Menu
 
North East Buses Local Bus Scene Go North East Go North East: Latest News & Discussion - January 2016

Go North East: Latest News & Discussion - January 2016

Go North East: Latest News & Discussion - January 2016

 
  • 2 Vote(s) - 2 Average
 
Pages (37): 1 2 337 Next
01 Jan 2016, 12:15 am #1
Happy New Year!

Forum Moderator  |  Find us on facebook

[Image: 0a85ed5b4e97324e338555472f222830.png]
northern156
01 Jan 2016, 12:15 am #1

Happy New Year!


Forum Moderator  |  Find us on facebook

[Image: 0a85ed5b4e97324e338555472f222830.png]

Michael



19,140
01 Jan 2016, 4:43 pm #2
I don't ever remember the M1 going to Newcastle?


https://www.flickr.com/photos/55509539@N05/24056232476/ - this is from 2009

Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.
Michael
01 Jan 2016, 4:43 pm #2

I don't ever remember the M1 going to Newcastle?


https://www.flickr.com/photos/55509539@N05/24056232476/ - this is from 2009


Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.

BJ10VUS



850
01 Jan 2016, 5:19 pm #3
(01 Jan 2016, 4:43 pm)Michael I don't ever remember the M1 going to Newcastle?

https://www.flickr.com/photos/55509539@N05/24056232476/ - this is from 2009

I think it was for Boxing Day only?
BJ10VUS
01 Jan 2016, 5:19 pm #3

(01 Jan 2016, 4:43 pm)Michael I don't ever remember the M1 going to Newcastle?

https://www.flickr.com/photos/55509539@N05/24056232476/ - this is from 2009

I think it was for Boxing Day only?

01 Jan 2016, 5:20 pm #4
(01 Jan 2016, 5:19 pm)BJ10VUS I think it was for Boxing Day only?

Possibly to try and maintain a link between Washington and Newcastle, if the X1 wasn't in operation?
R852 PRG
01 Jan 2016, 5:20 pm #4

(01 Jan 2016, 5:19 pm)BJ10VUS I think it was for Boxing Day only?

Possibly to try and maintain a link between Washington and Newcastle, if the X1 wasn't in operation?

Michael



19,140
01 Jan 2016, 5:28 pm #5
(01 Jan 2016, 5:19 pm)BJ10VUS I think it was for Boxing Day only?

Not sure, the photo says it was took on January 1, 2009 - although the date could be wrong.

Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.
Michael
01 Jan 2016, 5:28 pm #5

(01 Jan 2016, 5:19 pm)BJ10VUS I think it was for Boxing Day only?

Not sure, the photo says it was took on January 1, 2009 - although the date could be wrong.


Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.

Adrian



9,566
01 Jan 2016, 5:36 pm #6
(01 Jan 2016, 4:43 pm)Michael I don't ever remember the M1 going to Newcastle?


https://www.flickr.com/photos/55509539@N05/24056232476/ - this is from 2009
(01 Jan 2016, 5:19 pm)BJ10VUS I think it was for Boxing Day only?

Boxing Day service iirc. It was before the M1 route was changed to what the 4 is now. 

I don't think 4937 has ever been a Washington bus either.

Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook
Adrian
01 Jan 2016, 5:36 pm #6

(01 Jan 2016, 4:43 pm)Michael I don't ever remember the M1 going to Newcastle?


https://www.flickr.com/photos/55509539@N05/24056232476/ - this is from 2009
(01 Jan 2016, 5:19 pm)BJ10VUS I think it was for Boxing Day only?

Boxing Day service iirc. It was before the M1 route was changed to what the 4 is now. 

I don't think 4937 has ever been a Washington bus either.


Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook

01 Jan 2016, 5:38 pm #7
(01 Jan 2016, 5:36 pm)Adrian Boxing Day service iirc. It was before the M1 route was changed to what the 4 is now. 

I don't think 4937 has ever been a Washington bus either.

Here is a photograph of the M1 (heading to Easington Lane) on Boxing Day 2008, again in the hands of 4937: https://www.flickr.com/photos/emdjt42/43...7ap-nc97kA

Is it possible it was operated by Deptford, given that it later spent a number of years there, branded as ''Fab56''?
R852 PRG
01 Jan 2016, 5:38 pm #7

(01 Jan 2016, 5:36 pm)Adrian Boxing Day service iirc. It was before the M1 route was changed to what the 4 is now. 

I don't think 4937 has ever been a Washington bus either.

Here is a photograph of the M1 (heading to Easington Lane) on Boxing Day 2008, again in the hands of 4937: https://www.flickr.com/photos/emdjt42/43...7ap-nc97kA

Is it possible it was operated by Deptford, given that it later spent a number of years there, branded as ''Fab56''?

Michael



19,140
01 Jan 2016, 5:39 pm #8
(01 Jan 2016, 5:36 pm)Adrian Boxing Day service iirc. It was before the M1 route was changed to what the 4 is now. 

I don't think 4937 has ever been a Washington bus either.

Seems a long time since it was changed to the 4...... its flew over.

Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.
Michael
01 Jan 2016, 5:39 pm #8

(01 Jan 2016, 5:36 pm)Adrian Boxing Day service iirc. It was before the M1 route was changed to what the 4 is now. 

I don't think 4937 has ever been a Washington bus either.

Seems a long time since it was changed to the 4...... its flew over.


Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.

Davie

Banned

2,783
01 Jan 2016, 5:41 pm #9
(01 Jan 2016, 5:36 pm)Adrian I don't think 4937 has ever been a Washington bus either.

Wasn't last boxing day the first ever time Washington (And Stanley) had operated their services? I'm pretty sure Depford used to operate all of Washington's service on boxing day. I know for sure the X1 used to be allocated Prince Bishops Solars, then in 2014 it was allocated Fab 57 B9 (as well as 6099 & 6100) so maybe that might be why?
Davie
01 Jan 2016, 5:41 pm #9

(01 Jan 2016, 5:36 pm)Adrian I don't think 4937 has ever been a Washington bus either.

Wasn't last boxing day the first ever time Washington (And Stanley) had operated their services? I'm pretty sure Depford used to operate all of Washington's service on boxing day. I know for sure the X1 used to be allocated Prince Bishops Solars, then in 2014 it was allocated Fab 57 B9 (as well as 6099 & 6100) so maybe that might be why?

01 Jan 2016, 5:44 pm #10
(01 Jan 2016, 5:41 pm)Davie Wasn't last boxing day the first ever time Washington (And Stanley) had operated their services? I'm pretty sure Depford used to operate all of Washington's service on boxing day. I know for sure the X1 used to be allocated Prince Bishops Solars, then in 2014 it was allocated Fab 57 B9 (as well as 6099 & 6100) so maybe that might be why?

In 2014, the X1 was operated with Deptford-based B9TLs but driven by Washington drivers I believe.
R852 PRG
01 Jan 2016, 5:44 pm #10

(01 Jan 2016, 5:41 pm)Davie Wasn't last boxing day the first ever time Washington (And Stanley) had operated their services? I'm pretty sure Depford used to operate all of Washington's service on boxing day. I know for sure the X1 used to be allocated Prince Bishops Solars, then in 2014 it was allocated Fab 57 B9 (as well as 6099 & 6100) so maybe that might be why?

In 2014, the X1 was operated with Deptford-based B9TLs but driven by Washington drivers I believe.

Dan

Site Administrator

18,099
01 Jan 2016, 5:55 pm #11
(01 Jan 2016, 5:44 pm)R852 PRG In 2014, the X1 was operated with Deptford-based B9TLs but driven by Washington drivers I believe.

Washington drivers may have volunteered to work out of Deptford Depot that day - certainly wasn't just Washington drivers though.
Dan
01 Jan 2016, 5:55 pm #11

(01 Jan 2016, 5:44 pm)R852 PRG In 2014, the X1 was operated with Deptford-based B9TLs but driven by Washington drivers I believe.

Washington drivers may have volunteered to work out of Deptford Depot that day - certainly wasn't just Washington drivers though.

01 Jan 2016, 5:59 pm #12
(01 Jan 2016, 5:55 pm)Dan Washington drivers may have volunteered to work out of Deptford Depot that day - certainly wasn't just Washington drivers though.

Guessing something similar has happened in the past when Chester-le-Street has operated Stanley's services, with Stanley drivers offering to work out of Chester-le-Street depot?
R852 PRG
01 Jan 2016, 5:59 pm #12

(01 Jan 2016, 5:55 pm)Dan Washington drivers may have volunteered to work out of Deptford Depot that day - certainly wasn't just Washington drivers though.

Guessing something similar has happened in the past when Chester-le-Street has operated Stanley's services, with Stanley drivers offering to work out of Chester-le-Street depot?

01 Jan 2016, 6:17 pm #13
Out of interest, is anybody aware of whether or not some special services operated today? I remember the Jewish scholars services that Riverside do operated on New Year's Day last year, using Riverside's Olympians, and then I seem to recall the X40 was in operation with a reduced PVR, and using some ''TEN'' B9TLs. Does anybody know if anything similar has happened today?
R852 PRG
01 Jan 2016, 6:17 pm #13

Out of interest, is anybody aware of whether or not some special services operated today? I remember the Jewish scholars services that Riverside do operated on New Year's Day last year, using Riverside's Olympians, and then I seem to recall the X40 was in operation with a reduced PVR, and using some ''TEN'' B9TLs. Does anybody know if anything similar has happened today?

Dan

Site Administrator

18,099
01 Jan 2016, 6:23 pm #14
(01 Jan 2016, 6:17 pm)R852 PRG Out of interest, is anybody aware of whether or not some special services operated today? I remember the Jewish scholars services that Riverside do operated on New Year's Day last year, using Riverside's Olympians, and then I seem to recall the X40 was in operation with a reduced PVR, and using some ''TEN'' B9TLs. Does anybody know if anything similar has happened today?

The X40 service only operated last year because NUFC were playing at home.

I don't think the 850/851 scholars services operated today, but at least three National Express coaches were travelling up and down the country today.
Dan
01 Jan 2016, 6:23 pm #14

(01 Jan 2016, 6:17 pm)R852 PRG Out of interest, is anybody aware of whether or not some special services operated today? I remember the Jewish scholars services that Riverside do operated on New Year's Day last year, using Riverside's Olympians, and then I seem to recall the X40 was in operation with a reduced PVR, and using some ''TEN'' B9TLs. Does anybody know if anything similar has happened today?

The X40 service only operated last year because NUFC were playing at home.

I don't think the 850/851 scholars services operated today, but at least three National Express coaches were travelling up and down the country today.

01 Jan 2016, 7:26 pm #15
Something that has always seemed to puzzle me is that some of the ''Tyne Tees Express'' B9TLs have red leather headrests on the seating, and some don't. Anybody know why this is?
R852 PRG
01 Jan 2016, 7:26 pm #15

Something that has always seemed to puzzle me is that some of the ''Tyne Tees Express'' B9TLs have red leather headrests on the seating, and some don't. Anybody know why this is?

Davie

Banned

2,783
01 Jan 2016, 7:51 pm #16
(01 Jan 2016, 7:26 pm)R852 PRG Something that has always seemed to puzzle me is that some of the ''Tyne Tees Express'' B9TLs have red leather headrests on the seating, and some don't. Anybody know why this is?

6056 - 6083 also have them.
Davie
01 Jan 2016, 7:51 pm #16

(01 Jan 2016, 7:26 pm)R852 PRG Something that has always seemed to puzzle me is that some of the ''Tyne Tees Express'' B9TLs have red leather headrests on the seating, and some don't. Anybody know why this is?

6056 - 6083 also have them.

01 Jan 2016, 8:12 pm #17
(01 Jan 2016, 7:51 pm)Davie 6056 - 6083 also have them.

That's common knowledge. I'm asking as to why some of the batch that are allocated to the X9/X10 (6043-6048) have the red leather headrests, and some don't. I think the first three (6043-6045) do and the last three (6046-6048) don't, based on my observations, and I'm curious as to why there is an inconsistency.
R852 PRG
01 Jan 2016, 8:12 pm #17

(01 Jan 2016, 7:51 pm)Davie 6056 - 6083 also have them.

That's common knowledge. I'm asking as to why some of the batch that are allocated to the X9/X10 (6043-6048) have the red leather headrests, and some don't. I think the first three (6043-6045) do and the last three (6046-6048) don't, based on my observations, and I'm curious as to why there is an inconsistency.

Davie

Banned

2,783
01 Jan 2016, 8:14 pm #18
(01 Jan 2016, 8:12 pm)R852 PRG That's common knowledge. I'm asking as to why some of the batch that are allocated to the X9/X10 (6043-6048) have the red leather headrests, and some don't. I think the first three (6043-6045) do and the last three (6046-6048) don't, based on my observations, and I'm curious as to why there is an inconsistency.
Maybe they did but then got removed?
Davie
01 Jan 2016, 8:14 pm #18

(01 Jan 2016, 8:12 pm)R852 PRG That's common knowledge. I'm asking as to why some of the batch that are allocated to the X9/X10 (6043-6048) have the red leather headrests, and some don't. I think the first three (6043-6045) do and the last three (6046-6048) don't, based on my observations, and I'm curious as to why there is an inconsistency.
Maybe they did but then got removed?

Adrian



9,566
01 Jan 2016, 8:17 pm #19
(01 Jan 2016, 8:14 pm)Davie Maybe they did but then got removed?

The original question still remains why though. Smile

Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook
Adrian
01 Jan 2016, 8:17 pm #19

(01 Jan 2016, 8:14 pm)Davie Maybe they did but then got removed?

The original question still remains why though. Smile


Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook

01 Jan 2016, 8:18 pm #20
(01 Jan 2016, 8:14 pm)Davie Maybe they did but then got removed?

A photograph of 6048 (which does not currently have red leather headrests) taken when it was new in 2012 shows that it didn't have them then, either: https://www.flickr.com/photos/emdjt42/78...HjG-rMumJ7

Same case with 6046 and 6047. Personally, I couldn't see the sense in removing the headrests... Another thing of note, is that the website states that the ''Tyne Tees Xpress'' has ''luxury seating''. I'm guessing that these headrests are what defines the seating as luxurious? If so, how can the service provide luxury seating when only half of the vehicles branded for the service have them, and the other half are absent of them?
R852 PRG
01 Jan 2016, 8:18 pm #20

(01 Jan 2016, 8:14 pm)Davie Maybe they did but then got removed?

A photograph of 6048 (which does not currently have red leather headrests) taken when it was new in 2012 shows that it didn't have them then, either: https://www.flickr.com/photos/emdjt42/78...HjG-rMumJ7

Same case with 6046 and 6047. Personally, I couldn't see the sense in removing the headrests... Another thing of note, is that the website states that the ''Tyne Tees Xpress'' has ''luxury seating''. I'm guessing that these headrests are what defines the seating as luxurious? If so, how can the service provide luxury seating when only half of the vehicles branded for the service have them, and the other half are absent of them?

Pages (37): 1 2 337 Next
 
  • 2 Vote(s) - 2 Average