECA to make up balance.


'Illegitimis non carborundum'

Michael



19,175
22 Nov 2017, 6:21 pm #2,383
(22 Nov 2017, 1:09 pm)G-CPTN New rolling stock promised in the budget.

More info on the NEXUS site:

https://www.nexus.org.uk/news/item/fundi...sage-nexus

Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.
Michael
22 Nov 2017, 6:21 pm #2,383

(22 Nov 2017, 1:09 pm)G-CPTN New rolling stock promised in the budget.

More info on the NEXUS site:

https://www.nexus.org.uk/news/item/fundi...sage-nexus


Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.

Adrian



9,584
22 Nov 2017, 6:46 pm #2,384
(22 Nov 2017, 2:00 pm)Andreos1 Or certainly a big chunk of the funding anyway. 

It will be interesting to see what conditions are attached (franchise of system to DB was a previous proviso for funding).

"4.57 Tyne & Wear Metro – The government will invest £337 million from the NPIF to replace
the Tyne & Wear Metro’s nearly 40-year-old rolling stock with modern energy-effcient trains.
The new fleet will cut running costs while boosting performance and reliability for the 38 million
passengers that use the system annually. "

So specifically for the new rolling stock.

Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook
Adrian
22 Nov 2017, 6:46 pm #2,384

(22 Nov 2017, 2:00 pm)Andreos1 Or certainly a big chunk of the funding anyway. 

It will be interesting to see what conditions are attached (franchise of system to DB was a previous proviso for funding).

"4.57 Tyne & Wear Metro – The government will invest £337 million from the NPIF to replace
the Tyne & Wear Metro’s nearly 40-year-old rolling stock with modern energy-effcient trains.
The new fleet will cut running costs while boosting performance and reliability for the 38 million
passengers that use the system annually. "

So specifically for the new rolling stock.


Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook

Andreos1



14,236
22 Nov 2017, 6:56 pm #2,385
(22 Nov 2017, 6:46 pm)Adrian "4.57 Tyne & Wear Metro – The government will invest £337 million from the NPIF to replace
the Tyne & Wear Metro’s nearly 40-year-old rolling stock with modern energy-effcient trains.
The new fleet will cut running costs while boosting performance and reliability for the 38 million
passengers that use the system annually. "

So specifically for the new rolling stock.

http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/nort...p-13938410

No PFI by the looks of it either!

'Illegitimis non carborundum'
Andreos1
22 Nov 2017, 6:56 pm #2,385

(22 Nov 2017, 6:46 pm)Adrian "4.57 Tyne & Wear Metro – The government will invest £337 million from the NPIF to replace
the Tyne & Wear Metro’s nearly 40-year-old rolling stock with modern energy-effcient trains.
The new fleet will cut running costs while boosting performance and reliability for the 38 million
passengers that use the system annually. "

So specifically for the new rolling stock.

http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/nort...p-13938410

No PFI by the looks of it either!


'Illegitimis non carborundum'

Michael



19,175
22 Nov 2017, 7:35 pm #2,386
From the Sunderland Echo:

It will issue a formal notice in January, inviting firms to tender for the contract, followed in April by a Pre-Qualification Questionnaire, enabling it to evaluate the suitability of the bidders in relation to their technical knowledge, experience, capability and financial and economic standing, before an invitation to negotiate to set out the terms of the tender process is issued in July. Tenders will be submitted and considered between June and September 2019 and a contract is expected to be issued in February 2020, with the first of the new rolling stock to be delivered late in 2021. Replacement of the entire fleet of 84 trains is expected to take another two to three years.

Read more at: https://www.sunderlandecho.com/news/chan...-1-8871193

Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.
Michael
22 Nov 2017, 7:35 pm #2,386

From the Sunderland Echo:

It will issue a formal notice in January, inviting firms to tender for the contract, followed in April by a Pre-Qualification Questionnaire, enabling it to evaluate the suitability of the bidders in relation to their technical knowledge, experience, capability and financial and economic standing, before an invitation to negotiate to set out the terms of the tender process is issued in July. Tenders will be submitted and considered between June and September 2019 and a contract is expected to be issued in February 2020, with the first of the new rolling stock to be delivered late in 2021. Replacement of the entire fleet of 84 trains is expected to take another two to three years.

Read more at: https://www.sunderlandecho.com/news/chan...-1-8871193


Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.

S830OFT



1,395
22 Nov 2017, 9:06 pm #2,387
(22 Nov 2017, 7:35 pm)Michael From the Sunderland Echo:

It will issue a formal notice in January, inviting firms to tender for the contract, followed in April by a Pre-Qualification Questionnaire, enabling it to evaluate the suitability of the bidders in relation to their technical knowledge, experience, capability and financial and economic standing, before an invitation to negotiate to set out the terms of the tender process is issued in July. Tenders will be submitted and considered between June and September 2019 and a contract is expected to be issued in February 2020, with the first of the new rolling stock to be delivered late in 2021. Replacement of the entire fleet of 84 trains is expected to take another two to three years.

Read more at: https://www.sunderlandecho.com/news/chan...-1-8871193

Is it not 90 Metro cars?


S830OFT
22 Nov 2017, 9:06 pm #2,387

(22 Nov 2017, 7:35 pm)Michael From the Sunderland Echo:

It will issue a formal notice in January, inviting firms to tender for the contract, followed in April by a Pre-Qualification Questionnaire, enabling it to evaluate the suitability of the bidders in relation to their technical knowledge, experience, capability and financial and economic standing, before an invitation to negotiate to set out the terms of the tender process is issued in July. Tenders will be submitted and considered between June and September 2019 and a contract is expected to be issued in February 2020, with the first of the new rolling stock to be delivered late in 2021. Replacement of the entire fleet of 84 trains is expected to take another two to three years.

Read more at: https://www.sunderlandecho.com/news/chan...-1-8871193

Is it not 90 Metro cars?



markydh



263
23 Nov 2017, 12:52 am #2,388
Yes, but they are so unreliable that metro have to have a high percentage of those in for maintenance at any one time. That won’t be necessary for the new stock, at least in theory. It’s actually unlikely that there will be 84 new trains, in any case. They never run in single car formation and there was more than a hint in the NEXUS new stock feedback bumph that bidders would be encouraged to look at providing one single unit to save on wasted cab space to help with capacity.
markydh
23 Nov 2017, 12:52 am #2,388

Yes, but they are so unreliable that metro have to have a high percentage of those in for maintenance at any one time. That won’t be necessary for the new stock, at least in theory. It’s actually unlikely that there will be 84 new trains, in any case. They never run in single car formation and there was more than a hint in the NEXUS new stock feedback bumph that bidders would be encouraged to look at providing one single unit to save on wasted cab space to help with capacity.

Michael



19,175
24 Nov 2017, 8:08 pm #2,389
No trains Wallsend - North Shields due to problem with the overhead line. Bus replacement service, the number 900, calling at or near to all stations between Wallsend and North Shields. GNE are accepting Metro tickets on Bus services 1,11 operate between Wallsend - North Shields.


Go North East are still accepting Metro tickets in the affected area. Bus services 1,11,42,42a operate between Wallsend and North Shields.

Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.
Michael
24 Nov 2017, 8:08 pm #2,389

No trains Wallsend - North Shields due to problem with the overhead line. Bus replacement service, the number 900, calling at or near to all stations between Wallsend and North Shields. GNE are accepting Metro tickets on Bus services 1,11 operate between Wallsend - North Shields.


Go North East are still accepting Metro tickets in the affected area. Bus services 1,11,42,42a operate between Wallsend and North Shields.


Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.

S830OFT



1,395
24 Nov 2017, 8:31 pm #2,390
4002/4040 were out on the Green Line Today.


S830OFT
24 Nov 2017, 8:31 pm #2,390

4002/4040 were out on the Green Line Today.



markydh



263
28 Nov 2017, 8:29 pm #2,391
https://www.nexus.org.uk/news/item/nexus...th-shields

NEXUS have announced they are to build a training and maintenance centre on the site of the sidings beyond the current South Shields station.  As well as being the training centre for staff, it will also have room for stabling (and I presume light maintenance) of metro trains.
markydh
28 Nov 2017, 8:29 pm #2,391

https://www.nexus.org.uk/news/item/nexus...th-shields

NEXUS have announced they are to build a training and maintenance centre on the site of the sidings beyond the current South Shields station.  As well as being the training centre for staff, it will also have room for stabling (and I presume light maintenance) of metro trains.

BusLoverMum



5,285
28 Nov 2017, 8:41 pm #2,392
(28 Nov 2017, 8:29 pm)markydh https://www.nexus.org.uk/news/item/nexus...th-shields

NEXUS have announced they are to build a training and maintenance centre on the site of the sidings beyond the current South Shields station.  As well as being the training centre for staff, it will also have room for stabling (and I presume light maintenance) of metro trains.

I suspect that they're all the more keen after the chaos, the other weekend, due to being unable to get any trains out of the gosforth depot. Don't have all your electric trains in one basket, or something.
BusLoverMum
28 Nov 2017, 8:41 pm #2,392

(28 Nov 2017, 8:29 pm)markydh https://www.nexus.org.uk/news/item/nexus...th-shields

NEXUS have announced they are to build a training and maintenance centre on the site of the sidings beyond the current South Shields station.  As well as being the training centre for staff, it will also have room for stabling (and I presume light maintenance) of metro trains.

I suspect that they're all the more keen after the chaos, the other weekend, due to being unable to get any trains out of the gosforth depot. Don't have all your electric trains in one basket, or something.

BusLoverMum



5,285
29 Nov 2017, 7:39 am #2,393
Sunderland to oppose seating plans for new metro carriages.
https://www.sunderlandecho.com/news/sund...881850/amp
BusLoverMum
29 Nov 2017, 7:39 am #2,393

Sunderland to oppose seating plans for new metro carriages.
https://www.sunderlandecho.com/news/sund...881850/amp

markydh



263
29 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm #2,394
Sunderland Council opposes everything just for the sake of opposing. Thankfully, the other councils disagree.
markydh
29 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm #2,394

Sunderland Council opposes everything just for the sake of opposing. Thankfully, the other councils disagree.

James101



652
29 Nov 2017, 12:53 pm #2,395
(29 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm)markydh Sunderland Council opposes everything just for the sake of opposing. Thankfully, the other councils disagree.

I think it’s a fair point, linear seating is less comfortable for all involved, a hybrid version would be better. 

Light rail vehicles are generally quite nippy at pulling away - with front/back seating all this results in is the passenger being pushed back/forward in their seat. Linear seating results in a side-lean into your neighbouring passengers and isn’t particularly comfortable being repeated for every stop to Sunderland.


Despite Metro’s statement, do any comparable systems outside London use linear seating? Certainly Metrolink, Blackpool, Supertram & Nottingham don’t.
Edited 29 Nov 2017, 12:55 pm by James101.
James101
29 Nov 2017, 12:53 pm #2,395

(29 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm)markydh Sunderland Council opposes everything just for the sake of opposing. Thankfully, the other councils disagree.

I think it’s a fair point, linear seating is less comfortable for all involved, a hybrid version would be better. 

Light rail vehicles are generally quite nippy at pulling away - with front/back seating all this results in is the passenger being pushed back/forward in their seat. Linear seating results in a side-lean into your neighbouring passengers and isn’t particularly comfortable being repeated for every stop to Sunderland.


Despite Metro’s statement, do any comparable systems outside London use linear seating? Certainly Metrolink, Blackpool, Supertram & Nottingham don’t.

Andreos1



14,236
29 Nov 2017, 12:56 pm #2,396
(29 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm)markydh Sunderland Council opposes everything just for the sake of opposing. Thankfully, the other councils disagree.

How long is the average trip in the other council areas versus the Sunderland Council area?

I can see where they are coming from. The punter travelling from Sunderland - Newcastle won't want to stand/rest their bum due to the duration of a trip to Tyneside.
Gateshead to Newcastle?
Outlying suburbs to Newcastle?
Same for North and South Tyneside.

I wondered elsewhere, if there could be two different types of stock and a redesign of the line system to accomodate those travelling longer distances.
Appreciate this may reduce fleet flexibility somewhat, but the end result, could be a Metro R&OW thread!

'Illegitimis non carborundum'
Andreos1
29 Nov 2017, 12:56 pm #2,396

(29 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm)markydh Sunderland Council opposes everything just for the sake of opposing. Thankfully, the other councils disagree.

How long is the average trip in the other council areas versus the Sunderland Council area?

I can see where they are coming from. The punter travelling from Sunderland - Newcastle won't want to stand/rest their bum due to the duration of a trip to Tyneside.
Gateshead to Newcastle?
Outlying suburbs to Newcastle?
Same for North and South Tyneside.

I wondered elsewhere, if there could be two different types of stock and a redesign of the line system to accomodate those travelling longer distances.
Appreciate this may reduce fleet flexibility somewhat, but the end result, could be a Metro R&OW thread!


'Illegitimis non carborundum'

markydh



263
30 Nov 2017, 10:42 am #2,397
Except that wasn’t the argument Sunderland used. They made ridiculous claims about looking out the window and feeling claustrophobic.
markydh
30 Nov 2017, 10:42 am #2,397

Except that wasn’t the argument Sunderland used. They made ridiculous claims about looking out the window and feeling claustrophobic.

Andreos1



14,236
30 Nov 2017, 1:15 pm #2,398
(30 Nov 2017, 10:42 am)markydh Except that wasn’t the argument Sunderland used. They made ridiculous claims about looking out the window and feeling claustrophobic.

Aye, it was part of their argument.

Part of it was about the window. The other included the standing factor and less seats.

https://www.sunderlandecho.com/news/sund...881850/amp

'Illegitimis non carborundum'
Andreos1
30 Nov 2017, 1:15 pm #2,398

(30 Nov 2017, 10:42 am)markydh Except that wasn’t the argument Sunderland used. They made ridiculous claims about looking out the window and feeling claustrophobic.

Aye, it was part of their argument.

Part of it was about the window. The other included the standing factor and less seats.

https://www.sunderlandecho.com/news/sund...881850/amp


'Illegitimis non carborundum'

citaro5284



3,233
30 Nov 2017, 5:39 pm #2,399
New Metro trains WILL have Tube-style seating after decision by transport bosses

http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/nort...e-13976713
citaro5284
30 Nov 2017, 5:39 pm #2,399

New Metro trains WILL have Tube-style seating after decision by transport bosses

http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/nort...e-13976713

Malarkey



6,064
30 Nov 2017, 6:11 pm #2,400
Having used the Tube in London back in January on a few occasions I am definitely not a fan of linear seating, would rather not have someones arse in my face, surely having a seating layout similar to the trams in Edinburgh would be more beneficial as that maximises seating capacity, standing space, luggage and accessibility for the elderley, disabled and pushchairs.
Malarkey
30 Nov 2017, 6:11 pm #2,400

Having used the Tube in London back in January on a few occasions I am definitely not a fan of linear seating, would rather not have someones arse in my face, surely having a seating layout similar to the trams in Edinburgh would be more beneficial as that maximises seating capacity, standing space, luggage and accessibility for the elderley, disabled and pushchairs.

Pages (146) Previous 1119 120 121146 Next
 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average