Menu
 
North East Buses Local Bus Scene Stagecoach North East Stagecoach North East: Upcoming Service Changes

Stagecoach North East: Upcoming Service Changes

Stagecoach North East: Upcoming Service Changes

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
 
Pages (131) Previous 128 29 30131 Next
03 Sep 2016, 7:33 pm #561
How does transfers between divisions within the Stagecoach group happen?
Did Stagecoach North East request these kinetic's or were they told of management that they were getting them to replace certain buses?
Dans_bus_photos
03 Sep 2016, 7:33 pm #561

How does transfers between divisions within the Stagecoach group happen?
Did Stagecoach North East request these kinetic's or were they told of management that they were getting them to replace certain buses?

glen



705
03 Sep 2016, 8:04 pm #562
If buses 22508'15 are in bad condition can't stagecoach north east sand buses the buses stagecoach Yorkshire get money back or can't there do that.
glen
03 Sep 2016, 8:04 pm #562

If buses 22508'15 are in bad condition can't stagecoach north east sand buses the buses stagecoach Yorkshire get money back or can't there do that.

tyresmoke



5,318
03 Sep 2016, 8:08 pm #563
To be fair I think nobody at Stagecoach Yorkshire could believe anyone wanted to take them off their hands...
tyresmoke
03 Sep 2016, 8:08 pm #563

To be fair I think nobody at Stagecoach Yorkshire could believe anyone wanted to take them off their hands...

S813 FVK



6,030
03 Sep 2016, 8:10 pm #564
The fact that the North East is the Kinetic's 3rd home says something really.
S813 FVK
03 Sep 2016, 8:10 pm #564

The fact that the North East is the Kinetic's 3rd home says something really.

Ambassador



1,855
04 Sep 2016, 6:56 pm #565
It's really odd that the 100 doesn't get new investment as opposed to cast offs really

Wistfully stuck in the 90s
Ambassador
04 Sep 2016, 6:56 pm #565

It's really odd that the 100 doesn't get new investment as opposed to cast offs really


Wistfully stuck in the 90s

Brian13



242
05 Sep 2016, 8:32 am #566
(04 Sep 2016, 6:56 pm)Ambassador It's really odd that the 100 doesn't get new investment as opposed to cast offs really

Surprised there isn't deckers on there
Brian13
05 Sep 2016, 8:32 am #566

(04 Sep 2016, 6:56 pm)Ambassador It's really odd that the 100 doesn't get new investment as opposed to cast offs really

Surprised there isn't deckers on there

markydh



258
05 Sep 2016, 12:47 pm #567
It's not that odd. There are no comparable single deckers on the market in terms of capacity and they can't upgrade to double deckers due to one of the routes having a low bridge. Obviously, the E300s can't keep going forever (maybe 2 years left in them). It will be interesting to see what the powers that be decide to do.
markydh
05 Sep 2016, 12:47 pm #567

It's not that odd. There are no comparable single deckers on the market in terms of capacity and they can't upgrade to double deckers due to one of the routes having a low bridge. Obviously, the E300s can't keep going forever (maybe 2 years left in them). It will be interesting to see what the powers that be decide to do.

Ambassador



1,855
05 Sep 2016, 5:17 pm #568
(05 Sep 2016, 12:47 pm)markydh It's not that odd. There are no comparable single deckers on the market in terms of capacity and they can't upgrade to double deckers due to one of the routes having a low bridge. Obviously, the E300s can't keep going forever (maybe 2 years left in them). It will be interesting to see what the powers that be decide to do.

It wouldn't be a total loss to stop using the route with the low bridge. Plenty of alternatives around

Wistfully stuck in the 90s
Ambassador
05 Sep 2016, 5:17 pm #568

(05 Sep 2016, 12:47 pm)markydh It's not that odd. There are no comparable single deckers on the market in terms of capacity and they can't upgrade to double deckers due to one of the routes having a low bridge. Obviously, the E300s can't keep going forever (maybe 2 years left in them). It will be interesting to see what the powers that be decide to do.

It wouldn't be a total loss to stop using the route with the low bridge. Plenty of alternatives around


Wistfully stuck in the 90s

S813 FVK



6,030
05 Sep 2016, 5:27 pm #569
(05 Sep 2016, 5:17 pm)Ambassador It wouldn't be a total loss to stop using the route with the low bridge. Plenty of alternatives around

Exactly - if they just used Handy Drive etc both ways, deckers would be fine. Most drivers go to Newcastle via Dunston, out onto the A1 and off at the next sliproad onto the bypass thing that follows through onto the Redheugh Bridge yet come back to the Metrocentre via Teams & Handy Drive.
S813 FVK
05 Sep 2016, 5:27 pm #569

(05 Sep 2016, 5:17 pm)Ambassador It wouldn't be a total loss to stop using the route with the low bridge. Plenty of alternatives around

Exactly - if they just used Handy Drive etc both ways, deckers would be fine. Most drivers go to Newcastle via Dunston, out onto the A1 and off at the next sliproad onto the bypass thing that follows through onto the Redheugh Bridge yet come back to the Metrocentre via Teams & Handy Drive.

05 Sep 2016, 9:22 pm #570
(05 Sep 2016, 5:27 pm)S813 FVK Exactly - if they just used Handy Drive etc both ways, deckers would be fine. Most drivers go to Newcastle via Dunston, out onto the A1 and off at the next sliproad onto the bypass thing that follows through onto the Redheugh Bridge yet come back to the Metrocentre via Teams & Handy Drive.

I think it's about the drivers having the option to take the other route, to avoid traffic etc.

What has always been a little hard to believe is that a 46 seat 12.6m E300 would be unacceptable despite the 05-plates only having two more seats.  And if capacity is really the reason for lack of investment, why is/was a 43 seat Kinetic being considered?
stagecoachbusdepot
05 Sep 2016, 9:22 pm #570

(05 Sep 2016, 5:27 pm)S813 FVK Exactly - if they just used Handy Drive etc both ways, deckers would be fine. Most drivers go to Newcastle via Dunston, out onto the A1 and off at the next sliproad onto the bypass thing that follows through onto the Redheugh Bridge yet come back to the Metrocentre via Teams & Handy Drive.

I think it's about the drivers having the option to take the other route, to avoid traffic etc.

What has always been a little hard to believe is that a 46 seat 12.6m E300 would be unacceptable despite the 05-plates only having two more seats.  And if capacity is really the reason for lack of investment, why is/was a 43 seat Kinetic being considered?

Jimmi



10,970
06 Sep 2016, 3:13 pm #571
PB0002404/121 - BUSWAYS TRAVEL SERVICES LTD T/A STAGECOACH NORTHEAST, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, NORTH BRIDGE STREET, SUNDERLAND, SR5 1AQ

Variation Accepted by SN: Operating between Docks or City and Farringdon given service number 5 effective from 16-Oct-2016. To amend Timetable.
Jimmi
06 Sep 2016, 3:13 pm #571

PB0002404/121 - BUSWAYS TRAVEL SERVICES LTD T/A STAGECOACH NORTHEAST, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, NORTH BRIDGE STREET, SUNDERLAND, SR5 1AQ

Variation Accepted by SN: Operating between Docks or City and Farringdon given service number 5 effective from 16-Oct-2016. To amend Timetable.

06 Sep 2016, 3:24 pm #572
(05 Sep 2016, 9:22 pm)stagecoachbusdepot I think it's about the drivers having the option to take the other route, to avoid traffic etc.

What has always been a little hard to believe is that a 46 seat 12.6m E300 would be unacceptable despite the 05-plates only having two more seats.  And if capacity is really the reason for lack of investment, why is/was a 43 seat Kinetic being considered?

Isnt the Kinetic only being put on there as a trial though, as its a relatively easy route to see how the bus copes before deciding whether to refurbish the others and put them into service?
Dans_bus_photos
06 Sep 2016, 3:24 pm #572

(05 Sep 2016, 9:22 pm)stagecoachbusdepot I think it's about the drivers having the option to take the other route, to avoid traffic etc.

What has always been a little hard to believe is that a 46 seat 12.6m E300 would be unacceptable despite the 05-plates only having two more seats.  And if capacity is really the reason for lack of investment, why is/was a 43 seat Kinetic being considered?

Isnt the Kinetic only being put on there as a trial though, as its a relatively easy route to see how the bus copes before deciding whether to refurbish the others and put them into service?

glen



705
06 Sep 2016, 3:51 pm #573
I think be OK at Stockton route like 14'34'39 and 13.
glen
06 Sep 2016, 3:51 pm #573

I think be OK at Stockton route like 14'34'39 and 13.

Michael



19,168
06 Sep 2016, 5:43 pm #574
(06 Sep 2016, 3:13 pm)Jimmi PB0002404/121 - BUSWAYS TRAVEL SERVICES LTD T/A STAGECOACH NORTHEAST, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, NORTH BRIDGE STREET, SUNDERLAND, SR5 1AQ

Variation Accepted by SN: Operating between Docks or City and Farringdon given service number 5 effective from 16-Oct-2016. To amend Timetable.

Wonder what the timetable is, hopefully just timings and nothing cut.

Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.
Michael
06 Sep 2016, 5:43 pm #574

(06 Sep 2016, 3:13 pm)Jimmi PB0002404/121 - BUSWAYS TRAVEL SERVICES LTD T/A STAGECOACH NORTHEAST, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, NORTH BRIDGE STREET, SUNDERLAND, SR5 1AQ

Variation Accepted by SN: Operating between Docks or City and Farringdon given service number 5 effective from 16-Oct-2016. To amend Timetable.

Wonder what the timetable is, hopefully just timings and nothing cut.


Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.

markydh



258
06 Sep 2016, 5:53 pm #575
(05 Sep 2016, 9:22 pm)stagecoachbusdepot I think it's about the drivers having the option to take the other route, to avoid traffic etc.

What has always been a little hard to believe is that a 46 seat 12.6m E300 would be unacceptable despite the 05-plates only having two more seats.  And if capacity is really the reason for lack of investment, why is/was a 43 seat Kinetic being considered?

Don't forget that the E300s also have more standing capacity owing to their extra length. It's not just about the seat numbers...
markydh
06 Sep 2016, 5:53 pm #575

(05 Sep 2016, 9:22 pm)stagecoachbusdepot I think it's about the drivers having the option to take the other route, to avoid traffic etc.

What has always been a little hard to believe is that a 46 seat 12.6m E300 would be unacceptable despite the 05-plates only having two more seats.  And if capacity is really the reason for lack of investment, why is/was a 43 seat Kinetic being considered?

Don't forget that the E300s also have more standing capacity owing to their extra length. It's not just about the seat numbers...

06 Sep 2016, 7:28 pm #576
(06 Sep 2016, 5:43 pm)Michael Wonder what the timetable is, hopefully just timings and nothing cut.

Hopefully a extra morning journey a 1 hour gap from 7:30 to 8:40 I think

4842
Best bus ever
biglugs@yahoo.com
06 Sep 2016, 7:28 pm #576

(06 Sep 2016, 5:43 pm)Michael Wonder what the timetable is, hopefully just timings and nothing cut.

Hopefully a extra morning journey a 1 hour gap from 7:30 to 8:40 I think


4842
Best bus ever

06 Sep 2016, 9:26 pm #577
(06 Sep 2016, 5:53 pm)markydh Don't forget that the E300s also have more standing capacity owing to their extra length. It's not just about the seat numbers...

I believe the old Enviro300s are 12.5m, so similar (slightly shorter) than the longest Enviro300 currently available
stagecoachbusdepot
06 Sep 2016, 9:26 pm #577

(06 Sep 2016, 5:53 pm)markydh Don't forget that the E300s also have more standing capacity owing to their extra length. It's not just about the seat numbers...

I believe the old Enviro300s are 12.5m, so similar (slightly shorter) than the longest Enviro300 currently available

Michael



19,168
20 Sep 2016, 4:26 pm #578
PB0002404/308 - BUSWAYS TRAVEL SERVICES LTD T/A STAGECOACH NORTHEAST, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, NORTH BRIDGE STREET, SUNDERLAND, SR5 1AQ
Variation Accepted by SN: Operating between City Centre and Seaburn given service number 101 effective from 24-Sep-2016. To amend Timetable.

Info here:

Going to the Sunderland Illuminations? So are we !
14 Sep 2016
Sunderland Live have announced the Sunderland Illuminations will light up Roker and Seaburn from late September until early November.


https://www.stagecoachbus.com/service-up...:17:55:179


Last year it used gas buses so would imagine its the same this year.

Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.
Michael
20 Sep 2016, 4:26 pm #578

PB0002404/308 - BUSWAYS TRAVEL SERVICES LTD T/A STAGECOACH NORTHEAST, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, NORTH BRIDGE STREET, SUNDERLAND, SR5 1AQ
Variation Accepted by SN: Operating between City Centre and Seaburn given service number 101 effective from 24-Sep-2016. To amend Timetable.

Info here:

Going to the Sunderland Illuminations? So are we !
14 Sep 2016
Sunderland Live have announced the Sunderland Illuminations will light up Roker and Seaburn from late September until early November.


https://www.stagecoachbus.com/service-up...:17:55:179


Last year it used gas buses so would imagine its the same this year.


Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.

Michael



19,168
06 Oct 2016, 6:05 pm #579
(06 Sep 2016, 3:13 pm)Jimmi PB0002404/121 - BUSWAYS TRAVEL SERVICES LTD T/A STAGECOACH NORTHEAST, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, NORTH BRIDGE STREET, SUNDERLAND, SR5 1AQ

Variation Accepted by SN: Operating between Docks or City and Farringdon given service number 5 effective from 16-Oct-2016. To amend Timetable.

Changes to the 5 can be seen here:


Minor changes to Service 5 from Monday 17 October 2016


Due to revisions to Nexus contracts, the Monday to Saturday trips at 1748 and 1818 from Borough Road (1757 and 1827 from the Docks) will be withdrawn.

All other Service 5 journeys continue unchanged.

To view the new timetable, https://tiscon-maps-stagecoachbus.s3.ama...016Oct.pdf

Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.
Michael
06 Oct 2016, 6:05 pm #579

(06 Sep 2016, 3:13 pm)Jimmi PB0002404/121 - BUSWAYS TRAVEL SERVICES LTD T/A STAGECOACH NORTHEAST, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, NORTH BRIDGE STREET, SUNDERLAND, SR5 1AQ

Variation Accepted by SN: Operating between Docks or City and Farringdon given service number 5 effective from 16-Oct-2016. To amend Timetable.

Changes to the 5 can be seen here:


Minor changes to Service 5 from Monday 17 October 2016


Due to revisions to Nexus contracts, the Monday to Saturday trips at 1748 and 1818 from Borough Road (1757 and 1827 from the Docks) will be withdrawn.

All other Service 5 journeys continue unchanged.

To view the new timetable, https://tiscon-maps-stagecoachbus.s3.ama...016Oct.pdf


Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.

Michael



19,168
07 Oct 2016, 6:11 pm #580
Changes to Services 38 and 39 from Sunday 30 October 2016

https://www.stagecoachbus.com/service-up...:52:45:042

Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.
Michael
07 Oct 2016, 6:11 pm #580

Changes to Services 38 and 39 from Sunday 30 October 2016

https://www.stagecoachbus.com/service-up...:52:45:042


Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.

Pages (131) Previous 128 29 30131 Next
 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average