(16 Feb 2017, 9:26 am)Mark1 wrote [ -> ]Has anyone tried the new Live Travel map on the Nexus website. Its a big improvement on its predecessor with the inclusion of real time departures on most services. However in classic Nexus style they make it unnecessarily difficult with for instance the terminus of GNE services 5 and 88 is East Street instead of the more simple South Shields Town Centre/ASDA.
Its an improvement hopefully real time Metro information will be made available soon
I like it and the bonus is, you can screenshot times - so you don't have to struggle loading the app in areas of poor reception or check again when you get to the stop.
Get what you mean about the terminus points.
I think they need to develop that somehow.
They now have electronic timetables on Holmeside in Sunderland, i noticed one last night at my bus stop. (heading out of the town)
the live travel map also covers out of tyne and wear boundry, has live times for peterlee area aswell.
Not sure where to put this so, if it's in the wrong area, please move it.
Bus lane cameras make £31m in a year for councils
The most lucrative bus lane in England is on the northbound section of John Dobson Street in Newcastle-upon-Tyne.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-38957371
hahahaha, well no the wonder, the roads in Newcastle are horrendous, most are one way!
What does everyone think of the new Nexus site?
https://www.nexus.org.uk/
It doesn't really affect me that much, I don't need to use it on a regular basis with not living in Tyne & Wear. Navigation doesn't appear to be any different, tad slower than what I remember though.
It's better. The news section was completely hidden on the old site. It's now on the homepage.
Shame they couldn't be bothered to update the bus station section maps, when they updated the site, but it does look a lot better.
(06 Aug 2018, 7:13 pm)Bob wrote [ -> ]Nexus have today launched public consultation on proposed extension to 335 and proposed withdrawal of the K3.
www.nexus.org.uk/consultation
Been running from 6th August until 12th September. I can't personally see any of the plans being contested.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Nexus are advertising security in Sunderland Interchange, on some bus stops they have a dedicated mobile number you can ring if you see anything suspicious.
(25 Sep 2018, 11:55 pm)S830OFT wrote [ -> ]Nexus are advertising security in Sunderland Interchange, on some bus stops they have a dedicated mobile number you can ring if you see anything suspicious.
Like enthusiasts with cameras?
(28 Sep 2018, 12:11 pm)Adrian wrote [ -> ]Like enthusiasts with cameras?
Most likely, however whenever I'm in Park Lane the security just seem to sit at a bus stop and go on their phones and chat. I am sure Nexus got the security to ensure gangs would not hang around the interchange causing trouble.
(28 Sep 2018, 1:02 pm)S830OFT wrote [ -> ]Most likely, however whenever I'm in Park Lane the security just seem to sit at a bus stop and go on their phones and chat. I am sure Nexus got the security to ensure gangs would not hang around the interchange causing trouble.
They'd run away from gangs quicker than you could blink.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
(28 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm)Jamie M wrote [ -> ]They'd run away from gangs quicker than you could blink.
They couldn't catch a cold!
Probably attempt to pick us off as they figure we are gonna be easy targets for them to assert some form of their authoritah.
We might aswell see the Park Lane security as Interceptors as they bring the interchange to enthusiast free. (In their dreams)
Nexus are running a consultation proposing the withdrawal of the 59 / 359 services.If the proposal is agreed the GCT vehicle currently used on the 59 /359 will be redeployed to a new service.
What changes are we proposing?
The peak service 59 almost entirely duplicates Arriva’s service 54, with our bus in some cases operating just a few minutes in front of the commercial service. This effectively means that we are using public subsidy to replicate links already being provided by a private operator. This is not good use of public funds and it also undermines the commercial viability of the 54 which could place greater pressure on our limited funding, longer term. We therefore propose that the 59 service is withdrawn and passengers would be advised to use the Arriva service instead.
The off-peak 359 service was introduced to provide improved connections to North Tyneside Hospital, in particular from West Allotment and Marden Estate. Our data indicates that an average of just 2 passengers per day board the service in West Allotment (with the majority of these trips to Northumberland Park Metro) and an average of just 5 passengers per day use the service from Marden Estate (with the vast majority of these trips to/from the Morrison’s store at Preston Grange). Like the 59, the 359 route also has a considerable amount of overlap with the Arriva service 54. We therefore propose that the 359 service is withdrawn.
The bus currently used on the 59/359 would then instead be used to provide an extension to the current 51A service (Newcastle – Coast Road – Holystone Park). The new extension would operate between Holystone Park and Whitley Bay Metro via Northumberland Park Interchange, Heritage Green, Backworth North, Castle Park, Backworth Village, Earsdon Village, West Monkseaton Sainsbury’s, West Monkseaton, Monkseaton and Whitley Bay Town Centre. The service would operate hourly Monday - Saturday, between 7.30am – 7.00pm.
The proposed withdrawal of the 59/359 and introduction of new extension to service 51A would leave Murton Village without access to any bus service. We therefore propose that the W3 would be revised to additionally serve Murton Village Monday - Saturday (9.30am – 3.00pm).
J
(23 Feb 2019, 3:54 pm)GuyParkRoyal wrote [ -> ]Nexus are running a consultation proposing the withdrawal of the 59 / 359 services.If the proposal is agreed the GCT vehicle currently used on the 59 /359 will be redeployed to a new service.
What changes are we proposing?
The peak service 59 almost entirely duplicates Arriva’s service 54, with our bus in some cases operating just a few minutes in front of the commercial service. This effectively means that we are using public subsidy to replicate links already being provided by a private operator. This is not good use of public funds and it also undermines the commercial viability of the 54 which could place greater pressure on our limited funding, longer term. We therefore propose that the 59 service is withdrawn and passengers would be advised to use the Arriva service instead.
The off-peak 359 service was introduced to provide improved connections to North Tyneside Hospital, in particular from West Allotment and Marden Estate. Our data indicates that an average of just 2 passengers per day board the service in West Allotment (with the majority of these trips to Northumberland Park Metro) and an average of just 5 passengers per day use the service from Marden Estate (with the vast majority of these trips to/from the Morrison’s store at Preston Grange). Like the 59, the 359 route also has a considerable amount of overlap with the Arriva service 54. We therefore propose that the 359 service is withdrawn.
The bus currently used on the 59/359 would then instead be used to provide an extension to the current 51A service (Newcastle – Coast Road – Holystone Park). The new extension would operate between Holystone Park and Whitley Bay Metro via Northumberland Park Interchange, Heritage Green, Backworth North, Castle Park, Backworth Village, Earsdon Village, West Monkseaton Sainsbury’s, West Monkseaton, Monkseaton and Whitley Bay Town Centre. The service would operate hourly Monday - Saturday, between 7.30am – 7.00pm.
The proposed withdrawal of the 59/359 and introduction of new extension to service 51A would leave Murton Village without access to any bus service. We therefore propose that the W3 would be revised to additionally serve Murton Village Monday - Saturday (9.30am – 3.00pm).
To send a bus to west monkseaton sainsburys and monkseaton will go and put the W1/W1A/57/57A in the poor numbers as these services operate down this part of route already
(23 Feb 2019, 3:54 pm)GuyParkRoyal wrote [ -> ]Nexus are running a consultation proposing the withdrawal of the 59 / 359 services.If the proposal is agreed the GCT vehicle currently used on the 59 /359 will be redeployed to a new service.
What changes are we proposing?
The peak service 59 almost entirely duplicates Arriva’s service 54, with our bus in some cases operating just a few minutes in front of the commercial service. This effectively means that we are using public subsidy to replicate links already being provided by a private operator. This is not good use of public funds and it also undermines the commercial viability of the 54 which could place greater pressure on our limited funding, longer term. We therefore propose that the 59 service is withdrawn and passengers would be advised to use the Arriva service instead.
The off-peak 359 service was introduced to provide improved connections to North Tyneside Hospital, in particular from West Allotment and Marden Estate. Our data indicates that an average of just 2 passengers per day board the service in West Allotment (with the majority of these trips to Northumberland Park Metro) and an average of just 5 passengers per day use the service from Marden Estate (with the vast majority of these trips to/from the Morrison’s store at Preston Grange). Like the 59, the 359 route also has a considerable amount of overlap with the Arriva service 54. We therefore propose that the 359 service is withdrawn.
The bus currently used on the 59/359 would then instead be used to provide an extension to the current 51A service (Newcastle – Coast Road – Holystone Park). The new extension would operate between Holystone Park and Whitley Bay Metro via Northumberland Park Interchange, Heritage Green, Backworth North, Castle Park, Backworth Village, Earsdon Village, West Monkseaton Sainsbury’s, West Monkseaton, Monkseaton and Whitley Bay Town Centre. The service would operate hourly Monday - Saturday, between 7.30am – 7.00pm.
The proposed withdrawal of the 59/359 and introduction of new extension to service 51A would leave Murton Village without access to any bus service. We therefore propose that the W3 would be revised to additionally serve Murton Village Monday - Saturday (9.30am – 3.00pm).
When they're on, I am sure they could work on improving the W services in Whitley Bay and 333.
I would argue there's a bit of duplication within the W services and could look to improve revenues/margins (footfall) at the same time.
W2 and W3 to merge (along with western elements of W1), with some slight variations to routes.
W1 and 333 to merge (using the northern section of Broadway as the link) and 333 to serve Front Street in Tynemouth, before going back to its normal route, passing Linskill.
On the Fish Quay, it will serve the ferry in both directions and omit Brewhouse Bank.
Noticed in Park Lane this morning, that the electronic timetables are letting passengers know that services are not serving Ryhope. (Stands B etc)
(24 Feb 2019, 12:52 pm)Andreos1 wrote [ -> ]When they're on, I am sure they could work on improving the W services in Whitley Bay and 333.
I would argue there's a bit of duplication within the W services and could look to improve revenues/margins (footfall) at the same time.
W2 and W3 to merge (along with western elements of W1), with some slight variations to routes.
W1 and 333 to merge (using the northern section of Broadway as the link) and 333 to serve Front Street in Tynemouth, before going back to its normal route, passing Linskill.
On the Fish Quay, it will serve the ferry in both directions and omit Brewhouse Bank.
I know it would be difficult as it's two different operators and two different councils subsiding the services however the W2 would be better to merge with the 58. Then have a long extended bus route.
Cramlington -> New Hospital -> Seghill (Change From East Cramlington) -> Seaton Delaval -> New Hartley -> Seaton Sluice -> Whitley Bay Metro
This would create lots of new links such as:
- Restore the half hourly service between Seghill and Cramlington.
- New link from Seghill direct to hospital.
- New links between New Hartley / Seaton Delaval Hall and Whitley Bay
- New links between New Hartley / Seaton Delaval Hall / Seaton Sluice direct to the Metro for connections.
https://goo.gl/maps/km8fG7iHDyhSbcF56 - Something like that which would take an hour throughout with a PVR 2.
Then extend the 43 every hour to East Hartford like so to keep the Cramlington local links -
https://goo.gl/maps/3Q9AyYXSoFqTxeAr7 and extend the 43 from Morpeth to Northgate Hospital doing the T1A route. (Maybe omit Beacon Hill as I'm not sure deckers can get around there) with an extra PVR 1 giving those a direct link to Newcastle without changing.
Makes better use of public funds and it's only an extra PVR of 1/2 bus. (Nothing doing T2 and T3) but creates more links and creates potentially some profit on the Seghill to Cramlington part which can be standing at times on the 57A and gives New Hartley their link back to Whitley, they've been moaning for awhile about losing the 12 - a few years ago.
Edit: Just noticed that post was February sorry but still true.
Got a lot of good ideas, would like to get a operators license and run some of them, but would need to win the lottery ????
I’ve a feeling there were proposals to close the Fish Quay to traffic so this would solve the problem for the 333. Of course there are plans to move the ferry landing to the Fish Quay so problem then would be how to serve that with a connecting bus.
The 335 seems a good idea, the traffic lights at ASDA are dreadful so it would eliminate standing there twice on the current double run. It seems to provide more shopping links which would help increase loadings. Hopefully different operators for both!
(23 Jul 2021, 8:14 am)RMF1254 wrote [ -> ]I’ve a feeling there were proposals to close the Fish Quay to traffic so this would solve the problem for the 333. Of course there are plans to move the ferry landing to the Fish Quay so problem then would be how to serve that with a connecting bus.
The 335 seems a good idea, the traffic lights at ASDA are dreadful so it would eliminate standing there twice on the current double run. It seems to provide more shopping links which would help increase loadings. Hopefully different operators for both!
The actual state of public transport in North Tyneside when it takes 20 minutes on a bus to get from Forest Hall to Quorum is seen as an improvement! It's not much slower walking!
Im all for the 335 changes,finally Forest Hall getting recognised at last,ive always thought though,that 335 and 333 could be merged especially if both changes go ahead
Putting the 335 through Forest Hall and down into Palmersvill then to Benton Asda would give people the link that Arriva lost when the roundabout was took out and the 53 didn't serve Benton Asda
The planned changes would be introduced in September/October 2021 (subject to feedback/comments received)
This was at the bottom of the planned change for the 333/335
Surprised we haven't heard anything if it was successful