(04 Mar 2016, 4:59 pm)Kuyoyo wrote [ -> ]It replaced 1443 which then dropped back onto the 1610 replacing 1415 which has since ended up on 9 and the 1720 5a.
Wrong. 1418 replaced 1415, 1443 was always scheduled to do the 1610 departure. 1415 then replaced 1456 as it was late coming in.
Mpd on 306 left haymarket about 1700 to whitley bay
Sapphire Double Decker on the 23:15 service 7 from Durham to Newton Aycliffe unsure which one it is, it is supposed to be Pulsar operated on a night
7453/5 on X12
EDIT: 1438 on X93
7438, 1476, 7440 on Durham 64
1325 on the 46, meantime.
(05 Mar 2016, 10:40 am)BusLoverMum wrote [ -> ]7438, 1476, 7440 on Durham 64
1325 on the 46, meantime.
7444 also on the 64.
1595 on 61.
57 Reg VDL DB250 on the X12 should be approaching Eldon Square now
(05 Mar 2016, 11:06 am)Davie wrote [ -> ]7444 also on the 64.
1595 on 61.
7442 on the 64, too
(05 Mar 2016, 12:13 pm)BusLoverMum wrote [ -> ]7442 on the 64, too
Not a good day for the 64 then!
(05 Mar 2016, 12:14 pm)Davie wrote [ -> ]Not a good day for the 64 then!
7454, too!
I guess either something is being done to the e200s or they're using the deckers to increase capacity to the arnison centre, since it'll be v busy with it being mother's day weekend.
A DB250 was removed from the 1215 Ashington-Alnwick x20. Replaced with 7414
7531 is on 1240 x22 Ashington-Newcastle
(05 Mar 2016, 12:20 pm)BusLoverMum wrote [ -> ]7454, too!
I guess either something is being done to the e200s or they're using the deckers to increase capacity to the arnison centre, since it'll be v busy with it being mother's day weekend.
They've probably just whacked the E200's on other routes, that's where thet normally are.
(04 Mar 2016, 8:22 pm)tyresmoke wrote [ -> ]Wrong. 1418 replaced 1415, 1443 was always scheduled to do the 1610 departure. 1415 then replaced 1456 as it was late coming in.
7605 308
1419 306
1408 52
4517 55
2806 X16
2846 46
4520 43/44/45
1502 X10/X11
(05 Mar 2016, 1:06 pm)GX03 SVC wrote [ -> ]A DB250 was removed from the 1215 Ashington-Alnwick x20. Replaced with 7414
Ahh man! Where's the fun in that?!!!
1916 ended up on 9s
1458 was allocated to S1s but has been sat in Stockton since 1600 due to an old lady falling over as she got off. As such, 2804 has cover the last trip.
Corporate liveried pulsar heading for Durham on the 22. A growly rather than a whiny one, unusually for Belmont.
(05 Mar 2016, 4:28 pm)NK53 TKT wrote [ -> ]1502 X10/X11
Is a MAX spare on a MAX route really an rare/odd working?
(05 Mar 2016, 9:37 pm)X8X9X10 wrote [ -> ]Is a MAX spare on a MAX route really an rare/odd working?
Nope as it is a spare it can be used on any MAX route, it doesn't matter if its a saloon or a decker.
(05 Mar 2016, 9:37 pm)X8X9X10 wrote [ -> ]Is a MAX spare on a MAX route really an rare/odd working?
(05 Mar 2016, 9:40 pm)GX03 SVC wrote [ -> ]Nope as it is a spare it can be used on any MAX route, it doesn't matter if its a saloon or a decker.
I'd say strictly speaking, it's an odd working. It's a vehicle type other than what's specified on the boards.
(05 Mar 2016, 9:43 pm)Adrian wrote [ -> ]I'd say strictly speaking, it's an odd working. It's a vehicle type other than what's specified on the boards.
Majority of Darlington's spare MAX buses are...
NK05 GXF (fleet number was too small but id have a wild stab at it being 4658) heading to Darlington on a 7 - just gone through Nevilles Cross
(06 Mar 2016, 5:38 pm)S813 FVK wrote [ -> ]NK05 GXF (fleet number was too small but id have a wild stab at it being 4658) heading to Darlington on a 7 - just gone through Nevilles Cross
4652.
(06 Mar 2016, 5:39 pm)DanPicken wrote [ -> ]4652.
Thanks. For some reason i came to the conclusion that neither 4652 or 4654 suited GXF. Sounds stupid, i know.
(05 Mar 2016, 9:37 pm)X8X9X10 wrote [ -> ]Is a MAX spare on a MAX route really an rare/odd working?
It's X9 branded...