![]() |
|
Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - Printable Version +- North East Buses (https://northeastbuses.co.uk) +-- Forum: Local Bus Scene (https://northeastbuses.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Go North East (https://northeastbuses.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=54) +--- Thread: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 (/showthread.php?tid=1831) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
|
RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - ian foster - 08 Oct 2025 (07 Oct 2025, 7:30 pm)DaveFromUpNorth wrote I've had a little think about it and to make it easier I will talk about current services...The bus network in North Tyneside has been a complete mess since 2010. i would bring back an express bus from Whitley Bay via Marden Estate and onto the 308 route at the Foxhunters then fast from Billy Mill to Haymarket stopping only at Willington Square. The 306 would be withdrawn between Tynemouth and Whitley Bay replaced by a new local service to Cobalt from North Shields via Tynemouth, Marden and New York. RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - DaveFromUpNorth - 08 Oct 2025 (08 Oct 2025, 9:47 am)ian foster wrote The bus network in North Tyneside has been a complete mess since 2010. i would bring back an express bus from Whitley Bay via Marden Estate and onto the 308 route at the Foxhunters then fast from Billy Mill to Haymarket stopping only at Willington Square. The 306 would be withdrawn between Tynemouth and Whitley Bay replaced by a new local service to Cobalt from North Shields via Tynemouth, Marden and New York. I think the billy mill express is to large and potentially means it could run on a Single deck or mini as it would miss key points. my suggestion caters for regular leisure users people wanting to visit cinema shopping etc... a mix of work users throughout the day and night and other links believe it or not adding Mullen road into a route increases journey times by 4 mins only but adds about 8-10 stops but in your head it feels longer I know that on Battlehill Drive if a 306 or 307 turns up the 306 is chosen for the psychological service of it being loads quicker You need to remember to operate a single bus it costs at least £40 per hour RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - L469 YVK - 09 Oct 2025 (08 Oct 2025, 10:34 pm)DaveFromUpNorth wrote believe it or not adding Mullen road into a route increases journey times by 4 mins only but adds about 8-10 stops but in your head it feels longerNot if it's already running 5 minutes late as a result of traffic at the Coast.....then gets hammered at Noble's on Mullen Road. When the 309 ran via Selby Gardens......drivers could 'safely' (or maybe not unknown to us haha) make up time and arrive into Haymarket on time even if losing a bit time earlier en-route. Since the 309 was re-routed, the timekeeping has not been as solid IMO. Thankfully, the 309 is keeping the B9TLs as I doubt StreetDecks could keep to time on a PVR of 8x. RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - ian foster - 09 Oct 2025 (08 Oct 2025, 10:34 pm)DaveFromUpNorth wrote I think the billy mill express is to large and potentially means it could run on a Single deck or mini as it would miss key points. there is already more than enough buses through Battle Hill so why put any more in. there are plenty of people east of it who want a quick bus to Newcastle which they haven't had since the 44 was foolishly withdrawn back in 2010 RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - Storx - 09 Oct 2025 (08 Oct 2025, 10:34 pm)DaveFromUpNorth wrote I think the billy mill express is to large and potentially means it could run on a Single deck or mini as it would miss key points. Quite a long time 4 minutes, when it's only 15-20 minutes in a car though for the full journey. Btw I keep seeing stuff about express buses (me included) but maybe another option would be infrastructure upgrades instead and do something like: Along by Selby Gardens so the buses never have to leave the Coast Road, at all, with both sides of the road down to one direction at their respective side (there's enough ways round for those who live in the section) while omitting Benfield Road and the Chillingham Road junctions so beyond Tyne Met they can bomb straight to Newcastle without any traffic lights / roundabouts which slow them down, with the whole hatched part of the road turned into a new bus lane. It means you could have a 'fast' 306/308 via the Coast Road direct and a slow 307/309 via High Farm and Battle Hill. The time savings for an express bus would then be neglible really and it utilises part of the Coast Road which is effectively unused currently. You could probably do similar at the Tyne Met junction aswell, if you wanted to skip that roundabout aswell (Here: https://www.google.com/maps/@55.006728,-1.5098494,3a,75y,329.16h,80.25t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1st8fcIqUWIBIu2Tx9NdS_hQ!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D9.750942592939182%26panoid%3Dt8fcIqUWIBIu2Tx9NdS_hQ%26yaw%3D329.15554779879307!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MTAwNi4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D) RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - V514DFT - 09 Oct 2025 (09 Oct 2025, 5:54 am)L469 YVK wrote Not if it's already running 5 minutes late as a result of traffic at the Coast.....then gets hammered at Noble's on Mullen Road. Previously i thought the 311 was pointless, but i see it now that it was actually quite useful, so was the 57 and it predecessor (the 58) RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - L469 YVK - 11 Oct 2025 (06 Oct 2025, 7:35 pm)Storx wrote Even known it's an interesting idea, I'm not really sure it's needed. Your ideas are pretty good. I'm not sure the X40 could sustain an 'all day' operation although could run at peak times and maybe take advantage of CentreLink. I'd also be tempted to look at putting Medomsley into the 45 corridor. Express services: X30 - Every 30 mins Mon-Sat daytime | Evenings & Sunday daytime every 60 mins Consett - Leadgate - Dipton - Burnopfield - Sunniside - Team Valley North - Gateshead - Newcastle Note: X30 is basically a re-numbered X70 to keep in-line with the X31 & X32 below X31 - Hourly Mon-Sat all day & Sunday daytime **Stanley - Shield Row - Sunniside - Lobley Hill Estate - Team Valley North - Gateshead - Newcastle ** 2 hourly Sunday extension to Lanchester via X32 route below after Stanley X32 - Hourly Mon-Sat daytime Lanchester - Maiden Law - Burnhope - Quaking Houses & South Moor - Stanley - East Stanley - Sunniside - Team Valley North - Gateshead - Newcastle X44 - Every 20 mins Mon-Sat daytime | Hourly evenings & Sundays - Basically the X301 suggestion but less of a 'mouthful' of a number Newcastle - Central Station - Teams A184 - Dunston - Whickham Front Street - Fellside Park - Broadway - Whickham Front Street then back to Newcastle Other services: 43 - Every 30 mins Mon-Sat daytime | Hourly evenings & Sundays Stanley - New Kyo - Annfield Plain - Catchgate - Harelaw - Dipton - Tantobie - Burnopfield - Fellside Road - MetroCentre - Teams & Askew Road West - Newcastle 44 - Hourly all day daily Stanley - Tanfield Lea - Tantobie - Tanfield - Crookgate Bank - Sunniside Kingsway - Broadway - Broom Lane - Watergate Crescent - Whickham Front Street - MetroCentre - Teams & Askew Road West - Newcastle 44A - Every 60 mins Mon-Sat daytime Stanley - Tanfield Lea - Tantobie - Hobson - Sunniside Kingsway - Broadway - Broom Lane - Watergate Crescent - Whickham Front Street - MetroCentre - Teams & Askew Road West - Newcastle 45 - Every 30 mins Mon-Sat daytime | Hourly evenings & Sundays Same as X45 and still limited stop MetroCentre to Newcastle 46 - Every 30 mins Mon-Sat daytime | Hourly Mon-Sat evenings & Sunday daytime Consett - Leadgate - Medomsley - Hamsterley Mill then as 45 to Newcastle 47 - Same as now but Consett to Blackhall Mill reduced to hourly during Mon-Sat daytime Note that the 43, 44, 44A would run double back via Tyne Street and Centrelink during AM peaks. Not a great deal of difference other than the X40, and also the X30 & X31 running more frequent during evenings & Sundays. Also, if the 45/46/47 was re-introduced to a 10 minute frequency Rowlands Gill to Newcastle - is there a need for so many deckers including on the X30's? A batch of new B8RLE's mixed in with some of the existing E400MMC would be perfect for all of the above.....offering the right capacity and frequency with a reliable allocation. Not forgetting that the B8RLE is actually quite a good performer on the fuel considering it's more heavy-duty than a StreetLite/E200MMC. Worst case if growth comes and more deckers are needed, hoy the B8RLEs on the 8/78. RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - Storx - 11 Oct 2025 (11 Oct 2025, 8:38 am)L469 YVK wrote Your ideas are pretty good. I'm not sure the X40 could sustain an 'all day' operation although could run at peak times and maybe take advantage of CentreLink. I'd also be tempted to look at putting Medomsley into the 45 corridor. Interesting ideas but quite a big PVR increase there. Personally if I was going back up to the 6 buses through Rowlands Gill, I'd redo the whole Western side so it's something like: which would end up with: 45: Red (Every 30 Minutes, Hourly Evenings / Sundays) 46: Orange (Every 30 Minutes, Hourly Evenings / Sundays) 47: Purple (Every Hour All Day / Sunday) 47A: Pink (Every Hour Daytimes) V5: Withdrawn X70: No Changes (Every 30 Minutes Daytimes) X71: Withdrawn It gives most places a decent bus service during day, at least 30 minutes bar the pots of houses here and there, and everyone an hourly service in the evening with those in the Blackhill area not having to go on a magical mystery tour with journey times which are pretty unacceptable right now really. It's technically no extra buses between Meadomsley / Ebchester and Consett either since it's utilising the existing V5 and X71. RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - V514DFT - 11 Oct 2025 I'd also throw in a 48 which would essentially be the 47 and 49, might create some potentially useful links 48 would also be hourly creating a 20/20/20 split between the 47/47A/48 RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - L469 YVK - 12 Oct 2025 (11 Oct 2025, 11:18 am)Storx wrote Interesting ideas but quite a big PVR increase there.I actually like that! Only question though.....can a full size single / double decker serve The Dene? I recall GNE had issues during covid serving the Dene when tagged onto the X71 route unless it was maybe a different issue. RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - Storx - 12 Oct 2025 (12 Oct 2025, 7:30 am)L469 YVK wrote I actually like that! Only question though.....can a full size single / double decker serve The Dene? I recall GNE had issues during covid serving the Dene when tagged onto the X71 route unless it was maybe a different issue. Doesn't seem to be an issue with deckers tbh, they seem to be on the V5 most days now anyway. Saloons might be an issue though, with the extra length but I'm not sure tbh. Edit: Appears they can aswell, see: https://bustimes.org/services/v5-crookhall-the-dene-via-consett-leadgate-medomsl/vehicles?date=2025-10-06 RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - L469 YVK - 12 Oct 2025 (12 Oct 2025, 7:44 am)Storx wrote Doesn't seem to be an issue with deckers tbh, they seem to be on the V5 most days now anyway. And it looks like B9TLs can too !I really do like your Derwentside ideas! Looking at the current vs estimate PVR's on the Derwentside to Newcastle services: 2025 - 29 2022 - 25 2021 - 32 2019 (incl the M6/7/8) - 34 These suggestions including the Whickham express based on a rough estimate would come in at 38. However, the quality of service and offering to passengers would dramatically improve. The new links created by the 46, 47 & 47A could potentially qualify for BSIP funding too. If passengers have a simple, easy to use and easy to market network to rely on without the gimmicks or a myriad of meaningless route numbers going on a mystery tour, they will use the services. RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - Storx - 12 Oct 2025 (12 Oct 2025, 5:03 pm)L469 YVK wrote And it looks like B9TLs can too Yeah and if you wanted to save a few buses you could probably cut the 97(301) back to Gateshead and drop it down to every 30 minutes interworking with the 96. The X97, let's call it will do the Newcastle links now so it's not really needed, bar a very few bus stops near Dunston Hill but their in walking distance of the X97/Lobley Hill anyway. What happens with the 301 is open, maybe merge it with the 93/94 somehow so there's no loss in the Bensham area.and open direct Newcastle to Team Valley links? RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - S830OFT - 16 Oct 2025 Some suggestions for GNE Gateshead to try create some new links. 28 - Service will additionaly call into Beacon Lough on Sundew Road only to ensure the continuation of a direct bus to Gateshead during the day & two buses p/h to Newcastle. Voltra 53/54 - Services extended to Regent Centre or Wallsend to replace service Q3. These services will no longer operate as continous circular services, although service 53/54 will run together in both directions to offer a reasonable amount of buses within the Saltwell Park area with their combined frequency of every ten minutes. Both services will start & finish at Gateshead. 53 - Up to every 20 minutes 54 - Up to every 20 minutes (53 - Gateshead | Saltwell Park | Bensham Court | Central Station | Newcastle Monument, Grey Street | Quayside | Walker Road | St. Peter's Basin | Walker Road | Fossway | Wallsend High Street | Wallsend Metro) (54 - Gateshead | Bensham Court Flats | Saltwell Park | Gateshead | Quayside | Newcastle, Grey Street | Pilgrim Street | Jesmond | Gosforth High Street | Regent Centre) 57 - Service will be withdrawn & replaced by adjustments to services 28/67/69/91/92 58 - Journeys to Follingsby will no longer operate, however the X58 will continue to operate its one journey in each direction during the peak. 67 - This service will additionally serve Ellen Wilkinson Estate for journeys to Metrocentre only. 69 - Service will additionaly serve Heworth Interchange in both directions after Heworth Grange. Journeys towards Wardley will no longer serve Kirkwood Gardens, although passengers will be able to remain on the bus for this stop when the bus changes to service 92. 90 - Service withdrawn & replaced by extended service 92. 91 - This service will run hourly to offer much improved links to Team Valley Trading Estate throughout the day from Newcastle & parts of Gateshead. This service will only serve Ellen Wilkinson Estate for journeys to Newcastle only. (Wardley | Ellen Wilkinson Estate | Heworth Interchange | Colegate | Fewster Square | Wealcroft | Whitehills Estate | Beacon Lough | Wrekenton | Harlow Green | Team Valley Trading Estate | Nonstop | Newcastle) 92 - This service will run hourly to offer much improved links to Team Valley Trading Estate throughout the day from Blaydon & parts of Gateshead. This service will only serve Kirkwood Gardens for journeys to Winlaton only. (Wardley Turning Circle | Kirkwood Gardens | Fewster Square | Wealcroft | Whitehills Estate | Beacon Lough | Wrekenton | Harlow Green | Team Valley Trading Estate | Nonstop | Metrocentre | Swalwell Monument | Blaydon | Winlaton) Wardley will benefit from four buses per hour, ideally timed with a sufficient time gap between each departing bus, with improved connections to Team Valley, additional buses to Metrocentre & Winlaton & a bus to Newcastle continued. Services 67/91 will interwork therefore would allow passengers to remain on-board after Wardley for Ellen Wilkinson Estate, with services 69/92 interworking allowing those passengers to remain on for Kirkwood Gardens. Service 67/91 will interwork (Mon - Sat Daytimes) Service 69/92 will interwork (Mon - Sat Daytimes) Evenings & Sundays - Service 69 will run hourly, however due to tight running time will NOT serve Heworth Interchange, with service 91 providing this link for Evenings & Sundays. Service 91 will only run between Heworth, Wardley & Ellen Wilkinson Estate on an increased every 30 minute frequency. RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - Storx - 16 Oct 2025 (16 Oct 2025, 9:51 pm)S830OFT wrote Some suggestions for GNE Gateshead to try create some new links. I can't comment much on the 60/90's as I don't know them but disagree with that 53/54 change personally. Don't think it offers anything good for anyone. Personally I'd do: Q1: Current 53 (No Changes) - Every 15 Minutes Q2: Current 54 (No Changes) - Every 15 Minutes Q3: St Peter's Basin - Newcastle Loop - Every 15 Minutes Q1/Q3 or Q2/Q3 - Every 7.5 Minutes, Monument to Quayside 18: Extended to Wallsend - Every 30 Minutes 35: Sent via Jesmond - Every 30 Minutes X48: Current X46 - Every 30 Minutes X49: Run express like X46 to sort timing issues out - Every 30 Minutes Current Q3: Withdrawn That should be doable with the current PVR - or very close, I think, and everyone wins pretty much bar the Walker area but the tax payer shouldn't be subsidising 5 BPH. New: X48: 2 X49: 2 Q3: 3 35: 5 18: 1 Current: X46: 1 49: 1 35: 4 Q3: 7 If I'm right, so the same PVR. RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - V514DFT - 05 Nov 2025 Been talking in the Arriva thread, so thought i'd bring it over the right thread 55- Forest Hall- Wardley/Follingsby Amazon, pretty straightforward really, its the 355 merged with the 57/58 another one i was thinking of 56- Great Park- Sunderland 56 merged with the Q3 although probably not via Osbourne Road Q3- numbered to Q1, and curtailed at Hollywood Avenue, going the other way extends to the Cobalt via Howdon/ High Howdon reinstating links that were lost 5½ years ago through the loss of the 42/42A RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - Storx - 05 Nov 2025 (05 Nov 2025, 6:17 pm)V514DFT wrote Been talking in the Arriva thread, so thought i'd bring it over the right thread Yeah shouldn't be any issues with the 57/355 being merged. The 57 literally sits around for 20 minutes or so every run anyway, complete waste of resource imo. You couldn't merge the 57/58 though as it does a loop around Wardley so wouldn't really work. Flipping the 57/58 there wouldn't really work either as you'd lose the Wardley to QE link. Imo the Q3 just shouldn't exist - at all North of Newcastle. There's no need for it, let Stagecoach and Arriva run the corridor as they both dominate it anyway. RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - logidoodah - 08 Nov 2025 Some say these suggestions for upgrades to services provided are not necessary or stupid, but this has been a long-term project of mine, creating the maps, working out PVRs & typing them up. So, as we all know, GNE likes to claim their network is struggling at every given opportunity, and as far as everyone not inside the GNE bubble can see, it is that they haven't adapted very well to the 21st Century (never mind Covid, that just sped up the process of managed decline in the industry). Well, of course, besides trimming the fat and isolating people or cancelling routes and winning them back as contracts with no effort of trying to improve patronage, "make them sustainably viable" I have re-designed each area that GNE covers, but I thought I would start with Consett, West Gateshead & Durham links. Pictures are attached, and route colours match their writing below. Bear in mind, I am not interested in Branding and just used the terminology to properly separate the different corridors. Also please ignore all of the grey lines on the maps these are other routes I have drawn but coloured them in grey so its not confusing as they're not related Coast to Country (Combined PVR=14) 7 Sunderland to Stanley (via Houghton-le-Spring, Chester-le-St & South Stanley) 8 Sunderland to Consett (via Washington, Chester-le-St, Beamish & Stanley) New Connections: Beamish with Consett & Houghton to Chester-le-St Corridor upgrades: include Faster links between Chester-le-St & Houghton/Washington/Sunderland (via Chester Rd) and better coordination of services, meaning 15 mins combined frequency Any negatives?: Bournmoor lost has its direct link to Sunderland Tyne-Valley (Combined PVR=17) 10 Newcastle to Hexham (via Metrocentre, Blaydon, Prudhoe & Corbridge) 10A Newcastle to Prudhoe (via Team, Metrocentre, Crawcrook & Tyne View Retail Park) 10B Newcastle to Blackhall Mill (via Teams, Metrocentre, Crawcrook & Rockwood Hill) New Connections: 10A improves local journeys in Prudhoe by "going round the streets" Corridor upgrades: numbering makes more sense, each route every 30 mins combined into 10 min frequency from Crawcrook to Newcastle Any negatives?: 10B upped to 2 bph to keep Chopwell links/frequency, however longer journey to Metrocentre (compared to current 47). Highfield loses direct link to Metrocentre West Durham (Combined PVR=16) - X15 interworks with X70 14 - Castleside to Durham (via Consett, Lanchester, Langley Park & Arnison Centre) X15 - Consett to Durham (via Leadgate, Lanchester & Witton Gilbert) 16 - Shotley Bridge H to Durham (via Consett, Dipton, Stanley & Sacriston) 17 - Metrocentre to Durham (via Sunniside, Dipton, Stanley & Sacriston) New Connections: Castleside/Consett/Lanchester bolted onto 14 route means improved local connections to Arnsion Centre & 17 gives better connections to the Metrocentre. Corridor upgrades: Services simplified and each route being every 30 mins means Lanchester has more bph, also more people should use the X15 as the 14/16 are not meant for end-to-end journeys. 14 can be more profitable and not be empty by Langley Park Any negatives?: V5 southern section withdrawn, unsure what to do with northern section Beamish & Stanley (Combined PVR = 11) 28 - Newcastle to Durham (via Gateshead, Stanley, Beamish & Chester-le-St) 29 - Newcastle to Lanchester (via Gateshead, Sunniside, Stanley & Burnhope) 30 - Newcastle to Quaking Houses (via Gateshead, Sunniside, Tantobie & Stanley) New Connections: Newcastle to Beamish to Durham Corridor upgrades: Bus every 15 mins from Stanley to Gateshead & Newcastle (28-29-28-30), faster journey from Newcastle to Beamish Any negatives?: Slightly longer journey than current X30/X31, but this has better connections & higher frequency, & Catchgate loses its direct service to Newcastle. Derwentside (Combined PVR = 15) - X70 interworks with X15 45 Newcastle - Consett Delves (via Metrocentre, Rowlands Gill, Medomsley & Leadgate) 46 Newcastle - Consett (via Metrocentre, Rowlands Gill, Burnopfield & Shotley Bridge) 47 Newcastle - Consett (Blaydon, Rowlands Gill, Chopwell & Shotley Bridge) X70 Newcastle - Consett (via Gateshead, Whickham New Connections: Newcastle to Delves, Blaydon & Consett, Newcastle Business Park to Dertwentside & Consett, Leadgate to Metrocentre, Whickham to Consett Corridor upgrades: 46 reinstated, to keep the 4 bph to Metrocentre Any negatives?: X45 will lose the "X" express feel but will still be roughly the same as before, just pushes people to X70 for express journey. You would have to build a small bit of road between Oviington Court & Redmire Drive for the 45 route in Templetown. X15/X70 combined PVR = 7 RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - Storx - 09 Nov 2025 (08 Nov 2025, 6:12 pm)logidoodah wrote Some say these suggestions for upgrades to services provided are not necessary or stupid, but this has been a long-term project of mine, creating the maps, working out PVRs & typing them up. So, as we all know, GNE likes to claim their network is struggling at every given opportunity, and as far as everyone not inside the GNE bubble can see, it is that they haven't adapted very well to the 21st Century (never mind Covid, that just sped up the process of managed decline in the industry). Well, of course, besides trimming the fat and isolating people or cancelling routes and winning them back as contracts with no effort of trying to improve patronage, "make them sustainably viable" Must say this seems really confusing with buses bouncing around everywhere. Unless I'm missing something; Ouston, Kibblesworth and Dunston View, don't have a service to Newcastle anymore since you've took away the 28/29 and whatever X's going through Whickham these days? Also there's no bus service from Washington, on the existing 8 corridor towards Sunderland either? That's before imo: Shotley Bridge to Newcastle is way too slow Stanley to Metrocentre is way too slow The 2/8 are duplicating each other The 32/78 are duplicating each other The estates of Winlaton/Blaydon lose their direct Newcastle link. I don't disagree with sending a bus up that way though, to be fair. RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - logidoodah - 09 Nov 2025 (09 Nov 2025, 12:17 am)Storx wrote Must say this seems really confusing with buses bouncing around everywhere. Ah I see why you think that, I forgot to put which routes they would replace and that if something wasn't mentioned it will be covered in my other areas that's in doing. In terms of Ouston & Whickham, I have a fix for that which will be addressed when I can be bothered to type up my next area changes. But anything I have put in will replace any current routes unless stated like with the V5. This answers your question about the 8 duplicating the 2 and the 7 duplicating the 32. And I feel like my routes are still faster than the 6 (which goes around the world) and a lot easier to understand than the current X30/X31/X32/X70/X71/X72/X73 Regarding the 46/47 they will take the roughly the same amount of time as now. The 46 is slightly longer than what the X45 is now but only takes 5-10 mins extra to go via Burnopfield. Appreciate your opinion though
RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - Storx - 09 Nov 2025 (09 Nov 2025, 1:39 am)logidoodah wrote Ah I see why you think that, I forgot to put which routes they would replace and that if something wasn't mentioned it will be covered in my other areas that's in doing. Yeah that's fair, not going to lie. I always think they should revert back to the old 43/44/X30/X31/X70/X71 like it was for awhile around the Stanley area, it was much better than what it is now with too many X's going in different ways confusing the hell out of anyone. It's not miles away from what it was now anyway if you swapped some minor things around ie. X73 = 43 6 = 44 Drop the X30/X31 to every hour each and send them via Gateshead Send the X70/X71 via Gateshead Swap the 6 and X73 from the Pack Horse to Tantobie Crossroads, ie the fast route via Burnopfield; slower route via Catchgate (to even them out a bit) I don't disagree with the Meadomsley bus though, but I'd be tempted to send that to Shotley Bridge running direct then in turn send the 47, also via Meadomsley taking over the V5 (fixes that issue). Gives Shotley Bridge a proper express and then all the nooks and crannies into the 47 where you might pick up 1 or 2 people. RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - L469 YVK - 09 Nov 2025 (09 Nov 2025, 8:37 am)Storx wrote Yeah that's fair, not going to lie. I always think they should revert back to the old 43/44/X30/X31/X70/X71 like it was for awhile around the Stanley area, it was much better than what it is now with too many X's going in different ways confusing the hell out of anyone. I must admit, l loved your idea with the 45/46/47 which would also replace the V5 & X71 in hindsight too - with quite a smart idea to make the 46 more viable too. As I've said before. Derwentside is a very similar demographic to Blyth, Bedlington and Ashington. Arriva have been resillient not only during covid but even with the ABTRL - give or take a few potential future tweaks. If they still had the old X/EX and 40's nonsense that eventually got morphed into simplier and easier routes such as the X10/X11 - would be a different story IMO. All the 40's from Stanley & Consett had the MetroCentre going for them to make money. (11 Oct 2025, 11:18 am)Storx wrote Interesting ideas but quite a big PVR increase there. https://www.northeastbuses.co.uk/attachment.php?thumbnail=11055 This, especially the 46! ⬆️⬆️ I also mentioned it a good few posts back, but do all the Stanley / Consett to Newcastle boards need deckers? Volvo B8RLEs thrown in would be perfect for some trips. Worst case if routes grow and they're not suited capacity wise, put them on the 8/78. RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - Storx - 09 Nov 2025 (09 Nov 2025, 10:11 am)L469 YVK wrote I must admit, l loved your idea with the 45/46/47 which would also replace the V5 & X71 in hindsight too - with quite a smart idea to make the 46 more viable too. Aye that's the one, it's just much tidier imo. There's too many buses one going quick, one going slow, an express which is longer than everything else. It's just a mess right now and they give most areas a link to the Metrocentre like you said, which might not be a million passengers but it's a place - unlike Dunston where people do not want to be (no offence Dunston). The X30/X31/X32/X70/X71/X72/X73 for someone wanting to go Lobley Hill or Dunston must be up there with the most confusing bus routes in the country. Like who'd think the X30/X31/X71 are combined, the X32/X70/X72 are combined and the X73 is just something else altogether but maybe I'm just stupid... Imagine trying to explain that to someone when they're all going to Consett or Stanley, it's bad enough to tell them when the buses go to completely different places with completely different numbers never mind anything else. The X73 being by far the most confusing, since it ain't express, doesn't go to Consett (70's), doesn't go to Sunniside (30's and 70's) and you'd be mad to use it from Stanley to Newcastle the only real common route, bar Dipton which then doesn't have the X71. Why it's numbered that just does not make sense. RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - L469 YVK - 09 Nov 2025 (09 Nov 2025, 10:52 am)Storx wrote Aye that's the one, it's just much tidier imo. There's too many buses one going quick, one going slow, an express which is longer than everything else. It's just a mess right now and they give most areas a link to the Metrocentre like you said, which might not be a million passengers but it's a place - unlike Dunston where people do not want to be (no offence Dunston). Even from a marketing POV........something like these and a new Derwent Ranger brand for all Consett and Stanley to Newcastle services (X30/X31/X70, 43/44/44A, 45/46/47/47A) RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - TheClumsyPineapple - 09 Nov 2025 (09 Nov 2025, 10:11 am)L469 YVK wrote I must admit, l loved your idea with the 45/46/47 which would also replace the V5 & X71 in hindsight too - with quite a smart idea to make the 46 more viable too. As someone who uses a lot of the services. The X46 being brought back is needed quite badly as the 47 is too slow. The X70 isnt busy enough to even be hourly its mostly dead during the day. However at peak times I still think deckers are atill required. Morning 45 carries full and standing deckers. Peak X70 X71 also carry large loads meaning a decker is still required imo. I think the death of the local ventures should be looked into as it was well utilises by the old people. Especially the V3 V4 RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - L469 YVK - 09 Nov 2025 (09 Nov 2025, 1:47 pm)TheClumsyPineapple wrote As someone who uses a lot of the services. The X46 being brought back is needed quite badly as the 47 is too slow. The X70 isnt busy enough to even be hourly its mostly dead during the day. However at peak times I still think deckers are atill required. Morning 45 carries full and standing deckers. Peak X70 X71 also carry large loads meaning a decker is still required imo. I think with a clean 10 minute headway between Rowlands Gill and Newcastle, some runs could get away with single deckers. Likewise for the X70 - some getting away with singles and others needing deckers. But a more simple service with a better frequency will increase passenger numbers overtime. RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - TheClumsyPineapple - 09 Nov 2025 (09 Nov 2025, 3:08 pm)L469 YVK wrote I think with a clean 10 minute headway between Rowlands Gill and Newcastle, some runs could get away with single deckers. There really is no demand at all for the X70. Its literally dead excluding the morning and evening peak. I politely disagree with single deckers as the entire corridor is busy on X45/47 deckers are needed for the route. As even from consett there are healthy loads. Single deckers make no sense for it as they're always rammed whenever singles are put on. RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - Storx - 09 Nov 2025 (09 Nov 2025, 3:13 pm)TheClumsyPineapple wrote There really is no demand at all for the X70. Its literally dead excluding the morning and evening peak. It's the hourly that's a big problem though, it's borderline unusable for people who aren't working on fixed times as you could be sitting around 45 minutes if you time things wrong. It's why everything ideally needs to be every 30 minutes so it's actually useable. There's way too many hourly services right now imo. Obviously, assuming the routes you replied to, if it failed, you could get rid of it as it's mostly covered by other services anyway hence the day time running only but it's got a better chance being more frequent imo especially places like Leadgate etc. RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - L469 YVK - 09 Nov 2025 (09 Nov 2025, 3:13 pm)TheClumsyPineapple wrote There really is no demand at all for the X70. Its literally dead excluding the morning and evening peak. On a 15 minute frequency - I agree. But really, that corridor needs to go back up to every 10 minutes and a few single deckers thrown in wouldn't hurt on the quieter runs. I think GNE went overkill going fully double deck back in 2019 and it made things difficult from a cost perspective especially during covid. I think 4x boards out of the 45/46/47 wasn't quite enough, but not every board needs a decker. Only issue with mixed allocation is if something happens to the previous journey (i.e a breakdown). RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2 - L469 YVK - 09 Nov 2025 (09 Nov 2025, 3:29 pm)Storx wrote It's the hourly that's a big problem though, it's borderline unusable for people who aren't working on fixed times as you could be sitting around 45 minutes if you time things wrong.This again! Clean, simple, easy to use and useful = passengers will use. Look at the 350/351 on the part between Holystone Park and Newcastle as a prime example. Make it useful and people will use. If you look at the amount of crap and 'X, 41/42/43 and 363/364 variations that were running around Blyth and Cramlington before 2010 & 2012 - that's what the X30/X70 services are like at the moment. The Metrocentre whilst not what it was before covid, does still make money. Get the 43/44/44A and 45/46/47/47A nailed down and profitable - taking passengers to two key and major locations with the MetroCentre as the 'inbetween'. X30/X31 via Gateshead will make money on a half hourly frequency. X70 will run at slight loss or breakeven to start with but potential to grow if more useful as a 30 minute service. X44 around Whickham would also make money too especially with the 301 now running every 20 minutes as opposed to the 97/97A running upto every 10 minutes back in the day. |