What is the actual issue with the Angel Streetdecks? The allocation of the Angels to the 51/2/93/94 seems deliberate now to keep them vaguely near Rvierside.

Whilst I trundle through low fell at a top speed of 25mph, my leg propped on that weird box on the upper left side deck of the ex London tat, cursing Wright and Riverside under my breath

Gotta make a case for some new leccy buses.

Gotta make a case for some new leccy buses.

Imagine if the punters get that frustrated with the fleet, they make alternative travel arrangements?

The irony of yet another brand new tax-payer funded allocation, not only not taking people where they need to be, but also floating around empty - won't be lost on the 'tax payers money being spaffed up the wall' spotters amongst us.

What is the actual issue with the Angel Streetdecks? The allocation of the Angels to the 51/2/93/94 seems deliberate now to keep them vaguely near Rvierside.

Whilst I trundle through low fell at a top speed of 25mph, my leg propped on that weird box on the upper left side deck of the ex London tat, cursing Wright and Riverside under my breath

The engineer that came out to me yesterday told me it's a sensor fault on the emissions system.

Basically what happens is the ECU detects a fault with the emissions system and logs it, after about 100 miles the engine will go into limp mode with a maximum speed of 10 mph.

There reason they are kept on 51/52/93/94 is because its quicker for engineers to get to them rather than travelling to Durham/Bishop to reset them with the laptop

The engineer that came out to me yesterday told me it's a sensor fault on the emissions system.

Basically what happens is the ECU detects a fault with the emissions system and logs it, after about 100 miles the engine will go into limp mode with a maximum speed of 10 mph.

There reason they are kept on 51/51/93/94 is because ifs quicker for engineers to get to them rather than travelling to Durham/Bishop to reset them with the laptop

Given they use a Mercedes engine, I'd hazard a guess and say it's either the pressure sensor on the DPF or the pressure transducer for the EGR valve. They're common issues on Mercedes cars (and our diesel Smart car!). 

In our case, when the error pops up it won't let you rev past 2.5k and you get no boost.

Given they use a Mercedes engine, I'd hazard a guess and say it's either the pressure sensor on the DPF or the pressure transducer for the EGR valve. They're common issues on Mercedes cars (and our diesel Smart car!). 

In our case, when the error pops up it won't let you rev past 2.5k and you get no boost.

The DPF is causing issues on some of the 67 plate ones at the minute too, constantly failing to do a regeneration cycle which causes all sorts of dash lights to come on. Them ones normally get parked up in the corner of the Voltra park and have a forced regen done on the laptop

The 20/70 plates are common ones for going into limp mode at the minute, the 6356- 6363 batch are absolutely appalling vehicles to drive considering their ages.

The DPF is causing issues on some of the 67 plate ones at the minute too, constantly failing to do a regeneration cycle which causes all sorts of dash lights to come on. Them ones normally get parked up in the corner of the Voltra park and have a forced regen done on the laptop

The 20/70 plates are common ones for going into limp mode at the minute, the 6356- 6363 batch are absolutely appalling vehicles to drive considering their ages.

Then why are 6356-63 on the X21? The dead mileage and recovery costs must be high especially all the way in the Wear Valley.

At least if they were on the X71/X72 or any other Derwent to Newcastle service such as the Sunday X45/X72 cycle, Consett or Riverside could easily pick them up.

With 6377 and 6102 thrown into the mix, it's definitely possible to change the allocation on the X21 to E400MMCs (including more choice for the X10) and still keep the X30/X31/X45 working pattern with suitable low height spares.

Then why are 6356-63 on the X21? The dead mileage and recovery costs must be high especially all the way in the Wear Valley.

At least if they were on the X71/X72 or any other Derwent to Newcastle service such as the Sunday X45/X72 cycle, Consett or Riverside could easily pick them up.

With 6377 and 6102 thrown into the mix, it's definitely possible to change the allocation on the X21 to E400MMCs (including more choice for the X10) and still keep the X30/X31/X45 working pattern with suitable low height spares.

They’re on that service because that’s what the business has decided to do.

The answer to buses being unreliable cannot always be to move them onto another service. The answer is to fix them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The ex-London B9TLs don't seem to be fantastic deputies on the X21 for the broken StreetDecks. I had 6229 south this morning and, while fine before the A1(M) stretch, it seemed to top out at just over 40 mph on the A1M which cannot be helping with timekeeping.

The NSAs were also promoting WiFi and USBs for the duration of my trip, which obviously weren't present on that vehicle.

They’re on that service because that’s what the business has decided to do.

The answer to buses being unreliable cannot always be to move them onto another service. The answer is to fix them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Been plenty of examples where operators have moved fleets around to improve reliability, admittedly through various circumstances for some of them. 

But a route the distance of the X21 needs something more heavy duty.

- GNE X7 - B10BLEs > Citaros
- GNE X10 - B5TLs > Coaches / Enviro 400MMC
- Arriva X93 - E400 Classics and anything that went > B9TLs
- Arriva 602 - Dennis Trident ALX400s > B10BLEs
- GNE 49/49A - Dennis SPDs > B10BLEs
- Arriva 308 - Dennis Trident ALX400s > DAF DB250 Lowlanders

The ex-London B9TLs don't seem to be fantastic deputies on the X21 for the broken StreetDecks. I had 6229 south this morning and, while fine before the A1(M) stretch, it seemed to top out at just over 40 mph on the A1M which cannot be helping with timekeeping.

The NSAs were also promoting WiFi and USBs for the duration of my trip, which obviously weren't present on that vehicle.

Yeah seems a common theme. 

Just seen a Versa (didn't catch the number) leave Gateshead full and standing en route to Brandon 

Ironically sandwiched between 3 empty Angel streetdecks on the 27, 94 and 58

Yeah seems a common theme. 

Just seen a Versa (didn't catch the number) leave Gateshead full and standing en route to Brandon 

Ironically sandwiched between 3 empty Angel streetdecks on the 27, 94 and 58

5385 & 5386

If there are Versas on a match day, I’m storming bensham

Are washington having problems with buses the same riverside are. Its just theres deptford based buses on the 50 & 82

If bustimes is to be believed there's also an E200MMC on the 8.

If bustimes is to be believed there's also an E200MMC on the 8.

According to GNE's website, its 5493.

If bustimes is to be believed there's also an E200MMC on the 8.

seen today

---

i seen it when on x20

Read summat about a bus being too cold? I used to just say button ya coat up then button ya mouth!

To my dismay this morning, I got a solo on the 50. I was hoping that it was some sort of joke however, to my horror, it wasn't and it was jam packed. One stupid allocation and the driver kept letting people on even though there was hardly any room. I don't suppose drivers are trained to stop letting passengers on at a certain point but a bit of discretion for passenger comfort would be greatly appreciated.

To my dismay this morning, I got a solo on the 50. I was hoping that it was some sort of joke however, to my horror, it wasn't and it was jam packed. One stupid allocation and the driver kept letting people on even though there was hardly any room. I don't suppose drivers are trained to stop letting passengers on at a certain point but a bit of discretion for passenger comfort would be greatly appreciated.

In fairness, not letting passengers on is MUCH WORSE than someone being a little bit uncomfortable. People might be using that bus for work, that's much worse than someone having too little space for 10 minutes especially when it's every 30 minutes.

I can tell you've never been on the Tube at peak hours, now that is uncomfortable.

To my dismay this morning, I got a solo on the 50. I was hoping that it was some sort of joke however, to my horror, it wasn't and it was jam packed. One stupid allocation and the driver kept letting people on even though there was hardly any room. I don't suppose drivers are trained to stop letting passengers on at a certain point but a bit of discretion for passenger comfort would be greatly appreciated.

Drivers are trained to stop letting passengers on at a certain point, and there's a legal limit per vehicle of how many they can carry. So that they're not stranding people at bus stops, they'll take as many as they deem safe to carry (within the legal limit).

Drivers are trained to stop letting passengers on at a certain point, and there's a legal limit per vehicle of how many they can carry. So that they're not stranding people at bus stops, they'll take as many as they deem safe to carry (within the legal limit).

I always credit them getting as many on as possible (you can tell the ones who cannot wait to whack that bus full destination board on)

However I've noticed they seem to have entirely stopped enforcing no standing on the stairs or upper deck

However I've noticed they seem to have entirely stopped enforcing no standing on the stairs or upper deck

Is it worth all the aggravation?

Aye & the whinging punters would be falling over themsels (nee pun intended) to sue someone if the driver had to slam on & they nut the windscreen cos they’re stood too far forward!

---

Is it worth all the aggravation?

They didn’t dare try it back in my drivin days son

However I've noticed they seem to have entirely stopped enforcing no standing on the stairs or upper deck

Which is mental given that it alters the centre of gravity, and if there's a load stood upstairs and the driver takes a bend a bit too hard...

---

Is it worth all the aggravation?

A few annoyed (likely drunk) passengers is nothing in comparison to what could happen if there were too many stood upstairs. 

Handbrake on, engine off, they'll soon get the message to shift downstairs.

Which is mental given that it alters the centre of gravity, and if there's a load stood upstairs and the driver takes a bend a bit too hard...

---

A few annoyed (likely drunk) passengers is nothing in comparison to what could happen if there were too many stood upstairs. 

Handbrake on, engine off, they'll soon get the message to shift downstairs.

Tbf, I mainly see this pre match going into Newcastle before the drink flows but it’s far more common on the peak rush hour 21s out of Eldon Sq, especially if there’s been a gap.

But yes it’s not worth the hassle at all

I'm guessing 6142's destination display hasn't been updated for a while, just saw it now (11:35 1/3/24) showing 41 Howdon on it

Are they going to remove the interior vinyls showcasing the loop from the elite driver nonsense at any point?

They did remove the interior vinyls from the X21 and they have been replaced with X20 ones.

Legal lettering WRONG! on 6351. I believe Queen Street is now closed. Might complain to the Traffic Commissioner to this unforgivable wrongdoing. It has really ruined my travelling experience for me. Absolute shysters.

Sent from my SM-A526B using Tapatalk

6321 expired earlier today and is sitting blocking Eldon Square stand G. Buses competing at rush hour for a space.

Stand is closed off with a notice from nexus saying look out for a 21 pulling into any other stand