17 Dec 2016, 1:28 pm
(17 Dec 2016, 12:39 pm)cbma06 wrote [ -> ]24002 painted in the shed, by stagecoach uk Facebook page.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Will you be able to share a picture?, i'm not part of the group.
(17 Dec 2016, 12:39 pm)cbma06 wrote [ -> ]24002 painted in the shed, by stagecoach uk Facebook page.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
(17 Dec 2016, 1:28 pm)Michael wrote [ -> ]Will you be able to share a picture?, i'm not part of the group.
(19 Dec 2016, 9:42 am)RBZ 5459 wrote [ -> ]Summary of recent moves this period.
Slatyford:
22034/35/37/39/40/43/44/46 to disposal.
22049 to reserve.
22580 now in service.
26063-68/70/71/73 new into service.
26069/72/74-80 reserve/prep.
27510 to reserve.
Sunderland:
24001-3 reserve/prep.
Stockton:
17025/26/28/29/32 sold to Ensign.
22014 to disposal.
27506 into service.
(19 Dec 2016, 5:10 pm)RBZ 5459 wrote [ -> ]As thought, 24002 isn't painted yet. Was expecting to hear a bigger fuss if it was done.
(19 Dec 2016, 5:15 pm)Michael wrote [ -> ]I thought it was?
(19 Dec 2016, 5:10 pm)RBZ 5459 wrote [ -> ]As thought, 24002 isn't painted yet. Was expecting to hear a bigger fuss if it was done.
(19 Dec 2016, 9:42 am)RBZ 5459 wrote [ -> ]Summary of recent moves this period.
Slatyford:
22034/35/37/39/40/43/44/46 to disposal.
22049 to reserve.
22580 now in service.
26063-68/70/71/73 new into service.
26069/72/74-80 reserve/prep.
27510 to reserve.
Sunderland:
24001-3 reserve/prep.
Stockton:
17025/26/28/29/32 sold to Ensign.
22014 to disposal.
27506 into service.
(21 Dec 2016, 8:26 am)James M wrote [ -> ]Did Stockton only get 1 Transbus E300? Saw it NIS in Billingham yesterday... not keen on the livery around the headlights though.
(21 Dec 2016, 7:27 pm)Simmy wrote [ -> ]Not very important but noteworthy nonetheless..... Bdaily have posted a brief article on the new E200s at Slatyford: https://bdaily.co.uk/industrials/09-12-2...expansion/.
(22 Dec 2016, 9:14 am)RBZ 5459 wrote [ -> ]Quite impressed with the E200s. Slatyford's are the first ones I've sampled.
(22 Dec 2016, 1:00 pm)South Tyne Lad wrote [ -> ]Is it only me that thinks they shouldn't be called E200MMC's? As these Stagecoach examples feature the 6 cylinder 250hp 6.7L Cummins ISBe ( The same powerplant in the E400MMC ) and the same chassis that the E300 used, which effectively makes it a Euro 6 E300.
Standard spec for them is usaually the 4.5L , 4 Cylinder ISBe which usually produces 185-210hp.
(22 Dec 2016, 1:00 pm)South Tyne Lad wrote [ -> ]Is it only me that thinks they shouldn't be called E200MMC's? As these Stagecoach examples feature the 6 cylinder 250hp 6.7L Cummins ISBe ( The same powerplant in the E400MMC ) and the same chassis that the E300 used, which effectively makes it a Euro 6 E300.
Standard spec for them is usaually the 4.5L , 4 Cylinder ISBe which usually produces 185-210hp.
(22 Dec 2016, 2:02 pm)RBZ 5459 wrote [ -> ]Will be to do with narrowing the product range, and concentrating marketing into one sole single-deck product being available in lots of length and options, making it quite attractive to buyers. The second gen E200 got pushed by ADL and the industry (i.e. 'Bus of Britain'), there was very little publicity for the E300 Mk2, with smaller operators tending to go for the E200. Plus for the difference of less than a metre you may as well bung it all in as one diverse product.
(22 Dec 2016, 8:21 pm)cumbria0902150 wrote [ -> ]Not quite the same, and it isn't the same chassis that the E300 used. The long length E200 is essentially a reintroduced "SPD", now sitting at 11.5m with the standard 4.5 litre engine instead of 11.3m, with an extra 30cm added to the vehicle length to accommodate the optional larger 6.7 litre engine, which was also an option on the old shape E200.
(22 Dec 2016, 8:21 pm)cumbria0902150 wrote [ -> ]Not quite the same, and it isn't the same chassis that the E300 used. The long length E200 is essentially a reintroduced "SPD", now sitting at 11.5m with the standard 4.5 litre engine instead of 11.3m, with an extra 30cm added to the vehicle length to accommodate the optional larger 6.7 litre engine, which was also an option on the old shape E200.
(22 Dec 2016, 11:19 pm)Andreos1 wrote [ -> ]Let's hope they have sorted out the 'droop' at the back end, if they're stickting length and weight at the back like the SPD.
(23 Dec 2016, 1:23 am)James101 wrote [ -> ]I've read elsewhere that the 200MMC is particularly bad for the undercarriage scraping on speed bumps due to how low they ride.
(30 Dec 2016, 5:27 pm)Dans_bus_photos wrote [ -> ]Looks like one of the Omnlink's at Sunderland has been painted into the new livery worn by 27506 but with a navy back end instead of red.
(30 Dec 2016, 7:49 pm)Michael wrote [ -> ]Cool, thanks for the update, bet someones got a picture already.
(30 Dec 2016, 8:59 pm)Dans_bus_photos wrote [ -> ]I doubt it, it was inside over the pits.
(31 Dec 2016, 12:51 am)RBZ 5459 wrote [ -> ]Originally they were toying with the idea of the Omnilinks being in Gas bus colours, so something between that and the norm.
(31 Dec 2016, 6:11 am)cbma06 wrote [ -> ]Should of done the Onnilinks in stagecoach gold livery, I'm surprised that there's no stagecoach bus services in the north east in gold livery.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk