Is it really an infrastructure development of note though? 

You’ve (well not you directly of course) built an interchange station nobody wanted. Buses served the centre, the metro station is what it is and the ferry is so badly integrated you’d be better off swimming. 

The compelling reason to visit has to be the retail or bespoke offering which doesn’t exist. Fish Quay is car and taxi heavy and North Shields town centre is an utter dive.

The sensible investment would have been to lower rates, encourage investment in the town, open up bespoke retail, leisure etc then think about a shiny new interchange.

It's a waste of money imo, the only place where bus stations should exist is where people are realistically going to swap methods of transport. Beyond that does it really matter. The vast majority of people won't spend more than 10 minutes there anyway and if they have to walk further it's arguably it's a negative in the case for North Shields.

Personally, I'd much rather be able to get off at Nile Street then have the choice to get on at Bedford Street or near the library, now I wouldn't have that choice and must use the bus station miles away from the library for example.

It's a very British thing to build bus stations, similar could've been said for South Shields aswell which arguably could've been built as a massive loop around the town letting people choose where they actually want to be rather than being told where to go.

It's a waste of money imo, the only place where bus stations should exist is where people are realistically going to swap methods of transport. Beyond that does it really matter. The vast majority of people won't spend more than 10 minutes there anyway and if they have to walk further it's arguably it's a negative in the case for North Shields.

Personally, I'd much rather be able to get off at Nile Street then have the choice to get on at Bedford Street or near the library, now I wouldn't have that choice and must use the bus station miles away from the library for example.

It's a very British thing to build bus stations, similar could've been said for South Shields aswell which arguably could've been built as a massive loop around the town letting people choose where they actually want to be rather than being told where to go.

The former PTEs are obsessed with having bus stations. In Nexus case it’s to encourage more people to travel by Metro by having buses stop outside at Metro stations.

The former PTEs are obsessed with having bus stations. In Nexus case it’s to encourage more people to travel by Metro by having buses stop outside at Metro stations. 

I thought it was just to improve the public transport network to be honest. 
Whether that's getting on or off the metro, or indeed changing buses.

What worries me now though is that if they see this as a resounding success (which they probably will), then i wonder how long it'll be before another one pops up in another dying town like Wallsend, cus imo, when Wilkos shuts its doors, i wonder how long the rest of the Beacon Centre will last, theres already plenty of empty shops, whoever said it (cant remember who) but rents/taxes should of been lowered to encourage growth, before spaffing millions on a bus station, and that wasted space where all the plants and seats are, could of been put to better use imo, like a small indoor market joined onto the bus station, nobody is gonna wanna use that bus station, especially when all the scum come out to play

It's a waste of money imo, the only place where bus stations should exist is where people are realistically going to swap methods of transport. Beyond that does it really matter. The vast majority of people won't spend more than 10 minutes there anyway and if they have to walk further it's arguably it's a negative in the case for North Shields.

Personally, I'd much rather be able to get off at Nile Street then have the choice to get on at Bedford Street or near the library, now I wouldn't have that choice and must use the bus station miles away from the library for example.

It's a very British thing to build bus stations, similar could've been said for South Shields aswell which arguably could've been built as a massive loop around the town letting people choose where they actually want to be rather than being told where to go.

You can tell you don't live in South Shields. Shields Interchange is a great place to catch the bus after an evening of drinks in Newcastle or Shields, there's nothing wrong with the location either, the town centre isn't exactly a big place, everywhere is in a walkable distance.

What worries me now though is that if they see this as a resounding success (which they probably will), then i wonder how long it'll be before another one pops up in another dying town like Wallsend, cus imo, when Wilkos shuts its doors, i wonder how long the rest of the Beacon Centre will last, theres already plenty of empty shops, whoever said it (cant remember who) but rents/taxes should of been lowered to encourage growth, before spaffing millions on a bus station, and that wasted space where all the plants and seats are, could of been put to better use imo, like a small indoor market joined onto the bus station, nobody is gonna wanna use that bus station, especially when all the scum come out to play

Wallsend already has a bus station, just a shame that operators have pulled some services out of it. I think there are plans to revitalise it and make it more pleasant!

Wallsend already has a bus station, just a shame that operators have pulled some services out of it. I think there are plans to revitalise it and make it more pleasant!

Might have a bus station,its a couple of shelters, but nout like the one in North Shields

New transport hub and town square opens in North Shields with official ceremony

https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/nor...g-27640062

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-66696440

The former PTEs are obsessed with having bus stations. In Nexus case it’s to encourage more people to travel by Metro by having buses stop outside at Metro stations.

See, I could get that if it was a sensible place to connect but can't really see where anyone would want to.

----

Personally I always think bus stations are bad as one of the massive advantages of buses is they can get right into the heart of the city and stop at numerous spots which a car can't where you usually have to park away from where you want to be. So let's say if it was Newcastle, you could get your bus from Gosforth right through to Central Station and then gradually head back to the top end of Northumberland Street and get on (which you can do with the Metro). Once you start sticking a bus station at places like Haymarket it loses that advantage over the car, so why bother?

It's even worse if it's somewhere like Sunderland, Durham and Bishop Auckland where all 3 bus stations are in the backend of nowhere and the car actually has an advantage.

I know I've mentioned it before but it works well in Darlington where you can get on/off at Northgate but then have the choice to use Tubwell Row instead which are pretty much both ends of the town. I'd also love to see some councils to reverse some pedestrianisation schemes and get buses closer to the action in some places aswell.

The former PTEs are obsessed with having bus stations. In Nexus case it’s to encourage more people to travel by Metro by having buses stop outside at Metro stations.

Isn't that the entire point of an Interchange?

Isn't that the entire point of an Interchange?

Which was what Wallsend was when Metro opened, most services either called or terminated there with staff facilities on site. Deregulation put a stop to all that!

See, I could get that if it was a sensible place to connect but can't really see where anyone would want to.

----

Personally I always think bus stations are bad as one of the massive advantages of buses is they can get right into the heart of the city and stop at numerous spots which a car can't where you usually have to park away from where you want to be. So let's say if it was Newcastle, you could get your bus from Gosforth right through to Central Station and then gradually head back to the top end of Northumberland Street and get on (which you can do with the Metro). Once you start sticking a bus station at places like Haymarket it loses that advantage over the car, so why bother?

It's even worse if it's somewhere like Sunderland, Durham and Bishop Auckland where all 3 bus stations are in the backend of nowhere and the car actually has an advantage.

I know I've mentioned it before but it works well in Darlington where you can get on/off at Northgate but then have the choice to use Tubwell Row instead which are pretty much both ends of the town. I'd also love to see some councils to reverse some pedestrianisation schemes and get buses closer to the action in some places aswell.

Having a bus station doesn't stop buses serving the heart of town and city centres, I'd say it actually improves their ability to do so, if done correctly.

You can use Durham as an example, seeing as they're temporarily without a bus station. North Road is chaos, and you can't get moved. The buses struggle to get on correct stands, and there's no space for layovers or welfare facilities for staff.

Attracting people back to town and city centres is a huge part of regeneration programmes, and transport stations play a role in that. A proper, dry and safe waiting environment, rather than being stood out in the rain.

I don't buy the argument that the bus stations are in the back end of nowhere. Sunderland Interchange is a very short walk from the Bridges, Eldon Square is part of Eldon Square shopping centre and a couple minutes walk from Northumberland Street, and Durham is a 5 minute walk from the market place.

I'm not sure why people can go to these centres, walk round for hours shopping, then suddenly lose their ability to walk the short distance back to a bus station?

I do think bus stations could be additionally complimented by running a city circular service in and out of the bus stations. This may provide additional support to the elderly and disabled. Durham has it with the Cathedral bus, Sunderland has it (to a degree) with the 700, but nothing in Newcastle.

Which was what Wallsend was when Metro opened, most services either called or terminated there with staff facilities on site. Deregulation put a stop to all that!

Hopefully, one on the fix list, when we get franchising...!

Sent from my SM-S916B using Tapatalk

Having a bus station doesn't stop buses serving the heart of town and city centres, I'd say it actually improves their ability to do so, if done correctly.

You can use Durham as an example, seeing as they're temporarily without a bus station. North Road is chaos, and you can't get moved. The buses struggle to get on correct stands, and there's no space for layovers or welfare facilities for staff.

Attracting people back to town and city centres is a huge part of regeneration programmes, and transport stations play a role in that. A proper, dry and safe waiting environment, rather than being stood out in the rain.

I don't buy the argument that the bus stations are in the back end of nowhere. Sunderland Interchange is a very short walk from the Bridges, Eldon Square is part of Eldon Square shopping centre and a couple minutes walk from Northumberland Street, and Durham is a 5 minute walk from the market place.

I'm not sure why people can go to these centres, walk round for hours shopping, then suddenly lose their ability to walk the short distance back to a bus station?

I do think bus stations could be additionally complimented by running a city circular service in and out of the bus stations. This may provide additional support to the elderly and disabled. Durham has it with the Cathedral bus, Sunderland has it (to a degree) with the 700, but nothing in Newcastle.


Hopefully, one on the fix list, when we get franchising...!

Sent from my SM-S916B using Tapatalk

I have to disagree personally, I just find them generally a nuisance where they are. I'm all for proper interchanges, as I do think they are needed as you can't control timings but most the bus stations are just in the wrong place. Gateshead for example is a great interchange as it actually works with the Metro.

Park Lane on the otherhand is a long trek for example if someone is going to the Fire Station or Nando's which are both pretty reasonable reasons to be there and it's a grim waiting experience nevertheless anyway.

You have to remember your trying to fight against cars here who can go wherever they want, having a bus which can drop you off at one end of the street and then you can get on at the other end is literally a selling point. Having a bus station further away that the nearest car park is a massive negative, why bother using the bus? Not to mention if it's somewhere like Haymarket it's absolutely useless if you need to haul a case through to get on a train at Central.

Obviously we could go into the argument whether most these buses should exist AT ALL and people should be using an interchange to get onto a Metro train or tram, miles out of town, which takes you right into the heart of the city underground or on unique tracks with integrated ticketing and more frequent services on the connecting services rather than having 5 buses all trying to serve here there and everywhere but we live in Britain and public transport is just an inconvience to our politicians. It's pretty much how it works in every other country in the world and ironically Newcastle and Sunderland already have the Metro to do that, you just can't connect to it or it misses the most dense populations.

Slightly off subject, but when I am travelling around, I am quite surprised how many places in Yorkshire have bus stations and they seem to love them down there. Thinking of Heckmondwike, Castleford and Cleckheaton to name a couple.

I do think some of them are quite a way from the main shopping centres too like Wakefield but that one, everytime I have been there always seems well used.

Slightly off subject, but when I am travelling around, I am quite surprised how many places in Yorkshire have bus stations and they seem to love them down there.  Thinking of Heckmondwike, Castleford and Cleckheaton to name a couple.

I do think some of them are quite a way from the main shopping centres too like Wakefield but that one, everytime I have been there always seems well used.

Part of the West Yorkshire 'Metro' wasn't it? Must give them credit, they're by far one of the best ones around given the serious limitations they have since any form of tram / metro has been blocked in Leeds over and over again.

Complete opposite of Nexus, who half the time you question whether they actually know what they're doing with fantasy ideas and everything else pretty much failing, the fact we still don't have any form of sensible integrated ticketing is just embarrassing at this point.

£22.10 a week for unlimited uses of buses in West Yorkshire, is excellent value for money imo.

Part of the West Yorkshire 'Metro' wasn't it? Must give them credit, they're by far one of the best ones around given the serious limitations they have since any form of tram / metro has been blocked in Leeds over and over again.

Complete opposite of Nexus, who half the time you question whether they actually know what they're doing with fantasy ideas and everything else pretty much failing, the fact we still don't have any form of sensible integrated ticketing is just embarrassing at this point.

£22.10 a week for unlimited uses of buses in West Yorkshire, is excellent value for money imo.

i was going to say thats about the same as up here but WOW 30 quid for a all zone tyne and wear pass!!

i was going to say thats about the same as up here but WOW 30 quid for a all zone tyne and wear pass!!

It's £35 the equivilant Network One (okay you get Metro aswell but there's no comparison in Yorkshire). GNE is the £30 one I believe. Stagecoach at £17/£20 is still good enough value to give credit to them.

I have to disagree personally, I just find them generally a nuisance where they are. I'm all for proper interchanges, as I do think they are needed as you can't control timings but most the bus stations are just in the wrong place. Gateshead for example is a great interchange as it actually works with the Metro.

Park Lane on the otherhand is a long trek for example if someone is going to the Fire Station or Nando's which are both pretty reasonable reasons to be there and it's a grim waiting experience nevertheless anyway.

You have to remember your trying to fight against cars here who can go wherever they want, having a bus which can drop you off at one end of the street and then you can get on at the other end is literally a selling point. Having a bus station further away that the nearest car park is a massive negative, why bother using the bus? Not to mention if it's somewhere like Haymarket it's absolutely useless if you need to haul a case through to get on a train at Central.

Obviously we could go into the argument whether most these buses should exist AT ALL and people should be using an interchange to get onto a Metro train or tram, miles out of town, which takes you right into the heart of the city underground or on unique tracks with integrated ticketing and more frequent services on the connecting services rather than having 5 buses all trying to serve here there and everywhere but we live in Britain and public transport is just an inconvience to our politicians. It's pretty much how it works in every other country in the world and ironically Newcastle and Sunderland already have the Metro to do that, you just can't connect to it or it misses the most dense populations.

Is the Fire Station a long trek from Park Lane? It's only a 5 minute walk straight down and through the Bridges. Nandos, a little less so, but not a great distance at all. If you absolutely can't manage it, then there's a whole host of services from Park Lane/Stockton Road to Fawcett Street, which cuts the walk right down.

As I've said time and time again, you're never going to win the battle against cars for shoppers. Buses aren't designed to cater for shoppers; they haven't got any space for shopping, for a start. Leisure trade, then I think it's fair game, as unless you've got someone on soft drinks willing to drive, then the bus is the most effective and can be the cheapest option.

In the years ahead, I think we'll end up seeing more and more town and city centre streets become pedestrianised, in the long battle to improve air quality. Buses with renewable fuels have to be part of the solution to that, but the Great British public are also going to need to get used to using their feet more.

Slightly off subject, but when I am travelling around, I am quite surprised how many places in Yorkshire have bus stations and they seem to love them down there.  Thinking of Heckmondwike, Castleford and Cleckheaton to name a couple.

I do think some of them are quite a way from the main shopping centres too like Wakefield but that one, everytime I have been there always seems well used.

Even Leeds bus station, by the argument presented on here, is in the completely wrong place and at the bottom of the hill to all the shops. It doesn't seem to stop it being really well used.

Is the Fire Station a long trek from Park Lane? It's only a 5 minute walk straight down and through the Bridges. Nandos, a little less so, but not a great distance at all. If you absolutely can't manage it, then there's a whole host of services from Park Lane/Stockton Road to Fawcett Street, which cuts the walk right down.

As I've said time and time again, you're never going to win the battle against cars for shoppers. Buses aren't designed to cater for shoppers; they haven't got any space for shopping, for a start. Leisure trade, then I think it's fair game, as unless you've got someone on soft drinks willing to drive, then the bus is the most effective and can be the cheapest option.

In the years ahead, I think we'll end up seeing more and more town and city centre streets become pedestrianised, in the long battle to improve air quality. Buses with renewable fuels have to be part of the solution to that, but the Great British public are also going to need to get used to using their feet more.


Even Leeds bus station, by the argument presented on here, is in the completely wrong place and at the bottom of the hill to all the shops. It doesn't seem to stop it being really well used.

Bridges shuts earlier, it's quite a detour through some pretty unpleasant areas in an evening when arguably you want to be there.

Leeds is a really bad example btw, quite a lot of buses don't serve the thing at all and do the Leeds loop instead. Leeds is actually one of the better examples of buses serving more areas. The only buses which serve the bus station mainly come from the West, so already serve the city on the way. Not to mention there's quite a lot of cross city links.

https://bustimes.org/services/163-castleford-leeds#map - See the 163 for an example.
https://bustimes.org/services/x98-sky-cl...eeds-2#map - or X98 from Wetherby.

Like, if stuff like the E1/E2/E6/56 served the bus station there that's fair play as they already serve the city but stuff like the 60 etc would be better doing a loop still imo. Maybe serving a stop nearby so people can still change there if needed, it's the best of both worlds like Leeds.

Creating bus hub interchanges etc is a scam...

Nexus knows this and it is why they milked the pot

We have cllrs elected locally by residents


Some cllrs get out onto committees to approve white elephants

Nexus proposes white elephants

It is approved to build

Bus stations make a profit and the money is hidden within Nexus

Sunderland interchange is a classic example

No stagecoach goes into the bus station... why? Because every bus that enters the station is charged 60p-80p for the pleasure

Same as Haymarket and Eldon Sqaure and every other bus station...


And you wonder why Stagecoach oftens opts to using stops outside of bus station due to operational issues" or altering routes to avoid bus stations like 317 for example...

Now... as an example

Haymarket bus station ...

How many buses depart an hour and times that by 70p as a ball point average...

Mitigate that with the cost of Nexus manager to run the site (goes home after 5pm) we often see arriva staff managing the site not Nexus...

Combine the income with the rent of Greggs Arriva pub M&S

And general expenses is a Nexus employee working 9-5 and electric for the lights (bins are local council)

There is a reason bus stations are built....and that is to claim poverty.

Creating bus hub interchanges etc is a scam...

Nexus knows this and it is why they milked the pot

We have cllrs elected locally by residents


Some cllrs get out onto committees to approve white elephants

Nexus proposes white elephants 

It is approved to build

Bus stations make a profit and the money is hidden within Nexus

Sunderland interchange is a classic example

No stagecoach goes into the bus station... why? Because every bus that enters the station is charged 60p-80p  for the pleasure

Same as Haymarket and Eldon Sqaure and every other bus station...


And you wonder why Stagecoach oftens opts to using stops outside of bus station due to  operational issues" or altering routes to avoid  bus stations like 317  for example...

Now... as an example

Haymarket bus station ...

How many buses depart an hour  and times that by 70p as a ball point average...

Mitigate that with the cost of Nexus manager to run the site (goes home after 5pm) we often see arriva staff managing the site not Nexus...

Combine the income with the rent of Greggs Arriva pub M&S

And general expenses is a Nexus employee working 9-5 and electric for the lights  (bins are local council)

There is a reason bus stations are built....and that is to claim  poverty.

You think M&S rent their Newcastle Northumberland St store from Nexus?

As for Stagecoach mostly not using bus stations, isn’t this at least in Newcastle because they operate mostly cross-city services. And most of their services that do terminate in the city centre (x47, x87, x88, 685) do so at a bus station. 
Like wise most of Go North East and Arriva services terminate in the city centre, so many do so in a bus station where people get off the bus straight into the indoors.

Well Stand A was broken less than 24 hours of the hubs opening

Bridges shuts earlier, it's quite a detour through some pretty unpleasant areas in an evening when arguably you want to be there.

Leeds is a really bad example btw, quite a lot of buses don't serve the thing at all and do the Leeds loop instead. Leeds is actually one of the better examples of buses serving more areas. The only buses which serve the bus station mainly come from the West, so already serve the city on the way. Not to mention there's quite a lot of cross city links.

https://bustimes.org/services/163-castleford-leeds#map - See the 163 for an example.
https://bustimes.org/services/x98-sky-cl...eeds-2#map - or X98 from Wetherby.

Like, if stuff like the E1/E2/E6/56 served the bus station there that's fair play as they already serve the city but stuff like the 60 etc would be better doing a loop still imo. Maybe serving a stop nearby so people can still change there if needed, it's the best of both worlds like Leeds.

Which unpleasant areas? Even when the Bridges is shut, it's more or less a straight line through Green Terrace/Low Row, if you leave via the other end of the Interchange. 

I used to drink in Sunderland most weekends for years, and like most folk there, we'd walk back and forth between bars most of the night around the City Centre. I understand some can't, due to mobility issues, but it's as if we're making out that the vast majority of the population are incapable of walking 500/600 yards.

56 does serve the bus station, but I agree the E1/E2/E6 should revert to doing so, being City terminating services. 

I don't think Leeds is much different to Newcastle or Sunderland, in terms of what serves the bus station and what doesn't. You can see from their own guide that the bus station is extremely well served: https://www.wymetro.com/media/9699/leeds_wtcyb.pdf

Creating bus hub interchanges etc is a scam...

Nexus knows this and it is why they milked the pot

We have cllrs elected locally by residents


Some cllrs get out onto committees to approve white elephants

Nexus proposes white elephants 

It is approved to build

Bus stations make a profit and the money is hidden within Nexus

Sunderland interchange is a classic example

No stagecoach goes into the bus station... why? Because every bus that enters the station is charged 60p-80p  for the pleasure

Same as Haymarket and Eldon Sqaure and every other bus station...


And you wonder why Stagecoach oftens opts to using stops outside of bus station due to  operational issues" or altering routes to avoid  bus stations like 317  for example...

Now... as an example

Haymarket bus station ...

How many buses depart an hour  and times that by 70p as a ball point average...

Mitigate that with the cost of Nexus manager to run the site (goes home after 5pm) we often see arriva staff managing the site not Nexus...

Combine the income with the rent of Greggs Arriva pub M&S

And general expenses is a Nexus employee working 9-5 and electric for the lights  (bins are local council)

There is a reason bus stations are built....and that is to claim  poverty.

This is almost conspiracy theory level stuff. 

There's no scam in bus hubs/interchanges; they exist. 

Your accusations towards Nexus are completely unfair. The Interchange is part of North Tyneside Council's Town Centre and Fish Quay regeneration masterplan. 85% of the funding came from the Government's Transforming Cities Fund (TCF). Nexus are only involved, because they're the PTE for the area. 

On councillors voting for 'white elephants'; let's at least acknowledge that the masterplan has been through public consultation. As has the plan to move the North Shields ferry landing. It's one thing to not like the decisions taken forward as a result of consultation, but it's another to accuse it of being some kind of racket to raise funds for Nexus.

I agree with ne14ne1, in terms of the reasoning why Stagecoach don't serve bus stations. It's most likely down to practicality, not cost, when most of their services operate on a cross city basis. Somewhere like Eldon Square or Haymarket, you're adding at least 5 minutes on to a journey time to get in and out of the bus station. 

As for the service charge for using the bus station, I don't think that is too dissimilar to anything else, where we have either public/private partnerships or wholly private sector operation? Train operators pay a whole host of costs to run their services, Greggs pay money to set up shop in most buildings they lease, and domestically we pay money to 'rent' access to mobile phone networks. It pays towards the maintenance and upkeep of the infrastructure. Whilst the examples you quote are nothing to do with Nexus, if you look at examples that are (e.g. the Newsagent at Heworth Metro or kiosk in Monument), then surely this is a good thing? Your customers are able to purchase goods that they want, and the rent goes towards the cost of running the interchange. You make it sound like it's going into someone's back pocket.

Not sure what your link is between bus stations and poverty, but I probably don't want to know!

Say what you want about bus stations, but living in South Shields, I'd much rather wait my time for my bus home in South Shields Interchange than when I used to have to wait in Keppel Street. It's a much more inviting place that feels safer, especially with a security guard on hand. I'm sure the people of North Shields will appreciate the same thing.

This is almost conspiracy theory level stuff. 

You make it sound like it's going into someone's back pocket.

I was only waiting for “brown envelop” and “corruption” and I would’ve had a full house on this conspiracist bingo card.

---

Say what you want about bus stations, but living in South Shields, I'd much rather wait my time for my bus home in South Shields Interchange than when I used to have to wait in Keppel Street. It's a much more inviting place that feels safer, especially with a security guard on hand. I'm sure the people of North Shields will appreciate the same thing.

I know I was to surprised to find such negative comments about the new bus station when I came to this thread.
In comparison to the on street shelters the town had before, this is much better, and within reaching distance of the Metro which is exactly what we should be striving towards: a once-again integrated public transportation network.

I was only waiting for “brown envelop” and “corruption” and I would’ve had a full house on this conspiracist bingo card.

---

I know I was to surprised to find such negative comments about the new bus station when I came to this thread.
In comparison to the on street shelters the town had before, this is much better, and within reaching distance of the Metro which is exactly what we should be striving towards: a once-again integrated public transportation network.

I know Bishop Auckland Bus Station will be a complete waste of money.... unless you've had the misfortune of waiting for a connection at 11pm at night when it's -10c and snowing. Those current shelters might as well not be there, they're leakier than *insert political joke here*.

Which unpleasant areas? Even when the Bridges is shut, it's more or less a straight line through Green Terrace/Low Row, if you leave via the other end of the Interchange. 

I used to drink in Sunderland most weekends for years, and like most folk there, we'd walk back and forth between bars most of the night around the City Centre. I understand some can't, due to mobility issues, but it's as if we're making out that the vast majority of the population are incapable of walking 500/600 yards.

56 does serve the bus station, but I agree the E1/E2/E6 should revert to doing so, being City terminating services. 

I don't think Leeds is much different to Newcastle or Sunderland, in terms of what serves the bus station and what doesn't. You can see from their own guide that the bus station is extremely well served: https://www.wymetro.com/media/9699/leeds_wtcyb.pdf

Lot's of drunks etc, people going to see a show with kids etc. Not exactly the areas you want to go through.

If I'm right, Leeds pretty much works like this in terms of corridors. I actually really like it works well as the vast majority of areas have a direct link to the train station to interchange.

I don't know how feasable it would be but I'd always love to swap Haymarket and the Gateshead services around so all the Gateshead services serve Haymarket and Eldon Square and the Great North services heading down John Dobson Street and head down to Central like so:

Would give much much better connections for everyone as people from Gosforth, Cramlington, Morpeth would have a direct link to Newcastle Central and also stop the likes of the 56 clogging up around Market Street and remove buses from Market Street itself which is a horrid place currently, for the Stagecoach services moved from Blackett Street.

If I'm right it means that everyone would have a connection to every bus somewhere in Newcastle aswell.

Lot's of drunks etc, people going to see a show with kids etc. Not exactly the areas you want to go through.

If I'm right, Leeds pretty much works like this in terms of corridors. I actually really like it works well as the vast majority of areas have a direct link to the train station to interchange.

I don't know how feasable it would be but I'd always love to swap Haymarket and the Gateshead services around so all the Gateshead services serve Haymarket and Eldon Square and the Great North services heading down John Dobson Street and head down to Central like so:

Would give much much better connections for everyone as people from Gosforth, Cramlington, Morpeth would have a direct link to Newcastle Central and also stop the likes of the 56 clogging up around Market Street and remove buses from Market Street itself which is a horrid place currently, for the Stagecoach services moved from Blackett Street.

If I'm right it means that everyone would have a connection to every bus somewhere in Newcastle aswell.

Why, you have when have the metro and national rail already serving this link and a future line to Ashington in 2024. 
I do agree on this point. You also have the old Q3 stop on newgate street, the two on the opposite side of the road and the ex-100 stop on Blackett Street which currently arent used all withih easy reach of eldon square.

THe bridges where Debenhams used to be is open from 6am to 11pm to walk through

---

But I don't get the hate bus stations get, especially on a night with a security guard makes the place feel a lot safer (thats if they do anything)

Why, you have when have the metro and national rail already serving this link and a future line to Ashington in 2024. 
I do agree on this point. You also have the old Q3 stop on newgate street, the two on the opposite side of the road and the ex-100 stop on Blackett Street which currently arent used all withih easy reach of eldon square.

It's about connections to other buses aswell right now you can't really connect with the likes of the 56 without a 10/15 minute walk which isn't ideal if it's pissing itself down. By pushing it through you'd connect all the buses together at some point at Newcastle. 

Not to mention the links the other way. Newcastle Central to Quorum, Cobalt and the Northumberland Coast which people will want without a walk across the city. Also at the same time you'd have all the Gateshead buses at one place rather than the stupidity now where the 56 and 57 are from one place and the 28 and X1 are from another which doesn't make sense and you'll only get that by releasing Haymarket. 

You could potentially open a mini bus station at Central aswell with 6 or so stands if you removed the short stay car park which is absolutely ridiculous where it is in a major city. All the drop off zones etc could be moved to the back of the station or around the centre of life when the back entrance is complete.