Classic Coaches/TGM Group
Classic Coaches/TGM Group
Classic operate a bingo run from dawdon to gilesgate which could be a solo, dart, decker or coach. Its numbered 365 if I remember rightly.
Your bus is based at hetton and is part of yourbus heanor (nottingham). 3 electric hybrid solos and numerous levante coaches on national express contracts.
(06 Aug 2013, 2:33 pm)danpick what buses have classic used on the 900 during the mlc
(06 Aug 2013, 2:33 pm)danpick what buses have classic used on the 900 during the mlc
TGM Classic have had their 100 seat Volvo B9TL on the Metro replacement running from the stop near the Civic Centre today.
EDIT. Now with photo http://www.flickr.com/photos/98641142@N08/9457698508/
Section 5.3 – Notice of Transport Manager Public Inquiries to be Held
TM Public Inquiry (EpisodeId:1776 PublicInquiryId:1128) for IAN RAYMOND SHIPLEY to be held at Hillcrest House Hillcrest House 386 Harehills Lane Leeds LS9 6NF, on 09 September 2013 commencing at 10:30 (Previous Publication6093))
Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009
Section 5.3 – Notice of Transport Manager Public Inquiries to be Held
TM Public Inquiry (EpisodeId:1776 PublicInquiryId:1128) for IAN RAYMOND SHIPLEY to be held at Hillcrest House Hillcrest House 386 Harehills Lane Leeds LS9 6NF, on 09 September 2013 commencing at 10:30 (Previous Publication
Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009
Forum Moderator | Let us know if you have any issues
Service Manager, Coatham Connect
Classic have been using a mix of their DLA fleet, S236JUA and T312/13/17/18/19/20FGN, T421GGO on Metro Replacement, plus Volvo B9TL LJ58GCF saw use in the first week, plus one day last week.
Forum Moderator | Let us know if you have any issues
Service Manager, Coatham Connect
(30 Aug 2013, 8:53 am)AdamY Would this be the same Ian Shipley who runs Classic?
Conditions relating to the requirement of good repute
1. Subject to paragraph 2 of this Article, Member States shall determine the conditions to be met by undertakings and trans port managers in order to satisfy the requirement of good repute laid down in Article 3(1)(b).
In determining whether an undertaking has satisfied that require ment, Member States shall consider the conduct of the undertak ing, its transport managers and any other relevant person as may be determined by the Member State. Any reference in this Article to convictions, penalties or infringements shall include convic tions, penalties or infringements of the undertaking itself, its transport managers and any other relevant person as may be determined by the Member State.
The conditions referred to in the first subparagraph shall include at least the following:
of establishment shall carry out in an appropriate and timely manner a duly completed administrative procedure, which shall include, if appropriate, a check at the premises of the undertaking concerned.
The procedure shall determine whether, due to specific cir cumstances, the loss of good repute would constitute a dis proportionate response in the individual case. Any such finding shall be duly reasoned and justified.
If the competent authority finds that the loss of good repute would constitute a disproportionate response, it may decide that good repute is unaffected. In such case, the reasons shall be recorded in the national register. The number of such deci sions shall be indicated in the report referred to in Article 26(1).
If the competent authority does not find that the loss of good repute would constitute a disproportionate response, the conviction or penalty shall lead to the loss of good repute;
(b) the Commission shall draw up a list of categories, types and degrees of seriousness of serious infringements of Commu nity rules which, in addition to those set out in Annex IV, may lead to the loss of good repute. Member States shall take into account information on those infringements, including information received from other Member States, when set ting the priorities for checks pursuant to Article 12(1).
Those measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Regulation by supplementing it and which relate to this list, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 25(3).
To this end, the Commission shall:
(i) lay down the categories and types of infringement which are most frequently encountered;
(ii) define the degree of seriousness of infringements accord ing to their potential to create a risk of fatalities or seri ous injuries; and
(iii) provide the frequency of occurrence beyond which repeated infringements shall be regarded as more seri ous, by taking into account the number of drivers used for the transport activities managed by the transport manager.
3. The requirement laid down in Article 3(1)(b) shall not be satisfied until a rehabilitation measure or any other measure hav ing an equivalent effect has been taken pursuant to the relevant provisions of national law.
(a)
that there be no compelling grounds for doubting the good repute of the transport manager or the transport undertak ing, such as convictions or penalties for any serious infringe ment of national rules in force in the fields of:
(i) commercial law;
(ii) insolvency law;
(iii) pay and employment conditions in the profession;
(iv) road traffic;
(v) professional liability;
(vi) trafficking in human beings or drugs; and
that the transport manager or the transport undertaking have not in one or more Member States been convicted of a seri ous criminal offence or incurred a penalty for a serious infringement of Community rules relating in particular to:
(i) the driving time and rest periods of drivers, working time and the installation and use of recording equipment;
(ii) the maximum weights and dimensions of commercial vehicles used in international traffic;
(iii) the initial qualification and continuous training of drivers;
(iv) the roadworthiness of commercial vehicles, including the compulsory technical inspection of motor vehicles;
(v) access to the market in international road haulage or, as appropriate, access to the market in road passenger transport;
(vi) safety in the carriage of dangerous goods by road;
(vii) the installation and use of speed-limiting devices in cer tain categories of vehicle;
(viii) driving licences;
(ix) admission to the occupation;
(x) animal transport.
(b)
2.
paragraph 1:
For the purposes of point (b) of the third subparagraph of
(a) where the transport manager or the transport undertaking has in one or more Member States been convicted of a seri ous criminal offence or incurred a penalty for one of the most serious infringements of Community rules as set out in Annex IV, the competent authority of the Member State
of establishment shall carry out in an appropriate and timely manner a duly completed administrative procedure, which shall include, if appropriate, a check at the premises of the undertaking concerned.
The procedure shall determine whether, due to specific cir cumstances, the loss of good repute would constitute a dis proportionate response in the individual case. Any such finding shall be duly reasoned and justified.
If the competent authority finds that the loss of good repute would constitute a disproportionate response, it may decide that good repute is unaffected. In such case, the reasons shall be recorded in the national register. The number of such deci sions shall be indicated in the report referred to in Article 26(1).
If the competent authority does not find that the loss of good repute would constitute a disproportionate response, the conviction or penalty shall lead to the loss of good repute;
(b) the Commission shall draw up a list of categories, types and degrees of seriousness of serious infringements of Commu nity rules which, in addition to those set out in Annex IV, may lead to the loss of good repute. Member States shall take into account information on those infringements, including information received from other Member States, when set ting the priorities for checks pursuant to Article 12(1).
Those measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Regulation by supplementing it and which relate to this list, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 25(3).
To this end, the Commission shall:
(i) lay down the categories and types of infringement which are most frequently encountered;
(ii) define the degree of seriousness of infringements accord ing to their potential to create a risk of fatalities or seri ous injuries; and
(iii) provide the frequency of occurrence beyond which repeated infringements shall be regarded as more seri ous, by taking into account the number of drivers used for the transport activities managed by the transport manager.
3. The requirement laid down in Article 3(1)(b) shall not be satisfied until a rehabilitation measure or any other measure hav ing an equivalent effect has been taken pursuant to the relevant provisions of national law.
(30 Aug 2013, 8:53 am)AdamY Would this be the same Ian Shipley who runs Classic?
Conditions relating to the requirement of good repute
1. Subject to paragraph 2 of this Article, Member States shall determine the conditions to be met by undertakings and trans port managers in order to satisfy the requirement of good repute laid down in Article 3(1)(b).
In determining whether an undertaking has satisfied that require ment, Member States shall consider the conduct of the undertak ing, its transport managers and any other relevant person as may be determined by the Member State. Any reference in this Article to convictions, penalties or infringements shall include convic tions, penalties or infringements of the undertaking itself, its transport managers and any other relevant person as may be determined by the Member State.
The conditions referred to in the first subparagraph shall include at least the following:
of establishment shall carry out in an appropriate and timely manner a duly completed administrative procedure, which shall include, if appropriate, a check at the premises of the undertaking concerned.
The procedure shall determine whether, due to specific cir cumstances, the loss of good repute would constitute a dis proportionate response in the individual case. Any such finding shall be duly reasoned and justified.
If the competent authority finds that the loss of good repute would constitute a disproportionate response, it may decide that good repute is unaffected. In such case, the reasons shall be recorded in the national register. The number of such deci sions shall be indicated in the report referred to in Article 26(1).
If the competent authority does not find that the loss of good repute would constitute a disproportionate response, the conviction or penalty shall lead to the loss of good repute;
(b) the Commission shall draw up a list of categories, types and degrees of seriousness of serious infringements of Commu nity rules which, in addition to those set out in Annex IV, may lead to the loss of good repute. Member States shall take into account information on those infringements, including information received from other Member States, when set ting the priorities for checks pursuant to Article 12(1).
Those measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Regulation by supplementing it and which relate to this list, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 25(3).
To this end, the Commission shall:
(i) lay down the categories and types of infringement which are most frequently encountered;
(ii) define the degree of seriousness of infringements accord ing to their potential to create a risk of fatalities or seri ous injuries; and
(iii) provide the frequency of occurrence beyond which repeated infringements shall be regarded as more seri ous, by taking into account the number of drivers used for the transport activities managed by the transport manager.
3. The requirement laid down in Article 3(1)(b) shall not be satisfied until a rehabilitation measure or any other measure hav ing an equivalent effect has been taken pursuant to the relevant provisions of national law.
(a)
that there be no compelling grounds for doubting the good repute of the transport manager or the transport undertak ing, such as convictions or penalties for any serious infringe ment of national rules in force in the fields of:
(i) commercial law;
(ii) insolvency law;
(iii) pay and employment conditions in the profession;
(iv) road traffic;
(v) professional liability;
(vi) trafficking in human beings or drugs; and
that the transport manager or the transport undertaking have not in one or more Member States been convicted of a seri ous criminal offence or incurred a penalty for a serious infringement of Community rules relating in particular to:
(i) the driving time and rest periods of drivers, working time and the installation and use of recording equipment;
(ii) the maximum weights and dimensions of commercial vehicles used in international traffic;
(iii) the initial qualification and continuous training of drivers;
(iv) the roadworthiness of commercial vehicles, including the compulsory technical inspection of motor vehicles;
(v) access to the market in international road haulage or, as appropriate, access to the market in road passenger transport;
(vi) safety in the carriage of dangerous goods by road;
(vii) the installation and use of speed-limiting devices in cer tain categories of vehicle;
(viii) driving licences;
(ix) admission to the occupation;
(x) animal transport.
(b)
2.
paragraph 1:
For the purposes of point (b) of the third subparagraph of
(a) where the transport manager or the transport undertaking has in one or more Member States been convicted of a seri ous criminal offence or incurred a penalty for one of the most serious infringements of Community rules as set out in Annex IV, the competent authority of the Member State
of establishment shall carry out in an appropriate and timely manner a duly completed administrative procedure, which shall include, if appropriate, a check at the premises of the undertaking concerned.
The procedure shall determine whether, due to specific cir cumstances, the loss of good repute would constitute a dis proportionate response in the individual case. Any such finding shall be duly reasoned and justified.
If the competent authority finds that the loss of good repute would constitute a disproportionate response, it may decide that good repute is unaffected. In such case, the reasons shall be recorded in the national register. The number of such deci sions shall be indicated in the report referred to in Article 26(1).
If the competent authority does not find that the loss of good repute would constitute a disproportionate response, the conviction or penalty shall lead to the loss of good repute;
(b) the Commission shall draw up a list of categories, types and degrees of seriousness of serious infringements of Commu nity rules which, in addition to those set out in Annex IV, may lead to the loss of good repute. Member States shall take into account information on those infringements, including information received from other Member States, when set ting the priorities for checks pursuant to Article 12(1).
Those measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Regulation by supplementing it and which relate to this list, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 25(3).
To this end, the Commission shall:
(i) lay down the categories and types of infringement which are most frequently encountered;
(ii) define the degree of seriousness of infringements accord ing to their potential to create a risk of fatalities or seri ous injuries; and
(iii) provide the frequency of occurrence beyond which repeated infringements shall be regarded as more seri ous, by taking into account the number of drivers used for the transport activities managed by the transport manager.
3. The requirement laid down in Article 3(1)(b) shall not be satisfied until a rehabilitation measure or any other measure hav ing an equivalent effect has been taken pursuant to the relevant provisions of national law.
Just been reading Notices and Proceedings Publication No 2158 dated 20 September 2013. Section 5.2 Decisions taken at Public Inquiries states that TGM have been issued with a formal warning and had their authorisation reduced from 65 vehicles to 50.
Does anyone know the reason for the Public Inquiry?
(27 Sep 2013, 3:18 pm)GuyParkRoyal Just been reading Notices and Proceedings Publication No 2158 dated 20 September 2013. Section 5.2 Decisions taken at Public Inquiries states that TGM have been issued with a formal warning and had their authorisation reduced from 65 vehicles to 50.
Does anyone know the reason for the Public Inquiry?
(27 Sep 2013, 3:18 pm)GuyParkRoyal Just been reading Notices and Proceedings Publication No 2158 dated 20 September 2013. Section 5.2 Decisions taken at Public Inquiries states that TGM have been issued with a formal warning and had their authorisation reduced from 65 vehicles to 50.
Does anyone know the reason for the Public Inquiry?
(27 Sep 2013, 3:53 pm)Andreos1 Anything to do with the conversation on here in late August?
(27 Sep 2013, 3:53 pm)Andreos1 Anything to do with the conversation on here in late August?
(27 Sep 2013, 5:46 pm)GuyParkRoyal It appears to be a separate issue to the one in the August conversation having said that the item from August is covered in another section of the report that was issued on 20th September. The result in the case of Mr Shipley was "Repute not lost under article 6 of the Regulation".
(27 Sep 2013, 5:46 pm)GuyParkRoyal It appears to be a separate issue to the one in the August conversation having said that the item from August is covered in another section of the report that was issued on 20th September. The result in the case of Mr Shipley was "Repute not lost under article 6 of the Regulation".
Waiting for the Q2 (GNE) from Haymarket today around 430ish, A red Arriva branded London decker ALX 400 (which I think is a Classic Bus, not sure) pulled up into the Q2 stop and let off a crowd load of people, the display on the side said 'Racecorse to Haymarket' however when he went to reverse, the bus wouldnt reverse. The Q2 stopped at the stop next to it, however the Classic bus was sat there for a good 10minutes and as I left, The Arriva staff in the Haymarket couldnt help him put it into reverse, I noticed he kept lowering the bus and bringing it back up for some reason, The Q2 driver wasnt best pleased haha, especially with the match being on.
Anyone know if It had broken down and how long it was there, It was there when i Left.
(30 Nov 2013, 10:04 pm)Ely1992 Waiting for the Q2 (GNE) from Haymarket today around 430ish, A red Arriva branded London decker ALX 400 (which I think is a Classic Bus, not sure) pulled up into the Q2 stop and let off a crowd load of people, the display on the side said 'Racecorse to Haymarket' however when he went to reverse, the bus wouldnt reverse. The Q2 stopped at the stop next to it, however the Classic bus was sat there for a good 10minutes and as I left, The Arriva staff in the Haymarket couldnt help him put it into reverse, I noticed he kept lowering the bus and bringing it back up for some reason, The Q2 driver wasnt best pleased haha, especially with the match being on.
Anyone know if It had broken down and how long it was there, It was there when i Left.
Forum Moderator | Let us know if you have any issues
Service Manager, Coatham Connect
(30 Nov 2013, 10:04 pm)Ely1992 Waiting for the Q2 (GNE) from Haymarket today around 430ish, A red Arriva branded London decker ALX 400 (which I think is a Classic Bus, not sure) pulled up into the Q2 stop and let off a crowd load of people, the display on the side said 'Racecorse to Haymarket' however when he went to reverse, the bus wouldnt reverse. The Q2 stopped at the stop next to it, however the Classic bus was sat there for a good 10minutes and as I left, The Arriva staff in the Haymarket couldnt help him put it into reverse, I noticed he kept lowering the bus and bringing it back up for some reason, The Q2 driver wasnt best pleased haha, especially with the match being on.
Anyone know if It had broken down and how long it was there, It was there when i Left.
Forum Moderator | Let us know if you have any issues
Service Manager, Coatham Connect
(30 Nov 2013, 11:09 pm)tyresmoke They do the Newcastle Racecourse shuttle buses, didn't realise they did one to Haymarket though (is that new?) - they used to just do Regent Centre and Four Lane Ends...
(30 Nov 2013, 11:09 pm)tyresmoke They do the Newcastle Racecourse shuttle buses, didn't realise they did one to Haymarket though (is that new?) - they used to just do Regent Centre and Four Lane Ends...
(01 Dec 2013, 1:29 am)Ely1992 Yeah 100% it said that, was quiet shocked when Im standing waiting for the Quaylink and that pulled up packed with Arriva all over it.
Forum Moderator | Let us know if you have any issues
Service Manager, Coatham Connect
