Menu
 
North East Buses Local Bus Scene Go North East Go North East: Major Service Changes July 2022

Go North East: Major Service Changes July 2022

Go North East: Major Service Changes July 2022

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
 
Pages (87) Previous 185 86 87
Jimmi



10,970
22 Aug 2022, 1:46 pm #1,721
(21 Aug 2022, 9:13 pm)xpm and that is exactly the problem - half the time it is completely empty, might take an odd one or two from Alston to halty and back, a couple from Halton Lea Gate, and someone from Slaggy, but that's about it.  It could be a completely soul destroying duty ten and a half hours of solitude - worse in the winter when the weather came in - running about in bad conditions for no benefit for anyone - that triip back across Alston Moor and Whitfield could be long and hairy.

From what I understand it's a Beechings route - so there's always going to be some sort of service on there with a minimum number of journeys.  Prior to the most recent changes most people agreed the direction of travel at the time was the wrong way around - so it should have been going to Alston when it was coming from there - and vice-versa.

In latter years the last 185 was always empty both ways, and more often than not asides from tourist season you could often carry less than half a dozen people a day on all of the 185 trips.

681 was sometimes a little busier depending on whether an odd group of teenagers wanted to go to Halty to generally make a nuisance of themselves around the train station, but again more often than not it was an odd person here and there that were regulars - and by regular that was more often than not, once a week.
I think next year when the contracts are now scheduled for renewal/review, there should be some reviews into the passenger numbers as in some places and some routes there's probs ways to make them cheaper to run, unless some are tagged onto scholars and the like where a higher capacity is required, half of these tenders around Hexham could be done with say a Ford Transit like Rural Link/L&B Travel are already using on their tendered runs in the area.

I think the current model of DRT is likely not ideally suited to the rural scope especially as vast span as Northumberland where usage is likely to be low and will just end up being a glorified taxi service, I think a better method would be to retain timetables on the 681 but make it run on a demand basis where you have to call to travel on the journey so if there's no passengers at all which often sounds to be the case, the resources are saved by not having to run it (Durham County Council previously took this approach on their 88 service between Bishop Auckland to Hamsterley which was very lightly used other than the school time journey which is all that remains now, the likes of The Little White Bus use this method too although passes aren't accepted for some of these journeys).

Wright Bros run service 889 between Alston & Hexham on Tuesdays only: https://wrightscoaches.co.uk/routes/

The 680 used to run from Alston to Carlisle via many villages along the way operated by Telford's but closest it gets now is Brampton.
Jimmi
22 Aug 2022, 1:46 pm #1,721

(21 Aug 2022, 9:13 pm)xpm and that is exactly the problem - half the time it is completely empty, might take an odd one or two from Alston to halty and back, a couple from Halton Lea Gate, and someone from Slaggy, but that's about it.  It could be a completely soul destroying duty ten and a half hours of solitude - worse in the winter when the weather came in - running about in bad conditions for no benefit for anyone - that triip back across Alston Moor and Whitfield could be long and hairy.

From what I understand it's a Beechings route - so there's always going to be some sort of service on there with a minimum number of journeys.  Prior to the most recent changes most people agreed the direction of travel at the time was the wrong way around - so it should have been going to Alston when it was coming from there - and vice-versa.

In latter years the last 185 was always empty both ways, and more often than not asides from tourist season you could often carry less than half a dozen people a day on all of the 185 trips.

681 was sometimes a little busier depending on whether an odd group of teenagers wanted to go to Halty to generally make a nuisance of themselves around the train station, but again more often than not it was an odd person here and there that were regulars - and by regular that was more often than not, once a week.
I think next year when the contracts are now scheduled for renewal/review, there should be some reviews into the passenger numbers as in some places and some routes there's probs ways to make them cheaper to run, unless some are tagged onto scholars and the like where a higher capacity is required, half of these tenders around Hexham could be done with say a Ford Transit like Rural Link/L&B Travel are already using on their tendered runs in the area.

I think the current model of DRT is likely not ideally suited to the rural scope especially as vast span as Northumberland where usage is likely to be low and will just end up being a glorified taxi service, I think a better method would be to retain timetables on the 681 but make it run on a demand basis where you have to call to travel on the journey so if there's no passengers at all which often sounds to be the case, the resources are saved by not having to run it (Durham County Council previously took this approach on their 88 service between Bishop Auckland to Hamsterley which was very lightly used other than the school time journey which is all that remains now, the likes of The Little White Bus use this method too although passes aren't accepted for some of these journeys).

Wright Bros run service 889 between Alston & Hexham on Tuesdays only: https://wrightscoaches.co.uk/routes/

The 680 used to run from Alston to Carlisle via many villages along the way operated by Telford's but closest it gets now is Brampton.

DeltaMan



562
22 Aug 2022, 2:05 pm #1,722
The issue with Alston is Cumbria County Council.

They do not subsidise ANY conventional bus services. Unless somebody sets up a "Community Transport" style operation then they don't care.

It clearly comes down to money, but there was hardly mention of Alston at all in the counties BSIP submission either.

The other issue is even if there is a pot of money for buses, where do they do go? You could make a case for Carlisle, Penrith, Hexham and Haltwhistle. I'd say Carlisle would offer more bang for thier buck and seek to extend the short 685s from Brampton to Alston.
DeltaMan
22 Aug 2022, 2:05 pm #1,722

The issue with Alston is Cumbria County Council.

They do not subsidise ANY conventional bus services. Unless somebody sets up a "Community Transport" style operation then they don't care.

It clearly comes down to money, but there was hardly mention of Alston at all in the counties BSIP submission either.

The other issue is even if there is a pot of money for buses, where do they do go? You could make a case for Carlisle, Penrith, Hexham and Haltwhistle. I'd say Carlisle would offer more bang for thier buck and seek to extend the short 685s from Brampton to Alston.

22 Aug 2022, 2:10 pm #1,723
(22 Aug 2022, 10:55 am)Storx imo they should start community transport groups where they engage with the pensioners and setup a selection of routes similar to Spirit Group used to be in Rothbury, bar they got no funding at all because Hexham get's most the funding in Northumberland and got forced to close down especially since they changed the X14 timetable so it was impossible to connect the services anymore.

In an ideal world, Northumberland County Council along with other councils in the country, would have a fleet of vehicles which are responsive to the community's needs. No need for private companies to profit off unprofitable routes, or for local residents to put their hands even deeper into their pockets for a charity or small operator to run routes that they already pay Northumberland County Council through Council Tax to provide.

The money to provide these services is there. And it's there in abundance. The council isn't sat there looking into their wallets for the last few pennies. It's up to the council and central government to find ways to provide more of the services that they are paid to provide, and to reduce costs through cutting out waste (ie profit).


Spirit Buses was too ambitious in the start, although it focussed on the core Rothbury-Alnwick service, and the loop of Coquetdale with about 40-50% of passengers making local journeys. The Elsdon journeys (population of ~250) were never going to work. The Wallington journeys were a daytrip via bumfuck nowhere (the amount of people who live on the route could be counted on your fingers). And there was 2 buses on a Sunday to Morpeth and back which always looked empty.
omnicity4659
22 Aug 2022, 2:10 pm #1,723

(22 Aug 2022, 10:55 am)Storx imo they should start community transport groups where they engage with the pensioners and setup a selection of routes similar to Spirit Group used to be in Rothbury, bar they got no funding at all because Hexham get's most the funding in Northumberland and got forced to close down especially since they changed the X14 timetable so it was impossible to connect the services anymore.

In an ideal world, Northumberland County Council along with other councils in the country, would have a fleet of vehicles which are responsive to the community's needs. No need for private companies to profit off unprofitable routes, or for local residents to put their hands even deeper into their pockets for a charity or small operator to run routes that they already pay Northumberland County Council through Council Tax to provide.

The money to provide these services is there. And it's there in abundance. The council isn't sat there looking into their wallets for the last few pennies. It's up to the council and central government to find ways to provide more of the services that they are paid to provide, and to reduce costs through cutting out waste (ie profit).


Spirit Buses was too ambitious in the start, although it focussed on the core Rothbury-Alnwick service, and the loop of Coquetdale with about 40-50% of passengers making local journeys. The Elsdon journeys (population of ~250) were never going to work. The Wallington journeys were a daytrip via bumfuck nowhere (the amount of people who live on the route could be counted on your fingers). And there was 2 buses on a Sunday to Morpeth and back which always looked empty.

Storx



4,598
22 Aug 2022, 3:01 pm #1,724
(22 Aug 2022, 2:10 pm)omnicity4659 In an ideal world, Northumberland County Council along with other councils in the country, would have a fleet of vehicles which are responsive to the community's needs. No need for private companies to profit off unprofitable routes, or for local residents to put their hands even deeper into their pockets for a charity or small operator to run routes that they already pay Northumberland County Council through Council Tax to provide.

The money to provide these services is there. And it's there in abundance. The council isn't sat there looking into their wallets for the last few pennies. It's up to the council and central government to find ways to provide more of the services that they are paid to provide, and to reduce costs through cutting out waste (ie profit).


Spirit Buses was too ambitious in the start, although it focussed on the core Rothbury-Alnwick service, and the loop of Coquetdale with about 40-50% of passengers making local journeys. The Elsdon journeys (population of ~250) were never going to work. The Wallington journeys were a daytrip via bumfuck nowhere (the amount of people who live on the route could be counted on your fingers). And there was 2 buses on a Sunday to Morpeth and back which always looked empty.

Honestly, can't disagree at all but aren't councils banned from setting up bus companies as part of Bus Act (forgot it's full name) so it would be rather difficult to do. Even known personally I think it's ridiculous, I think the same with the Nexus services especially the likes of the W1 etc which will never be profitable and just go around and around operators and finding a timetable is like trying to find a needle in a haystack.

It's a shame Nexus / NCC and DCC can't come up with a joint one to operate the subsidised services with cross boundary services services like the W1/58 and 101/688 which could easily make a case of being joined but don't because of cross border issues to just pick 2.
Storx
22 Aug 2022, 3:01 pm #1,724

(22 Aug 2022, 2:10 pm)omnicity4659 In an ideal world, Northumberland County Council along with other councils in the country, would have a fleet of vehicles which are responsive to the community's needs. No need for private companies to profit off unprofitable routes, or for local residents to put their hands even deeper into their pockets for a charity or small operator to run routes that they already pay Northumberland County Council through Council Tax to provide.

The money to provide these services is there. And it's there in abundance. The council isn't sat there looking into their wallets for the last few pennies. It's up to the council and central government to find ways to provide more of the services that they are paid to provide, and to reduce costs through cutting out waste (ie profit).


Spirit Buses was too ambitious in the start, although it focussed on the core Rothbury-Alnwick service, and the loop of Coquetdale with about 40-50% of passengers making local journeys. The Elsdon journeys (population of ~250) were never going to work. The Wallington journeys were a daytrip via bumfuck nowhere (the amount of people who live on the route could be counted on your fingers). And there was 2 buses on a Sunday to Morpeth and back which always looked empty.

Honestly, can't disagree at all but aren't councils banned from setting up bus companies as part of Bus Act (forgot it's full name) so it would be rather difficult to do. Even known personally I think it's ridiculous, I think the same with the Nexus services especially the likes of the W1 etc which will never be profitable and just go around and around operators and finding a timetable is like trying to find a needle in a haystack.

It's a shame Nexus / NCC and DCC can't come up with a joint one to operate the subsidised services with cross boundary services services like the W1/58 and 101/688 which could easily make a case of being joined but don't because of cross border issues to just pick 2.

xpm



116
22 Aug 2022, 3:13 pm #1,725
As has been said - Cumbria County Council stopped subsidising any bus services - probably about 5 years ago now IIRC or maybe a little longer, which is one of the reasons why the AD122 stopped going further west to Brampton etc.

A community transport organisation (Border Rambler) used to run a couple if times a week service Gilsland/Greehead/Walltown to Brampton IIRC - but I never saw it in a post covid world - although I'm not up there as often as I used to be.

The timetable and route has been tweaked several times over the years for one reason or another - sometime to match up better with the afternoon connecting train service, and right at the start of the contract to include Yont the Cleugh Caravan park. It is alledged that someone on the park had been repeatedly requesting a service there 'strongly' for quite some time. What happened - shortly after the service started to serve the park the person moved out, and asides a handful (and I do mean a handful) of visitors over the years - it just doesn't get used. The point with a caravan park is that most have a car in the first place, so you're on a hiding to nowhere there. Some other passengers started watching the service and demanding it turn up at all times regardless of the weather, add in the fact that in winter it's not on the gritting route and is very dangerous and icy most of the winter - it gets omitted anyway (one bus got written off there and I'm sure there was at least one other near miss).

It's a hard route physically on the vehicle and staff costs too, for little revenue (although the subsidy is, or was fairly handsome), which probably explains why a smaller operator isn't really interested (and also most smaller operators are already occupied with school contracts).
xpm
22 Aug 2022, 3:13 pm #1,725

As has been said - Cumbria County Council stopped subsidising any bus services - probably about 5 years ago now IIRC or maybe a little longer, which is one of the reasons why the AD122 stopped going further west to Brampton etc.

A community transport organisation (Border Rambler) used to run a couple if times a week service Gilsland/Greehead/Walltown to Brampton IIRC - but I never saw it in a post covid world - although I'm not up there as often as I used to be.

The timetable and route has been tweaked several times over the years for one reason or another - sometime to match up better with the afternoon connecting train service, and right at the start of the contract to include Yont the Cleugh Caravan park. It is alledged that someone on the park had been repeatedly requesting a service there 'strongly' for quite some time. What happened - shortly after the service started to serve the park the person moved out, and asides a handful (and I do mean a handful) of visitors over the years - it just doesn't get used. The point with a caravan park is that most have a car in the first place, so you're on a hiding to nowhere there. Some other passengers started watching the service and demanding it turn up at all times regardless of the weather, add in the fact that in winter it's not on the gritting route and is very dangerous and icy most of the winter - it gets omitted anyway (one bus got written off there and I'm sure there was at least one other near miss).

It's a hard route physically on the vehicle and staff costs too, for little revenue (although the subsidy is, or was fairly handsome), which probably explains why a smaller operator isn't really interested (and also most smaller operators are already occupied with school contracts).

Adrian



9,584
22 Aug 2022, 3:32 pm #1,726
(22 Aug 2022, 2:05 pm)DeltaMan The issue with Alston is Cumbria County Council.

They do not subsidise ANY conventional bus services. Unless somebody sets up a "Community Transport" style operation then they don't care.

It clearly comes down to money, but there was hardly mention of Alston at all in the counties BSIP submission either.

The other issue is even if there is a pot of money for buses, where do they do go? You could make a case for Carlisle, Penrith, Hexham and Haltwhistle. I'd say Carlisle would offer more bang for thier buck and  seek to extend the short 685s from Brampton to Alston.

Local authorities don't have the luxury of applying a blanket refusal to secure any bus services, as they have some legal obligations around this. There's a pretty good write up of it here: https://bettertransport.org.uk/sites/def...duties.pdf

Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook
Adrian
22 Aug 2022, 3:32 pm #1,726

(22 Aug 2022, 2:05 pm)DeltaMan The issue with Alston is Cumbria County Council.

They do not subsidise ANY conventional bus services. Unless somebody sets up a "Community Transport" style operation then they don't care.

It clearly comes down to money, but there was hardly mention of Alston at all in the counties BSIP submission either.

The other issue is even if there is a pot of money for buses, where do they do go? You could make a case for Carlisle, Penrith, Hexham and Haltwhistle. I'd say Carlisle would offer more bang for thier buck and  seek to extend the short 685s from Brampton to Alston.

Local authorities don't have the luxury of applying a blanket refusal to secure any bus services, as they have some legal obligations around this. There's a pretty good write up of it here: https://bettertransport.org.uk/sites/def...duties.pdf


Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook

Ambassador



1,859
22 Aug 2022, 4:40 pm #1,727
(22 Aug 2022, 12:44 pm)Adrian I'm not convinced it would be. What kind of resource do you think would be needed to cover an area the size of South (and West, given the similar challenges) Northumberland, vs. the cost of providing 4x Solos or whatever it is? 

Tees Flex has I think 11 vehicles, and they're paying Stagecoach just over £1 million a year to operate it.

My calculations were based on the current policy for DRT which appears to be just throw money at a rural area and hope it sticks.

Wistfully stuck in the 90s
Ambassador
22 Aug 2022, 4:40 pm #1,727

(22 Aug 2022, 12:44 pm)Adrian I'm not convinced it would be. What kind of resource do you think would be needed to cover an area the size of South (and West, given the similar challenges) Northumberland, vs. the cost of providing 4x Solos or whatever it is? 

Tees Flex has I think 11 vehicles, and they're paying Stagecoach just over £1 million a year to operate it.

My calculations were based on the current policy for DRT which appears to be just throw money at a rural area and hope it sticks.


Wistfully stuck in the 90s

Jimmi



10,970
22 Aug 2022, 5:33 pm #1,728
(22 Aug 2022, 3:13 pm)xpm A community transport organisation (Border Rambler) used to run a couple if times a week service Gilsland/Greehead/Walltown to Brampton IIRC - but I never saw it in a post covid world - although I'm not up there as often as I used to be.

This still operates on Wednesdays & Thursdays in the summer: https://www.borderramblerbus.co.uk/bus-routes/br3.html

Note that the advertised connections with the AD122 at Walton Roman Army Museum in this timetable no longer match up.
Jimmi
22 Aug 2022, 5:33 pm #1,728

(22 Aug 2022, 3:13 pm)xpm A community transport organisation (Border Rambler) used to run a couple if times a week service Gilsland/Greehead/Walltown to Brampton IIRC - but I never saw it in a post covid world - although I'm not up there as often as I used to be.

This still operates on Wednesdays & Thursdays in the summer: https://www.borderramblerbus.co.uk/bus-routes/br3.html

Note that the advertised connections with the AD122 at Walton Roman Army Museum in this timetable no longer match up.

Unber43



3,556
01 Sep 2022, 6:07 pm #1,729
I definitely think X45 needs a higher frequency than every 30 mins they've all been rammed today. They are always late and delayed.
Unber43
01 Sep 2022, 6:07 pm #1,729

I definitely think X45 needs a higher frequency than every 30 mins they've all been rammed today. They are always late and delayed.

nova347



415
01 Sep 2022, 8:19 pm #1,730
Will GNE tickets still be accepted on 82/30/31/725 after September 2nd?
nova347
01 Sep 2022, 8:19 pm #1,730

Will GNE tickets still be accepted on 82/30/31/725 after September 2nd?

Unber43



3,556
10 Dec 2022, 12:19 pm #1,731
The 28/29 have had some excellent loading when I've seen them, especially the 29, however I did see them both heading into Newcastle with 2/3 people on them I was walking around Newcastle when I saw them so i don't know how many got off at Gateshead
Unber43
10 Dec 2022, 12:19 pm #1,731

The 28/29 have had some excellent loading when I've seen them, especially the 29, however I did see them both heading into Newcastle with 2/3 people on them I was walking around Newcastle when I saw them so i don't know how many got off at Gateshead

nova347



415
10 Dec 2022, 12:38 pm #1,732
(10 Dec 2022, 12:19 pm)Unber43 The 28/29 have had some excellent loading when I've seen them, especially the 29, however I did see them both heading into Newcastle with 2/3 people on them I was walking around Newcastle when I saw them so i don't know how many got off at Gateshead
I got the 29 a few weeks ago, it had 3 people from Newcastle but it was quite busy from Gateshead.
nova347
10 Dec 2022, 12:38 pm #1,732

(10 Dec 2022, 12:19 pm)Unber43 The 28/29 have had some excellent loading when I've seen them, especially the 29, however I did see them both heading into Newcastle with 2/3 people on them I was walking around Newcastle when I saw them so i don't know how many got off at Gateshead
I got the 29 a few weeks ago, it had 3 people from Newcastle but it was quite busy from Gateshead.

Pages (87) Previous 185 86 87
 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average