(10 Jun 2014, 3:31 pm)Andreos Constantopolous wrote [ -> ]So the are operator is self subsidising quiet runs, with takings from busier ones?
Exactly the sort of the thing they can do on some services they decide to have nowt to do with on an evening or night.
Unless of course, the margin percentages aren't good enough, they can reduce costs or they don't have the staff to drive the vehicles?
My point was that operators up and down the country self-subsidise the quiet runs throughout the day by picking up the revenue on the return journey or during the peak period.
If they do this during the day and a little way into the evening too, they're in no position to continue doing that all night, if they want to make as much profit as they do now to re-invest back into the fleet to provide higher quality vehicles for passengers.
As I've said previously - if passengers aren't fussed about having newer, more reliable vehicles, which are fitted with Wi-Fi and power sockets, then I'm sure bus operators could self-subsidise all night long too.
(10 Jun 2014, 3:29 pm)Half Pint wrote [ -> ]I thought the cowboys had their own section and not on a Stagecoach NE thread?
The topic of discussion derives from
this post, which in turn brought us on to a topic which concerned both 'The Boys in Blue' and 'The Cowboys'.
I'm assuming you haven't read the posts from the start, or you wouldn't have made that post.
(10 Jun 2014, 3:33 pm)Dan wrote [ -> ]My point was that operators up and down the country self-subsidise the quiet runs throughout the day by picking up the revenue on the return journey or during the peak period.
If they do this during the day and a little way into the evening too, they're in no position to continue doing that all night, if they want to make as much profit as they do now to re-invest back into the fleet to provide higher quality vehicles for passengers.
As I've said previously - if passengers aren't fussed about having newer, more reliable vehicles, which are fitted with Wi-Fi and power sockets, then I'm sure bus operators could self-subsidise all night long too.
The topic of discussion derives from this post, which in turn brought us on to a topic which concerned both 'The Boys in Blue' and 'The Cowboys'.
I'm assuming you haven't read the posts from the start, or you wouldn't have made that post.
My point being; there is more to an operator not running (and also bidding) for an evening run, than just revenue - or lack of it.
Going back to the original point; There is a lot more to a subsidised operator not accepting the daytime operators tickets too.
E300 24115 working the 364/52 board today.
(11 Jun 2014, 7:39 am)Kuyoyo wrote [ -> ]E300 24115 working the 364/52 board today.
And sister 24112 is on the 58/evening 52 board.
Some from yesterday saw 36 branded E300 24103 floating around on 13s and 24109(?) was on the 37. Meanwhile 22657 was reported on 7s!
Their a man alx 300 on loan to Hartlepool on service 7 also ive not seen 33101 for while normally on the 3s
35158(?) on 12s today in Sunderland.
22049 is on the X34. First time that I have been on a MAN in a while.
(12 Jun 2014, 10:04 am)AIG20 wrote [ -> ]I guess there must be an issue with one of the E400s.
19194 has been off all day for emergency repairs, hopefully it will be back tomorrow
(12 Jun 2014, 9:46 am)Simmy wrote [ -> ]22049 is on the X34. First time that I have been on a MAN in a while.
(12 Jun 2014, 6:16 pm)AIG20 wrote [ -> ]One of the E400s in service today (either 19196/7) sounds terrible. There is a screeching and clattering noise as it accelerates.
I think Stagecoach should invest in some new buses for the X34 in next years order, as this route obviously isn't doing them any good.
That'll be 19197
35172 on service 10 in Newcastle.
(14 Jun 2014, 8:56 pm)AIG20 wrote [ -> ]Unfortunately, I didn't get the fleet numbers but...
*A MAN E200 and an ADL E200 were on the "E" services.
*An unbranded ADL E300 was on the X34.
*A Pointer Dart was on the 3/4/7/8 circuit.
27729 was the E300 on the X34, 22734 also managed a trip as did an ADL E200 along with the usual 19194/6/7
(14 Jun 2014, 10:30 pm)mrnut85 wrote [ -> ]27729 was the E300 on the X34, 22734 also managed a trip as did an ADL E200 along with the usual 19194/6/7
The E200 would be 36461 doing the 1440
[
attachment=5601]
As a result of today's duty changes on Teesside, service 38 ceases to interwork with the 36 at all times. As such, 22017's appearance on the 0815 36 from Stockton to Hartlepool this morning is now once again considered unusual (it also worked a 52 but that's normal apart from that one normally seeing E300 operation).
Another change as a result of this change is the end of the decker working on 36s.
MAN Enviro 200 on the 100 to Metrocentre at about half 11 this morning.
(16 Jun 2014, 7:31 am)Kuyoyo wrote [ -> ]As a result of today's duty changes on Teesside, service 38 ceases to interwork with the 36 at all times. As such, 22017's appearance on the 0815 36 from Stockton to Hartlepool this morning is now once again considered unusual (it also worked a 52 but that's normal apart from that one normally seeing E300 operation).
Another change as a result of this change is the end of the decker working on 36s.
An additional ALX on the 36 now is 22488.
Meanwhile, 24109 is on 58s while both 24114/5 are now on 52s (24114 as a changeover for 17028 which was a changeover for 22469).
(16 Jun 2014, 6:03 pm)AIG20 wrote [ -> ]This was 39719 (NK09 EBU). 
Image owned by mdw9121.
Its still on. I am just about to disembark at blackett street at 1950
22020 is on 36's this afternoon
17029 on the Stockton 58's.
Usually a single decker working whenever I have seen it.
(20 Jun 2014, 8:15 am)Andreos Constantopolous wrote [ -> ]17029 on the Stockton 58's.
Usually a single decker working whenever I have seen it.
What time did you see it? As there's 2 trips on the 58 that are worked by the deckers off the Macmillan runs.
(20 Jun 2014, 8:25 am)Kuyoyo wrote [ -> ]What time did you see it? As there's 2 trips on the 58 that are worked by the deckers off the Macmillan runs.
It was heading into Stockton just before 9.
Carrying a decent load from what I could see.
(20 Jun 2014, 11:24 am)Andreos Constantopolous wrote [ -> ]It was heading into Stockton just before 9.
Carrying a decent load from what I could see.
Yeah, the 0814 and 0826 departures from Stockton (which arrive back at 0848 and 0900) work off the Macmillan school runs on schooldays. As does the 0824 52 from Owington Farm. As such, the buses that do the 0838, 0850 and 0902 58s (which are the 3 buses that will be operating on the 58s now) each get a 12 minutes layover in Stockton from arriving off the 52 to going out on the 58.
35155 on 4s today in Sunderland.
(20 Jun 2014, 4:39 pm)AIG20 wrote [ -> ]22022 was spotted on South Shields service 12 a few days ago doing a half trip to cover a late running working.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/matt56120/14278820878/
Image owned by Matt Edwards.
Meanwhile, a MAN ALX300 has also been on the 3/4/7/8 circuit today, as well as a MAN E200 on the "E" services.
It was me driving too [emoji3]
(20 Jun 2014, 4:39 pm)AIG20 wrote [ -> ]22022 was spotted on South Shields service 12 a few days ago doing a half trip to cover a late running working.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/matt56120/14278820878/
Image owned by Matt Edwards.
Meanwhile, a MAN ALX300 has also been on the 3/4/7/8 circuit today, as well as a MAN E200 on the "E" services.
The driver from 22049 this morning had 39712 on the Ecos this afternoon. Guess that he pulled the short straw
. Both 39712 and 22049 were out at 6PM.
24114 on 37, 1117 from North Tees Hospital.
(21 Jun 2014, 9:55 am)Kuyoyo wrote [ -> ]24114 on 37, 1117 from North Tees Hospital.
And 24115 is half hour behind.