North East Buses

Full Version: Website suspended
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Did someone forget to put the 50p in the meter?
(30 May 2022, 8:36 pm)streetdeckfan wrote [ -> ]Did someone forget to put the 50p in the meter?

Nah, someone stuck a DIY 'No Entry' sign on us for most of the day.
Great to see it back up and running
It's back up and running!
Checked a couple of times today and wondered what had happened. 
Checked again and it's all systems go!
I've missed my daily dose of the apparent 'GNE bashing' Wink
(30 May 2022, 9:16 pm)Andreos1 wrote [ -> ]It's back up and running!
Checked a couple of times today and wondered what had happened. 
Checked again and it's all systems go!
I've missed my daily dose of the apparent 'GNE bashing' Wink

Must be what it feels like to be a GNE passenger!
(30 May 2022, 9:16 pm)Andreos1 wrote [ -> ]It's back up and running!
Checked a couple of times today and wondered what had happened. 
Checked again and it's all systems go!
I've missed my daily dose of the apparent 'GNE bashing' Wink
I assumed GNE pulled a Transdev and blocked the site to silence any criticism that was directed their way
was gutted when it went down, How do I access the by gone era year categories?
When I first saw the vaguely worded "account suspended" notice I thought I'd been banned from the forum or something.

(30 May 2022, 9:45 pm)adavies3774 wrote [ -> ]was gutted when it went down, How do I access the by gone era year categories?

https://www.northeastbuses.co.uk/bygone/timeline.php
(30 May 2022, 9:20 pm)Jimmi wrote [ -> ]I assumed GNE pulled a Transdev and blocked the site to silence any criticism that was directed their way
You dont know how close you are to the truth lol
(31 May 2022, 10:16 am)Rob44 wrote [ -> ]You dont know how close you are to the truth lol

The admin of the site works for GNE, coincidence?
(31 May 2022, 10:21 am)streetdeckfan wrote [ -> ]The admin of the site works for GNE, coincidence?

...and the four others don't!

Sounds like you're putting 2+2 together and getting 7,592.
(31 May 2022, 10:33 am)Adrian wrote [ -> ]...and the four others don't!

Sounds like you're putting 2+2 together and getting 7,592.

It only takes one bad apple to spoil the barrel, as they say
(31 May 2022, 10:54 am)streetdeckfan wrote [ -> ]It only takes one bad apple to spoil the barrel, as they say

*Yawn*... I'm not sure why you're here, if it's so bad?!

We're all for constructive criticism and debate on here, but not far-fetched conspiracy theories. As much as you (and others) would like to blame a particular operator in some way, it's a ridiculous suggestion. 

I'm going to close this thread as it's ran its course.