Menu
 
North East Buses Local Bus Scene Go North East Go North East: Latest News & Discussion - February 2020

Go North East: Latest News & Discussion - February 2020

Go North East: Latest News & Discussion - February 2020

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
 
Pages (15) Previous 111 12 1315 Next
S830OFT



1,395
23 Feb 2020, 3:01 pm #221
What's happening with 6905 - 6909 when the new E400s arrive?


S830OFT
23 Feb 2020, 3:01 pm #221

What's happening with 6905 - 6909 when the new E400s arrive?



Michael



19,158
23 Feb 2020, 3:22 pm #222
(23 Feb 2020, 3:01 pm)S830OFT What's happening with 6905 - 6909 when the new E400s arrive?

Probables stay, i think 6905-6909 are for contracted services, the Red Arrow B9's are getting the Euro 6 upgrade so they'll be allocated on services which enter Newcastle.

Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.
Michael
23 Feb 2020, 3:22 pm #222

(23 Feb 2020, 3:01 pm)S830OFT What's happening with 6905 - 6909 when the new E400s arrive?

Probables stay, i think 6905-6909 are for contracted services, the Red Arrow B9's are getting the Euro 6 upgrade so they'll be allocated on services which enter Newcastle.


Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.

23 Feb 2020, 8:09 pm #223
(23 Feb 2020, 6:49 pm)Dan In terms of a bus, I don't think there's anything out there on the market that's suitable for the X9/X10 that won't require replacement after a few years. In recent years, Go North East have had 5-litre, 7-litre and 9-litre engined buses running on these routes, and all after a few years have started facing reliability issues.

It's not too bad a business model to have - run buses for a few years on the X9/X10 then replace them once they start having issues (cascading onto less demanding routes). Ensures X9/X10 always stay at the forefront of innovation and other services reap the benefits too.

The only thing that could feasibly operate the X9/X10 services without issue would be interdeck coaches, which are a) very expensive, and b) unsuitable for the 'local' sections of the route.

Realistically I don't think Go North East would be considering replacement of these buses this year if it wasn't for the Newcastle CAZ coming into effect from January 2021. It's unusual to see more than one of these buses off the road, and now there's two dedicated spare buses (6334 & 6335), one would presume the allocation of single-deck buses will be a lot less frequent.

Continuing on from the discussion over on the Arriva discussion...

You mention that they wouldn't be considering replacement if it wasn't for the CAZ, am I right in thinking that would that be because the B5s will need replaced shortly anyway and it makes more sense financially to update them early to cascade the B5s elsewhere rather than update other routes that need it with new vehicles and be stuck with the B5s once they're replaced later down the line?
streetdeckfan
23 Feb 2020, 8:09 pm #223

(23 Feb 2020, 6:49 pm)Dan In terms of a bus, I don't think there's anything out there on the market that's suitable for the X9/X10 that won't require replacement after a few years. In recent years, Go North East have had 5-litre, 7-litre and 9-litre engined buses running on these routes, and all after a few years have started facing reliability issues.

It's not too bad a business model to have - run buses for a few years on the X9/X10 then replace them once they start having issues (cascading onto less demanding routes). Ensures X9/X10 always stay at the forefront of innovation and other services reap the benefits too.

The only thing that could feasibly operate the X9/X10 services without issue would be interdeck coaches, which are a) very expensive, and b) unsuitable for the 'local' sections of the route.

Realistically I don't think Go North East would be considering replacement of these buses this year if it wasn't for the Newcastle CAZ coming into effect from January 2021. It's unusual to see more than one of these buses off the road, and now there's two dedicated spare buses (6334 & 6335), one would presume the allocation of single-deck buses will be a lot less frequent.

Continuing on from the discussion over on the Arriva discussion...

You mention that they wouldn't be considering replacement if it wasn't for the CAZ, am I right in thinking that would that be because the B5s will need replaced shortly anyway and it makes more sense financially to update them early to cascade the B5s elsewhere rather than update other routes that need it with new vehicles and be stuck with the B5s once they're replaced later down the line?

cbma06



2,669
23 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm #224
(23 Feb 2020, 8:09 pm)streetdeckfan Continuing on from the discussion over on the Arriva discussion...

You mention that they wouldn't be considering replacement if it wasn't for the CAZ, am I right in thinking that would that be because the B5s will need replaced shortly anyway and it makes more sense financially to update them early to cascade the B5s elsewhere rather than update other routes that need it with new vehicles and be stuck with the B5s once they're replaced later down the line?


When new buses arrive for the X9/X10 , The B5s from the X9/X10 supposedly be going on the X84/X85 and rebranded as Xlines


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


cbma06
23 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm #224

(23 Feb 2020, 8:09 pm)streetdeckfan Continuing on from the discussion over on the Arriva discussion...

You mention that they wouldn't be considering replacement if it wasn't for the CAZ, am I right in thinking that would that be because the B5s will need replaced shortly anyway and it makes more sense financially to update them early to cascade the B5s elsewhere rather than update other routes that need it with new vehicles and be stuck with the B5s once they're replaced later down the line?


When new buses arrive for the X9/X10 , The B5s from the X9/X10 supposedly be going on the X84/X85 and rebranded as Xlines


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



23 Feb 2020, 9:13 pm #225
(23 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm)cbma06 When new buses arrive for the X9/X10 , The B5s from the X9/X10 supposedly be going on the X84/X85 and rebranded as Xlines


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That was my thinking.
There's honestly no reason to upgrade the B5s just yet (as much as I hate them), but the Citaros will need to go soon because of the CAZ, and if the B5s will need to be replaced in the next few years anyway because of the mileage, replacing them early and cascading them to another route which needs Euro 6 and is less demanding makes a lot of sense.
streetdeckfan
23 Feb 2020, 9:13 pm #225

(23 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm)cbma06 When new buses arrive for the X9/X10 , The B5s from the X9/X10 supposedly be going on the X84/X85 and rebranded as Xlines


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That was my thinking.
There's honestly no reason to upgrade the B5s just yet (as much as I hate them), but the Citaros will need to go soon because of the CAZ, and if the B5s will need to be replaced in the next few years anyway because of the mileage, replacing them early and cascading them to another route which needs Euro 6 and is less demanding makes a lot of sense.

S830OFT



1,395
23 Feb 2020, 9:41 pm #226
Will the Red Arrows B9s be reallocated to the Crusader? Also if they don't get enough Euro 6 vehicles avaible, would it be a possibility to revise the 26 to be Gateshead to Shields only, with the 27 only crossing to Newcastle. End result reducing the PVR by 1.


S830OFT
23 Feb 2020, 9:41 pm #226

Will the Red Arrows B9s be reallocated to the Crusader? Also if they don't get enough Euro 6 vehicles avaible, would it be a possibility to revise the 26 to be Gateshead to Shields only, with the 27 only crossing to Newcastle. End result reducing the PVR by 1.



23 Feb 2020, 9:45 pm #227
(23 Feb 2020, 9:41 pm)S830OFT Will the Red Arrows B9s be reallocated to the Crusader? Also if they don't get enough Euro 6 vehicles avaible, would it be a possibility to revise the 26 to be Gateshead to Shields only, with the 27 only crossing to Newcastle. End result reducing the PVR by 1.

Isn't Gateshead Interchange covered under the CAZ as well?
streetdeckfan
23 Feb 2020, 9:45 pm #227

(23 Feb 2020, 9:41 pm)S830OFT Will the Red Arrows B9s be reallocated to the Crusader? Also if they don't get enough Euro 6 vehicles avaible, would it be a possibility to revise the 26 to be Gateshead to Shields only, with the 27 only crossing to Newcastle. End result reducing the PVR by 1.

Isn't Gateshead Interchange covered under the CAZ as well?

Dan

Site Administrator

18,114
23 Feb 2020, 9:46 pm #228
(23 Feb 2020, 9:45 pm)streetdeckfan Isn't Gateshead Interchange covered under the CAZ as well?


No, just Newcastle City Centre.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dan
23 Feb 2020, 9:46 pm #228

(23 Feb 2020, 9:45 pm)streetdeckfan Isn't Gateshead Interchange covered under the CAZ as well?


No, just Newcastle City Centre.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

23 Feb 2020, 9:48 pm #229
(23 Feb 2020, 9:46 pm)Dan No, just Newcastle City Centre.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm sure it was in one of the previous proposals, either that or my memory is worse than I thought!
streetdeckfan
23 Feb 2020, 9:48 pm #229

(23 Feb 2020, 9:46 pm)Dan No, just Newcastle City Centre.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm sure it was in one of the previous proposals, either that or my memory is worse than I thought!

23 Feb 2020, 11:37 pm #230
The proposals have undergone many changes since they were first announced.

Please feel free to visit my Flickr page - https://www.flickr.com/photos/gjm-photogenic/
Who needs heroes anyway? Villians have more fun.
Rapidsnap
23 Feb 2020, 11:37 pm #230

The proposals have undergone many changes since they were first announced.


Please feel free to visit my Flickr page - https://www.flickr.com/photos/gjm-photogenic/
Who needs heroes anyway? Villians have more fun.

Big O



124
24 Feb 2020, 12:18 am #231
DB300s in my experience are very good at handling heavy-duty work, its just the DPF filters can get clogged up quite a bit (I know it's not in production anymore). I agree the B5TL isn't good for motorway work or any high-speed interval work, 240HP and the 918nm of torque just doesn't cut it. Couple that with all the equipment onboard, tables and passengers, it will stress the vehicle when loaded thus providing a laden feeling ride.

Problem is now with all the weight-saving dribble and lower emissions ect, vehicles are nowhere what they used to be. It's a false economy as vehicles are now less reliable and need replacing/upgrading sooner.
Big O
24 Feb 2020, 12:18 am #231

DB300s in my experience are very good at handling heavy-duty work, its just the DPF filters can get clogged up quite a bit (I know it's not in production anymore). I agree the B5TL isn't good for motorway work or any high-speed interval work, 240HP and the 918nm of torque just doesn't cut it. Couple that with all the equipment onboard, tables and passengers, it will stress the vehicle when loaded thus providing a laden feeling ride.

Problem is now with all the weight-saving dribble and lower emissions ect, vehicles are nowhere what they used to be. It's a false economy as vehicles are now less reliable and need replacing/upgrading sooner.

Dan

Site Administrator

18,114
24 Feb 2020, 5:57 am #232
(23 Feb 2020, 9:48 pm)streetdeckfan I'm sure it was in one of the previous proposals, either that or my memory is worse than I thought!

(23 Feb 2020, 11:37 pm)Rapidsnap The proposals have undergone many changes since they were first announced.

Indeed, the original CAZ was much larger (and indeed went further into Gateshead). Effectively the 'border' is now any of the bridges:
https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/nor...k-17266448

So to answer the original question - yes, if an operator was inclined to do so, they could terminate a service at Gateshead rather than run it into Newcastle, to avoid a £50 charge if the vehicle is non-compliant. It wouldn't really be in the operator's interests to do this as the majority of its passengers are in Newcastle, but there are a fair few peak-time journeys which run on/off scholars or other services which don't usually operate into Newcastle, so either these will need to be upgraded to Euro 6, or they won't run as they do currently.
Dan
24 Feb 2020, 5:57 am #232

(23 Feb 2020, 9:48 pm)streetdeckfan I'm sure it was in one of the previous proposals, either that or my memory is worse than I thought!

(23 Feb 2020, 11:37 pm)Rapidsnap The proposals have undergone many changes since they were first announced.

Indeed, the original CAZ was much larger (and indeed went further into Gateshead). Effectively the 'border' is now any of the bridges:
https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/nor...k-17266448

So to answer the original question - yes, if an operator was inclined to do so, they could terminate a service at Gateshead rather than run it into Newcastle, to avoid a £50 charge if the vehicle is non-compliant. It wouldn't really be in the operator's interests to do this as the majority of its passengers are in Newcastle, but there are a fair few peak-time journeys which run on/off scholars or other services which don't usually operate into Newcastle, so either these will need to be upgraded to Euro 6, or they won't run as they do currently.

24 Feb 2020, 8:44 am #233
Does anyone know what 999 Depot is tracking as on the 310
Citaro5338
24 Feb 2020, 8:44 am #233

Does anyone know what 999 Depot is tracking as on the 310

24 Feb 2020, 11:44 am #234
(23 Feb 2020, 9:41 pm)S830OFT Will the Red Arrows B9s be reallocated to the Crusader? Also if they don't get enough Euro 6 vehicles avaible, would it be a possibility to revise the 26 to be Gateshead to Shields only, with the 27 only crossing to Newcastle. End result reducing the PVR by 1.
I thought the 6/12/12A would be a good shout for Red arrow B9s , However a rumour has it that 5463-5480 are going on crusaders and deptford to get the citaros
Citaro5326
24 Feb 2020, 11:44 am #234

(23 Feb 2020, 9:41 pm)S830OFT Will the Red Arrows B9s be reallocated to the Crusader? Also if they don't get enough Euro 6 vehicles avaible, would it be a possibility to revise the 26 to be Gateshead to Shields only, with the 27 only crossing to Newcastle. End result reducing the PVR by 1.
I thought the 6/12/12A would be a good shout for Red arrow B9s , However a rumour has it that 5463-5480 are going on crusaders and deptford to get the citaros

24 Feb 2020, 2:30 pm #235
How long has 5453 had that vinyl on the bottom of the front windscreen?
It looks bloody horrendous!

Sent from my LM-G710 using Tapatalk
streetdeckfan
24 Feb 2020, 2:30 pm #235

How long has 5453 had that vinyl on the bottom of the front windscreen?
It looks bloody horrendous!

Sent from my LM-G710 using Tapatalk

24 Feb 2020, 2:57 pm #236
(24 Feb 2020, 2:30 pm)streetdeckfan How long has 5453 had that vinyl on the bottom of the front windscreen?
It looks bloody horrendous!

Sent from my LM-G710 using Tapatalk

What vinyl?
BeachBoy99
24 Feb 2020, 2:57 pm #236

(24 Feb 2020, 2:30 pm)streetdeckfan How long has 5453 had that vinyl on the bottom of the front windscreen?
It looks bloody horrendous!

Sent from my LM-G710 using Tapatalk

What vinyl?

24 Feb 2020, 3:22 pm #237
(24 Feb 2020, 2:57 pm)BeachBoy99 What vinyl?
I believe it is a promo for the £1.20 child ticket. We were driving past it and it stuck out like a big yellow sticker on a red bus!
Although, I suppose that's the point since I looked at it!

Sent from my LM-G710 using Tapatalk
streetdeckfan
24 Feb 2020, 3:22 pm #237

(24 Feb 2020, 2:57 pm)BeachBoy99 What vinyl?
I believe it is a promo for the £1.20 child ticket. We were driving past it and it stuck out like a big yellow sticker on a red bus!
Although, I suppose that's the point since I looked at it!

Sent from my LM-G710 using Tapatalk

Jimmi



10,969
24 Feb 2020, 3:29 pm #238
(24 Feb 2020, 2:30 pm)streetdeckfan How long has 5453 had that vinyl on the bottom of the front windscreen?
It looks bloody horrendous!

Sent from my LM-G710 using Tapatalk
Think a few buses have recieved promos on the front windscreens over the last few days, saw a few buses going round with a yellow vinyl advertising something under the destination screen on Saturday
Jimmi
24 Feb 2020, 3:29 pm #238

(24 Feb 2020, 2:30 pm)streetdeckfan How long has 5453 had that vinyl on the bottom of the front windscreen?
It looks bloody horrendous!

Sent from my LM-G710 using Tapatalk
Think a few buses have recieved promos on the front windscreens over the last few days, saw a few buses going round with a yellow vinyl advertising something under the destination screen on Saturday

LVK 404L



993
24 Feb 2020, 3:40 pm #239
(24 Feb 2020, 11:44 am)Citaro5326 I thought the 6/12/12A would be a good shout for Red arrow B9s , However a rumour has it that 5463-5480 are going on crusaders and deptford to get the citaros
Hope we are not going from a suggestion of upgrading the Crusader to double deck and then going downhill by 'upgrading' to a streetlite instead.
LVK 404L
24 Feb 2020, 3:40 pm #239

(24 Feb 2020, 11:44 am)Citaro5326 I thought the 6/12/12A would be a good shout for Red arrow B9s , However a rumour has it that 5463-5480 are going on crusaders and deptford to get the citaros
Hope we are not going from a suggestion of upgrading the Crusader to double deck and then going downhill by 'upgrading' to a streetlite instead.

Kuyoyo



6,853
24 Feb 2020, 3:52 pm #240
(24 Feb 2020, 11:44 am)Citaro5326 I thought the 6/12/12A would be a good shout for Red arrow B9s , However a rumour has it that 5463-5480 are going on crusaders and deptford to get the citaros

(24 Feb 2020, 3:40 pm)ifm001 Hope we are not going from a suggestion of upgrading the Crusader to double deck and then going downhill by 'upgrading' to a streetlite instead.

More than likely see the B9s go on the Crusader (even though there's not enough on the Red Arrows to cover the PVR) than them going on 6/12/12A - not withstanding that they would have to change what the evening 6A/X30s would work off given the B9s are too tall for the Bridge in Dunston on the X30.....
Kuyoyo
24 Feb 2020, 3:52 pm #240

(24 Feb 2020, 11:44 am)Citaro5326 I thought the 6/12/12A would be a good shout for Red arrow B9s , However a rumour has it that 5463-5480 are going on crusaders and deptford to get the citaros

(24 Feb 2020, 3:40 pm)ifm001 Hope we are not going from a suggestion of upgrading the Crusader to double deck and then going downhill by 'upgrading' to a streetlite instead.

More than likely see the B9s go on the Crusader (even though there's not enough on the Red Arrows to cover the PVR) than them going on 6/12/12A - not withstanding that they would have to change what the evening 6A/X30s would work off given the B9s are too tall for the Bridge in Dunston on the X30.....

Pages (15) Previous 111 12 1315 Next
 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average