29 Dec 2016, 11:34 am
#531
(29 Dec 2016, 11:19 am)eezypeazy Usual sweeping statements from Andreos without evidence...
Glad to see you're still following me, though!
I would copy and paste a link from the Hexham Courant, but the site isn't letting me paste it.
Just from earlier this year, there are quotes from a councillor in Hexham who isn't happy at the withdrawal of runs on the 682.
Despite requests to open communication with the operator, it appears his attempts were fruitless.
Speaking personally, I'm not too keen on the response from the operator representative either mind...
I am guessing that is what you mean when you state that there is a usual sweeping statement without evidence. It was a pretty vague response you provided. Hopefully this clarifies things for you?
You're going to have to clarify the 'following' line. Slightly worrying that you are being followed mind...
'Illegitimis non carborundum'
