Menu
 
North East Buses Local Bus Scene Go North East Enviro 400MMC's for the X10

Enviro 400MMC's for the X10

Enviro 400MMC's for the X10

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
 
Pages (19) Previous 18 9 1019 Next
col87



506
30 Dec 2021, 1:54 am #161
I not sure Go north east really know what they are doing here. I have used the X10 a few times this year and seen it at Dalton Park while waiting for 23 a few times and it always seems busy.
I agree as well I don’t like the coaches have been on it at different with both my friend and my daughter and it was agreed they are just awful and not very good for people with disabilities so I welcome the return to double deck buses as will several other people. So I don’t think getting rid of the X9 and reducing the service to every hour is a good idea as I can see it getting capacity before it even gets to Stockton or Heworth. They really need to rethink this.
col87
30 Dec 2021, 1:54 am #161

I not sure Go north east really know what they are doing here. I have used the X10 a few times this year and seen it at Dalton Park while waiting for 23 a few times and it always seems busy.
I agree as well I don’t like the coaches have been on it at different with both my friend and my daughter and it was agreed they are just awful and not very good for people with disabilities so I welcome the return to double deck buses as will several other people. So I don’t think getting rid of the X9 and reducing the service to every hour is a good idea as I can see it getting capacity before it even gets to Stockton or Heworth. They really need to rethink this.

30 Dec 2021, 2:27 am #162
(30 Dec 2021, 1:54 am)col87 I not sure Go north east really know what they are doing here. I have used the X10 a few times this year and seen it at Dalton Park while waiting for 23 a few times and it always seems busy.
I agree as well I don’t like the coaches have been on it at different with both my friend and my daughter and it was agreed they are just awful and not very good for people with disabilities so I welcome the return to double deck buses as will several other people. So I don’t think getting rid of the X9 and reducing the service to every hour is a good idea as I can see it getting capacity before it even gets to Stockton or Heworth. They really need to rethink this.
They can always up the frequency back to half hourly if needed, but don't the E400s have a higher capacity than the coaches?

Sent from my AC2003 using Tapatalk
streetdeckfan
30 Dec 2021, 2:27 am #162

(30 Dec 2021, 1:54 am)col87 I not sure Go north east really know what they are doing here. I have used the X10 a few times this year and seen it at Dalton Park while waiting for 23 a few times and it always seems busy.
I agree as well I don’t like the coaches have been on it at different with both my friend and my daughter and it was agreed they are just awful and not very good for people with disabilities so I welcome the return to double deck buses as will several other people. So I don’t think getting rid of the X9 and reducing the service to every hour is a good idea as I can see it getting capacity before it even gets to Stockton or Heworth. They really need to rethink this.
They can always up the frequency back to half hourly if needed, but don't the E400s have a higher capacity than the coaches?

Sent from my AC2003 using Tapatalk

Bus3888



11
30 Dec 2021, 2:30 am #163
(30 Dec 2021, 2:27 am)streetdeckfan They can always up the frequency back to half hourly if needed, but don't the E400s have a higher capacity than the coaches?

Sent from my AC2003 using Tapatalk
They might be able to...but what would they use there isn't enough spare same spec E400's
Bus3888
30 Dec 2021, 2:30 am #163

(30 Dec 2021, 2:27 am)streetdeckfan They can always up the frequency back to half hourly if needed, but don't the E400s have a higher capacity than the coaches?

Sent from my AC2003 using Tapatalk
They might be able to...but what would they use there isn't enough spare same spec E400's

6049



259
30 Dec 2021, 2:42 am #164
(30 Dec 2021, 2:27 am)streetdeckfan They can always up the frequency back to half hourly if needed, but don't the E400s have a higher capacity than the coaches?

Sent from my AC2003 using Tapatalk
66 seated capacity on coaches going off the fleet list, while the E400s have 73.

It's not unheard-of for dupes to be put on when high passenger loads are expected, such as match days.

Sent from my SM-G981B using Tapatalk

(30 Dec 2021, 2:30 am)Bus3888 They might be able to...but what would they use there isn't enough spare same spec E400's
6377 will no doubt be the spare. I'm sure GNE will love to have the headache of sourcing buses for an increase in the PVR if demand returns.

Sent from my SM-G981B using Tapatalk
Edited 30 Dec 2021, 2:43 am by 6049.
6049
30 Dec 2021, 2:42 am #164

(30 Dec 2021, 2:27 am)streetdeckfan They can always up the frequency back to half hourly if needed, but don't the E400s have a higher capacity than the coaches?

Sent from my AC2003 using Tapatalk
66 seated capacity on coaches going off the fleet list, while the E400s have 73.

It's not unheard-of for dupes to be put on when high passenger loads are expected, such as match days.

Sent from my SM-G981B using Tapatalk

(30 Dec 2021, 2:30 am)Bus3888 They might be able to...but what would they use there isn't enough spare same spec E400's
6377 will no doubt be the spare. I'm sure GNE will love to have the headache of sourcing buses for an increase in the PVR if demand returns.

Sent from my SM-G981B using Tapatalk

30 Dec 2021, 2:51 am #165
(30 Dec 2021, 2:30 am)Bus3888 They might be able to...but what would they use there isn't enough spare same spec E400's

I'm too lazy to scroll back up and read, but isn't there talks about there being other spare E400s? Maybe I'm wrong though

(30 Dec 2021, 2:42 am)6049 66 seated capacity on coaches going off the fleet list, while the E400s have 73.

It's not unheard-of for dupes to be put on when high passenger loads are expected, such as match days.

Sent from my SM-G981B using Tapatalk

So that puts them at around 55% of the seated capacity per hour. However, if we include standing, then it's at 80% of the total previous capacity, which I believe is around where passenger numbers are at compared to pre-covid.
I'd guess that for the X10, it's probably somewhere around 50% of pre-covid numbers for them to be willing to drop the capacity by that much. And, to be fair, whenever I've used the X9/X10 with the coaches, I've never seen it more than half full!
streetdeckfan
30 Dec 2021, 2:51 am #165

(30 Dec 2021, 2:30 am)Bus3888 They might be able to...but what would they use there isn't enough spare same spec E400's

I'm too lazy to scroll back up and read, but isn't there talks about there being other spare E400s? Maybe I'm wrong though

(30 Dec 2021, 2:42 am)6049 66 seated capacity on coaches going off the fleet list, while the E400s have 73.

It's not unheard-of for dupes to be put on when high passenger loads are expected, such as match days.

Sent from my SM-G981B using Tapatalk

So that puts them at around 55% of the seated capacity per hour. However, if we include standing, then it's at 80% of the total previous capacity, which I believe is around where passenger numbers are at compared to pre-covid.
I'd guess that for the X10, it's probably somewhere around 50% of pre-covid numbers for them to be willing to drop the capacity by that much. And, to be fair, whenever I've used the X9/X10 with the coaches, I've never seen it more than half full!

Bus3888



11
30 Dec 2021, 2:56 am #166
(30 Dec 2021, 2:51 am)streetdeckfan I'm too lazy to scroll back up and read, but isn't there talks about there being other spare E400s? Maybe I'm wrong though


So that puts them at around 55% of the seated capacity per hour. However, if we include standing, then it's at 80% of the total previous capacity, which I believe is around where passenger numbers are at compared to pre-covid.
I'd guess that for the X10, it's probably somewhere around 50% of pre-covid numbers for them to be willing to drop the capacity by that much. And, to be fair, whenever I've used the X9/X10 with the coaches, I've never seen it more than half full!
I was at Gateshead the other week and X10 stand was packed (friday night) and the 19:10 or 19:20 apparently was full. And Spare E400 I think 6338-6340 are but they have different tables, you could use 6337/6377/6335.
Bus3888
30 Dec 2021, 2:56 am #166

(30 Dec 2021, 2:51 am)streetdeckfan I'm too lazy to scroll back up and read, but isn't there talks about there being other spare E400s? Maybe I'm wrong though


So that puts them at around 55% of the seated capacity per hour. However, if we include standing, then it's at 80% of the total previous capacity, which I believe is around where passenger numbers are at compared to pre-covid.
I'd guess that for the X10, it's probably somewhere around 50% of pre-covid numbers for them to be willing to drop the capacity by that much. And, to be fair, whenever I've used the X9/X10 with the coaches, I've never seen it more than half full!
I was at Gateshead the other week and X10 stand was packed (friday night) and the 19:10 or 19:20 apparently was full. And Spare E400 I think 6338-6340 are but they have different tables, you could use 6337/6377/6335.

LeeCalder



1,928
30 Dec 2021, 9:35 am #167
(30 Dec 2021, 1:54 am)col87 I not sure Go north east really know what they are doing here. I have used the X10 a few times this year and seen it at Dalton Park while waiting for 23 a few times and it always seems busy. 
I agree as well I don’t like the coaches have been on it at different with both my friend and my daughter and it was agreed they are just awful and not very good for people with disabilities so I welcome the return to double deck buses as will several other people. So I don’t think getting rid of the X9 and reducing the service to every hour is a good idea as I can see it getting capacity before it even gets to Stockton or Heworth.  They really need to rethink this.

I really don't think that's a fair comment which looks at the bigger picture. That's an isolated example of one journey or a few journeys.

Surely Go North East know how many people are travelling on each service, and what capacity is required?
LeeCalder
30 Dec 2021, 9:35 am #167

(30 Dec 2021, 1:54 am)col87 I not sure Go north east really know what they are doing here. I have used the X10 a few times this year and seen it at Dalton Park while waiting for 23 a few times and it always seems busy. 
I agree as well I don’t like the coaches have been on it at different with both my friend and my daughter and it was agreed they are just awful and not very good for people with disabilities so I welcome the return to double deck buses as will several other people. So I don’t think getting rid of the X9 and reducing the service to every hour is a good idea as I can see it getting capacity before it even gets to Stockton or Heworth.  They really need to rethink this.

I really don't think that's a fair comment which looks at the bigger picture. That's an isolated example of one journey or a few journeys.

Surely Go North East know how many people are travelling on each service, and what capacity is required?

L469 YVK



3,552
30 Dec 2021, 10:11 am #168
With 'both' 6336 & 37 soon to be now available as Consett spares, 6338-40 with a slight fleet re-jigg (to ensure suitable Euro 6 spares at Consett) could be deployed should demand increase to ever re-introduce the X9 in the future. That however is a long way off.

6377 or a B9TL will likely stand in as a spare should any of 6352-55 become unavailable.
L469 YVK
30 Dec 2021, 10:11 am #168

With 'both' 6336 & 37 soon to be now available as Consett spares, 6338-40 with a slight fleet re-jigg (to ensure suitable Euro 6 spares at Consett) could be deployed should demand increase to ever re-introduce the X9 in the future. That however is a long way off.

6377 or a B9TL will likely stand in as a spare should any of 6352-55 become unavailable.

Train8261



1,016
30 Dec 2021, 10:42 am #169
(30 Dec 2021, 10:11 am)L469 YVK With 'both' 6336 & 37 soon to be now available as Consett spares, 6338-40 with a slight fleet re-jigg (to ensure suitable Euro 6 spares at Consett) could be deployed should demand increase to ever re-introduce the X9 in the future. That however is a long way off.

6377 or a B9TL will likely stand in as a spare should any of 6352-55 become unavailable.
Nah I think the X9 is done for. It's been withdrawn way to many times now and so might as well keep it withdrawn
Train8261
30 Dec 2021, 10:42 am #169

(30 Dec 2021, 10:11 am)L469 YVK With 'both' 6336 & 37 soon to be now available as Consett spares, 6338-40 with a slight fleet re-jigg (to ensure suitable Euro 6 spares at Consett) could be deployed should demand increase to ever re-introduce the X9 in the future. That however is a long way off.

6377 or a B9TL will likely stand in as a spare should any of 6352-55 become unavailable.
Nah I think the X9 is done for. It's been withdrawn way to many times now and so might as well keep it withdrawn

Jimmi



10,971
30 Dec 2021, 10:59 am #170
(30 Dec 2021, 10:42 am)Train8261 Nah I think the X9 is done for. It's been withdrawn way to many times now and so might as well keep it withdrawn
X9 could maybe return one day but if it were to happen it won't be any time soon, be years down the line by which time everything will have been moved around and services changed a hundred times so its pointless suggesting such and such a bus will go on a service that ain't returning any time soon.

I think X84 (684) will be stuck with Versas, especially if my theory that the 684 will interwork with the 680/688 turns out to be true or at very least until whenever the new tenders for the Hexham services are awarded.
Jimmi
30 Dec 2021, 10:59 am #170

(30 Dec 2021, 10:42 am)Train8261 Nah I think the X9 is done for. It's been withdrawn way to many times now and so might as well keep it withdrawn
X9 could maybe return one day but if it were to happen it won't be any time soon, be years down the line by which time everything will have been moved around and services changed a hundred times so its pointless suggesting such and such a bus will go on a service that ain't returning any time soon.

I think X84 (684) will be stuck with Versas, especially if my theory that the 684 will interwork with the 680/688 turns out to be true or at very least until whenever the new tenders for the Hexham services are awarded.

MurdnunoC



3,975
30 Dec 2021, 11:33 am #171
(30 Dec 2021, 10:11 am)L469 YVK With 'both' 6336 & 37 soon to be now available as Consett spares, 6338-40 with a slight fleet re-jigg (to ensure suitable Euro 6 spares at Consett) could be deployed should demand increase to ever re-introduce the X9 in the future. That however is a long way off.

6377 or a B9TL will likely stand in as a spare should any of 6352-55 become unavailable.

How would you re-jig them?

Is there anything else you would repaint if the opportunity presented itself?
MurdnunoC
30 Dec 2021, 11:33 am #171

(30 Dec 2021, 10:11 am)L469 YVK With 'both' 6336 & 37 soon to be now available as Consett spares, 6338-40 with a slight fleet re-jigg (to ensure suitable Euro 6 spares at Consett) could be deployed should demand increase to ever re-introduce the X9 in the future. That however is a long way off.

6377 or a B9TL will likely stand in as a spare should any of 6352-55 become unavailable.

How would you re-jig them?

Is there anything else you would repaint if the opportunity presented itself?

L469 YVK



3,552
30 Dec 2021, 12:08 pm #172
(30 Dec 2021, 11:33 am)MurdnunoC How would you re-jig them?

Is there anything else you would repaint if the opportunity presented itself?
All Consett would need is 6336/37 (which they've got) plus 2-3 other Euro 6 deckers (don't need to be low height) as spares and that would then release 6338-40
L469 YVK
30 Dec 2021, 12:08 pm #172

(30 Dec 2021, 11:33 am)MurdnunoC How would you re-jig them?

Is there anything else you would repaint if the opportunity presented itself?
All Consett would need is 6336/37 (which they've got) plus 2-3 other Euro 6 deckers (don't need to be low height) as spares and that would then release 6338-40

Bus3888



11
30 Dec 2021, 12:42 pm #173
(30 Dec 2021, 12:08 pm)L469 YVK All Consett would need is 6336/37 (which they've got) plus 2-3 other Euro 6 deckers (don't need to be low height) as spares and that would then release 6338-40
But the 6338-40 are slightly lower spec, table wise they don't have the pull out tables. I know it is minor but. Also I think 6377 and 6337 would be a good spares, however I was on it i can't remember when using 6335 on both the X10 and X21 and it seems to be working really well with the motor ways so that could be a option.
Bus3888
30 Dec 2021, 12:42 pm #173

(30 Dec 2021, 12:08 pm)L469 YVK All Consett would need is 6336/37 (which they've got) plus 2-3 other Euro 6 deckers (don't need to be low height) as spares and that would then release 6338-40
But the 6338-40 are slightly lower spec, table wise they don't have the pull out tables. I know it is minor but. Also I think 6377 and 6337 would be a good spares, however I was on it i can't remember when using 6335 on both the X10 and X21 and it seems to be working really well with the motor ways so that could be a option.

mb134



4,151
30 Dec 2021, 2:32 pm #174
(30 Dec 2021, 12:42 pm)Bus3888 But the 6338-40 are slightly lower spec, table wise they don't have the pull out tables. I know it is minor but. Also I think 6377 and 6337 would be a good spares, however I was on it i can't remember when using 6335 on both the X10 and X21 and it seems to be working really well with the motor ways so that could be a option.

Are you just plucking random fleet numbers out the air at this stage? Three completely different vehicle types there, one of which has already proven itself to be a poor choice on the route you're suggesting it covers for...
mb134
30 Dec 2021, 2:32 pm #174

(30 Dec 2021, 12:42 pm)Bus3888 But the 6338-40 are slightly lower spec, table wise they don't have the pull out tables. I know it is minor but. Also I think 6377 and 6337 would be a good spares, however I was on it i can't remember when using 6335 on both the X10 and X21 and it seems to be working really well with the motor ways so that could be a option.

Are you just plucking random fleet numbers out the air at this stage? Three completely different vehicle types there, one of which has already proven itself to be a poor choice on the route you're suggesting it covers for...

L469 YVK



3,552
30 Dec 2021, 2:45 pm #175
(30 Dec 2021, 2:32 pm)mb134 Are you just plucking random fleet numbers out the air at this stage? Three completely different vehicle types there, one of which has already proven itself to be a poor choice on the route you're suggesting it covers for...
I agree. Irrespective of minor differences, 6338-40 would likely be the natural choice if they decided to bring back the X9.

Spares, 6377 or a B9TL is more than fine for that given purpose.
L469 YVK
30 Dec 2021, 2:45 pm #175

(30 Dec 2021, 2:32 pm)mb134 Are you just plucking random fleet numbers out the air at this stage? Three completely different vehicle types there, one of which has already proven itself to be a poor choice on the route you're suggesting it covers for...
I agree. Irrespective of minor differences, 6338-40 would likely be the natural choice if they decided to bring back the X9.

Spares, 6377 or a B9TL is more than fine for that given purpose.

30 Dec 2021, 5:17 pm #176
(30 Dec 2021, 12:08 pm)L469 YVK All Consett would need is 6336/37 (which they've got) plus 2-3 other Euro 6 deckers (don't need to be low height) as spares and that would then release 6338-40
we lost 6337 as that went to act as the spare bus for the X84/85.

We are gaining Under Euro 6 Buses such as the B5LH's and losing Streetdecks from 6302-7. probably gonna lose 6301. However i have seen on bustimes.org that we (Consett) may be keeping 3963, the Volvo B7TL Wright Gemini as it was caught doing the Red Kite Ranger 47 to Consett. However, this could of been a ticketer swap.
we will have lost all of our Charcoal spares.
6336 - Possibly to be a spare for the X10
6337 - Spare for the X84/85
6376 - Washington General Spare
6377 - Chester-Le-Street for the X21.

Would be ideal to have 6334 & 5 to trial on the Red Kite Ranger 47/47A or the X-Lines X45 & X46 or really just become a General Spare to see how they would run on the routes they were gonna be apart of in the original X-Lines Investment plan.

Consett could do with some ''New'' Spare buses like Optare Versas or 2005/6 Reg Geminis like 3963 if they were allocated onto the 16/16A or X5/X15. So that Euro 5 Buses can still work on longer whilst avoiding LEZ's Such as Newcastle's soon. But obviously its not gonna very easy to strategize for what depot get's what bus as Go North East have got to look at which Vehicles need to go where like the movement of 6942 the Ex GAL Plaxton President which can do the Odd 56 so it would need either moved or stay at Deptford but can't do the CityRider 56. Another example of the Scania Omnicitys which had to be moved to Riverside to replace the Euro 5 Wright Streetlites but then they will have to work out what buses can replace those Omnicitys when they are withdrawn along with the Omnidekkas by 2023 if that is still the plan.

i know i went off topic there but it is about how to plan vehicle movement's and what routes they are allowed on. It cant be that bus you want come to your depot as it would need Strict allocations so like the Euro 4 Voyager Scania N270UD OmniDekkas which will have to become a spare for the 26/50 as it will not be allowed to Enter Newcastle for free and it will have to be the route GNE takes to pay to have their Under Euro 6 Vehicles in Newcastle for about 10 Minutes or so for them to leave and then repeat that process when it comes back which will cost more. So thats why buses like the former Coaster B5LH's got took off the Coaster 1 and got replaced by the Daimler Euro 6 Streetlites as the B5's are Euro 5 and like i said the Streetlites are Euro 6. Its not that GNE don't like the bus on the route its that they need to prepare for the LEZ.
KingSlayerRBLX
30 Dec 2021, 5:17 pm #176

(30 Dec 2021, 12:08 pm)L469 YVK All Consett would need is 6336/37 (which they've got) plus 2-3 other Euro 6 deckers (don't need to be low height) as spares and that would then release 6338-40
we lost 6337 as that went to act as the spare bus for the X84/85.

We are gaining Under Euro 6 Buses such as the B5LH's and losing Streetdecks from 6302-7. probably gonna lose 6301. However i have seen on bustimes.org that we (Consett) may be keeping 3963, the Volvo B7TL Wright Gemini as it was caught doing the Red Kite Ranger 47 to Consett. However, this could of been a ticketer swap.
we will have lost all of our Charcoal spares.
6336 - Possibly to be a spare for the X10
6337 - Spare for the X84/85
6376 - Washington General Spare
6377 - Chester-Le-Street for the X21.

Would be ideal to have 6334 & 5 to trial on the Red Kite Ranger 47/47A or the X-Lines X45 & X46 or really just become a General Spare to see how they would run on the routes they were gonna be apart of in the original X-Lines Investment plan.

Consett could do with some ''New'' Spare buses like Optare Versas or 2005/6 Reg Geminis like 3963 if they were allocated onto the 16/16A or X5/X15. So that Euro 5 Buses can still work on longer whilst avoiding LEZ's Such as Newcastle's soon. But obviously its not gonna very easy to strategize for what depot get's what bus as Go North East have got to look at which Vehicles need to go where like the movement of 6942 the Ex GAL Plaxton President which can do the Odd 56 so it would need either moved or stay at Deptford but can't do the CityRider 56. Another example of the Scania Omnicitys which had to be moved to Riverside to replace the Euro 5 Wright Streetlites but then they will have to work out what buses can replace those Omnicitys when they are withdrawn along with the Omnidekkas by 2023 if that is still the plan.

i know i went off topic there but it is about how to plan vehicle movement's and what routes they are allowed on. It cant be that bus you want come to your depot as it would need Strict allocations so like the Euro 4 Voyager Scania N270UD OmniDekkas which will have to become a spare for the 26/50 as it will not be allowed to Enter Newcastle for free and it will have to be the route GNE takes to pay to have their Under Euro 6 Vehicles in Newcastle for about 10 Minutes or so for them to leave and then repeat that process when it comes back which will cost more. So thats why buses like the former Coaster B5LH's got took off the Coaster 1 and got replaced by the Daimler Euro 6 Streetlites as the B5's are Euro 5 and like i said the Streetlites are Euro 6. Its not that GNE don't like the bus on the route its that they need to prepare for the LEZ.

L469 YVK



3,552
30 Dec 2021, 5:32 pm #177
(30 Dec 2021, 5:17 pm)KingSlayerRBLX we lost 6337 as that went to act as the spare bus for the X84/85.

We are gaining Under Euro 6 Buses such as the B5LH's and losing Streetdecks from 6302-7. probably gonna lose 6301. However i have seen on bustimes.org that we (Consett) may be keeping 3963, the Volvo B7TL Wright Gemini as it was caught doing the Red Kite Ranger 47 to Consett. However, this could of been a ticketer swap.
we will have lost all of our Charcoal spares.
6336 - Possibly to be a spare for the X10
6337 - Spare for the X84/85
6376 - Washington General Spare
6377 - Chester-Le-Street for the X21.

Would be ideal to have 6334 & 5 to trial on the Red Kite Ranger 47/47A or the X-Lines X45 & X46 or really just become a General Spare to see how they would run on the routes they were gonna be apart of in the original X-Lines Investment plan.
Neither 6336 or 6337 will be required at Hexham after the 30th January due to the X84/X85 being withdrawn in their current form. The revised X10 doesn't need a low height decker and can be covered by 6377 or a B9TL.

Therefore, the most natural option (unless GNE have other plans) will be to put both of them at Consett where low height Euro 6 deckers are needed as spares.

Volvo B5TLs were never part of the original XLines investment plan, only StreetDecks and E400MMCs. There were plans for the B5TLs when on the X9/X10 to eventually be cascaded on to the X84/X85 when the intention was to purchase more suitable deckers for the X9/X10. However, COVID changed all the original plans.
L469 YVK
30 Dec 2021, 5:32 pm #177

(30 Dec 2021, 5:17 pm)KingSlayerRBLX we lost 6337 as that went to act as the spare bus for the X84/85.

We are gaining Under Euro 6 Buses such as the B5LH's and losing Streetdecks from 6302-7. probably gonna lose 6301. However i have seen on bustimes.org that we (Consett) may be keeping 3963, the Volvo B7TL Wright Gemini as it was caught doing the Red Kite Ranger 47 to Consett. However, this could of been a ticketer swap.
we will have lost all of our Charcoal spares.
6336 - Possibly to be a spare for the X10
6337 - Spare for the X84/85
6376 - Washington General Spare
6377 - Chester-Le-Street for the X21.

Would be ideal to have 6334 & 5 to trial on the Red Kite Ranger 47/47A or the X-Lines X45 & X46 or really just become a General Spare to see how they would run on the routes they were gonna be apart of in the original X-Lines Investment plan.
Neither 6336 or 6337 will be required at Hexham after the 30th January due to the X84/X85 being withdrawn in their current form. The revised X10 doesn't need a low height decker and can be covered by 6377 or a B9TL.

Therefore, the most natural option (unless GNE have other plans) will be to put both of them at Consett where low height Euro 6 deckers are needed as spares.

Volvo B5TLs were never part of the original XLines investment plan, only StreetDecks and E400MMCs. There were plans for the B5TLs when on the X9/X10 to eventually be cascaded on to the X84/X85 when the intention was to purchase more suitable deckers for the X9/X10. However, COVID changed all the original plans.

Bus3888



11
30 Dec 2021, 5:42 pm #178
i know i went off topic there but it is about how to plan vehicle movement's and what routes they are allowed on. It cant be that bus you want come to your depot as it would need Strict allocations so like the Euro 4 Voyager Scania N270UD OmniDekkas which will have to become a spare for the 26/50 as it will not be allowed to Enter Newcastle for free and it will have to be the route GNE takes to pay to have their Under Euro 6 Vehicles in Newcastle for about 10 Minutes or so for them to leave and then repeat that process when it comes back which will cost more. So thats why buses like the former Coaster B5LH's got took off the Coaster 1 and got replaced by the Daimler Euro 6 Streetlites as the B5's are Euro 5 and like i said the Streetlites are Euro 6. Its not that GNE don't like the bus on the route its that they need to prepare for the LEZ.

--------------------------------
For this, for the X1/56 with them being every 15 mins respectively they could just turn around at gateshead same with the 21 and make sure passengers get on the right service. 

The only issue I am thinking of is if that X1 is going to Peterlee or Dalton park, or the 21 Durham or Brandon.
Bus3888
30 Dec 2021, 5:42 pm #178

i know i went off topic there but it is about how to plan vehicle movement's and what routes they are allowed on. It cant be that bus you want come to your depot as it would need Strict allocations so like the Euro 4 Voyager Scania N270UD OmniDekkas which will have to become a spare for the 26/50 as it will not be allowed to Enter Newcastle for free and it will have to be the route GNE takes to pay to have their Under Euro 6 Vehicles in Newcastle for about 10 Minutes or so for them to leave and then repeat that process when it comes back which will cost more. So thats why buses like the former Coaster B5LH's got took off the Coaster 1 and got replaced by the Daimler Euro 6 Streetlites as the B5's are Euro 5 and like i said the Streetlites are Euro 6. Its not that GNE don't like the bus on the route its that they need to prepare for the LEZ.

--------------------------------
For this, for the X1/56 with them being every 15 mins respectively they could just turn around at gateshead same with the 21 and make sure passengers get on the right service. 

The only issue I am thinking of is if that X1 is going to Peterlee or Dalton park, or the 21 Durham or Brandon.

peter



993
30 Dec 2021, 5:48 pm #179
(30 Dec 2021, 5:17 pm)KingSlayerRBLX Consett could do with some ''New'' Spare buses like Optare Versas or 2005/6 Reg Geminis like 3963 if they were allocated onto the 16/16A or X5/X15. 

I don't think there's any issue with 'new' spare buses at Consett. In theory they'll end up with 6064/69/70, 6336/8/9/40, I reckon one of 6356-63 will be spare with the X45/6 PVR decrease and then it looks like 5409/10 might stay for the 78 - not really sure why they would need non-standardised Versa's on top of all that

(30 Dec 2021, 10:59 am)Jimmi X9 could maybe return one day but if it were to happen it won't be any time soon, be years down the line by which time everything will have been moved around and services changed a hundred times so its pointless suggesting such and such a bus will go on a service that ain't returning any time soon.

I think X84 (684) will be stuck with Versas, especially if my theory that the 684 will interwork with the 680/688 turns out to be true or at very least until whenever the new tenders for the Hexham services are awarded.

I had the same theory about Versa's interworking on the 680/684/688 - with X84 taking over an hour it would make sense and the 680/688 already interwork with the 687 using Versa's (with it being said elsewhere the 687 isn't going to do so anymore).
Edited 30 Dec 2021, 5:52 pm by peter.
peter
30 Dec 2021, 5:48 pm #179

(30 Dec 2021, 5:17 pm)KingSlayerRBLX Consett could do with some ''New'' Spare buses like Optare Versas or 2005/6 Reg Geminis like 3963 if they were allocated onto the 16/16A or X5/X15. 

I don't think there's any issue with 'new' spare buses at Consett. In theory they'll end up with 6064/69/70, 6336/8/9/40, I reckon one of 6356-63 will be spare with the X45/6 PVR decrease and then it looks like 5409/10 might stay for the 78 - not really sure why they would need non-standardised Versa's on top of all that

(30 Dec 2021, 10:59 am)Jimmi X9 could maybe return one day but if it were to happen it won't be any time soon, be years down the line by which time everything will have been moved around and services changed a hundred times so its pointless suggesting such and such a bus will go on a service that ain't returning any time soon.

I think X84 (684) will be stuck with Versas, especially if my theory that the 684 will interwork with the 680/688 turns out to be true or at very least until whenever the new tenders for the Hexham services are awarded.

I had the same theory about Versa's interworking on the 680/684/688 - with X84 taking over an hour it would make sense and the 680/688 already interwork with the 687 using Versa's (with it being said elsewhere the 687 isn't going to do so anymore).

L469 YVK



3,552
30 Dec 2021, 6:37 pm #180
(30 Dec 2021, 5:42 pm)Bus3888 --------------------------------
For this, for the X1/56 with them being every 15 mins respectively they could just turn around at gateshead same with the 21 and make sure passengers get on the right service. 

The only issue I am thinking of is if that X1 is going to Peterlee or Dalton park, or the 21 Durham or Brandon.
And I strongly doubt GNE would ever do that. That is why they're backfilling accordingly to ensure there are enough Euro 6 spares to go around.
L469 YVK
30 Dec 2021, 6:37 pm #180

(30 Dec 2021, 5:42 pm)Bus3888 --------------------------------
For this, for the X1/56 with them being every 15 mins respectively they could just turn around at gateshead same with the 21 and make sure passengers get on the right service. 

The only issue I am thinking of is if that X1 is going to Peterlee or Dalton park, or the 21 Durham or Brandon.
And I strongly doubt GNE would ever do that. That is why they're backfilling accordingly to ensure there are enough Euro 6 spares to go around.

Pages (19) Previous 18 9 1019 Next
 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average