Pricing
Pricing
(12 Feb 2017, 9:09 pm)Andreos1 It is a gripe of mine and as my demand for the service is inelastic (I have no choice but to pay the fare charged) - it often feels that venting is a form of therapy.
> Isn't that the point though? Bus fares are high because Demand is inelastic.
Anyway, I was reading an old post from March 2015 where there was comment about the high fares on the 20, particularly between Houghton and Durham (who could have posted that comment I wonder?!). The single fare for that trip was £4.00. In less than two years, the fare has risen by almost 5%!
Do salaries increase that much over the same timescale?
> Some in the private sector may have had 5% rises over the last two years. Us in the public sector; 4% in 8 years!
As a comparison; First Manchester increased their fares by 7% last month, but those with internet banking and iphones who agreed to use mtickets were spared. First's argument (as mentioned in the trade press) is that the use of mtickets would speed up boarding by 75%. They claimed that without any mtickets, it takes 10.5 minutes to board 50 passengers. When has a driver EVER had anything like 10 minutes to board a full load?
(12 Feb 2017, 9:09 pm)Andreos1 It is a gripe of mine and as my demand for the service is inelastic (I have no choice but to pay the fare charged) - it often feels that venting is a form of therapy.
> Isn't that the point though? Bus fares are high because Demand is inelastic.
Anyway, I was reading an old post from March 2015 where there was comment about the high fares on the 20, particularly between Houghton and Durham (who could have posted that comment I wonder?!). The single fare for that trip was £4.00. In less than two years, the fare has risen by almost 5%!
Do salaries increase that much over the same timescale?
> Some in the private sector may have had 5% rises over the last two years. Us in the public sector; 4% in 8 years!
As a comparison; First Manchester increased their fares by 7% last month, but those with internet banking and iphones who agreed to use mtickets were spared. First's argument (as mentioned in the trade press) is that the use of mtickets would speed up boarding by 75%. They claimed that without any mtickets, it takes 10.5 minutes to board 50 passengers. When has a driver EVER had anything like 10 minutes to board a full load?
7%?! That's a canny hike. Over what sort of period was that? Is it for all tickets or just certain types?
I still struggle to believe mobile tickets increase boarding times as quickly as stated. I've seen similar comments to the ones you have seen and I can't get my head around it - particularly when drivers have to squint at phones or the app (inevitably crashes).
For once, I have to agree with eezypeazy (shock horror) and say that there is some elasticity with passengers - even if it is just some passengers. Maybe it all depends on the alternatives for them?
Without making this all about me (I'm only giving examples of bus use), I thought I would share the options when travelling to and from the station.
* Blag a lift. Not always an option, due to other people's commitments.
* Use a taxi. When a taxi is hitting the £20 mark and you're using it a few times a week, it soon adds up.
* Park at the station. Durham station doesn't have the biggest car park in the world and it costs circa £13 a day. It is a gamble taking the car through. The walk from the bigger of the car parks to platform 1 isn't easy with luggage/bags.
* Use the bus. Pay £4.20 singles, unless returning the same day.
If I still lived in Durham, instantly at least two of the options become more viable. Walking could even be an option.
For those who do live nearer the station, then demand has the elasticy mentioned - including the choice of bus operator. An increase by one operator in a previously competitive fare may see passengers use an alternative option.
(12 Feb 2017, 9:09 pm)Andreos1 is there another service (whatever the operator) that has seen such an increase in the same period?....
(12 Feb 2017, 9:09 pm)Andreos1 is there another service (whatever the operator) that has seen such an increase in the same period?....
(13 Feb 2017, 8:57 am)eezypeazy Erm, yes. Back in 1982, ALL bus fares in Tyne and Wear were increased by THIRTY per cent by local politicians after a two year freeze. (see Route One magazine, 2 October 2013). That was when local buses were run by the politically-controlled PTE (as Nexus was then) through the erstwhile Tyne and Wear County Council.
It rather makes your six per cent in two years sound very reasonable, doesn't it?
(13 Feb 2017, 8:57 am)eezypeazy Erm, yes. Back in 1982, ALL bus fares in Tyne and Wear were increased by THIRTY per cent by local politicians after a two year freeze. (see Route One magazine, 2 October 2013). That was when local buses were run by the politically-controlled PTE (as Nexus was then) through the erstwhile Tyne and Wear County Council.
It rather makes your six per cent in two years sound very reasonable, doesn't it?
(13 Feb 2017, 8:57 am)eezypeazy Erm, yes. Back in 1982, ALL bus fares in Tyne and Wear were increased by THIRTY per cent by local politicians after a two year freeze. (see Route One magazine, 2 October 2013). That was when local buses were run by the politically-controlled PTE (as Nexus was then) through the erstwhile Tyne and Wear County Council.
It rather makes your six per cent in two years sound very reasonable, doesn't it?
(13 Feb 2017, 8:57 am)eezypeazy Erm, yes. Back in 1982, ALL bus fares in Tyne and Wear were increased by THIRTY per cent by local politicians after a two year freeze. (see Route One magazine, 2 October 2013). That was when local buses were run by the politically-controlled PTE (as Nexus was then) through the erstwhile Tyne and Wear County Council.
It rather makes your six per cent in two years sound very reasonable, doesn't it?
(12 Feb 2017, 11:30 pm)Andreos1 7%?! That's a canny hike. Over what sort of period was that? Is it for all tickets or just certain types?
I still struggle to believe mobile tickets increase boarding times as quickly as stated. I've seen similar comments to the ones you have seen and I can't get my head around it - particularly when drivers have to squint at phones or the app (inevitably crashes).
For once, I have to agree with eezypeazy (shock horror) and say that there is some elasticity with passengers - even if it is just some passengers. Maybe it all depends on the alternatives for them?
Without making this all about me (I'm only giving examples of bus use), I thought I would share the options when travelling to and from the station.
* Blag a lift. Not always an option, due to other people's commitments.
* Use a taxi. When a taxi is hitting the £20 mark and you're using it a few times a week, it soon adds up.
* Park at the station. Durham station doesn't have the biggest car park in the world and it costs circa £13 a day. It is a gamble taking the car through. The walk from the bigger of the car parks to platform 1 isn't easy with luggage/bags.
* Use the bus. Pay £4.20 singles, unless returning the same day.
If I still lived in Durham, instantly at least two of the options become more viable. Walking could even be an option.
For those who do live nearer the station, then demand has the elasticy mentioned - including the choice of bus operator. An increase by one operator in a previously competitive fare may see passengers use an alternative option.
(12 Feb 2017, 11:30 pm)Andreos1 7%?! That's a canny hike. Over what sort of period was that? Is it for all tickets or just certain types?
I still struggle to believe mobile tickets increase boarding times as quickly as stated. I've seen similar comments to the ones you have seen and I can't get my head around it - particularly when drivers have to squint at phones or the app (inevitably crashes).
For once, I have to agree with eezypeazy (shock horror) and say that there is some elasticity with passengers - even if it is just some passengers. Maybe it all depends on the alternatives for them?
Without making this all about me (I'm only giving examples of bus use), I thought I would share the options when travelling to and from the station.
* Blag a lift. Not always an option, due to other people's commitments.
* Use a taxi. When a taxi is hitting the £20 mark and you're using it a few times a week, it soon adds up.
* Park at the station. Durham station doesn't have the biggest car park in the world and it costs circa £13 a day. It is a gamble taking the car through. The walk from the bigger of the car parks to platform 1 isn't easy with luggage/bags.
* Use the bus. Pay £4.20 singles, unless returning the same day.
If I still lived in Durham, instantly at least two of the options become more viable. Walking could even be an option.
For those who do live nearer the station, then demand has the elasticy mentioned - including the choice of bus operator. An increase by one operator in a previously competitive fare may see passengers use an alternative option.
(13 Feb 2017, 2:57 pm)Tamesider The 7% is for Day, weekly and monthly tickets. Single fares went up slightly more modestly, but that assumes fare stages weren't moved at the same time.
The point about elasticity is that services are deteriorating fastest in low(er) car ownership areas, with "bus wars" (with reduced fares) reserved either for trendy areas with increasing affluence (commuters).
"Blagging a lift" is usually a non starter, as the car-less tend to be single, have fewer friends locally, and have different travelling patterns to car owning friends and relations. Also, and am not sure if this is still true today; Friends don't tend to offer lifts unless its likely to be returned "in kind".
Taxis: If you can afford regular taxi fares, you can afford a car! Again, the car-less don't usually travel to the same place at the same time as friends/relatives with a car.
Car parking: Obviously not relevant to the car-less, but I'm surprised parking at a rail station is so expensive. I think parking at Manchester Piccadilly is about £4 a day, but it might be more expensive before 0930ish on weekdays. Only Manchester Airport, Hospitals and some city centre Car parks charge large fees in GM. Where services are deteriorating in the poorer suburbs, most parking is free - thanks to Supermarkets.
(13 Feb 2017, 2:57 pm)Tamesider The 7% is for Day, weekly and monthly tickets. Single fares went up slightly more modestly, but that assumes fare stages weren't moved at the same time.
The point about elasticity is that services are deteriorating fastest in low(er) car ownership areas, with "bus wars" (with reduced fares) reserved either for trendy areas with increasing affluence (commuters).
"Blagging a lift" is usually a non starter, as the car-less tend to be single, have fewer friends locally, and have different travelling patterns to car owning friends and relations. Also, and am not sure if this is still true today; Friends don't tend to offer lifts unless its likely to be returned "in kind".
Taxis: If you can afford regular taxi fares, you can afford a car! Again, the car-less don't usually travel to the same place at the same time as friends/relatives with a car.
Car parking: Obviously not relevant to the car-less, but I'm surprised parking at a rail station is so expensive. I think parking at Manchester Piccadilly is about £4 a day, but it might be more expensive before 0930ish on weekdays. Only Manchester Airport, Hospitals and some city centre Car parks charge large fees in GM. Where services are deteriorating in the poorer suburbs, most parking is free - thanks to Supermarkets.
(13 Feb 2017, 9:19 pm)Andreos1 Found a blog on First Manchester fares.
https://mancunian1001.wordpress.com/2016...re-freeze/
I'm not doubting what you are saying about the 7%, but I could only see it on the weekly ticket - using the figures provided. The monthly ticket was closer to a GNE increase.
However, I do like that bundle deal they're offering. The app is also available on Windows Phone!
https://www.virgintrainseastcoast.com/th...m-station/
Details of the parking costs at the station. The location of the station (at the top of a very steep hill), doesn't lend itself to parking in another car park.
(13 Feb 2017, 9:19 pm)Andreos1 Found a blog on First Manchester fares.
https://mancunian1001.wordpress.com/2016...re-freeze/
I'm not doubting what you are saying about the 7%, but I could only see it on the weekly ticket - using the figures provided. The monthly ticket was closer to a GNE increase.
However, I do like that bundle deal they're offering. The app is also available on Windows Phone!
https://www.virgintrainseastcoast.com/th...m-station/
Details of the parking costs at the station. The location of the station (at the top of a very steep hill), doesn't lend itself to parking in another car park.
(13 Feb 2017, 9:34 pm)Tamesider Sorry, I was wrong about monthly/annual, but Day tickets still go up about 7%. I'm not sure how many people risk monthly, let alone annual tickets, with passengers either liable to job change, or only ever 8 weeks away from a possible service change/reduction.
The flaw in the argument about boarding times is fairly obvious: Relatively few people pay with cash, especially after 0900 on Mon/Tues. And even then another possible solution would be to re-instate the ban on £20 notes, originally introduced by both First and Stagecoach on Police advice, due to the large numbers of forgeries in circulation.
(13 Feb 2017, 9:34 pm)Tamesider Sorry, I was wrong about monthly/annual, but Day tickets still go up about 7%. I'm not sure how many people risk monthly, let alone annual tickets, with passengers either liable to job change, or only ever 8 weeks away from a possible service change/reduction.
The flaw in the argument about boarding times is fairly obvious: Relatively few people pay with cash, especially after 0900 on Mon/Tues. And even then another possible solution would be to re-instate the ban on £20 notes, originally introduced by both First and Stagecoach on Police advice, due to the large numbers of forgeries in circulation.
(13 Feb 2017, 9:52 pm)Andreos1 A trial between the exact change offer like Lothian introduced and a mobile ticket would be interesting!
After the initial costs in sourcing the app and any additional charges, I wonder what the cost saving is for the operator between a mobile ticket and paper ticket? I imagine the costs of having a mobile ticket offer is pretty stable compared to those costs incurred with paper tickets.
Are we talking marginal amounts or are we talking amounts that is going to increase margins?
However, unless operators find a way around it, the paper tickets offer a revenue stream via advertising.
(13 Feb 2017, 9:52 pm)Andreos1 A trial between the exact change offer like Lothian introduced and a mobile ticket would be interesting!
After the initial costs in sourcing the app and any additional charges, I wonder what the cost saving is for the operator between a mobile ticket and paper ticket? I imagine the costs of having a mobile ticket offer is pretty stable compared to those costs incurred with paper tickets.
Are we talking marginal amounts or are we talking amounts that is going to increase margins?
However, unless operators find a way around it, the paper tickets offer a revenue stream via advertising.
(22 Feb 2017, 9:18 am)idiot Trying x36 to get to redhouse today. Stuck on 570. So uncomfortable and paying £1.85 for the pleasure.
Really can't see it doing any better and ultimately getting changed soon.
(13 Feb 2017, 10:48 pm)James101 I think we'll be hard pressed to find any actual figures to compare, but I imagine the savings for a large company like stagecoach will be considerable. If the system was cash-less there would be insurance savings on the buses themselves and the buildings the cash is kept in. There would be no outlay to g4s or similar for collecting and banking the cash. There would also be big labour savings as the cash-out process when returning to depot for takes a few minutes per driver.
(13 Feb 2017, 10:48 pm)James101 I think we'll be hard pressed to find any actual figures to compare, but I imagine the savings for a large company like stagecoach will be considerable. If the system was cash-less there would be insurance savings on the buses themselves and the buildings the cash is kept in. There would be no outlay to g4s or similar for collecting and banking the cash. There would also be big labour savings as the cash-out process when returning to depot for takes a few minutes per driver.
Arriva is making fare changes on 28th May:
https://www.arrivabus.co.uk/north-east/L...Nqc0O.dpuf
Quote:Copied from GNE Thread: -
Only then, we will have a fully integrated travel policy, and I\m sDan Wrote:
Oxford Bus Company recently installed the same machines and have confirmed that they have the ability of accepting contactless payments:
https://www.oxfordbus.co.uk/serviceupdat...-machines/
It has recently been confirmed to Go North East drivers that contactless payments will shortly be enabled on the machines, following completion of full rollout of the new machines at all depots.
Quote:Copied from GNE Thread: -
Only then, we will have a fully integrated travel policy, and I\m sDan Wrote:
Oxford Bus Company recently installed the same machines and have confirmed that they have the ability of accepting contactless payments:
https://www.oxfordbus.co.uk/serviceupdat...-machines/
It has recently been confirmed to Go North East drivers that contactless payments will shortly be enabled on the machines, following completion of full rollout of the new machines at all depots.
(23 Jun 2017, 1:58 pm)Tom Fares are going up on GNE services - quite a big increase for weekly Buzzfare tickets I think too noticed a poster on the bus but didn't get a chance to read it properly.
(23 Jun 2017, 1:58 pm)Tom Fares are going up on GNE services - quite a big increase for weekly Buzzfare tickets I think too noticed a poster on the bus but didn't get a chance to read it properly.