Menu
 
North East Buses Local Bus Scene Go North East Go North East : Upcoming Service Changes

Go North East : Upcoming Service Changes

Go North East : Upcoming Service Changes

 
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
 
Pages (26) Previous 1 2 3 426 Next
NL62WVW



134
24 Dec 2021, 10:28 am #41
Some journeys on the 8, 21, 25 pulled from CLS

Views and Opinions are my own
NL62WVW
24 Dec 2021, 10:28 am #41

Some journeys on the 8, 21, 25 pulled from CLS


Views and Opinions are my own

Adrian



9,583
24 Dec 2021, 11:00 am #42
Looking at the Bus Service Improvement Plan, three of the KPIs of the plan are as follows:

  • Covid-19 recovery: We will repair the damage caused by Covid-19 to bus ridership in our region by returning to the pre-pandemic level of 162.4 million trips by March 2023.
  • Grow bus patronage: Once that has been achieved we will significantly grow bus patronage, targeting 10% growth on the 2019 baseline by March 2024 and a further 10% growth on 2019 figures by March 2025. We want to make sure this growth comes from all parts of the region and so the same target will apply for boardings at rural bus stops, and for patronage among young people. 
  • Grow bus modal share: We will increase the modal share of bus by 1 percentage point by March 2024, and by another 1 percentage point by March 2025. This target will apply both overall, and for journeys to work and  education.

I'm not sure how to take these services cuts in relation to the positivity span by the BSIP. The target is 178.6 million trips by March 2024 (using the 2019 baseline) and 194.8 million by March 2025. That's only just over 2 and 3 years away respectively. 

The suggestion that a growing popularity of a railway service is impacting the X84/X85, or the all but abandoned battle with the railway service on the X9/X10, feels like an acceptance of defeat. What happened to offering a better product, travel experience and so on? 

Maybe this is an early sign that operators are already abandoning the ambition of the BSIP.

Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook
Adrian
24 Dec 2021, 11:00 am #42

Looking at the Bus Service Improvement Plan, three of the KPIs of the plan are as follows:

  • Covid-19 recovery: We will repair the damage caused by Covid-19 to bus ridership in our region by returning to the pre-pandemic level of 162.4 million trips by March 2023.
  • Grow bus patronage: Once that has been achieved we will significantly grow bus patronage, targeting 10% growth on the 2019 baseline by March 2024 and a further 10% growth on 2019 figures by March 2025. We want to make sure this growth comes from all parts of the region and so the same target will apply for boardings at rural bus stops, and for patronage among young people. 
  • Grow bus modal share: We will increase the modal share of bus by 1 percentage point by March 2024, and by another 1 percentage point by March 2025. This target will apply both overall, and for journeys to work and  education.

I'm not sure how to take these services cuts in relation to the positivity span by the BSIP. The target is 178.6 million trips by March 2024 (using the 2019 baseline) and 194.8 million by March 2025. That's only just over 2 and 3 years away respectively. 

The suggestion that a growing popularity of a railway service is impacting the X84/X85, or the all but abandoned battle with the railway service on the X9/X10, feels like an acceptance of defeat. What happened to offering a better product, travel experience and so on? 

Maybe this is an early sign that operators are already abandoning the ambition of the BSIP.


Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook

S813 FVK



6,030
24 Dec 2021, 11:18 am #43
The list of reductions have now been posted online:
https://www.gonortheast.co.uk/temporary-...-4-january
S813 FVK
24 Dec 2021, 11:18 am #43

The list of reductions have now been posted online:
https://www.gonortheast.co.uk/temporary-...-4-january

24 Dec 2021, 11:29 am #44
As I have said before so much for Bus Improvement, whilst temporary may be the claim, permanent is far more likely.

2022 the year of not travelling by bus.
54APhotography
24 Dec 2021, 11:29 am #44

As I have said before so much for Bus Improvement, whilst temporary may be the claim, permanent is far more likely.

2022 the year of not travelling by bus.

Wybus



235
24 Dec 2021, 11:31 am #45
(24 Dec 2021, 11:18 am)S813 FVK The list of reductions have now been posted online:
https://www.gonortheast.co.uk/temporary-...-4-january
So what’s the chances of the X22 being suspended permanently?

Only certain journeys will have good loadings due to the timings and in my experience Saturday journeys tend to be just full of teenagers who won’t be lost as they can’t change to driving there instead

The 21/X21 and then X66 is a fairly easy link they’d promote as an alternative

And if this turns out to be true it’s yet more paint wasted
Wybus
24 Dec 2021, 11:31 am #45

(24 Dec 2021, 11:18 am)S813 FVK The list of reductions have now been posted online:
https://www.gonortheast.co.uk/temporary-...-4-january
So what’s the chances of the X22 being suspended permanently?

Only certain journeys will have good loadings due to the timings and in my experience Saturday journeys tend to be just full of teenagers who won’t be lost as they can’t change to driving there instead

The 21/X21 and then X66 is a fairly easy link they’d promote as an alternative

And if this turns out to be true it’s yet more paint wasted

Adrian



9,583
24 Dec 2021, 11:54 am #46
(24 Dec 2021, 11:31 am)Wybus So what’s the chances of the X22 being suspended permanently?

Only certain journeys will have good loadings due to the timings and in my experience Saturday journeys tend to be just full of teenagers who won’t be lost as they can’t change to driving there instead

The 21/X21 and then X66 is a fairly easy link they’d promote as an alternative

And if this turns out to be true it’s yet more paint wasted

In the short term, maybe, but in the mid-long term it'll just re-enforce the position that buses aren't a convenient form of transport for them and will speed up their desire to learn to drive and get behind a wheel.

Plus the X22 generally takes around 40 minutes from Durham to the Metrocentre, whereas the X21/X66 takes almost twice the time at 76 minutes. Not exactly convenient for a 17 mile trip... an average speed of 22mph?

Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook
Adrian
24 Dec 2021, 11:54 am #46

(24 Dec 2021, 11:31 am)Wybus So what’s the chances of the X22 being suspended permanently?

Only certain journeys will have good loadings due to the timings and in my experience Saturday journeys tend to be just full of teenagers who won’t be lost as they can’t change to driving there instead

The 21/X21 and then X66 is a fairly easy link they’d promote as an alternative

And if this turns out to be true it’s yet more paint wasted

In the short term, maybe, but in the mid-long term it'll just re-enforce the position that buses aren't a convenient form of transport for them and will speed up their desire to learn to drive and get behind a wheel.

Plus the X22 generally takes around 40 minutes from Durham to the Metrocentre, whereas the X21/X66 takes almost twice the time at 76 minutes. Not exactly convenient for a 17 mile trip... an average speed of 22mph?


Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook

Andreos1



14,211
24 Dec 2021, 11:59 am #47
(24 Dec 2021, 11:18 am)S813 FVK The list of reductions have now been posted online:
https://www.gonortheast.co.uk/temporary-...-4-january

That night time timetable for the 4 is a funny one. Two buses within 15mins off Heworth and then nothing for 45?

'Illegitimis non carborundum'
Andreos1
24 Dec 2021, 11:59 am #47

(24 Dec 2021, 11:18 am)S813 FVK The list of reductions have now been posted online:
https://www.gonortheast.co.uk/temporary-...-4-january

That night time timetable for the 4 is a funny one. Two buses within 15mins off Heworth and then nothing for 45?


'Illegitimis non carborundum'

Train8261



1,016
24 Dec 2021, 12:19 pm #48
I'm confused why anything is being done to Percy Main depot

1/18/19/310/311 as I've only seen them cancelled a few journeys over the past week
Train8261
24 Dec 2021, 12:19 pm #48

I'm confused why anything is being done to Percy Main depot

1/18/19/310/311 as I've only seen them cancelled a few journeys over the past week

L469 YVK



3,549
24 Dec 2021, 12:25 pm #49
To be honest, it would make sense keeping the evening Ex Newcastle 310 journeys running via Hadrian Park. Serving Hadrian Park during the evening isn't a great deal of bother given less traffic on the road. I didn't mind it in the past.
L469 YVK
24 Dec 2021, 12:25 pm #49

To be honest, it would make sense keeping the evening Ex Newcastle 310 journeys running via Hadrian Park. Serving Hadrian Park during the evening isn't a great deal of bother given less traffic on the road. I didn't mind it in the past.

Keeiajs

563891

1,026
24 Dec 2021, 12:25 pm #50
(24 Dec 2021, 12:19 pm)Train8261 I'm confused why anything is being done to Percy Main depot

1/18/19/310/311 as I've only seen them cancelled a few journeys over the past week
I think there has been around 6-8 journeys and I think only around 4 were full ones, I concour with this.

Also how many of these changes will become permanent? 

Also 56 Once Per Hour from 20:15...
Keeiajs
24 Dec 2021, 12:25 pm #50

(24 Dec 2021, 12:19 pm)Train8261 I'm confused why anything is being done to Percy Main depot

1/18/19/310/311 as I've only seen them cancelled a few journeys over the past week
I think there has been around 6-8 journeys and I think only around 4 were full ones, I concour with this.

Also how many of these changes will become permanent? 

Also 56 Once Per Hour from 20:15...

Train8261



1,016
24 Dec 2021, 12:28 pm #51
(24 Dec 2021, 12:25 pm)L469 YVK To be honest, it would make sense keeping the evening Ex Newcastle 310 journeys running via Hadrian Park. Serving Hadrian Park during the evening isn't a great deal of bother given less traffic on the road. I didn't mind it in the past.
I still don't understand why GNE made the 311 serve Hadrian Park later anyway when the 310 was doing fine anyway. There basically going back on what they did back in 2020

(24 Dec 2021, 12:25 pm)Keeiajs I think there has been around 6-8 journeys and I think only around 4 were full ones, I concour with this.

Also how many of these changes will become permanent? 

Also 56 Once Per Hour from 20:15...
Percy Main has been the less affected depot concerned to other depot and routes. Yet somehow needs to cut them evening services 

Also 

Why the 18 I've never seen a journey cut on that yet

Also why are gne concerned about the 19. When there's plans up to scrap it anyway (I know have a go if u want)
Edited 24 Dec 2021, 12:32 pm by Train8261.
Train8261
24 Dec 2021, 12:28 pm #51

(24 Dec 2021, 12:25 pm)L469 YVK To be honest, it would make sense keeping the evening Ex Newcastle 310 journeys running via Hadrian Park. Serving Hadrian Park during the evening isn't a great deal of bother given less traffic on the road. I didn't mind it in the past.
I still don't understand why GNE made the 311 serve Hadrian Park later anyway when the 310 was doing fine anyway. There basically going back on what they did back in 2020

(24 Dec 2021, 12:25 pm)Keeiajs I think there has been around 6-8 journeys and I think only around 4 were full ones, I concour with this.

Also how many of these changes will become permanent? 

Also 56 Once Per Hour from 20:15...
Percy Main has been the less affected depot concerned to other depot and routes. Yet somehow needs to cut them evening services 

Also 

Why the 18 I've never seen a journey cut on that yet

Also why are gne concerned about the 19. When there's plans up to scrap it anyway (I know have a go if u want)

Thomas12



467
24 Dec 2021, 12:39 pm #52
(24 Dec 2021, 12:28 pm)Train8261 I still don't understand why GNE made the 311 serve Hadrian Park later anyway when the 310 was doing fine anyway. There basically going back on what they did back in 2020

Percy Main has been the less affected depot concerned to other depot and routes. Yet somehow needs to cut them evening services 

Also 

Why the 18 I've never seen a journey cut on that yet

Also why are gne concerned about the 19. When there's plans up to scrap it anyway (I know have a go if u want)

I’m guessing it’s been agreed with Nexus?
Thomas12
24 Dec 2021, 12:39 pm #52

(24 Dec 2021, 12:28 pm)Train8261 I still don't understand why GNE made the 311 serve Hadrian Park later anyway when the 310 was doing fine anyway. There basically going back on what they did back in 2020

Percy Main has been the less affected depot concerned to other depot and routes. Yet somehow needs to cut them evening services 

Also 

Why the 18 I've never seen a journey cut on that yet

Also why are gne concerned about the 19. When there's plans up to scrap it anyway (I know have a go if u want)

I’m guessing it’s been agreed with Nexus?

Train8261



1,016
24 Dec 2021, 12:40 pm #53
(24 Dec 2021, 12:39 pm)Thomas12 I’m guessing it’s been agreed with Nexus?
It's possible but I'm still confused about why thr 18 & 19 are having a timetable reduced anyway
Train8261
24 Dec 2021, 12:40 pm #53

(24 Dec 2021, 12:39 pm)Thomas12 I’m guessing it’s been agreed with Nexus?
It's possible but I'm still confused about why thr 18 & 19 are having a timetable reduced anyway

Keeiajs

563891

1,026
24 Dec 2021, 12:41 pm #54
(24 Dec 2021, 12:40 pm)Train8261 It's possible but I'm still confused about why thr 18 & 19 are having a timetable reduced anyway
Im confused why any of Percy Main have any reducing.

Also why was the confirmation of the X84 (Now 684) and X9 scrapped not announced with these changes were put out.
Edited 24 Dec 2021, 12:42 pm by Keeiajs.
Keeiajs
24 Dec 2021, 12:41 pm #54

(24 Dec 2021, 12:40 pm)Train8261 It's possible but I'm still confused about why thr 18 & 19 are having a timetable reduced anyway
Im confused why any of Percy Main have any reducing.

Also why was the confirmation of the X84 (Now 684) and X9 scrapped not announced with these changes were put out.

Train8261



1,016
24 Dec 2021, 12:43 pm #55
(24 Dec 2021, 12:41 pm)Keeiajs Im confused why any of Percy Main have any reducing.

Also why was the confirmation of the X84 (Now 684) and X9 scrapped annouced?
Passengers numbers on the X85 is to low 
X84 needs to be renumbered to make it work with the 685 (don't ask me)
X9 no idea but the X10 severs that route enough since the start of the pandemic
Train8261
24 Dec 2021, 12:43 pm #55

(24 Dec 2021, 12:41 pm)Keeiajs Im confused why any of Percy Main have any reducing.

Also why was the confirmation of the X84 (Now 684) and X9 scrapped annouced?
Passengers numbers on the X85 is to low 
X84 needs to be renumbered to make it work with the 685 (don't ask me)
X9 no idea but the X10 severs that route enough since the start of the pandemic

RobinHood



638
24 Dec 2021, 1:11 pm #56
(24 Dec 2021, 11:00 am)Adrian Looking at the Bus Service Improvement Plan, three of the KPIs of the plan are as follows:

  • Covid-19 recovery: We will repair the damage caused by Covid-19 to bus ridership in our region by returning to the pre-pandemic level of 162.4 million trips by March 2023.
  • Grow bus patronage: Once that has been achieved we will significantly grow bus patronage, targeting 10% growth on the 2019 baseline by March 2024 and a further 10% growth on 2019 figures by March 2025. We want to make sure this growth comes from all parts of the region and so the same target will apply for boardings at rural bus stops, and for patronage among young people. 
  • Grow bus modal share: We will increase the modal share of bus by 1 percentage point by March 2024, and by another 1 percentage point by March 2025. This target will apply both overall, and for journeys to work and  education.

I'm not sure how to take these services cuts in relation to the positivity span by the BSIP. The target is 178.6 million trips by March 2024 (using the 2019 baseline) and 194.8 million by March 2025. That's only just over 2 and 3 years away respectively. 

The suggestion that a growing popularity of a railway service is impacting the X84/X85, or the all but abandoned battle with the railway service on the X9/X10, feels like an acceptance of defeat. What happened to offering a better product, travel experience and so on? 

Maybe this is an early sign that operators are already abandoning the ambition of the BSIP.
The BSIP is only built around obtaining the £800m it has asked for.

Clearly TNE are not going to receive the full amount they want, so lots of BSIP ambition will be lost.

My understanding, as it stands, operators are at best, 70-75% recovered and leveling off. Clearly, funding only guaranteed until end of March. No surprise operators are already starting to cut their cloth to match demand and/or remove services that are marginal or loss making even before this.
RobinHood
24 Dec 2021, 1:11 pm #56

(24 Dec 2021, 11:00 am)Adrian Looking at the Bus Service Improvement Plan, three of the KPIs of the plan are as follows:

  • Covid-19 recovery: We will repair the damage caused by Covid-19 to bus ridership in our region by returning to the pre-pandemic level of 162.4 million trips by March 2023.
  • Grow bus patronage: Once that has been achieved we will significantly grow bus patronage, targeting 10% growth on the 2019 baseline by March 2024 and a further 10% growth on 2019 figures by March 2025. We want to make sure this growth comes from all parts of the region and so the same target will apply for boardings at rural bus stops, and for patronage among young people. 
  • Grow bus modal share: We will increase the modal share of bus by 1 percentage point by March 2024, and by another 1 percentage point by March 2025. This target will apply both overall, and for journeys to work and  education.

I'm not sure how to take these services cuts in relation to the positivity span by the BSIP. The target is 178.6 million trips by March 2024 (using the 2019 baseline) and 194.8 million by March 2025. That's only just over 2 and 3 years away respectively. 

The suggestion that a growing popularity of a railway service is impacting the X84/X85, or the all but abandoned battle with the railway service on the X9/X10, feels like an acceptance of defeat. What happened to offering a better product, travel experience and so on? 

Maybe this is an early sign that operators are already abandoning the ambition of the BSIP.
The BSIP is only built around obtaining the £800m it has asked for.

Clearly TNE are not going to receive the full amount they want, so lots of BSIP ambition will be lost.

My understanding, as it stands, operators are at best, 70-75% recovered and leveling off. Clearly, funding only guaranteed until end of March. No surprise operators are already starting to cut their cloth to match demand and/or remove services that are marginal or loss making even before this.

Jimmi



10,969
24 Dec 2021, 1:13 pm #57
(24 Dec 2021, 11:54 am)Adrian In the short term, maybe, but in the mid-long term it'll just re-enforce the position that buses aren't a convenient form of transport for them and will speed up their desire to learn to drive and get behind a wheel.

Plus the X22 generally takes around 40 minutes from Durham to the Metrocentre, whereas the X21/X66 takes almost twice the time at 76 minutes. Not exactly convenient for a 17 mile trip... an average speed of 22mph?
Didn't help that in the most recent timetable change the X21 got extra running time added in so the journey time is now the same as the X12 takes from Durham, at least on the plus side the 21 & X21 now leave 15 minutes between each other although annoyingly for me now leaves 5 mins in front of the X12 towards Newcastle (annoying long wait or painfully long 21 trip for me if the 7 arrives in Durham late).

Problem with suspending the likes of the X22 is it damages any thoughts of its existence so will just be forgotten about when the service starts up again, to a degree this is what saw the downfall of Arriva's X24 which ran to the same route as the X22 does. If you have to suspend something at CLS, at least its a service mostly used for leisure purposes although some Metrocentre staff do use it.

Think this could be the case for some time, they're gonna struggle to recruit when posts on their socials are littered with comments about poor pay, bad experiences from past members of staff and frustrated passengers from buses not running.
Jimmi
24 Dec 2021, 1:13 pm #57

(24 Dec 2021, 11:54 am)Adrian In the short term, maybe, but in the mid-long term it'll just re-enforce the position that buses aren't a convenient form of transport for them and will speed up their desire to learn to drive and get behind a wheel.

Plus the X22 generally takes around 40 minutes from Durham to the Metrocentre, whereas the X21/X66 takes almost twice the time at 76 minutes. Not exactly convenient for a 17 mile trip... an average speed of 22mph?
Didn't help that in the most recent timetable change the X21 got extra running time added in so the journey time is now the same as the X12 takes from Durham, at least on the plus side the 21 & X21 now leave 15 minutes between each other although annoyingly for me now leaves 5 mins in front of the X12 towards Newcastle (annoying long wait or painfully long 21 trip for me if the 7 arrives in Durham late).

Problem with suspending the likes of the X22 is it damages any thoughts of its existence so will just be forgotten about when the service starts up again, to a degree this is what saw the downfall of Arriva's X24 which ran to the same route as the X22 does. If you have to suspend something at CLS, at least its a service mostly used for leisure purposes although some Metrocentre staff do use it.

Think this could be the case for some time, they're gonna struggle to recruit when posts on their socials are littered with comments about poor pay, bad experiences from past members of staff and frustrated passengers from buses not running.

Storx



4,575
24 Dec 2021, 2:04 pm #58
(24 Dec 2021, 11:00 am)Adrian The suggestion that a growing popularity of a railway service is impacting the X84/X85, or the all but abandoned battle with the railway service on the X9/X10, feels like an acceptance of defeat. What happened to offering a better product, travel experience and so on?

Surely that's the correct thing if everything was right. It shouldn't be bus vs train. It should public transport vs car. The fact that trains up here are so fragmented is a massive issue in comparison to say places like Leeds where you can get train and bus tickets. There is literally no ticket for someone catching a train from Hexham to Newcastle, then a bus from there to Cobalt let's say.

The problem isn't the X84/X85, it's the horrendous ticket acceptance between trains and buses. It's £173 a month for someone travelling from Huddersfield to Leeds with the ability to use any train in West Yorkshire and buses county wise. Good value imo as trains are never cheap and it's what is needed in places like Hexham. You'd be looking at £20's worth of petrol a week at least travelling back and forwards from Hexham every day with a car before parking and so on. (£92 without the train).

It's the same for the X9/X10. Surely the best answer would be a train then change to a bus on one ticket. less vehicles through the ULEZ and less traffic on the roads especially in Newcastle which is just filled with buses.

It's the same with Newcastle to Durham, yes the hill is a big problem but if we're being serious then you could easily build some escalators up from where the top of the ramp is with that improved aswell. It's literally a 5 minute walk from the bus station with that done and that would be a big push. Bus to Durham 15 mins, train to Newcastle 15 mins. 45 minute journey time vs driving for from 45 mins but that could be double with traffic.
Storx
24 Dec 2021, 2:04 pm #58

(24 Dec 2021, 11:00 am)Adrian The suggestion that a growing popularity of a railway service is impacting the X84/X85, or the all but abandoned battle with the railway service on the X9/X10, feels like an acceptance of defeat. What happened to offering a better product, travel experience and so on?

Surely that's the correct thing if everything was right. It shouldn't be bus vs train. It should public transport vs car. The fact that trains up here are so fragmented is a massive issue in comparison to say places like Leeds where you can get train and bus tickets. There is literally no ticket for someone catching a train from Hexham to Newcastle, then a bus from there to Cobalt let's say.

The problem isn't the X84/X85, it's the horrendous ticket acceptance between trains and buses. It's £173 a month for someone travelling from Huddersfield to Leeds with the ability to use any train in West Yorkshire and buses county wise. Good value imo as trains are never cheap and it's what is needed in places like Hexham. You'd be looking at £20's worth of petrol a week at least travelling back and forwards from Hexham every day with a car before parking and so on. (£92 without the train).

It's the same for the X9/X10. Surely the best answer would be a train then change to a bus on one ticket. less vehicles through the ULEZ and less traffic on the roads especially in Newcastle which is just filled with buses.

It's the same with Newcastle to Durham, yes the hill is a big problem but if we're being serious then you could easily build some escalators up from where the top of the ramp is with that improved aswell. It's literally a 5 minute walk from the bus station with that done and that would be a big push. Bus to Durham 15 mins, train to Newcastle 15 mins. 45 minute journey time vs driving for from 45 mins but that could be double with traffic.

Andreos1



14,211
24 Dec 2021, 2:13 pm #59
(24 Dec 2021, 1:13 pm)Jimmi Didn't help that in the most recent timetable change the X21 got extra running time added in so the journey time is now the same as the X12 takes from Durham, at least on the plus side the 21 & X21 now leave 15 minutes between each other although annoyingly for me now leaves 5 mins in front of the X12 towards Newcastle (annoying long wait or painfully long 21 trip for me if the 7 arrives in Durham late).

Problem with suspending the likes of the X22 is it damages any thoughts of its existence so will just be forgotten about when the service starts up again, to a degree this is what saw the downfall of Arriva's X24 which ran to the same route as the X22 does. If you have to suspend something at CLS, at least its a service mostly used for leisure purposes although some Metrocentre staff do use it. 

Think this could be the case for some time, they're gonna struggle to recruit when posts on their socials are littered with comments about poor pay, bad experiences from past members of staff and frustrated passengers from buses not running.

Similar to the X9 during the pandemic.

'Illegitimis non carborundum'
Andreos1
24 Dec 2021, 2:13 pm #59

(24 Dec 2021, 1:13 pm)Jimmi Didn't help that in the most recent timetable change the X21 got extra running time added in so the journey time is now the same as the X12 takes from Durham, at least on the plus side the 21 & X21 now leave 15 minutes between each other although annoyingly for me now leaves 5 mins in front of the X12 towards Newcastle (annoying long wait or painfully long 21 trip for me if the 7 arrives in Durham late).

Problem with suspending the likes of the X22 is it damages any thoughts of its existence so will just be forgotten about when the service starts up again, to a degree this is what saw the downfall of Arriva's X24 which ran to the same route as the X22 does. If you have to suspend something at CLS, at least its a service mostly used for leisure purposes although some Metrocentre staff do use it. 

Think this could be the case for some time, they're gonna struggle to recruit when posts on their socials are littered with comments about poor pay, bad experiences from past members of staff and frustrated passengers from buses not running.

Similar to the X9 during the pandemic.


'Illegitimis non carborundum'

busmanT



933
24 Dec 2021, 2:20 pm #60
(23 Dec 2021, 10:50 pm)Ambassador I’m not sure what to make of that update to a point,

A growing in popularity railway service impacting the X84/5….growing In popularity since erm…1834?

There’s an elephant in the room aspect to this. The govt will not and can’t afford to fund buses, the pandemic has made buses even less popular than before which is an achievement and all that money spent on Ray Stenning PowerPoint templates was a nice try but erm…yeah nobody likes buses. It shows all the money wasted on paint jobs as the union call them and fanfare of printed timetables (popular with old people, roger french and bus enthusiasts only)  mean absolutely nothing

I hate to sound like our dear Andreos…well I don’t…but at what point do you realise the problem is you

More to come here I think. Further cuts, more money to DRT schemes and those impacted don’t and won’t vote tory. I’d be rts worried if I relied on public transport in a less desirable connected area or worked at go ahead but I’d be thrilled to be a middle manager or a shareholder…or ray stenning, rebrands ahoy!

To end a positive…of sorts. It’s a real shame Martijn joined GNE at a time of crisis and you wonder what he could have done with the resources that Huntley and Carr had, both massive massive failures.
The rail service from Hexham to Newcastle has increased in frequency since GNE started the X85 (from 2 trains per hour to 3 trains per hour) and the rolling stock has improved from the class 142s - so the train is bound to have hit passenger numbers on the X85 (as well as X84 and 685)>

(23 Dec 2021, 10:50 pm)Ambassador I’m not sure what to make of that update to a point,

A growing in popularity railway service impacting the X84/5….growing In popularity since erm…1834?

There’s an elephant in the room aspect to this. The govt will not and can’t afford to fund buses, the pandemic has made buses even less popular than before which is an achievement and all that money spent on Ray Stenning PowerPoint templates was a nice try but erm…yeah nobody likes buses. It shows all the money wasted on paint jobs as the union call them and fanfare of printed timetables (popular with old people, roger french and bus enthusiasts only)  mean absolutely nothing

I hate to sound like our dear Andreos…well I don’t…but at what point do you realise the problem is you

More to come here I think. Further cuts, more money to DRT schemes and those impacted don’t and won’t vote tory. I’d be rts worried if I relied on public transport in a less desirable connected area or worked at go ahead but I’d be thrilled to be a middle manager or a shareholder…or ray stenning, rebrands ahoy!

To end a positive…of sorts. It’s a real shame Martijn joined GNE at a time of crisis and you wonder what he could have done with the resources that Huntley and Carr had, both massive massive failures.
First time I've heard the late Peter Huntley called a failure !
Peter brought route branding in, vehicle refurbishment, reinvigorated printed timetables and, like MG, was high profile.

Peter H and MG have both spent a very large amount of money on fleet upgrades and vehicle presentation - but GNE continued pre pandemic to be the least profitable of the 3 large North East operators.
Edited 24 Dec 2021, 2:25 pm by busmanT.
busmanT
24 Dec 2021, 2:20 pm #60

(23 Dec 2021, 10:50 pm)Ambassador I’m not sure what to make of that update to a point,

A growing in popularity railway service impacting the X84/5….growing In popularity since erm…1834?

There’s an elephant in the room aspect to this. The govt will not and can’t afford to fund buses, the pandemic has made buses even less popular than before which is an achievement and all that money spent on Ray Stenning PowerPoint templates was a nice try but erm…yeah nobody likes buses. It shows all the money wasted on paint jobs as the union call them and fanfare of printed timetables (popular with old people, roger french and bus enthusiasts only)  mean absolutely nothing

I hate to sound like our dear Andreos…well I don’t…but at what point do you realise the problem is you

More to come here I think. Further cuts, more money to DRT schemes and those impacted don’t and won’t vote tory. I’d be rts worried if I relied on public transport in a less desirable connected area or worked at go ahead but I’d be thrilled to be a middle manager or a shareholder…or ray stenning, rebrands ahoy!

To end a positive…of sorts. It’s a real shame Martijn joined GNE at a time of crisis and you wonder what he could have done with the resources that Huntley and Carr had, both massive massive failures.
The rail service from Hexham to Newcastle has increased in frequency since GNE started the X85 (from 2 trains per hour to 3 trains per hour) and the rolling stock has improved from the class 142s - so the train is bound to have hit passenger numbers on the X85 (as well as X84 and 685)>

(23 Dec 2021, 10:50 pm)Ambassador I’m not sure what to make of that update to a point,

A growing in popularity railway service impacting the X84/5….growing In popularity since erm…1834?

There’s an elephant in the room aspect to this. The govt will not and can’t afford to fund buses, the pandemic has made buses even less popular than before which is an achievement and all that money spent on Ray Stenning PowerPoint templates was a nice try but erm…yeah nobody likes buses. It shows all the money wasted on paint jobs as the union call them and fanfare of printed timetables (popular with old people, roger french and bus enthusiasts only)  mean absolutely nothing

I hate to sound like our dear Andreos…well I don’t…but at what point do you realise the problem is you

More to come here I think. Further cuts, more money to DRT schemes and those impacted don’t and won’t vote tory. I’d be rts worried if I relied on public transport in a less desirable connected area or worked at go ahead but I’d be thrilled to be a middle manager or a shareholder…or ray stenning, rebrands ahoy!

To end a positive…of sorts. It’s a real shame Martijn joined GNE at a time of crisis and you wonder what he could have done with the resources that Huntley and Carr had, both massive massive failures.
First time I've heard the late Peter Huntley called a failure !
Peter brought route branding in, vehicle refurbishment, reinvigorated printed timetables and, like MG, was high profile.

Peter H and MG have both spent a very large amount of money on fleet upgrades and vehicle presentation - but GNE continued pre pandemic to be the least profitable of the 3 large North East operators.

Pages (26) Previous 1 2 3 426 Next
 
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average