Menu
 
North East Buses Local Bus Scene Go North East Go North East: Service Suggestions v2

Go North East: Service Suggestions v2

Go North East: Service Suggestions v2

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
 
Pages (150) Previous 149 50 51150 Next
Rob44



1,514
16 Sep 2020, 2:56 pm #981
(16 Sep 2020, 1:02 pm)ifm001 It's even better when there is no 21 to the business park at all and it is the 22 that they would have needed.

Good point LOL
Rob44
16 Sep 2020, 2:56 pm #981

(16 Sep 2020, 1:02 pm)ifm001 It's even better when there is no 21 to the business park at all and it is the 22 that they would have needed.

Good point LOL

big mac



430
16 Sep 2020, 4:48 pm #982
(16 Sep 2020, 1:02 pm)ifm001 It's even better when there is no 21 to the business park at all and it is the 22 that they would have needed.
There's also the 12 to the Business Park which is a GNE service. Same numbers, just the wrong way round!

Sent from my moto g(8) power lite using Tapatalk
big mac
16 Sep 2020, 4:48 pm #982

(16 Sep 2020, 1:02 pm)ifm001 It's even better when there is no 21 to the business park at all and it is the 22 that they would have needed.
There's also the 12 to the Business Park which is a GNE service. Same numbers, just the wrong way round!

Sent from my moto g(8) power lite using Tapatalk

Storx



4,621
16 Sep 2020, 5:24 pm #983
(16 Sep 2020, 1:11 pm)tcts24 I kinda get the point about the 10A going off the beaten track a tiny bit. But it is a 10A, i.e. not a 10 or 10B. It goes vaguely the same direction and has a slightly different service number, which differnentiates it enough to figure out that like the 10B, it wont go anywhere near Hexam!

The same goes for the X10. It's different, as in it's not a 10 and it's pretty simply to comprehend that may not go to Coulby Newham from Middlesbrough Bus Station - like the 10 does! Expecting anything with a X prefix to take the same route as a similarly numbered non prefixed service is bodering distictly on the anal side.

The 55 and Stagecoach North East service 1's (both of them) present a bigger issue. Does it go to Buddle Road or Slatyford? Seaton Carew or Middlesbrough? Peterlee or Wingate? Where it goes, nobody knows! I have known instances of customers stopping the bus and asking the driver where it's going because they've established it's a 1, but haven't (or couldn't) read the actual destination. If these type of routes were split into a 1 and 2 or 1 and 1A or 55 and 155 or whatever.

I disagree with this personally I don't think any bus company in their own company shouldn't have duplicate numbers with an express and a non express service. It's not a bad assumption to assume an X1 is an express version of their 1, or the X10 is an express version of their 10 (ignoring common sense). Between other operators then fair enough but there's 99 numbers GNE could use (if you want to keep it 2 digits) without having an X1 and 1 and X10 and 10 running from the same bus stations (or nearby).

In terms of the 10, I quite like the way Trent Barton have done it for their 'nines' routes where it's 9.1 and 9.3 (used to be a 9.2 which got scrapped - don't have the gap). Could work well for the 10's 10.1 to Hexham, 10.2 for the 10A and 10.3 for the 10B

In terms of GNE, Arriva and Stagecoach is there any services which have the same number running from the same bus stop / station in Tyne and Wear, can't think of any tbh.
Storx
16 Sep 2020, 5:24 pm #983

(16 Sep 2020, 1:11 pm)tcts24 I kinda get the point about the 10A going off the beaten track a tiny bit. But it is a 10A, i.e. not a 10 or 10B. It goes vaguely the same direction and has a slightly different service number, which differnentiates it enough to figure out that like the 10B, it wont go anywhere near Hexam!

The same goes for the X10. It's different, as in it's not a 10 and it's pretty simply to comprehend that may not go to Coulby Newham from Middlesbrough Bus Station - like the 10 does! Expecting anything with a X prefix to take the same route as a similarly numbered non prefixed service is bodering distictly on the anal side.

The 55 and Stagecoach North East service 1's (both of them) present a bigger issue. Does it go to Buddle Road or Slatyford? Seaton Carew or Middlesbrough? Peterlee or Wingate? Where it goes, nobody knows! I have known instances of customers stopping the bus and asking the driver where it's going because they've established it's a 1, but haven't (or couldn't) read the actual destination. If these type of routes were split into a 1 and 2 or 1 and 1A or 55 and 155 or whatever.

I disagree with this personally I don't think any bus company in their own company shouldn't have duplicate numbers with an express and a non express service. It's not a bad assumption to assume an X1 is an express version of their 1, or the X10 is an express version of their 10 (ignoring common sense). Between other operators then fair enough but there's 99 numbers GNE could use (if you want to keep it 2 digits) without having an X1 and 1 and X10 and 10 running from the same bus stations (or nearby).

In terms of the 10, I quite like the way Trent Barton have done it for their 'nines' routes where it's 9.1 and 9.3 (used to be a 9.2 which got scrapped - don't have the gap). Could work well for the 10's 10.1 to Hexham, 10.2 for the 10A and 10.3 for the 10B

In terms of GNE, Arriva and Stagecoach is there any services which have the same number running from the same bus stop / station in Tyne and Wear, can't think of any tbh.

S813 FVK



6,030
16 Sep 2020, 5:33 pm #984
(16 Sep 2020, 5:24 pm)Storx In terms of GNE, Arriva and Stagecoach is there any services which have the same number running from the same bus stop / station in Tyne and Wear, can't think of any tbh.

X47 at Eldon Square is the one that jumps out at me straight away.
S813 FVK
16 Sep 2020, 5:33 pm #984

(16 Sep 2020, 5:24 pm)Storx In terms of GNE, Arriva and Stagecoach is there any services which have the same number running from the same bus stop / station in Tyne and Wear, can't think of any tbh.

X47 at Eldon Square is the one that jumps out at me straight away.

16 Sep 2020, 5:53 pm #985
(16 Sep 2020, 5:33 pm)S813 FVK X47 at Eldon Square is the one that jumps out at me straight away.

GNE's was the 47 until they insisted on making it X-lines though!
OrangeArrow49
16 Sep 2020, 5:53 pm #985

(16 Sep 2020, 5:33 pm)S813 FVK X47 at Eldon Square is the one that jumps out at me straight away.

GNE's was the 47 until they insisted on making it X-lines though!

V514DFT



2,251
16 Sep 2020, 5:53 pm #986
Dont both the 10s stop at Central Station

Kind Regards
Tez
V514DFT
16 Sep 2020, 5:53 pm #986

Dont both the 10s stop at Central Station


Kind Regards
Tez

16 Sep 2020, 5:55 pm #987
(16 Sep 2020, 5:24 pm)Storx I disagree with this personally I don't think any bus company in their own company shouldn't have duplicate numbers with an express and a non express service. It's not a bad assumption to assume an X1 is an express version of their 1, or the X10 is an express version of their 10 (ignoring common sense). Between other operators then fair enough but there's 99 numbers GNE could use (if you want to keep it 2 digits) without having an X1 and 1 and X10 and 10 running from the same bus stations (or nearby).

In terms of the 10, I quite like the way Trent Barton have done it for their 'nines' routes where it's 9.1 and 9.3 (used to be a 9.2 which got scrapped - don't have the gap). Could work well for the 10's 10.1 to Hexham, 10.2 for the 10A and 10.3 for the 10B

In terms of GNE, Arriva and Stagecoach is there any services which have the same number running from the same bus stop / station in Tyne and Wear, can't think of any tbh.

There used to be the Stagecoach 40 and GNE 40 from Wallsend Interchange. Different stops, but same interchange!

(16 Sep 2020, 5:53 pm)V514DFT Dont both the 10s stop at Central Station

Yes, different stops, but you could argue Central Station is an interchange and served by a 10 from two companies.

Stagecoach 6 and GNE 6 at the Metrocentre, although different stands, could be confusing as they go from the same interchange!
Edited 16 Sep 2020, 5:59 pm by OrangeArrow49.
OrangeArrow49
16 Sep 2020, 5:55 pm #987

(16 Sep 2020, 5:24 pm)Storx I disagree with this personally I don't think any bus company in their own company shouldn't have duplicate numbers with an express and a non express service. It's not a bad assumption to assume an X1 is an express version of their 1, or the X10 is an express version of their 10 (ignoring common sense). Between other operators then fair enough but there's 99 numbers GNE could use (if you want to keep it 2 digits) without having an X1 and 1 and X10 and 10 running from the same bus stations (or nearby).

In terms of the 10, I quite like the way Trent Barton have done it for their 'nines' routes where it's 9.1 and 9.3 (used to be a 9.2 which got scrapped - don't have the gap). Could work well for the 10's 10.1 to Hexham, 10.2 for the 10A and 10.3 for the 10B

In terms of GNE, Arriva and Stagecoach is there any services which have the same number running from the same bus stop / station in Tyne and Wear, can't think of any tbh.

There used to be the Stagecoach 40 and GNE 40 from Wallsend Interchange. Different stops, but same interchange!

(16 Sep 2020, 5:53 pm)V514DFT Dont both the 10s stop at Central Station

Yes, different stops, but you could argue Central Station is an interchange and served by a 10 from two companies.

Stagecoach 6 and GNE 6 at the Metrocentre, although different stands, could be confusing as they go from the same interchange!

Storx



4,621
16 Sep 2020, 6:36 pm #988
(16 Sep 2020, 5:33 pm)S813 FVK X47 at Eldon Square is the one that jumps out at me straight away.

Ah yeah forgot about that one, very recent though.

(16 Sep 2020, 5:55 pm)OrangeArrow49 There used to be the Stagecoach 40 and GNE 40 from Wallsend Interchange. Different stops, but same interchange!


Yes, different stops, but you could argue Central Station is an interchange and served by a 10 from two companies.

Stagecoach 6 and GNE 6 at the Metrocentre, although different stands, could be confusing as they go from the same interchange!

Okay maybe there is a few then Tongue I knew about the two 40's though it's what got me thinking about it. Noticable that it's all caused by GNE.
Storx
16 Sep 2020, 6:36 pm #988

(16 Sep 2020, 5:33 pm)S813 FVK X47 at Eldon Square is the one that jumps out at me straight away.

Ah yeah forgot about that one, very recent though.

(16 Sep 2020, 5:55 pm)OrangeArrow49 There used to be the Stagecoach 40 and GNE 40 from Wallsend Interchange. Different stops, but same interchange!


Yes, different stops, but you could argue Central Station is an interchange and served by a 10 from two companies.

Stagecoach 6 and GNE 6 at the Metrocentre, although different stands, could be confusing as they go from the same interchange!

Okay maybe there is a few then Tongue I knew about the two 40's though it's what got me thinking about it. Noticable that it's all caused by GNE.

big mac



430
16 Sep 2020, 6:38 pm #989
(16 Sep 2020, 6:36 pm)Storx Ah yeah forgot about that one, very recent though.


Okay maybe there is a few then I knew about the two 40's though it's what got me thinking about it. Noticable that it's all caused by GNE.
Probably because Stagecoach have hardly changed any service numbers in decades and GNE change them pretty much every week.

Sent from my moto g(8) power lite using Tapatalk
big mac
16 Sep 2020, 6:38 pm #989

(16 Sep 2020, 6:36 pm)Storx Ah yeah forgot about that one, very recent though.


Okay maybe there is a few then I knew about the two 40's though it's what got me thinking about it. Noticable that it's all caused by GNE.
Probably because Stagecoach have hardly changed any service numbers in decades and GNE change them pretty much every week.

Sent from my moto g(8) power lite using Tapatalk

col87



506
16 Sep 2020, 7:23 pm #990
(16 Sep 2020, 5:33 pm)S813 FVK X47 at Eldon Square is the one that jumps out at me straight away.
Stage coach and Go North East both have a service 10 from Newcastle Central Station.
col87
16 Sep 2020, 7:23 pm #990

(16 Sep 2020, 5:33 pm)S813 FVK X47 at Eldon Square is the one that jumps out at me straight away.
Stage coach and Go North East both have a service 10 from Newcastle Central Station.

col87



506
16 Sep 2020, 8:01 pm #991
A few service suggestions which I think could work some of which I have posted before.

Tyne and Wear

The Angel split into two services, the 21 as it is to Durham but reduced to every 20 minutes with new service 22 running to Chester le Street but running via what I think is called Harlow Green and Wrekenton. Both would combine to give a 10 minute frequency between Newcastle the Angel and Chester Le Street.

Some X22 journeys to extend to Bishop Auckland on a trail basis. Would combine with X21 to give Go North East more services in the Bishop Auckland area.

Service X55

Newcastle to Hartlepool

A new service bringing Go North East back into Hartlepool. Service would be hourly until 7PM. Would operate via Hart Village the A19 Washington and Metro centre.

Service X56

Would operate hourly as an express version of the Fab 56 but will also serve Washington Galleries. Both the X55 and X56 combine to bring an additional half hourly service between Washington and Newcastle. X55 also restores a service between Washington and the metro centre.

Tees Valley and Country Durham.

Service X6 restored to once again serve Hartlepool. This would once again give passengers a service between Hartlepool and Seaham.

Service X7. The X7 will also be restored to operate once again to Middlesbrough. To improve journey times this will no longer serve Seaham and will instead operate direct to Sunderland from Peterlee via Dalton Park.
Passengers can instead use the improved X6 or local indigo services.

New Service X11 Middlesbrough - Bishop Auckland

New Service X11 will once again see a direct service between Middlesbrough and Bishop Auckland.

The service will operate via Teesside Park, Stockton High Street, Norton , North Tees Hospital, Stillington Sedgefield and Ferryhill. The service will operate hourly.
col87
16 Sep 2020, 8:01 pm #991

A few service suggestions which I think could work some of which I have posted before.

Tyne and Wear

The Angel split into two services, the 21 as it is to Durham but reduced to every 20 minutes with new service 22 running to Chester le Street but running via what I think is called Harlow Green and Wrekenton. Both would combine to give a 10 minute frequency between Newcastle the Angel and Chester Le Street.

Some X22 journeys to extend to Bishop Auckland on a trail basis. Would combine with X21 to give Go North East more services in the Bishop Auckland area.

Service X55

Newcastle to Hartlepool

A new service bringing Go North East back into Hartlepool. Service would be hourly until 7PM. Would operate via Hart Village the A19 Washington and Metro centre.

Service X56

Would operate hourly as an express version of the Fab 56 but will also serve Washington Galleries. Both the X55 and X56 combine to bring an additional half hourly service between Washington and Newcastle. X55 also restores a service between Washington and the metro centre.

Tees Valley and Country Durham.

Service X6 restored to once again serve Hartlepool. This would once again give passengers a service between Hartlepool and Seaham.

Service X7. The X7 will also be restored to operate once again to Middlesbrough. To improve journey times this will no longer serve Seaham and will instead operate direct to Sunderland from Peterlee via Dalton Park.
Passengers can instead use the improved X6 or local indigo services.

New Service X11 Middlesbrough - Bishop Auckland

New Service X11 will once again see a direct service between Middlesbrough and Bishop Auckland.

The service will operate via Teesside Park, Stockton High Street, Norton , North Tees Hospital, Stillington Sedgefield and Ferryhill. The service will operate hourly.

LVK 404L



996
16 Sep 2020, 8:33 pm #992
(16 Sep 2020, 5:24 pm)Storx I disagree with this personally I don't think any bus company in their own company shouldn't have duplicate numbers with an express and a non express service. It's not a bad assumption to assume an X1 is an express version of their 1, or the X10 is an express version of their 10 (ignoring common sense). Between other operators then fair enough but there's 99 numbers GNE could use (if you want to keep it 2 digits) without having an X1 and 1 and X10 and 10 running from the same bus stations (or nearby).

In terms of the 10, I quite like the way Trent Barton have done it for their 'nines' routes where it's 9.1 and 9.3 (used to be a 9.2 which got scrapped - don't have the gap). Could work well for the 10's 10.1 to Hexham, 10.2 for the 10A and 10.3 for the 10B

In terms of GNE, Arriva and Stagecoach is there any services which have the same number running from the same bus stop / station in Tyne and Wear, can't think of any tbh.
I think the worst one that was around until recently was in Sunderland with the Stagecoach 8 and the GNE 8 both operating and then for a while GNE had the contract for the evening and Sunday Stagecoach service but still operated the normal GNE 8.   So there was 2 GNE 8s in Sunderland going to different locations.  Least that's rectified now
LVK 404L
16 Sep 2020, 8:33 pm #992

(16 Sep 2020, 5:24 pm)Storx I disagree with this personally I don't think any bus company in their own company shouldn't have duplicate numbers with an express and a non express service. It's not a bad assumption to assume an X1 is an express version of their 1, or the X10 is an express version of their 10 (ignoring common sense). Between other operators then fair enough but there's 99 numbers GNE could use (if you want to keep it 2 digits) without having an X1 and 1 and X10 and 10 running from the same bus stations (or nearby).

In terms of the 10, I quite like the way Trent Barton have done it for their 'nines' routes where it's 9.1 and 9.3 (used to be a 9.2 which got scrapped - don't have the gap). Could work well for the 10's 10.1 to Hexham, 10.2 for the 10A and 10.3 for the 10B

In terms of GNE, Arriva and Stagecoach is there any services which have the same number running from the same bus stop / station in Tyne and Wear, can't think of any tbh.
I think the worst one that was around until recently was in Sunderland with the Stagecoach 8 and the GNE 8 both operating and then for a while GNE had the contract for the evening and Sunday Stagecoach service but still operated the normal GNE 8.   So there was 2 GNE 8s in Sunderland going to different locations.  Least that's rectified now

JP6004



1,833
16 Sep 2020, 9:35 pm #993
(16 Sep 2020, 8:01 pm)col87 A few service suggestions which I think could work some of which I have posted before. 

Tyne and Wear

The Angel split into two services, the 21 as it is to Durham but reduced to every 20 minutes with new service 22 running to Chester le Street but running via what I think is  called Harlow Green and Wrekenton.  Both would combine to give a 10 minute frequency between Newcastle the Angel and Chester Le Street.   

Some X22 journeys to extend to Bishop Auckland on a trail basis. Would combine with X21 to give Go North East more services in the Bishop Auckland area. 

Service X55

Newcastle to Hartlepool

A new service bringing Go North East back into Hartlepool.  Service would be hourly until 7PM.  Would operate via  Hart Village the A19 Washington and Metro centre. 

Service X56

Would operate hourly as an express version of the Fab 56 but will also serve Washington Galleries.  Both the X55 and X56  combine to bring an additional half hourly service between Washington and Newcastle. X55 also restores a service between Washington and the metro centre. 

Tees Valley and Country Durham. 

Service X6 restored to once again serve Hartlepool. This would once again give passengers a service between Hartlepool and Seaham.   

Service X7.  The X7 will also be restored to operate once again to Middlesbrough. To improve journey times this will no longer serve Seaham and will instead operate direct to Sunderland from Peterlee via Dalton Park.   
Passengers can instead use the improved X6 or local indigo services. 

New Service X11 Middlesbrough - Bishop Auckland 

New Service X11 will once again see a direct service between Middlesbrough and Bishop Auckland. 

The service will operate via Teesside Park, Stockton High Street, Norton , North Tees Hospital, Stillington  Sedgefield and Ferryhill.  The service will operate hourly.
21 should be fun, busy enough through low fell. Also there was a reason why the 55 was cut from hartlepool.
JP6004
16 Sep 2020, 9:35 pm #993

(16 Sep 2020, 8:01 pm)col87 A few service suggestions which I think could work some of which I have posted before. 

Tyne and Wear

The Angel split into two services, the 21 as it is to Durham but reduced to every 20 minutes with new service 22 running to Chester le Street but running via what I think is  called Harlow Green and Wrekenton.  Both would combine to give a 10 minute frequency between Newcastle the Angel and Chester Le Street.   

Some X22 journeys to extend to Bishop Auckland on a trail basis. Would combine with X21 to give Go North East more services in the Bishop Auckland area. 

Service X55

Newcastle to Hartlepool

A new service bringing Go North East back into Hartlepool.  Service would be hourly until 7PM.  Would operate via  Hart Village the A19 Washington and Metro centre. 

Service X56

Would operate hourly as an express version of the Fab 56 but will also serve Washington Galleries.  Both the X55 and X56  combine to bring an additional half hourly service between Washington and Newcastle. X55 also restores a service between Washington and the metro centre. 

Tees Valley and Country Durham. 

Service X6 restored to once again serve Hartlepool. This would once again give passengers a service between Hartlepool and Seaham.   

Service X7.  The X7 will also be restored to operate once again to Middlesbrough. To improve journey times this will no longer serve Seaham and will instead operate direct to Sunderland from Peterlee via Dalton Park.   
Passengers can instead use the improved X6 or local indigo services. 

New Service X11 Middlesbrough - Bishop Auckland 

New Service X11 will once again see a direct service between Middlesbrough and Bishop Auckland. 

The service will operate via Teesside Park, Stockton High Street, Norton , North Tees Hospital, Stillington  Sedgefield and Ferryhill.  The service will operate hourly.
21 should be fun, busy enough through low fell. Also there was a reason why the 55 was cut from hartlepool.

16 Sep 2020, 9:57 pm #994
GNE’s route planners have been on acid for a good 30 years. Their network had chopped and changed , and for much of the time , for little benefit. No wonder their service numbers are all over the place. I’ll give you a local Sunderland example - how long will it take for the 33 to be scrapped again (again) !!!!
Economic505
16 Sep 2020, 9:57 pm #994

GNE’s route planners have been on acid for a good 30 years. Their network had chopped and changed , and for much of the time , for little benefit. No wonder their service numbers are all over the place. I’ll give you a local Sunderland example - how long will it take for the 33 to be scrapped again (again) !!!!

V514DFT



2,251
17 Sep 2020, 8:47 am #995
(16 Sep 2020, 6:36 pm)Storx Ah yeah forgot about that one, very recent though.


Okay maybe there is a few then Tongue I knew about the two 40's though it's what got me thinking about it. Noticable that it's all caused by GNE.
That was right up until March, now theres just the Stagecoach 40, but were very close,think GNE 40 stipped at Stand B and Stagecoach 40 was Stand C

Kind Regards
Tez
V514DFT
17 Sep 2020, 8:47 am #995

(16 Sep 2020, 6:36 pm)Storx Ah yeah forgot about that one, very recent though.


Okay maybe there is a few then Tongue I knew about the two 40's though it's what got me thinking about it. Noticable that it's all caused by GNE.
That was right up until March, now theres just the Stagecoach 40, but were very close,think GNE 40 stipped at Stand B and Stagecoach 40 was Stand C


Kind Regards
Tez

17 Sep 2020, 9:12 am #996
Wish they'd do something about metrocentre no direct services from south tyneside, east durham, sunderland or washington & houghton

New Services X2/X2A Sunderland - Southwick - Enterprise Park - Castletown - Waterview Park - Sulgrave - Concord - Washington Galleries - Team Valley (X2A) - Metrocentre - Newcastle
These Services will replace nexus 73, 939 & 939A

Twitter: @ASX_Terranova
Blog: https://asxterranova.home.blog/
ASX_Terranova
17 Sep 2020, 9:12 am #996

Wish they'd do something about metrocentre no direct services from south tyneside, east durham, sunderland or washington & houghton

New Services X2/X2A Sunderland - Southwick - Enterprise Park - Castletown - Waterview Park - Sulgrave - Concord - Washington Galleries - Team Valley (X2A) - Metrocentre - Newcastle
These Services will replace nexus 73, 939 & 939A


Twitter: @ASX_Terranova
Blog: https://asxterranova.home.blog/

tcts24



170
17 Sep 2020, 9:59 am #997
(16 Sep 2020, 5:24 pm)Storx I disagree with this personally I don't think any bus company in their own company shouldn't have duplicate numbers with an express and a non express service. It's not a bad assumption to assume an X1 is an express version of their 1, or the X10 is an express version of their 10 (ignoring common sense). Between other operators then fair enough but there's 99 numbers GNE could use (if you want to keep it 2 digits) without having an X1 and 1 and X10 and 10 running from the same bus stations (or nearby).

In terms of the 10, I quite like the way Trent Barton have done it for their 'nines' routes where it's 9.1 and 9.3 (used to be a 9.2 which got scrapped - don't have the gap). Could work well for the 10's 10.1 to Hexham, 10.2 for the 10A and 10.3 for the 10B

In terms of GNE, Arriva and Stagecoach is there any services which have the same number running from the same bus stop / station in Tyne and Wear, can't think of any tbh.

In 38 years of being alive, at no point do I ever remember assuming 2 different services went to the same places because of similarities in route number. When I was a child, United service 10 from Middlesbrough went to Hartlepool, United and Northern joint service X10 went to Newcastle (as it still does), so it's nothing new.

Route numbers exist for customers to differentiate between what bus goes where. Stood in Sunderland and looking for a bus to Souter Lighthouse, having buses with only a destination of "South Shields" on it's and no number isn't too helpful as they all take seperate routes. As they're numbered either 20, E1, E2, or E6, then it's easy to identify that I'd need to be on the E1 to South Shields. Those four routes could respectively be numbered 974, 74G, EGY74 and D74J and it would would make no difference at all, because I'd still know which bus I'd need to catch to Souter Lighthouse, regardless of whatever route identifier it's displaying.

The use of dots and dashes is novel, but could potentially cause the confusion your trying to avoid between a 1.1 and 11. The use of alphanumeric indentifiers for route variations are more legible on a destination board.

And suggesting that it's "fair enough" for seperate operators to number their routes similarly is bizarre. From my experience of talking to people, the average person on the street can not identify one operator from another. This is especially relevant when dealing with Go-Ahead, who constantly swap and change routes, route numbers, bus colours (both inside and out) and bus types. While you and I can tell the difference, the only non bus spotters that'll care about the two service 8's in Sunderland are those that use them and they will already know whether they need to be on a 8 to Stanley or an 8 to South Hylton. On average, the colour of the bus or who's name is plastered across the side of it won't matter in the slightest and probably won't even get noticed.
tcts24
17 Sep 2020, 9:59 am #997

(16 Sep 2020, 5:24 pm)Storx I disagree with this personally I don't think any bus company in their own company shouldn't have duplicate numbers with an express and a non express service. It's not a bad assumption to assume an X1 is an express version of their 1, or the X10 is an express version of their 10 (ignoring common sense). Between other operators then fair enough but there's 99 numbers GNE could use (if you want to keep it 2 digits) without having an X1 and 1 and X10 and 10 running from the same bus stations (or nearby).

In terms of the 10, I quite like the way Trent Barton have done it for their 'nines' routes where it's 9.1 and 9.3 (used to be a 9.2 which got scrapped - don't have the gap). Could work well for the 10's 10.1 to Hexham, 10.2 for the 10A and 10.3 for the 10B

In terms of GNE, Arriva and Stagecoach is there any services which have the same number running from the same bus stop / station in Tyne and Wear, can't think of any tbh.

In 38 years of being alive, at no point do I ever remember assuming 2 different services went to the same places because of similarities in route number. When I was a child, United service 10 from Middlesbrough went to Hartlepool, United and Northern joint service X10 went to Newcastle (as it still does), so it's nothing new.

Route numbers exist for customers to differentiate between what bus goes where. Stood in Sunderland and looking for a bus to Souter Lighthouse, having buses with only a destination of "South Shields" on it's and no number isn't too helpful as they all take seperate routes. As they're numbered either 20, E1, E2, or E6, then it's easy to identify that I'd need to be on the E1 to South Shields. Those four routes could respectively be numbered 974, 74G, EGY74 and D74J and it would would make no difference at all, because I'd still know which bus I'd need to catch to Souter Lighthouse, regardless of whatever route identifier it's displaying.

The use of dots and dashes is novel, but could potentially cause the confusion your trying to avoid between a 1.1 and 11. The use of alphanumeric indentifiers for route variations are more legible on a destination board.

And suggesting that it's "fair enough" for seperate operators to number their routes similarly is bizarre. From my experience of talking to people, the average person on the street can not identify one operator from another. This is especially relevant when dealing with Go-Ahead, who constantly swap and change routes, route numbers, bus colours (both inside and out) and bus types. While you and I can tell the difference, the only non bus spotters that'll care about the two service 8's in Sunderland are those that use them and they will already know whether they need to be on a 8 to Stanley or an 8 to South Hylton. On average, the colour of the bus or who's name is plastered across the side of it won't matter in the slightest and probably won't even get noticed.

idiot



1,121
17 Sep 2020, 10:05 am #998
(17 Sep 2020, 9:12 am)ASX_Terranova Wish they'd do something about metrocentre no direct services from south tyneside, east durham, sunderland or washington & houghton

New Services X2/X2A Sunderland - Southwick - Enterprise Park - Castletown - Waterview Park - Sulgrave - Concord - Washington Galleries - Team Valley (X2A) -  Metrocentre - Newcastle
These Services will replace nexus 73, 939 & 939A

Nooo means day ticket sales have dropped!
idiot
17 Sep 2020, 10:05 am #998

(17 Sep 2020, 9:12 am)ASX_Terranova Wish they'd do something about metrocentre no direct services from south tyneside, east durham, sunderland or washington & houghton

New Services X2/X2A Sunderland - Southwick - Enterprise Park - Castletown - Waterview Park - Sulgrave - Concord - Washington Galleries - Team Valley (X2A) -  Metrocentre - Newcastle
These Services will replace nexus 73, 939 & 939A

Nooo means day ticket sales have dropped!

Storx



4,621
17 Sep 2020, 10:33 am #999
(17 Sep 2020, 9:59 am)tcts24 In 38 years of being alive, at no point do I ever remember assuming 2 different services went to the same places because of similarities in route number. When I was a child, United service 10 from Middlesbrough went to Hartlepool, United and Northern joint service X10 went to Newcastle (as it still does), so it's nothing new.

Route numbers exist for customers to differentiate between what bus goes where. Stood in Sunderland and looking for a bus to Souter Lighthouse, having buses with only a destination of "South Shields" on it's and no number isn't too helpful as they all take seperate routes. As they're numbered either 20, E1, E2, or E6, then it's easy to identify that I'd need to be on the E1 to South Shields. Those four routes could respectively be numbered 974, 74G, EGY74 and D74J and it would would make no difference at all, because I'd still know which bus I'd need to catch to Souter Lighthouse, regardless of whatever route identifier it's displaying.

The use of dots and dashes is novel, but could potentially cause the confusion your trying to avoid between a 1.1 and 11. The use of alphanumeric indentifiers for route variations are more legible on a destination board.

And suggesting that it's "fair enough" for seperate operators to number their routes similarly is bizarre. From my experience of talking to people, the average person on the street can not identify one operator from another. This is especially relevant when dealing with Go-Ahead, who constantly swap and change routes, route numbers, bus colours (both inside and out) and bus types. While you and I can tell the difference, the only non bus spotters that'll care about the two service 8's in Sunderland are those that use them and they will already know whether they need to be on a 8 to Stanley or an 8 to South Hylton. On average, the colour of the bus or who's name is plastered across the side of it won't matter in the slightest and probably won't even get noticed.

Some people are extremely stupid though and don't bother to read destinations properly. That wasn't a comment directed at you, this was directed at the people who can't read a basic timetable and those who get on a 21 to Chester Le Street and ask if it goes to Durham for 2 examples. There will be some idiots who see X10 and think oh that must be the 10 and it doesn't help when GNE add X's to routes for no reason bar branding reasons (X5, X15, X45, X46, X47). There's enough numbers around there's no need for a 1 and X1, 10 and X10 when it's not needed.

That's a valid point with the 1 and one I didn't think of, maybe only use it where there is no service with the same number so with the 10's it could work.

You misinterpretated the comment on using the same numbers I meant in the sense that in the whole of GNE, numbers shouldn't duplicate anywhere so every route should be different, the same with Arriva Northumbria / North East (they're two different companies as they're not connected) and Stagecoach's each little area nor should there be an express of a bus route has a local service of the same number. There certainly should be no duplicates in the same bus station or town though but the fact GNE have a 57 in Gateshead and Arriva have a 57 in Whitley then there's no issue there as their far enough apart or even the example such as the GNE 47 and Stagecoach X47 in Eldon Square (the two X47's is stupid though). It wouldn't be sensible to ban the same number everywhere in the North East.
Storx
17 Sep 2020, 10:33 am #999

(17 Sep 2020, 9:59 am)tcts24 In 38 years of being alive, at no point do I ever remember assuming 2 different services went to the same places because of similarities in route number. When I was a child, United service 10 from Middlesbrough went to Hartlepool, United and Northern joint service X10 went to Newcastle (as it still does), so it's nothing new.

Route numbers exist for customers to differentiate between what bus goes where. Stood in Sunderland and looking for a bus to Souter Lighthouse, having buses with only a destination of "South Shields" on it's and no number isn't too helpful as they all take seperate routes. As they're numbered either 20, E1, E2, or E6, then it's easy to identify that I'd need to be on the E1 to South Shields. Those four routes could respectively be numbered 974, 74G, EGY74 and D74J and it would would make no difference at all, because I'd still know which bus I'd need to catch to Souter Lighthouse, regardless of whatever route identifier it's displaying.

The use of dots and dashes is novel, but could potentially cause the confusion your trying to avoid between a 1.1 and 11. The use of alphanumeric indentifiers for route variations are more legible on a destination board.

And suggesting that it's "fair enough" for seperate operators to number their routes similarly is bizarre. From my experience of talking to people, the average person on the street can not identify one operator from another. This is especially relevant when dealing with Go-Ahead, who constantly swap and change routes, route numbers, bus colours (both inside and out) and bus types. While you and I can tell the difference, the only non bus spotters that'll care about the two service 8's in Sunderland are those that use them and they will already know whether they need to be on a 8 to Stanley or an 8 to South Hylton. On average, the colour of the bus or who's name is plastered across the side of it won't matter in the slightest and probably won't even get noticed.

Some people are extremely stupid though and don't bother to read destinations properly. That wasn't a comment directed at you, this was directed at the people who can't read a basic timetable and those who get on a 21 to Chester Le Street and ask if it goes to Durham for 2 examples. There will be some idiots who see X10 and think oh that must be the 10 and it doesn't help when GNE add X's to routes for no reason bar branding reasons (X5, X15, X45, X46, X47). There's enough numbers around there's no need for a 1 and X1, 10 and X10 when it's not needed.

That's a valid point with the 1 and one I didn't think of, maybe only use it where there is no service with the same number so with the 10's it could work.

You misinterpretated the comment on using the same numbers I meant in the sense that in the whole of GNE, numbers shouldn't duplicate anywhere so every route should be different, the same with Arriva Northumbria / North East (they're two different companies as they're not connected) and Stagecoach's each little area nor should there be an express of a bus route has a local service of the same number. There certainly should be no duplicates in the same bus station or town though but the fact GNE have a 57 in Gateshead and Arriva have a 57 in Whitley then there's no issue there as their far enough apart or even the example such as the GNE 47 and Stagecoach X47 in Eldon Square (the two X47's is stupid though). It wouldn't be sensible to ban the same number everywhere in the North East.

Andreos1



14,240
17 Sep 2020, 11:23 am #1,000
(17 Sep 2020, 10:33 am)Storx Some people are extremely stupid though and don't bother to read destinations properly. That wasn't a comment directed at you, this was directed at the people who can't read a basic timetable and those who get on a 21 to Chester Le Street and ask if it goes to Durham for 2 examples. There will be some idiots who see X10 and think oh that must be the 10 and it doesn't help when GNE add X's to routes for no reason bar branding reasons (X5, X15, X45, X46, X47). There's enough numbers around there's no need for a 1 and X1, 10 and X10 when it's not needed.

That's a valid point with the 1 and one I didn't think of, maybe only use it where there is no service with the same number so with the 10's it could work.

You misinterpretated the comment on using the same numbers I meant in the sense that in the whole of GNE, numbers shouldn't duplicate anywhere so every route should be different, the same with Arriva Northumbria / North East (they're two different companies as they're not connected) and Stagecoach's each little area nor should there be an express of a bus route has a local service of the same number. There certainly should be no duplicates in the same bus station or town though but the fact GNE have a 57 in Gateshead and Arriva have a 57 in Whitley then there's no issue there as their far enough apart or even the example such as the GNE 47 and Stagecoach X47 in Eldon Square (the two X47's is stupid though). It wouldn't be sensible to ban the same number everywhere in the North East.

This 'simplification' and consolidation of service numbers for GNE came about in the 2006 changes.
No idea whether they thought that those changes would be the final ones, ever. But there were some trends/patterns initially.
However, as those revisions were revised again (and again), then the numbers have fallen out of sync.
Using your examples previously, there did seem some sort of common ground with the 35, 36, X35 and X36. That seems to have gone out of the window now, with those services having a random hotchpotch of numbers covering sections of the routes.
Not sure who benefits at all. 

Conversely, there were that many revisions to some numbers, passengers probably didn't have a clue where a certain service was going from one week to the next. Without checking, I can think of 3 southern variations of termination points for the 36 (I think they were Low Moorsley, Rainton Bridge and Chester le Street). I can't even begin to think how many northern variations of the route there was. Shields, Sunderland, Castletown and Town End Farm (possibly?) as terminating points is a start

'Illegitimis non carborundum'
Andreos1
17 Sep 2020, 11:23 am #1,000

(17 Sep 2020, 10:33 am)Storx Some people are extremely stupid though and don't bother to read destinations properly. That wasn't a comment directed at you, this was directed at the people who can't read a basic timetable and those who get on a 21 to Chester Le Street and ask if it goes to Durham for 2 examples. There will be some idiots who see X10 and think oh that must be the 10 and it doesn't help when GNE add X's to routes for no reason bar branding reasons (X5, X15, X45, X46, X47). There's enough numbers around there's no need for a 1 and X1, 10 and X10 when it's not needed.

That's a valid point with the 1 and one I didn't think of, maybe only use it where there is no service with the same number so with the 10's it could work.

You misinterpretated the comment on using the same numbers I meant in the sense that in the whole of GNE, numbers shouldn't duplicate anywhere so every route should be different, the same with Arriva Northumbria / North East (they're two different companies as they're not connected) and Stagecoach's each little area nor should there be an express of a bus route has a local service of the same number. There certainly should be no duplicates in the same bus station or town though but the fact GNE have a 57 in Gateshead and Arriva have a 57 in Whitley then there's no issue there as their far enough apart or even the example such as the GNE 47 and Stagecoach X47 in Eldon Square (the two X47's is stupid though). It wouldn't be sensible to ban the same number everywhere in the North East.

This 'simplification' and consolidation of service numbers for GNE came about in the 2006 changes.
No idea whether they thought that those changes would be the final ones, ever. But there were some trends/patterns initially.
However, as those revisions were revised again (and again), then the numbers have fallen out of sync.
Using your examples previously, there did seem some sort of common ground with the 35, 36, X35 and X36. That seems to have gone out of the window now, with those services having a random hotchpotch of numbers covering sections of the routes.
Not sure who benefits at all. 

Conversely, there were that many revisions to some numbers, passengers probably didn't have a clue where a certain service was going from one week to the next. Without checking, I can think of 3 southern variations of termination points for the 36 (I think they were Low Moorsley, Rainton Bridge and Chester le Street). I can't even begin to think how many northern variations of the route there was. Shields, Sunderland, Castletown and Town End Farm (possibly?) as terminating points is a start


'Illegitimis non carborundum'

Pages (150) Previous 149 50 51150 Next
 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average