30 jarrow-boldon -downhill-witherwack-southwick -seaburn
31 jarrow-boldon-downhill-casletown -palion-barnes-silksworth
Both hourly so replacing the short 9s
The short 9 will be now
Sunderland -east boldon -boldon at hourly
Pvr
30 2x
31 2x
Short 9 1x
The 30 and 31 replace parts of the short 9 and fully replace route 99
Pvr will remain the same with
Short 9 using a vyking to interwork with schools
30 and 31 to use solars and renowns
No sunday service on these routes
(09 Feb 2016, 9:32 pm)biglugs@yahoo.com wrote [ -> ]30 jarrow-boldon -downhill-witherwack-southwick -seaburn
31 jarrow-boldon-downhill-casletown -palion-barnes-silksworth
Both hourly so replacing the short 9s
The short 9 will be now
Sunderland -east boldon -boldon at hourly
Pvr
30 2x
31 2x
Short 9 1x
The 30 and 31 replace parts of the short 9 and fully replace route 99
Pvr will remain the same with
Short 9 using a vyking to interwork with schools
30 and 31 to use solars and renowns
No sunday service on these routes
passengers of the 9 will go off it like me anyways your suggestions all of them will not work leave Sunderland Services alone am happy the way they are
I don't mind the odd suggestion here and there, especially the sensible or viable ones, but Howay, some of these suggestions put forward are getting both annoying and boring.
(10 Feb 2016, 9:00 am)LeeCalder wrote [ -> ]I don't mind the odd suggestion here and there, especially the sensible or viable ones, but Howay, some of these suggestions put forward are getting both annoying and boring.
Agreed,
Why do we keep getting suggestions for services to Crook? If GNE were to do a service from there it would probably be commercial suicide, the current X46 is just a dead run back to the depot from Durham and has carried pretty much fresh air everytime I've seen it.
(10 Feb 2016, 9:00 am)LeeCalder wrote [ -> ]I don't mind the odd suggestion here and there, especially the sensible or viable ones, but Howay, some of these suggestions put forward are getting both annoying and boring.
The one that Michael did the other day was a good suggestion I like that idea
The ones that biglugs@yahoo.com made won't happen some of his ideas are terrible ideas either they have been done or will fail within days
(10 Feb 2016, 9:32 am)Diamond One wrote [ -> ]The one that Michael did the other day was a good suggestion I like that idea
The ones that biglugs@yahoo.com made won't happen some of his ideas are terrible ideas either they have been done or will fail within days
When I do them, I try to make it clear I know they'd never happen but I try to make them realistic.
(10 Feb 2016, 1:01 pm)Davie wrote [ -> ]When I do them, I try to make it clear I know they'd never happen but I try to make them realistic.
we all try our best even you do but yours is an effort you never know
(10 Feb 2016, 5:49 pm)Diamond One wrote [ -> ]we all try our best even you do but yours is an effort you never know
Tbh I just come up with whatever when I'm bored, if anyone thinks they are good it's a bounus.
(10 Feb 2016, 5:55 pm)Davie wrote [ -> ]Tbh I just come up with whatever when I'm bored, if anyone thinks they are good it's a bounus.
years ago i suggesting having an express to newcastle 27X it worked but was later withdrawn
(12 Feb 2016, 12:55 am)Diamond One wrote [ -> ]years ago i suggesting having an express to newcastle 27X it worked but was later withdrawn
So it didn't work then?...
(12 Feb 2016, 8:04 am)LeeCalder wrote [ -> ]So it didn't work then?...
From my experience it was pretty quiet, although some journeys were quite heavily used. It wasn't really much use for commuters with the first journey from Hebburn at around 10, and the final from Newcastle at about half past 4.
(12 Feb 2016, 8:04 am)LeeCalder wrote [ -> ]So it didn't work then?...
Half worked
X7 Sunderland-Peterlee-Stockton(North Tees Hospital) Sunday (Every 2 Hours)
same weekday but adding Shotton Colliery Same route from Wingate too Stockton High Street then Direct too the Hospital.
(13 Feb 2016, 10:41 pm)2bagstew wrote [ -> ]X7 Sunderland-Peterlee-Stockton(North Tees Hospital) Sunday (Every 2 Hours)
same weekday but adding Shotton Colliery Same route from Wingate too Stockton High Street then Direct too the Hospital.
Might need to drop the X bit, with all that added.
(13 Feb 2016, 10:41 pm)2bagstew wrote [ -> ]X7 Sunderland-Peterlee-Stockton(North Tees Hospital) Sunday (Every 2 Hours)
same weekday but adding Shotton Colliery Same route from Wingate too Stockton High Street then Direct too the Hospital.
That will never happen
An unlikely one due to dead millage (possible X7 interworking) but from operated from peterlee:
Hartlepool Middlegate
Hartlepool Hospital
Hartlepool Town Centre
fast to Billingham
fast to Stockton
North Tees Hospital.
Based on overcrowding on the 36 and the downgrading of Hartlepool Hospital with many services now at North Tees but there is still no public bus link.
(14 Feb 2016, 10:57 pm)James101 wrote [ -> ]An unlikely one due to dead millage (possible X7 interworking) but from operated from peterlee:
Hartlepool Middlegate
Hartlepool Hospital
Hartlepool Town Centre
fast to Billingham
fast to Stockton
North Tees Hospital.
Based on overcrowding on the 36 and the downgrading of Hartlepool Hospital with many services now at North Tees but there is still no public bus link.
The Hospital Trust already provide a shuttle bus between the two hospital, and the previous attempt at a proper bus service didn't last long.
X10 newcastle -gateshead -heworth -concord-Sulgrave -nissan-a19-peterlee by pass-norton-stockton -middlesbrough
Provides a direct route for nissan workers from Newcastle or middlesbrough
May take 25 mins longer.
(14 Feb 2016, 10:59 pm)Kuyoyo wrote [ -> ]The Hospital Trust already provide a shuttle bus between the two hospital, and the previous attempt at a proper bus service didn't last long.
I'm aware of this shuttle; though it's a poorly advertised service which requires pre-booking with an irregular timetable and priority is given to NHS staff. Being left behind is a real risk!
Also people aren't likely to be traveling from Hartlepool Hospital direct to North Tees. The reality is they're going from their homes, the suggested route runs through much of the town to reach the A689 and could pick up en route. I believe it could also pick up some 36 passengers fed up going the 'long way' through Hartlepool and Greatham. Plus a fast link between Billingham and Stockton.
(14 Feb 2016, 11:04 pm)biglugs@yahoo.com wrote [ -> ]X10 newcastle -gateshead -heworth -concord-Sulgrave -nissan-a19-peterlee by pass-norton-stockton -middlesbrough
Provides a direct route for nissan workers from Newcastle or middlesbrough
May take 25 mins longer.
I'm not sure the extra passengers gained would outweigh the ones who would ditch the bus for the train for it taking so long! Also the justification of 2 extra buses in the PVR
(14 Feb 2016, 11:04 pm)biglugs@yahoo.com wrote [ -> ]X10 newcastle -gateshead -heworth -concord-Sulgrave -nissan-a19-peterlee by pass-norton-stockton -middlesbrough
Provides a direct route for nissan workers from Newcastle or middlesbrough
May take 25 mins longer.
Would probably only be 5 or so minutes faster at getting from Newcastle to Concord than the 56. Also making the X10 (or X9) routes any longer than they are now especially adding as long as 25 minutes to the timetable would be a recipe for disaster, not sure people many people would want to spend nearly two hours on a bus between Middlesbrough and Newcastle.
(15 Feb 2016, 12:21 am)Jimmi wrote [ -> ]Would probably only be 5 or so minutes faster at getting from Newcastle to Concord than the 56. Also making the X10 (or X9) routes any longer than they are now especially adding as long as 25 minutes to the timetable would be a recipe for disaster, not sure people many people would want to spend nearly two hours on a bus between Middlesbrough and Newcastle.
They would have a choice as the x9 will be the faster option
(15 Feb 2016, 12:25 am)biglugs@yahoo.com wrote [ -> ]They would have a choice as the x9 will be the faster option
Yeah but you'd be going down from two fast buses an hour to one, having two buses an hour is probably something that makes the X9/X10 a more attractive option than the train which runs hourly and takes roughly the same length of time as the X9/X10, if you were to change the X10 to take nearly two hours (although the X9 would stay the same) it may be enough for people to choose the train over the X9/X10. Also adding 25 minutes to the route would mean that the times wouldn't match up, you would end up with the X10 having to leave either Newcastle or Middlesbrough at the same time as the X9. Also passengers in Stockton and Norton would not have the alternative of the fast bus to Newcastle as the X9 runs via Billingham, plus I'm assuming this would be the Sunday route as well which would take 2 hours and that's not including layover times, this suggestion would probably come very close to the maximum number of hours a driver can do without a break on a route with a tachograph and on this route where if something goes wrong on the A19 and heavily delays the service, it may be unable to complete the journey.
(14 Feb 2016, 11:04 pm)biglugs@yahoo.com wrote [ -> ]X10 newcastle -gateshead -heworth -concord-Sulgrave -nissan-a19-peterlee by pass-norton-stockton -middlesbrough
Provides a direct route for nissan workers from Newcastle or middlesbrough
May take 25 mins longer.
Your making things worse for the company a recipe for disaster even the old N-1 Rocket had better success and that didn't have any success as it blew up every time it launched thus only 5 were launched all failed so I agree with Jimmi on this one yet again your suggestions are pointless
(15 Feb 2016, 12:21 am)Jimmi wrote [ -> ]Would probably only be 5 or so minutes faster at getting from Newcastle to Concord than the 56. Also making the X10 (or X9) routes any longer than they are now especially adding as long as 25 minutes to the timetable would be a recipe for disaster, not sure people many people would want to spend nearly two hours on a bus between Middlesbrough and Newcastle.
Agreed 1 hour and 20 minutes is long enough plus PVR would increase and passengers will drop and worse it won't work so your right it is a recipe for disaster
(15 Feb 2016, 12:25 am)biglugs@yahoo.com wrote [ -> ]They would have a choice as the x9 will be the faster option
X9 takes the same amount of time as the current X10 today X9 is hourly and both them services will only work if you leave them be drivers are happy the way they are right now
(15 Feb 2016, 12:33 am)Jimmi wrote [ -> ]Yeah but you'd be going down from two fast buses an hour to one, having two buses an hour is probably something that makes the X9/X10 a more attractive option than the train which runs hourly and takes roughly the same length of time as the X9/X10, if you were to change the X10 to take nearly two hours (although the X9 would stay the same) it may be enough for people to choose the train over the X9/X10. Also adding 25 minutes to the route would mean that the times wouldn't match up, you would end up with the X10 having to leave either Newcastle or Middlesbrough at the same time as the X9.
I agree with you Jimmi again 2nd time I've said that within the last 5 minutes
(14 Feb 2016, 11:04 pm)biglugs@yahoo.com wrote [ -> ]X10 newcastle -gateshead -heworth -concord-Sulgrave -nissan-a19-peterlee by pass-norton-stockton -middlesbrough
Provides a direct route for nissan workers from Newcastle or middlesbrough
May take 25 mins longer.
Did you suggest the X18 to Arriva by any chance?
55 stockton-darlington-shildon-spennymoor
55 will replace service 7 by weardale also extend go north east to Darlington. And if replacing weardales 7 itll mean no confusion with sapphire 7
Also a Saturday operation as well as mon-fri
(20 Feb 2016, 8:53 pm)biglugs@yahoo.com wrote [ -> ]55 stockton-darlington-shildon-spennymoor
55 will replace service 7 by weardale also extend go north east to Darlington. And if replacing weardales 7 itll mean no confusion with sapphire 7
Also a Saturday operation as well as mon-fri
Go North East's last crack at that area didn't end well, so I'd imagine this would likely meet the same fate. Also the 7 is supported by Durham County Council so I don't think it would be commercially viable, also you'd struggle to compete with Arriva, especially between Darlington and Shildon especially if it ran on a hourly frequency.
Services X84/X85
These services rebranded as TOONLINK, using 5234-8.
Services 12/12A
Unbranded, using repainted 5229-33.
5229-33 would gain tachographs (from 4941/49/67, 5227/8) after recalibration.
These changes would give a better standard of vehicle on TTX WHEN REQUIRED, as wifi and high backed seats are fitted.
Wifi would be fitted to 5234-8.
53/54.
To continue the current route, but to add on a figure of 8 loop at the southern end, to incorporate Low Fell and Chowdene.
The idea being that it takes away some of the pressure on existing long distance Durham Road services.
...Bensham Bank, Saltwell Road, Belle Vue Bank, Durham Road, Chowdene Bank, Saltwell Road - current route beyond Saltwell Park.
...Saltwell Road, Chowdene Bank, Durham Road, Belle Vue Bank, Saltwell Road, Bensham Bank - current route beyond Bensham Bank.
Frequency to be reduced or PVR increased.