(30 Jul 2016, 6:23 am)Jimmi wrote Why is it that when you get seat reservation's on trains, they feel the need to plonk you next to someone else? The carriage is dead and I have to squeeze myself into a cramped space with someone next to me as a result. The fact that I'm on a one of CrossCountry's rancid Voyagers makes it even worse as there is barely any space to begin with.

(30 Jul 2016, 9:30 am)BusLoverMum wrote I'm stuck next to big'un on mine

My stupid phone is annoying me today. Its days are numbered

(30 Jul 2016, 9:39 am)Jimmi wrote Bet you wish he was like the passenger next to me? Asleep!

Had to wake him up when it was time to change trains.

(30 Jul 2016, 9:42 am)Andreos1 wrote And you haven't uploaded a photo in the sleepy passenger thread?


Missed opportunity there like

(30 Jul 2016, 9:44 am)Jimmi wrote Didn't realise til it was time to get off, was only a reasonably young lad as well.

(30 Jul 2016, 10:05 am)biglugs@yahoo.com wrote I think its against the law to take a picture of someone without there permission

(30 Jul 2016, 10:05 am)GX03 SVC wrote That's us bus photographers f**ked then!

(30 Jul 2016, 10:08 am)biglugs@yahoo.com wrote Yes.
If you do take a picture i would pixalise it if it was me

(30 Jul 2016, 10:10 am)GX03 SVC wrote I don't have to pixelate photos of individuals if the photo was taken in a public place.

(30 Jul 2016, 10:21 am)biglugs@yahoo.com wrote Yes but if your taken it of a individual they may not want to end up on the likes of you tube , Facebook, Twitter and instargram

(30 Jul 2016, 6:23 am)Jimmi wrote Why is it that when you get seat reservation's on trains, they feel the need to plonk you next to someone else? The carriage is dead and I have to squeeze myself into a cramped space with someone next to me as a result. The fact that I'm on a one of CrossCountry's rancid Voyagers makes it even worse as there is barely any space to begin with.

(30 Jul 2016, 10:05 am)biglugs@yahoo.com wrote I think its against the law to take a picture of someone without there permission

(30 Jul 2016, 11:05 am)Adrian wrote Why didn't you just sit elsewhere, if the carriage was dead? You're not bound to sit in the seat allocated, as long as you stick to the same class of ticket.


Utter nonsense.

(30 Jul 2016, 11:05 am)GX03 SVC wrote I don't care. If they don't want their photo taken they'll make an attempt to cover their face.

(30 Jul 2016, 10:21 am)biglugs@yahoo.com wrote Yes but if your taken it of a individual they may not want to end up on the likes of you tube , Facebook, Twitter and instargram

(30 Jul 2016, 12:02 pm)MrFozz wrote Can you back that up?

Show me where it says that...

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

(30 Jul 2016, 12:04 pm)biglugs@yahoo.com wrote I cant but say the likes of my family ended up deliberately on a social website or so that would be classed as bullying.

(30 Jul 2016, 12:22 pm)MrFozz wrote It is not bullying...Believe me, I have been bullied, and was bullied for years, putting a photo of someone on Facebook because they unintentionally show up in front of a camera lens is not bullying, good luck trying to prove that one

If someone sees a camera pointed at them, if they dont want to seen on the pic, they will take adequate to cover there face or turn there back.

It is not bullying and it is not against any law.

I suppose it would become uncalled for if I was purposely seeking to take photos of the same over and over again

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

(30 Jul 2016, 1:07 pm)biglugs@yahoo.com wrote I spoke to debra and she said safety is first and that people that take photos of people deliberately are classed as stalkers

(30 Jul 2016, 1:15 pm)Adrian wrote Can we end this here? This is on the verge of being ridiculous now, and is scaremongering.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with taking photos in public places, even if they include someone. You do not need their permission. Permission is only required when you're taking photos on private property, but even then, it would merely be classed a trespassing, which is a civil matter - not criminal.

Harassment does not come into it, unless you're deliberately following a particular person around, in order to log their movements or record what they're doing. This is a criminal matter.

This post of course does not constitute legal advice, and I'd always recommend that you spoke to a qualified legal professional, if you want your own guarantees.

(30 Jul 2016, 9:43 pm)MrFozz wrote You and Debra really dont have a clue...I would like to see that in Black and White

Taking a photo of somebody who happens to be on the bus your photographing is not a deliberate act of stalking, that is stupid, because in that case, we would all be classed as stalkers, including your good self if you take such a photo...

If you want to continue this conversation, feel more than free to PM me


Fair enough Adrian, best to leave it alone mate...Just think his claims are quite ridiculous

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk