Heard things such as:
- CR 8's moving to Consett
- 8/34 moving to Washington
- National Express to Washington
- 21/X21 to Riverside
- Versa and Lites to Deptford
- Solos to Washington
- Cathedral runs to Consett
- 8319 to Riverside
pretty much

So the 8 is moving to washington & Consett.

34 moving to Washington, however the Veras's & Lites are gonna to to Deptford, also what spare Streetlites do CLS have... | X21 are gonna have some dead mileage, aswell so are the Mercedes gonna be replaced by god what a waste of money on repaints

So the 8's moving to Consett & Washington. 


X21 going to have so much dead mileage. 

Which Veras's and Streetlites, so whats gonna be on the 34, clearly the consultation hasn’t came with any changes to the 25 or 28 which is a shame

What are the veras and streetlites gonna do at Deptford....

anything could happen. its all too confusing to believe. best just wait till things are confirmed

Doubt Nat Exp would go to Washington, it doesn't have any toilet drop facilities

Doubt Nat Exp would go to Washington, it doesn't have any toilet drop facilities

just gonna have to wait till things are confirmed

The letter that Ambassador mentions above talks of restructure and consolidating the footprint down to 6 depots. I doubt very much a new depot is on the cards, certainly in the short term.

---

It’s on the North East Bus Enthusiasts Facebook group

Aye that's fair, see I thought it might've been a move like Riverside which was a merger of the old Winlaton and Gateshead depots and they got a new depot out of it in the process which saved costs in the long term.

The thing has been rumoured for years especially at Drum Ind. Estate.

Someone I know suggested they could use the Northern garage at Beamish Museum as an outstation. I did laugh out loud at that.

Someone I know suggested they could use the Northern garage at Beamish Museum as an outstation. I did laugh out loud at that.

To be fair, whilst it is small, it definitely looks more modern. Kind of incongruous to Beamish.

Someone I know suggested they could use the Northern garage at Beamish Museum as an outstation. I did laugh out loud at that.

I mean a PVR of 3, 34. 

It goes right near there...

Heard things such as:
- CR 8's moving to Consett
- 8/34 moving to Washington
- National Express to Washington
- 21/X21 to Riverside
- Versa and Lites to Deptford
- Solos to Washington
- Cathedral runs to Consett
- 8319 to Riverside
pretty much

8 & 34 to Washington make sense - 9 PVR; Washington losing 4 PVR from 82/84 changes and 4 PVR from 26 linking with 24 in South Shields; losing 2 PVR from service 4 reduction so room for some Nexus schools. 700 etc could go to Washington as well.

21/X21 to Riverside (pity there isn't an outstation at Crook......)

Nat Exp to Riverside, Saltmeadows or even Percy M

Everything else cancelled as per consultation:
X22
25
28/28A/28B/734
plus school buses

8 & 34 to Washington make sense - 9 PVR; Washington losing 4 PVR from 82/84 changes and 4 PVR from 26 linking with 24 in South Shields; losing 2 PVR from service 4 reduction so room for some Nexus schools. 700 etc could go to Washington as well.

21/X21 to Riverside (pity there isn't an outstation at Crook......)

Nat Exp to Riverside, Saltmeadows or even Percy M

Everything else cancelled as per consultation:
X22
25
28/28A/28B/734
plus school buses

Has it been confirmed that the 

24 is every 15 mins, and being split with the 26/5

Has it been confirmed that the 

24 is every 15 mins, and being split with the 26/5

Didn’t the consultation say it would be every 15 mins?
The only reason for splitting the 20 can be to allow interworking in S Shields with 26 (interworking with 50 won’t work due to both having a longer route) 

The 9 won’t work on its own (too tight), so it’s possible that the 24 might interwork with 5 & 9 - we’ll have to wait until the timetables appear.

Time for a good fleet livery…..

Can’t see them building a new depot , as there supposed to be cutting back as there’s no money to spend, if some Chester services move to Washington then probably some Washington services will transfer to deptford


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I always thought the plan was to build a new depot in the Birtley area to replace both Chester le Street and Washington but that doesn't seem to be happening anymore. They would probably get a good price for the land at both depots maybe enough to build a new one.

I always thought the plan was to build a new depot in the Birtley area to replace both Chester le Street and Washington but that doesn't seem to be happening anymore. They would probably get a good price for the land at both depots maybe enough to build a new one.

Is the land in CLS really that valuable? There's nowt really going for it other than being somewhat near the A1, and it'll be expensive to build on because of the massive retaining wall

Sent from my AC2003 using Tapatalk

Once all the cuts GNE are intent on go through other depots will have capacity. And with Mr popular from GNW arriving, guess more cuts and maybe another depot will go.

Is the land in CLS really that valuable? There's nowt really going for it other than being somewhat near the A1, and it'll be expensive to build on because of the massive retaining wall

Sent from my AC2003 using Tapatalk

Doubtful, its an awkward corner plot with existing commercial businesses attached to it and there's a lot of land (and current spare capacity) around Chester at the moment.

There may be some short term industrial or commercial use for it but I doubt its up to the modern spec most businesses would look for (and can probably get cheaper elsewhere)

I wonder if we could see the return of Birtley terminating 21's - straight up Newcastle Bank - bypass - Riverside and done. Guessing it will be a lot harder to regulate 21s from Riverside than it is via CLS

Heard things such as:
- CR 8's moving to Consett
- 8/34 moving to Washington
- National Express to Washington
- 21/X21 to Riverside
- Versa and Lites to Deptford
- Solos to Washington
- Cathedral runs to Consett
- 8319 to Riverside
pretty much

8 to Washington is very Logical

Maybe there could be an option to Extend 34 to Washington covering some of the routes to be withdrawn if it is paid for (Hopefully we will find out what (if anything) is saved soon!)

What depot(s) have the facilities available for coach maintenance especially triaxle coaches? I know at Deptford we send them to Chester Le Street.

Also, it has been mentioned the 71 transferring to Deptford.

What depot(s) have the facilities available for coach maintenance especially triaxle coaches? I know at Deptford we send them to Chester Le Street.

Also, it has been mentioned the 71 transferring to Deptford.

Tbh, it could be worth extending it to Sunderland to have a every 30 mins with the X6 leaving, you could extend it actually throught where the 734 goes, and some of the 28 routes, say to Wreckton

https://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/2...le-street/


Sent from my iPhone 13 Pro using Tapatalk

Is the old travelshop / mess room going as well?

https://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/2...le-street/


Sent from my iPhone 13 Pro using Tapatalk

I've been trying to find the original points of discussion following the rumours and stories earlier this year.
Gave up looking in the millions of multiple threads that exist now. 

But it would be interesting to compare and contrast the comments then with the comments now.
I'm particularly concerned around the comments relating to the proposed changes. We've been told they're proposed. We've been told nothing is definite. Yet there's comments in that article that seem to conflict with everything else.

* If the routes aren't going - why mention that they are in the article?
* If the routes are going and are based on falling numbers, then surely the decision to close the depot was made months ago, when rumours first emerged. 

My own opinion is that there's not enough money to replace the life expired (or soon to be) vehicles and the need to save money/consolidate remaining vehicles at the remaining depots is ever more urgent.
Mix that up with a commercial team unable to muster up anything exciting or new, alongside the ability to quickly point the finger at Covid and you end up with a story like this.
Ultimately, you can't run a network (viable or otherwise) the size of GNE's, with fewer vehicles.

Mind, there's more holes in these leaks and stories, than there are in a Swiss cheese factory that's been infested with hungry mice.

I've been trying to find the original points of discussion following the rumours and stories earlier this year.
Gave up looking in the millions of multiple threads that exist now. 

But it would be interesting to compare and contrast the comments then with the comments now.
I'm particularly concerned around the comments relating to the proposed changes. We've been told they're proposed. We've been told nothing is definite. Yet there's comments in that article that seem to conflict with everything else.

* If the routes aren't going - why mention that they are in the article?
* If the routes are going and are based on falling numbers, then surely the decision to close the depot was made months ago, when rumours first emerged. 

My own opinion is that there's not enough money to replace the life expired (or soon to be) vehicles and the need to save money/consolidate remaining vehicles at the remaining depots is ever more urgent.
Mix that up with a commercial team unable to muster up anything exciting or new, alongside the ability to quickly point the finger at Covid and you end up with a story like this.
Ultimately, you can't run a network (viable or otherwise) the size of GNE's, with fewer vehicles.

Mind, there's more holes in these leaks and stories, than there are in a Swiss cheese factory that's been infested with hungry mice.

It's worth pointing out it that in almost every bus company it is senior directors/management that set PVR numbers and vehicle requirements. Not commercial teams or engineering departments. That would be tail wagging the dog....

The consultation letter confirming the closure is wisely circulating on Facebook

Hexham becomes a Consett out station

Does anyone have a copy of this?

What’s the change for Hexham then? What does becoming an ‘outstation’ mean in practice.

Also from March > https://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/1...pot-close/

Does anyone have a copy of this? (DM if needs be)

What’s the change for Hexham then? What does becoming an ‘outstation’ mean in practice.

Also from March > https://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/1...pot-close/

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

Does anyone have a copy of this? (DM if needs be)

What’s the change for Hexham then? What does becoming an ‘outstation’ mean in practice.

Also from March > https://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/1...pot-close/

I think Hexham will be similar as what Peterlee outstation was with just a small handful of buses parked up there overnight with all maintenance work done to the buses presumably done at consett


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The MP for North Durham, Kevan Jones has published a letter to be sent to GNE has posted it on his Facebook page.


Sent from my iPhone 13 Pro using Tapatalk

https://www.facebook.com/96783637568/pos...3BX8KcSml/

Interesting comments from members of the public, staff and ex-staff.

It's worth pointing out it that in almost every bus company it is senior directors/management that set PVR numbers and vehicle requirements. Not commercial teams or engineering departments. That would be tail wagging the dog....

That might be the case.
But if a commercial team can't be as creative as Southeasterns accounting teams - things keep getting squeezed tighter and tighter.
It goes without saying that if the money ain't coming in, there's going to be a limit on what the MD can do to replace the life expired vehicles.

It does look a lot like a gradual retreat northwards. Services to hartlepool and teesside have been slashed, Peterlee and Crook and now Chester closed. I'm wondering how long before nothing heads south of Durham or Peterlee?

That might be the case.
But if a commercial team can't be as creative at Southeasterns accounting teams - things keep getting squeezed tighter and tighter.
It goes without saying that if the money ain't coming in, there's going to be a limit on what the MD can do to replace the life expired vehicles.

They'd have to be creative in any circumstance if they are told by senior management teams to cut PVR by X or Y but still cover most of the network.

They'd have to be creative in any circumstance if they are told by senior management teams to cut PVR by X or Y but still cover most of the network.

It'd be odd for any company to impose a directive such as cutting PVR or services, wouldn't it? Are they not more likely to have been told to maintain (or increase) margin to X%? Of course, I agree one key way to achieve that is to reduce overheads, but the other is to increase sales.