North East Buses
PCL Travel - Printable Version

+- North East Buses (https://northeastbuses.co.uk/forums)
+-- Forum: Local Bus Scene (https://northeastbuses.co.uk/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Other Operators (https://northeastbuses.co.uk/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=58)
+---- Forum: Northumberland Independents (https://northeastbuses.co.uk/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=70)
+---- Thread: PCL Travel (/showthread.php?tid=876)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43


RE: PCL Travel - Tom - 08 Nov 2016

(08 Nov 2016, 7:34 pm)South Tyne Lad The fact Spirit had a near 100% Reliability Rating while PCL have managed to fail on the second day is rather shocking id say.
As for VANs on the Service's, I wouldn't be surprised if one will be seen by the end of the week!

Yeah it's a joke. No wonder they are failing considering they are using some crap darts and Spirit Buses used a near new E200. Think they need some newer stock as the Darts are ok for the S1 but not for the 15/16/M1.


RE: PCL Travel - Jimmi - 08 Nov 2016

(08 Nov 2016, 7:34 pm)South Tyne Lad The fact Spirit had a near 100% Reliability Rating while PCL have managed to fail on the second day is rather shocking id say.
As for VANs on the Service's, I wouldn't be surprised if one will be seen by the end of the week!

Is it bad that I've spent the last few days thinking that something would go with the connection between the 16 and M1?

Some communication between the drivers and me would have been nice, rather than 45 minutes of pacing up and down in Thropton not knowing how I was going to get home.

Me and ex London Darts are a bad omen, going back to the X---GGO examples that Arriva had.


RE: PCL Travel - Dan - 08 Nov 2016

(08 Nov 2016, 8:38 pm)Jimmi Is it bad that I've spent the last few days thinking that something would go with the connection between the 16 and M1?

Some communication between the drivers and me would have been nice, rather than 45 minutes of pacing up and down in Thropton not knowing how I was going to get home.

Me and ex London Darts are a bad omen, going back to the X---GGO examples that Arriva had.

We've not heard about those Darts for a while!! [FACE WITH TEARS OF JOY]


RE: PCL Travel - Andreos1 - 08 Nov 2016

(08 Nov 2016, 7:34 pm)South Tyne Lad The fact Spirit had a near 100% Reliability Rating while PCL have managed to fail on the second day is rather shocking id say.
As for VANs on the Service's, I wouldn't be surprised if one will be seen by the end of the week!

Didn't Sprit have issues with their vehicles when they first got them? I seem to remember buses going back to the leasing company after reliability issues. A quick check of the Spirit thread might confirm either way.

I do wonder if the higher costs incurred by using modern vehicles played a part in their downfall? Suppose it's like having older, cheaper vehicles and the potential for it to be a false economy once repairs and maintenance are paid for.

Do you go for the more expensive modern vehicle that should be more reliable, but costs a fortune to hire? Or do you buy a cheaper, older vehicle and gamble on its reliability?

(08 Nov 2016, 8:38 pm)Jimmi Is it bad that I've spent the last few days thinking that something would go with the connection between the 16 and M1?

Some communication between the drivers and me would have been nice, rather than 45 minutes of pacing up and down in Thropton not knowing how I was going to get home.

Me and ex London Darts are a bad omen, going back to the X---GGO examples that Arriva had.

Did the drivers have the right intentions i.e having both services running? I get it was an inconvenience, there was no communicstion and it may have stressed you out, but I am pretty sure the drivers were doing their utmost to have a full service, even if they ended up running one so late.

Not having a go at either of you, just trying to offer some balance or perspective.


RE: PCL Travel - South Tyne Lad - 08 Nov 2016

(08 Nov 2016, 8:02 pm)Tom Yeah it's a joke. No wonder they are failing considering they are using some crap darts and Spirit Buses used a near new E200. Think they need some newer stock as the Darts are ok for the S1 but not for the 15/16/M1.


Aye, And Bad Maintenance by the look of things too, No pride in the fleet presentation either, With Paper Cards showing Fleetnumbers and panels lying on the back of the Dart Jimmi was on either.

I wouldn't be bothered if they had newer vehicles IMO, Just some TLC and a more appealing livery, Current Livery looks like Vomit to me haha



(08 Nov 2016, 8:38 pm)Jimmi Is it bad that I've spent the last few days thinking that something would go with the connection between the 16 and M1?

Some communication between the drivers and me would have been nice, rather than 45 minutes of pacing up and down in Thropton not knowing how I was going to get home.

Me and ex London Darts are a bad omen, going back to the X---GGO examples that Arriva had.


45 mins does sound quite bad mind, Hopefully that was ironed out later in the day by the long layovers Spirit had at Cawledge Services ( if they still have them )

I remember them Darts, I don't think my Nana ( Who used to regularly come out on outings back then ) Would've said the same though!


RE: PCL Travel - South Tyne Lad - 08 Nov 2016

(08 Nov 2016, 9:25 pm)Andreos1 Didn't Sprit have issues with their vehicles when they first got them? I seem to remember buses going back to the leasing company after reliability issues. A quick check of the Spirit thread might confirm either way.

I do wonder if the higher costs incurred by using modern vehicles played a part in their downfall? Suppose it's like having older, cheaper vehicles and the potential for it to be a false economy once repairs and maintenance are paid for.

Do you go for the more expensive modern vehicle that should be more reliable, but costs a fortune to hire? Or do you buy a cheaper, older vehicle and gamble on its reliability?

Spirit had Ceatano bodied Darts which were new around the same time as PCLs ( 2002 ) but I didn't really take notice back then about Maintenance issues.

Moving from the fleet of Darts to the single E200 will have improved the economics of the company, But Steve kept everything Local, Including the Maintenance ( He used the local Mechanic I believe ) while PCL will no doubt have a few PLCs to deal with, Which will reduce the profit of the services.  ( Might be wrong with this )


Bit of a loose loose situation imo, Newer vehicle gets more attention and provides better service, Pushing up profits but cost's more to lease.
While a Older Vehicle will be better suited economically to a lesser demand route like this, So Id say PCL are right in taking the older Darts, But just a bit TLC would keep them running a bit more reliably, Pushing up profits?

Sorry if non of this makes sense, I'm typing on my phone.


RE: PCL Travel - Jimmi - 08 Nov 2016

Both Dart's pictured here in Thropton earlier this evening.
[Image: 30750292662_35a8fe40ef.jpg]PCL Travel: 601 - LG02FFR & 600 - LG02FFP by Matthew Jimmison, on Flickr


RE: PCL Travel - Andreos1 - 08 Nov 2016

(08 Nov 2016, 9:37 pm)South Tyne Lad Spirit had Ceatano bodied Darts which were new around the same time as PCLs ( 2002 ) but I didn't really take notice back then about Maintenance issues.

Moving from the fleet of Darts to the single E200 will have improved the economics of the company, But Steve kept everything Local, Including the Maintenance ( He used the local Mechanic I believe ) while PCL will no doubt have a few PLCs to deal with, Which will reduce the profit of the services.  ( Might be wrong with this )


Bit of a loose loose situation imo, Newer vehicle gets more attention and provides better service, Pushing up profits but cost's more to lease.
While a Older Vehicle will be better suited economically to a lesser demand route like this, So Id say PCL are right in taking the older Darts, But just a bit TLC would keep them running a bit more reliably, Pushing up profits?

Sorry if non of this makes sense, I'm typing on my phone.

And all of that comes down to cash flow. 
It is OK having thousands of pounds tied up in assets, but you need cash to hand to finance the maintenance and titivating. 

To go back to your point about keeping it in-house. That in itself will have cost. You either have a multi-skilled driver/fitter/jack of all trades or a dedicated member of staff. That's without the costs involved in purchasing and maintaining equipment and tools. Or you pay someone to do it.

Just to tie this in with the big-boys. After de-reg in 86 (when assets were bought from the government/taxpayer), it was a good few years before the likes of United, Northumbria or Go-ahead were able to finance the purchase of new vehicles. Go-ahead's first purchase from memory was a handful of Lynx's, Alexander Olympians in and the G RTY Delta's circa 1990. That was despite having stock from the 70's on front line service. The last lot of deckers would have been the C OCN Metrobuses and C LJR Olympians 7/8 years previous.
If it takes a PLC 4 or 5 years to purchase new vehicles, you can see how difficult it is for an independent like PCL.

Edit: Completely forgot the MiniLink/bread vans! A clear example of trying to open up new revenue streams.


RE: PCL Travel - Tom - 08 Nov 2016

(08 Nov 2016, 9:52 pm)Andreos1 And all of that comes down to cash flow. 
It is OK having thousands of pounds tied up in assets, but you need cash to hand to finance the maintenance and titivating. 

To go back to your point about keeping it in-house. That in itself will have cost. You either have a multi-skilled driver/fitter/jack of all trades or a dedicated member of staff. That's without the costs involved in purchasing and maintaining equipment and tools. Or you pay someone to do it.

Just to tie this in with the big-boys. After de-reg in 86 (when assets were bought from the government/taxpayer), it was a good few years before the likes of United, Northumbria or Go-ahead were able to finance the purchase of new vehicles. Go-ahead's first purchase from memory was a handful of Lynx's, Alexander Olympians in and the G RTY Delta's circa 1990. That was despite having stock from the 70's on front line service. The last lot of deckers would have been the C OCN Metrobuses and C LJR Olympians 7/8 years previous.
If it takes a PLC 4 or 5 years to purchase new vehicles, you can see how difficult it is for an independent like PCL.

I get what you are saying but the darts and that's horrible Primo they are operating make the company look so unprofessional. One of the darts with S1 sub branding looks terrible, the destinations are all over the place and looks like it has been done by themselves. And the maintenance seems really bad.


RE: PCL Travel - James101 - 09 Nov 2016

Is the use of vans an entirely bad thing? If one thing became clear throughout the 15/16 tendering saga it was the cost of running the routes needed to be reduced. Undoubtedly PCL could tidy up their presentation/branding to improve their public appeal, which wouldn't cost anything - but a well presented Mercedes Sprinter with a clear destination would be entirely agreeable.


RE: PCL Travel - Woodpecker - 09 Nov 2016

PCL would appear to now have a Volvo B7TL/East Lancs double decker in stock. I saw it yesterday in Hexham Wentworth car park (albeit from some distance) alongside the former Eden LDV minibus MH06 WHU.


RE: PCL Travel - mb134 - 09 Nov 2016

Just a thought, I assume the ANE Volvo B10BLE/ALX300's can't have too long left with Arriva, they would be perfect for PCL in my eyes. I don't imagine that they would be too expensive, but they would almost definitely be more reliable than an ex-London dart?

Or, speaking very hypothetically here, I wonder if once Arriva take those Volvo's off the Jesmond routes, they would be tempted to use them themselves on the old Spirit network, if PCL can't make it work? (Not that I don't want PCL to make it work)


RE: PCL Travel - Phoenix Coaches - 09 Nov 2016

(09 Nov 2016, 1:25 am)James101 Is the use of vans an entirely bad thing? If one thing became clear throughout the 15/16 tendering saga it was the cost of running the routes needed to be reduced. Undoubtedly PCL could tidy up their presentation/branding to improve their public appeal, which wouldn't cost anything - but a well presented Mercedes Sprinter with a clear destination would be entirely agreeable.

DDA regs is the main reason that can't happen !


RE: PCL Travel - Tom - 09 Nov 2016

(09 Nov 2016, 8:06 pm)mb134 Just a thought, I assume the ANE Volvo B10BLE/ALX300's can't have too long left with Arriva, they would be perfect for PCL in my eyes. I don't imagine that they would be too expensive, but they would almost definitely be more reliable than an ex-London dart?

Or, speaking very hypothetically here, I wonder if once Arriva take those Volvo's off the Jesmond routes, they would be tempted to use them themselves on the old Spirit network, if PCL can't make it work? (Not that I don't want PCL to make it work)

Yeah they are great buses despite their age!

I hope PCL travel make it work too as I would much rather an independent be running the services, but they just need to make themselves look a bit more professional.


RE: PCL Travel - Cobalt271 - 09 Nov 2016

(09 Nov 2016, 8:06 pm)mb134 Just a thought, I assume the ANE Volvo B10BLE/ALX300's can't have too long left with Arriva, they would be perfect for PCL in my eyes. I don't imagine that they would be too expensive, but they would almost definitely be more reliable than an ex-London dart?

Or, speaking very hypothetically here, I wonder if once Arriva take those Volvo's off the Jesmond routes, they would be tempted to use them themselves on the old Spirit network, if PCL can't make it work? (Not that I don't want PCL to make it work)

Those are a little bit longer than your PCL dart and I doubt they would get through some of the Coquetdale villages with ease.


RE: PCL Travel - mb134 - 09 Nov 2016

(09 Nov 2016, 8:15 pm)Tom Yeah they are great buses despite their age!

I hope PCL travel make it work too as I would much rather an independent be running the services, but they just need to make themselves look a bit more professional.

I can't think of too many vehicles that would be able to do those routes any better, and they are something else in terms of reliability. I was surprised that Spirit didn't try and get one of 4501-14 when Arriva were scrapping them.

I'm not too bothered who is running them, as long as they run them well. If it came to it, I think Arriva would do a good job of running the services, Ashington seem to do a pretty good job with their current rural routes.


RE: PCL Travel - James101 - 09 Nov 2016

(09 Nov 2016, 8:06 pm)Phoenix Coaches DDA regs is the main reason that can't happen !
DDA/PSVAR compliant Mercedes Sprinters are on order to Stagecoach Kent this year and Arriva Midlands have also had one on demo. It seems sensible that a lease agreement on a Sprinter (or similar) would be much more  affordable than what would have been in place in Spirit's E200.


RE: PCL Travel - Cobalt271 - 09 Nov 2016

(09 Nov 2016, 9:16 pm)James101 DDA/PSVAR compliant Mercedes Sprinters are on order to Stagecoach Kent this year and Arriva Midlands have also had one on demo. It seems sensible that a lease agreement on a Sprinter (or similar) would be much more  affordable than what would have been in place in Spirit's E200.

Spirit ran the services commercially whereas now PCL are running it under the tendered contract so maybe there are specific demands from NCC as to what vehicles should operate.


RE: PCL Travel - James101 - 09 Nov 2016

(09 Nov 2016, 9:30 pm)Cobalt271 Spirit ran the services commercially whereas now PCL are running it under the tendered contract so maybe there are specific demands from NCC as to what vehicles should operate.

Entirely possible, but I would have thought the same restrictions would apply to their other tendered services which are often van-operated. I suppose it comes down to choice of business model, which Andreos1 mentioned earlier. It seems PCL prefer to own their vehicles - which appears to mean they operate older, potentially less reliable buses. This is entirely understandable for a small indipendant which specialises in marginal services. 

The alternative would be to go for fixed term asset leasing where they could potentially have a new bus for each contract they gain - potentially better for cashflow but likely to be more expensive overall. Personally I'd look for a middle-ground - working with an asset leasing company to identify mid-life, fuel efficient buses. 

Of course it's PCL's choice how they operate and as long as they are trading and providing the services they advertise they are doing everything right.


RE: PCL Travel - Andreos1 - 09 Nov 2016

I posted a message earlier and it seems to have vanished. 
Spotted PCL sister vehicle LG02 FFK. Designated as a training vehicle.