(31 Dec 2015, 2:24 pm)Adrian wrote It'll be interesting to see if any depots send non-compliant vehicles out on the 2nd. If the worst comes to the worst, do they send a bus with a knackered rear destination out, or just bite the bullet and record the lost mileage? 


Have you been round the depots to do an audit, Dan? I'd noticed a MAN yesterday, where the illumination on the front flipdot wasn't working. That wouldn't be 'ready', would it?

(31 Dec 2015, 2:27 pm)DanPicken wrote BIB#1 They'd probably just send it out as otherwise some services could have a limited service.

BIB#2 No, I haven't but thats one compared to the amount GNE/ANE have.

(31 Dec 2015, 2:24 pm)Adrian wrote It'll be interesting to see if any depots send non-compliant vehicles out on the 2nd. If the worst comes to the worst, do they send a bus with a knackered rear destination out, or just bite the bullet and record the lost mileage?

(31 Dec 2015, 2:27 pm)DanPicken wrote BIB#2 No, I haven't but thats one compared to the amount GNE/ANE have.

(31 Dec 2015, 2:35 pm)Dan wrote On paper, it should render the bus unfit for service. In reality, I can't see that being the case!

I'm all for making public transport more accessible, but I think that most disabled passengers would prefer the bus to turn up, instead of them being left there at a bus stop in the freezing cold while the bus that should have turned up is VOR due to a side or rear destination display not working.


So Stagecoach aren't 100% ready, then?

(15 Aug 2015, 2:54 pm)DaveyBowyer wrote I don't think DDA is affecting the bus industry too much. I'd say that:

- High fuel costs
- Euro emission laws

Are affecting the industry. If the D10-245 was mounted into a Gemini 2 body with a ZF Ecomat, you'd have the perfect bus that could do everything from a short hop around the Toon to a (100?) mile stint to Berwick with ease.

(31 Dec 2015, 2:39 pm)DanPicken wrote 99.98% ready.

(31 Dec 2015, 2:35 pm)Adrian wrote Do you have a figure that you can put on how many they have, compared to what Stagecoach have?

(31 Dec 2015, 2:42 pm)DanPicken wrote Stagecoach have 1. That we know of.

(31 Dec 2015, 2:49 pm)Dan wrote 'That we know of' - those are the key words! Whilst Stagecoach undeniably have fewer examples of destinations not working, they definitely do have more than one...

Anything can be made to look good as a percentage. For your information; one vehicle in the fleet of Busways' 385 without a full compliment of working destinations would be 99.25% working - not 99.98%. 

(31 Dec 2015, 2:51 pm)DanPicken wrote Not good with counting...

(31 Dec 2015, 3:25 pm)Andreos1 wrote I think it was 6028, but it was displaying 'Easington Lane' earlier.

edit: It appears underline doesn't work. Either way, the 'Easing' part of Easington, was underlined.

(31 Dec 2015, 2:24 pm)Adrian wrote It'll be interesting to see if any depots send non-compliant vehicles out on the 2nd. If the worst comes to the worst, do they send a bus with a knackered rear destination out, or just bite the bullet and record the lost mileage? 


Have you been round the depots to do an audit, Dan? I'd noticed a MAN yesterday, where the illumination on the front flipdot wasn't working. That wouldn't be 'ready', would it?

(01 Jan 2016, 7:39 pm)BusLoverMum wrote The number on the front of the whey aye five o (5256) we caught the other day was flickering. We did mention it to the driver, but got a blank look.

(01 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm)citaro5284 wrote Ta

(01 Jan 2016, 9:08 pm)pdiddy wrote From tomorrow 2nd Jan....



What happens if for eg.  



Scarlet Band have a bus out that's not DDA say with the destination number on the wrong side 



Do they get fined!!!

(01 Jan 2016, 9:09 pm)DanPicken wrote Yes.

(01 Jan 2016, 9:08 pm)pdiddy wrote From tomorrow 2nd Jan....

What happens if for eg.  

Scarlet Band have a bus out that's not DDA say with the destination number on the wrong side 

Do they get fined!!!

(01 Jan 2016, 9:13 pm)BusLoverMum wrote How would it be policed?

(01 Jan 2016, 9:13 pm)BusLoverMum wrote How would it be policed?

(01 Jan 2016, 9:16 pm)citaro5284 wrote I cannot remember if the number on the nearside comes under a 'regulation' or 'best practice'.

If its under best practice, then no, but if it is a regulation, then possible, but I doubt they will get fined (or any other operator) in the first instance.

---

VOSA Officials.

(01 Jan 2016, 9:19 pm)LeeCalder wrote I believe it says that the number 'should' be on the nearside.

(01 Jan 2016, 9:16 pm)citaro5284 wrote I cannot remember if the number on the nearside comes under a 'regulation' or 'best practice'.

If its under best practice, then no, but if it is a regulation, then possible, but I doubt they will get fined (or any other operator) in the first instance.

---

DVSA Officials.

(01 Jan 2016, 9:16 pm)citaro5284 wrote I cannot remember if the number on the nearside comes under a 'regulation' or 'best practice'.

If its under best practice, then no, but if it is a regulation, then possible, but I doubt they will get fined (or any other operator) in the first instance.

(01 Jan 2016, 9:19 pm)LeeCalder wrote I believe it says that the number 'should' be on the nearside.

(01 Jan 2016, 9:21 pm)DanPicken wrote Trent Barton aren't good at that I know alot of theirs are/were on the wrong side.

(01 Jan 2016, 9:17 pm)He Adrian wrote DVSA should be policing it through spot checks. Not sure whether this will also be covered as part of an MOT going forward though?

It's always going to be a case that people will report it too, so I can't see any operators running the risk.

(01 Jan 2016, 9:22 pm)Adrian wrote I wonder how Trent Barton will get away with not displaying a route number at all?

(01 Jan 2016, 9:26 pm)BusLoverMum wrote I can see how reports will be made, though I'm doubting most of joe public will even aware of the requirements.

(01 Jan 2016, 9:26 pm)LeeCalder wrote A lot of them? There are only seven routes with numbers...