19 Nov 2021, 6:30 pm
Is there a reason the tables on 6338 (and maybe the other vehicles in the initial batch) haven't had the new table design retrofitted?
Sent from my AC2003 using Tapatalk
Sent from my AC2003 using Tapatalk
(19 Nov 2021, 6:30 pm)streetdeckfan wrote [ -> ]Is there a reason the tables on 6338 (and maybe the other vehicles in the initial batch) haven't had the new table design retrofitted?
Sent from my AC2003 using Tapatalk
(19 Nov 2021, 7:56 pm)L469 YVK wrote [ -> ]Will the role of 6338-40 with ULEZ coming in soon be to just act as low height spares?Christ, they're barely broken in!
(19 Nov 2021, 8:02 pm)streetdeckfan wrote [ -> ]Christ, they're barely broken in!Yeah I know Consett have 6336 (and Hexham have 6337) but with ULEZ coming in, aren't GNE overdoing the number of spares (i.e 6301-07 at CLS & Washington) to ensure there is enough cover?
Sent from my AC2003 using Tapatalk
(19 Nov 2021, 9:07 pm)L469 YVK wrote [ -> ]Yeah I know Consett have 6336 (and Hexham have 6337) but with ULEZ coming in, aren't GNE overdoing the number of spares (i.e 6301-07 at CLS & Washington) to ensure there is enough cover?
Also, is GNE's bike guarantee for the X30's / X70's still valid?
(19 Nov 2021, 9:07 pm)L469 YVK wrote [ -> ]Yeah I know Consett have 6336 (and Hexham have 6337) but with ULEZ coming in, aren't GNE overdoing the number of spares (i.e 6301-07 at CLS & Washington) to ensure there is enough cover?Well 50 need atleast 1, so does the 25. + 4 OmniDekka's which were on the X21 the other day
Also, is GNE's bike guarantee for the X30's / X70's still valid?