22 Apr 2016, 8:26 pm
(22 Apr 2016, 7:27 pm)BusLoverMum wrote [ -> ]Maybe it had ended up on the 7 as a replacement? Durham's a bit nuts, lately.
It was there at 20:30 as well but pointing in the direction of Darlington this time
(22 Apr 2016, 7:27 pm)BusLoverMum wrote [ -> ]Maybe it had ended up on the 7 as a replacement? Durham's a bit nuts, lately.
(23 Apr 2016, 5:05 pm)jaimzm wrote [ -> ]sorry if this been asked already how come 24 been mostly streetlites on it i've only seen 1 or 2 pulsars
(23 Apr 2016, 6:44 pm)tyresmoke wrote [ -> ]The 22/24 are currently interworking due to an extra bus being used to help with delays from roadworks in Durham.
(23 Apr 2016, 7:39 pm)cbma06 wrote [ -> ]lately on service 24 you be able to get all sorts on there, from solos to service 6 branded double deckersHalf the time it's probably the result of the 6 requiring the 24 branded Enviro 400's for the school runs the 6 interwork with when the 6 branded examples are VOR etc.
(22 Apr 2016, 8:26 pm)Stuartphin1639 wrote [ -> ]It was there at 20:30 as well but pointing in the direction of Darlington this time
(22 Apr 2016, 12:28 pm)Cock Robin wrote [ -> ]I think restoring later buses from Whitby would be better than extending to Scarborough.
Running through to Bridlington was tried at one time - was it the bus from Redcar?
(25 Apr 2016, 6:44 pm)Davie wrote [ -> ]Is the 51 (Jesmond) service secured by Nexus or ran commercially?
(25 Apr 2016, 6:44 pm)Davie wrote [ -> ]Is the 51 (Jesmond) service secured by Nexus or ran commercially?
(25 Apr 2016, 7:17 pm)NK53 TKT wrote [ -> ]Well it doesn't use Nexus branded vehiclesWell it is Jemond.
(25 Apr 2016, 7:24 pm)citaro5284 wrote [ -> ]Certain journeys are secured - it mentions it on the bottom of the timetable
http://www.nexus.org.uk/sites/default/fi...0814_0.pdf
(25 Apr 2016, 10:43 am)scania driver wrote [ -> ]The idea of running additional late evening services from Whitby, or indeed Scarborough, is just incredulous! I had the misfortune to have to catch a train back to Hartlepool on Saturday last, a train that had originated in Whitby and was just an extension of the revellers who clearly have no respect or interest in the wider travelling public or the crews who have to suffer these services. Imagine then just how a single crewed decker full of these morons would fare.
(26 Apr 2016, 9:43 am)Kuyoyo wrote [ -> ]1766 is now at Whitby
(27 Apr 2016, 10:48 am)scania driver wrote [ -> ]I guess Redcar's 63's are next in line for "Frequenta?"
(27 Apr 2016, 10:50 am)tyresmoke wrote [ -> ]Think it'll be the 15s first before 63 gets done.
Talking of the 63's - I am told 1435 & 7416 have been swapped back following the end of trial on X93 for 7416.
(27 Apr 2016, 9:34 am)Kuyoyo wrote [ -> ]2807 is the Solo branded for today's 'Frequenta' 7 launchHas only 2807 being branded so far or are there others in service?
(27 Apr 2016, 11:07 am)Jimmi wrote [ -> ]Has only 2807 being branded so far or are there others in service?
Never even realised that the launch was today, possibly because they didn't include the launch details within the posts on Facebook, you had to click the links and view a page on their website to find that out. Find that a slightly poor way to advertise the event as I imagine many people like me can't be bothered clicking through links on Facebook posts.
(27 Apr 2016, 10:50 am)tyresmoke wrote [ -> ]Think it'll be the 15s first before 63 gets done.
Talking of the 63's - I am told 1435 & 7416 have been swapped back following the end of trial on X93 for 7416.
(27 Apr 2016, 9:34 am)Kuyoyo wrote [ -> ]2807 is the Solo branded for today's 'Frequenta' 7 launch
(27 Apr 2016, 10:43 am)TEN 6083 wrote [ -> ]Just been, on the way back to Newcastle now
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
(27 Apr 2016, 9:34 am)Kuyoyo wrote [ -> ]2807 is the Solo branded for today's 'Frequenta' 7 launch
(27 Apr 2016, 2:59 pm)Jimmi wrote [ -> ]Oh dear! Some seats on 7627.You have clearly never been on 4660-4664 then! Clearly not 4661
(27 Apr 2016, 2:59 pm)Jimmi wrote [ -> ]Oh dear! Some seats on 7627.