(22 Sep 2018, 2:40 pm)Andreos1 wrote Just seen two 20A's running together.
Surely there has to be a better way of managing the Durham delays?

(22 Sep 2018, 2:49 pm)Malarkey wrote Terminate them at Claypath

(22 Sep 2018, 2:49 pm)Malarkey wrote Terminate them at Claypath

(23 Sep 2018, 6:43 am)cbma06 wrote I wonder what the frequency of the Sunderland to shields section would of been on the 20/20A due to the hold ups at gilesgate, should of sent the 60 to shields and have the 20/20A only between Sunderland and Durham only as Durham is unpredictable


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(23 Sep 2018, 7:27 am)deanmachine wrote The 60?! The 60 is worse than the 20 for reliability due to Seaham being unpredictable for most of the day. 

There’s nothing wrong with the reliability of the 20 outside peak times. Yesterday was only bad due to the perfect storm the 15 times a year Sunderland play at home on and a busy Saturday in Durham.

(23 Sep 2018, 8:30 am)S830OFT wrote The 20 should go back to Sunderland to Durham only with a new route between Sunderland and South Shields.

(23 Sep 2018, 8:34 am)Dan wrote Why? What would that achieve?

Reliability isn't an issue, other than on match days when Sunderland play at home. In this instance all that needs to be done is for the service to be regulated effectively on a match day to combat late-running.

By no means should a re-hash of the services in Sunderland be necessary.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

(23 Sep 2018, 8:38 am)Jamie M wrote Put it on the end of 8/78/78A..! It's such an obvious missing link between Pelton and Cleadon!

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

(23 Sep 2018, 6:43 am)cbma06 wrote I wonder what the frequency of the Sunderland to shields section would of been on the 20/20A due to the hold ups at gilesgate, should of sent the 60 to shields and have the 20/20A only between Sunderland and Durham only as Durham is unpredictable


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(23 Sep 2018, 8:46 am)Andreos1 wrote The site isn't letting me upload photos at the moment, so can't show the screen shots I took from the app. 

At the time of the two 20A's heading towards Shields, there was a 20 coming down Seaham Road in to Houghton. 
There was another 20 between Barnes gyratory and Sunderland City centre.
There was nothing in the Raintons.

The two in my example were on Houghton cut and had been following each other since at least Rainton Bridge when I first saw them running together. 

(I just want to clarify that I was out and about yesterday both in the car and using public transport and wasn't following buses on the app).

(23 Sep 2018, 8:53 am)Jamie M wrote Dunno why they didn't just swap the pax over at rainton bridge and send the very late one to turn around at belmont or where-ever it was due to be running out of Durham next. I don't think 2 vehicles should ever get the chance to be running in parallel but that's idealism for you.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

(23 Sep 2018, 8:34 am)Dan wrote Why? What would that achieve?

Reliability isn't an issue, other than on match days when Sunderland play at home. In this instance all that needs to be done is for the service to be regulated effectively on a match day to combat late-running.

By no means should a re-hash of the services in Sunderland be necessary.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

(23 Sep 2018, 12:18 pm)Dan wrote Completely different note but 718 has now transferred to Peterlee.

658 is VOR for inspection today but hopefully should be swapped back over tomorrow, which is when 5206 will leave Peterlee and all service allocations at Peterlee should be restored to how they were prior to the conversion of service X6/X7 to Scania L94 to release minibuses.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

(23 Sep 2018, 12:20 pm)Jamie M wrote Where are our beloved rattlebox solar-systems going to?

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

(23 Sep 2018, 1:06 pm)Michael wrote 5206 could go back to Chester, as it was allocated there before it moved to Peterlee.

(23 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm)Jamie M wrote Not sure if they need it though.. unless spare vehicles are on the up like they should be!

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

(23 Sep 2018, 1:15 pm)Michael wrote It'll end up somewhere, as it has the modifications, so either way 1 depot will gain an extra spare.

(23 Sep 2018, 12:18 pm)Dan wrote Completely different note but 718 has now transferred to Peterlee.

658 is VOR for inspection today but hopefully should be swapped back over tomorrow, which is when 5206 will leave Peterlee and all service allocations at Peterlee should be restored to how they were prior to the conversion of service X6/X7 to Scania L94 to release minibuses.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

(23 Sep 2018, 1:18 pm)Jamie M wrote Hopefully washy or salties to cover for bluestar refurbs/repaints so one less of those things can end up in public.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

(23 Sep 2018, 1:21 pm)Michael wrote The Bluestar Citaro's are only getting a repaint, as they won't be in the fleet long.

(23 Sep 2018, 1:21 pm)Michael wrote The Bluestar Citaro's are only getting a repaint, as they won't be in the fleet long.

(23 Sep 2018, 1:55 pm)JM03 wrote How long are we talking?

(23 Sep 2018, 1:55 pm)JM03 wrote How long are we talking?

(23 Sep 2018, 2:15 pm)Michael wrote I heard a couple of years but could be less, as the Scania's should hopefully start to be replaced next year when the contracts runs out for the council funding.... which in someway i would be gutted, as the Scania's are brilliant but i can't see the Scania's replacing them.

After the Scania's i would imagine the Versa's would be the next to go in a spare role (god help us).

(23 Sep 2018, 12:18 pm)Dan wrote Completely different note but 718 has now transferred to Peterlee.

658 is VOR for inspection today but hopefully should be swapped back over tomorrow, which is when 5206 will leave Peterlee and all service allocations at Peterlee should be restored to how they were prior to the conversion of service X6/X7 to Scania L94 to release minibuses.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

(24 Sep 2018, 5:29 pm)cbma06 wrote 5206 and 5213 both working duties at Peterlee today on 206/X6.