(23 Jan 2024, 9:34 am)Ambassador wrote Did I mention how delighted I am this loss making business has moved on from enthusiast pleasing paint jobs that make absolutely no difference to passengers on a route that needs absolutely no support and if you put an Arriva bus on would still fill up?

(23 Jan 2024, 9:34 am)Ambassador wrote Did I mention how delighted I am this loss making business has moved on from enthusiast pleasing paint jobs that make absolutely no difference to passengers on a route that needs absolutely no support and if you put an Arriva bus on would still fill up?

(23 Jan 2024, 12:44 pm)Adrian wrote I can't wait to see how a new lick of paint and a blast back to the 90s, completely changes the fortunes of this company. Because they've never tried that in the last 20 years.

(23 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm)busmanT wrote Wasn’t a new lick of paint due anyway, with the demise of Green Arrow and the return from Bee Network?
X66 has been branded for years, only latterly not branded as the last branded buses were commandeered for Go North West.

(23 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm)busmanT wrote Wasn’t a new lick of paint due anyway, with the demise of Green Arrow and the return from Bee Network?
X66 has been branded for years, only latterly not branded as the last branded buses were commandeered for Go North West.

(23 Jan 2024, 5:06 pm)Aaron21 wrote Well it's here. Nice to see the metro logo has been added

https://flic.kr/p/2pu7vjP (front)
https://flic.kr/p/2pu69ve (back)

(23 Jan 2024, 3:11 pm)Adrian wrote That's my point, though. Maybe not specifically about the X66, but continuing to do the same repetitive nonsense over and over, expecting a different result.

If this is indeed a new X66 livery, it's the 6th that I can count in the past 12 years. In that time, we've seen it lose it's shuttle status, rerouted to serve additional stops, reduce in capacity and reduce in frequency. But hey, let's try it again, I'm sure it'll be better next time.

(23 Jan 2024, 6:16 pm)Storx wrote It's more ironic that they've just put a ZEBRA 2 bid in, which if they win, then this will last 3 years max.

(23 Jan 2024, 6:32 pm)busmanT wrote 3 years is a long time in bus operation …….

And no guarantee that the ZEBRA2 bid will be accepted.

(23 Jan 2024, 6:47 pm)Wybus wrote Looks nice and it’s good that the X66 is getting branded again considering it has pretty much always been branded

Isn’t this thing where some people have to moan and complain about everything getting a bit boring now?

(23 Jan 2024, 6:47 pm)Wybus wrote Looks nice and it’s good that the X66 is getting branded again considering it has pretty much always been branded

Isn’t this thing where some people have to moan and complain about everything getting a bit boring now?

(23 Jan 2024, 6:46 pm)Ambassador wrote Im sure it’s nice for whoever is involved to get to play designer but this is a total waste of resource by a company we’re told has no money. It’s taken up someone’s time and effort and all to get some likes on a Facebook group for a livery that is utterly meaningless to anyone that isn’t an enthusiast.

Navel gazing nonsense…any chance we can get some adults in charge?

(23 Jan 2024, 6:47 pm)Wybus wrote Looks nice and it’s good that the X66 is getting branded again considering it has pretty much always been branded

Isn’t this thing where some people have to moan and complain about everything getting a bit boring now?

(23 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm)L469 YVK wrote Unless the 'SuperShuttle' base livery will be the new corporate base livery going forward? Actually looks pretty smart, simple and could absorb up most brands. Keeping some form of a 'sub-brand' whilst retaining a recognisable corporate livery.

(23 Jan 2024, 9:35 pm)ne14ne1 wrote No it’s not. Where you getting this from?

(23 Jan 2024, 9:35 pm)ne14ne1 wrote It gets worse:

https://x.com/garyhunter91/status/1749847481590915077?s=46&t=tPuGEygnn6BhKgNFiA4yAw

Why would you paint up 3 modern buses to look old.
Surely we want to attract passengers to bus travel and chance perceptions.

There’s already a B9 knocking around in some old fashioned heritage livery. Do they really need 4 retro liveries?
Simply to excite a handful of spotters?

(23 Jan 2024, 9:35 pm)ne14ne1 wrote No it’s not. Where you getting this from?

---

It gets worse:

https://x.com/garyhunter91/status/1749847481590915077?s=46&t=tPuGEygnn6BhKgNFiA4yAw

Why would you paint up 3 modern buses to look old.
Surely we want to attract passengers to bus travel and chance perceptions.

There’s already a B9 knocking around in some old fashioned heritage livery. Do they really need 4 retro liveries?
Simply to excite a handful of spotters?

(23 Jan 2024, 10:24 pm)James101 wrote Crikey, this repaint has shown the worst habits of this forum.

A bus that needed a repaint regardless has had so in an on-brand and cost effective manor. In doing so, a core route with a legacy of branding has been returned to the status-quo as per the past almost 40 years.

Yes, Go North East has suffered an almighty fall from grace by its own actions, but this specific thing really seems like a job well done.

Arriva has a schizophrenic corporate identity with multiple brands in tatters, often wrongly defended as ‘defunct’ by those who haven’t grasped that word’s meaning. Stagecoach at their best has a new livery which is washed out and anonymous within weeks and at their worst operate MANviros in Hartlepool and elsewhere which appear to have been dragged out from a field.

Innovation in the bus industry is near enough dead, bar perhaps electric propulsion heavily subsidised. By the end of the decade most metropolitan areas will have franchising systems well under way and we’ll miss these hayclon days of creativity, though at least we might have a better service to console us.

(24 Jan 2024, 12:28 am)Adrian wrote Could someone, with knowledge of the subject, please explain how it's more cost-effective to paint a bus in 3 or 4 colours versus 1 colour?

I've seen at least three posters mention this now, but my limited knowledge tells me that's incorrect? Is it not a process/re-masking per colour, given you can't paint on top of or alongside wet paint?

Sent from my SM-S916B using Tapatalk

(23 Jan 2024, 11:46 pm)mb134 wrote The repaint isn't in the recent "roadstripe" style so I'm struggling to see how it is on-brand. In terms of being cost effective, given someone will have been paid to design it then it is quite literally not as cost effective as simply painting it into the 2019 livery - for 99.9% of users they simply could not care less about it being branded. 

In terms of your Arriva and Stagecoach points, does every critical discussion surrounding GNE turn into whataboutery? 

On your last point, can a rehash of an old livery really be termed "innovation"? Looking to the continent across the cities where I've used buses there is no route branding, simply an easy to understand system with frequent services and good value fares. To me, innovation in the bus industry would be to deliver services which the general public see as reliable and useful, or to deliver better integration between different modes of public transport. 

During the peak of MG-era GNE branding, a few folk on here (rightly) questioned the approach of the company. Other people on here told them they were wrong, and pointed to stats from years ago that suggested branding had a positive impact on passenger numbers. Ultimately the world has changed and so new approaches are needed to grow public transport usage, we can't just carry on repeating old ideas when they quite clearly do not work anymore.

(23 Jan 2024, 5:45 pm)streetdeckfan wrote You know, if it wasn't for that awkward bit of yellow dipping down on the front, I'd say that looked rather smart!