(09 Dec 2024, 5:48 pm)morritt89 wrote Don't understand why so many buses to Pennywell. Whenever I did the 39, the Pennywell end was noticeably quieter (probably due to the fact you normally followed a Stagecoach 20 round most of the way).

(09 Dec 2024, 4:18 pm)logidoodah wrote From what I can see these changes are pretty detrimental to GNE passengers. 

61 - Improved connections to Royal Hospital, but still poor service and pointless doubling back in Murton to get to Peterlee
62/62A - just a renumbered 39A/B however twice the amount of buses to Pennywell, (9 bph combined with the Stagecoach 20 - just overkill)
63 - Ryhope's (and therefore connections from 22/60/61) are lost to Doxford park. People have to now connect at Grangetown. Also loss of connections to Leechmere ASDA)

25 - Even worse connections, my gf lives in Boldon and says that the current timetabling puts the 5/50 leapfrogging eachother. So was this intentional to make the 5 less viable? How can this be if the buses are always rammed (especially at peaks)...
26 - West of Jarrow to South Shields/South Tyneside Hospital is unforgivable. Again buses are usually rammed at peaks. Right now there are 4 (GNE) bph to ST Hospital from around South Shields, this will reduce to 2!
35 - This should have happened a long time ago but with the 30 mins frequency for just the 35. Gives lots of little connections and people who want Sunderland quickly can get the metro. So does this mean the nexus funded section from Town End Farm - Boldon is commercial now? 
36 - How many attempts have they had with this route? So the only way they can make this work is to butcher the 35 so the passengers are shared out. One thing I hated when the 9 went to Lukes Lane was the 2 minute walk from York Road to Lukes Lane but the 30 minute journey on the bus. So if someone who lives in Lukes Lane misses their bus to Sunderland they can walk to York Avenue and catch the bus before the one they aimed for and get there 30 mins earlier... Pure pointless nonsense.

32 - Even longer journey for those in Low Moorsley to Sunderland (by doing the 35A route all day), no benefits of this at all, as well as losing the cross city connections from south of East Herrington). 

So they have done this to tidy up the numbering system yet forgot about the 34? So the services in sunderland are now the 32/33/35/36 (seems really stupid) if they can change the 25 to the 22 then they can change the 34 t0 the 23.

(09 Dec 2024, 5:48 pm)morritt89 wrote The 63 (old 42/142) and 33 (133), going back to Magic Roundabout changes.

Don't understand why so many buses to Pennywell. Whenever I did the 39, the Pennywell end was noticeably quieter (probably due to the fact you normally followed a Stagecoach 20 round most of the way).

The 35 (as it currently is) was, in my opinion a very long route and splitting it is a good idea.

(09 Dec 2024, 11:15 pm)Unber43 wrote the 55 should be brought back as the 37 and the 202 should be brough back as the 64.

And the 61 should be every 20 mins to Murton

(09 Dec 2024, 11:32 pm)F114TML wrote I mean the 61 pretty much is the 202 now, albeit going a different way. Trouble is the 202 complimented the 60, 61 and X35, whereas the 61 now is the only Sunderland bus for a lot of people.

(09 Dec 2024, 11:32 pm)F114TML wrote I mean the 61 pretty much is the 202 now, albeit going a different way. Trouble is the 202 complimented the 60, 61 and X35, whereas the 61 now is the only Sunderland bus for a lot of people.

(09 Dec 2024, 11:35 pm)Unber43 wrote Couple of things change the 202, Have it go through Ashbrooke and QA Road then Leechmere Asda then along seafront Seaham, Dalton Park, Easington Lane Shotton Peterlee.

New Connection to Dalton Park for people that live in Sunderland, and to ResQ at Seaham for people from Shotton too

(09 Dec 2024, 11:41 pm)Storx wrote The 61 is one of those awkward buses that just sits along other buses really. Hopefully when franchising comes in it can be dealt with and merged with the 22/23/24, or whatever ones go to Sunderland nowadays and offer a 15 minute service to Dalton Park direct.

Also ideally run them limited stop after Seaham Grange aswell since they don't pick anyone up barely anyway and give people from Peterlee, Murton and beyond a faster service to Sunderland who don't want to go for a tour around Ryhope etc.

(10 Dec 2024, 6:45 pm)deanmachine wrote I think the people of Murton would disagree with you that the 61 is awkward and needs to be dealt with.

(10 Dec 2024, 6:57 pm)MurdnunoC wrote I agree, it's a pretty straight forward bus service actually, as it stands, discounting the Peterlee extension. Circular route around Murton, Dalton Park, then pretty much the direct route to Sunderland.

(10 Dec 2024, 6:45 pm)deanmachine wrote I think the people of Murton would disagree with you that the 61 is awkward and needs to be dealt with.

(Yesterday, 5:07 am)ALavery wrote Personally I would reroute the 61 to do the old 62 route between dalton park and peterlee going straight through murton and have a 61A doing the normal route between pennywell and murton but doing the loop around murton ans then going back and have them at either every 40 minutes combined 20 or every 30 combined 15. That way people wanting their only bus to easington lane, south hetton, etc don’t have to spend an extra 10 or 20 minutes trundling around murtons estates to pick up two people who were probably standing on the through roads anyway.  The network in east durham and in general tbh really needs sorting out and this isn’t the way to do it.

(10 Dec 2024, 1:19 am)F114TML wrote Just brainstorming rn will work out what would be feasable later;
2/2A: Washington - Sunderland only
24: Extend via Chester Road, Ormonde Street, Durham Road, Farringdon, Doxford International, then 55 route to Peterlee (Perhaps alternate journeys terminate at Grasmere Terrace).
X60: As 60 all stops Parkside - Seaham Grange, then limited stop; Ryhope Green, Toll Bar, Ocean Road, Winter Gardens, Holmeside, Park Lane.
X61: As murton trips on 61 (skipping matthews road), same stopping pattern as X60. All journeys terminate in Murton.
62/62A: 39 loop round Pennywell, then as 2/2A respectively. Contines from Silksworth to Doxford Morrisons or Doxford International.
63/63A: 39 loop round Pennywell, then 39 to Ryhope Green. 63 as 39 to Doxford International; 63A via Ryhope Hospitals and Burdon Road to Doxford International
64: Doxford International - Doxford Park - Tunstall Bank Estate - Esdale Estate - Hollycarrside - Leechmere ASDA - Ryhope Road - Winter Gardens - Holmeside - Park Lane
65: As now but serves Matthews Road in Murton.
66: Peterlee Bus Station - Moorcock via College - Easington - South Hetton - Murton - Matthews Road - Dawdon - Seaham Harbour - Ryhope Green - Ocean Road - Queen Alexandra Road - Chester Road - Park Lane

(Yesterday, 12:19 am)Storx wrote Aye no arguments there but the rest of the route probably couldn't give a toss if it didn't exist and use something else instead. 

Ideally the 22/60/61 need to interwork really but it's not possible when you have 2 operators. 

On the Murton to Peterlee, surely it would be cheaper to extend whatever the minibus (forgot number) that runs upto Easington.

It's more than enough capacity wise really.

(Yesterday, 5:07 am)ALavery wrote Personally I would reroute the 61 to do the old 62 route between dalton park and peterlee going straight through murton and have a 61A doing the normal route between pennywell and murton but doing the loop around murton ans then going back and have them at either every 40 minutes combined 20 or every 30 combined 15. That way people wanting their only bus to easington lane, south hetton, etc don’t have to spend an extra 10 or 20 minutes trundling around murtons estates to pick up two people who were probably standing on the through roads anyway.  The network in east durham and in general tbh really needs sorting out and this isn’t the way to do it.

(Yesterday, 8:50 pm)Jimmi wrote 208? Problems with that are: it takes 27 minutes just to reach Easington from Peterlee, plus it would likely be rather awkward to schedule/resource especially when all the 'Peterlee Purples' already have to run on/off the X6 since the outstation at Peterlee was done away with.

(Yesterday, 8:50 pm)Jimmi wrote 208? Problems with that are: it takes 27 minutes just to reach Easington from Peterlee, plus it would likely be rather awkward to schedule/resource especially when all the 'Peterlee Purples' already have to run on/off the X6 since the outstation at Peterlee was done away with.

EDIT: just realised the 62/62A did the current 208 route between Peterlee & Easington, little wonder it ended up not being commercially viable ?