31 Dec 2014, 9:35 am
I was told the angel buses were going onto the 27 as they were too slow on the 21, 21 supposed to get older diesel deckers and the mercedes to be cascaded elsewhere, like I say I don't know how true it is...
(31 Dec 2014, 9:35 am)dodsy wrote [ -> ]I was told the angel buses were going onto the 27 as they were too slow on the 21, 21 supposed to get older diesel deckers and the mercedes to be cascaded elsewhere, like I say I don't know how true it is...
(31 Dec 2014, 9:35 am)dodsy wrote [ -> ]I was told the angel buses were going onto the 27 as they were too slow on the 21, 21 supposed to get older diesel deckers and the mercedes to be cascaded elsewhere, like I say I don't know how true it is...
(30 Dec 2014, 7:47 pm)citaro5284 wrote [ -> ]I am led to believe that some new vehicles will be getting delivered between March and May.
As to the make, model, livery and brand.....let the guessing commence
(31 Dec 2014, 10:15 am)gtom wrote [ -> ]More likely too unreliable than slow but the 27 is hardly an easy going route.Honestly, We've gone over this 101 times with other vehicles in the fleet...
But saying that, the 21 is due its usual management cock up downgrade.
(31 Dec 2014, 10:33 am)Dan wrote [ -> ]Honestly, We've gone over this 101 times with other vehicles in the fleet...
Regularly seeing red spares on a route is not due to the fact that the branded allocation are unreliable. It's just a misconception due to the fact there are no branded spare vehicles. Matters will be made worse for the "Prince Bishops" services next month, when they cover a PVR of 20 with no branded spares...
I agree that the Volvo Hybrids may have been 'too slow' to stick to the timetable Go North East had for the 21 originally, but that's the reason why the timetables changed and the PVR increased by 2 vehicles (and hence now uses the two Volvo B7s - which were originally spares). To clear this up, the Angel B5s are staying where they are (for the next few years at least).
(31 Dec 2014, 10:41 am)Michael wrote [ -> ]I'm expecting loads of odd workings on the Prince Bishops, due to the re-fueling and buses having checks etc...They'll also have to re-fueled more than often due to its LONG route?
They should have at least 2-3 spares for it but that brings more problems up... don't think GNE will want to have loads of branded spares sitting around.......
Hopefully this is sorted when GNE do the 2015/2016 orders
(31 Dec 2014, 10:27 am)Michael wrote [ -> ]I would say i can guarantee at least 2 routes which will get new buses during this financial term, aslthough still not 100% on what buses they'll get here is my guess...
Lime - Streetlite
X66 - Versa
As for others.... no idea
How many buses are being ordered
(31 Dec 2014, 10:53 am)Robert wrote [ -> ]We have all been able to establish that those 2 routes in particular are to receive an upgrade or cascade of some sort for months now although like you say, we can't say that what vehicles will be purchased for them. We won't know how many buses are being ordered until they actually are. At the moment, we can only guess roughly which i think was about 80 if i remember correctly?
(31 Dec 2014, 10:53 am)Robert wrote [ -> ]We have all been able to establish that those 2 routes in particular are to receive an upgrade or cascade of some sort for months now although like you say, we can't say that what vehicles will be purchased for them. We won't know how many buses are being ordered until they actually are. At the moment, we can only guess roughly which i think was about 80 if i remember correctly?
(31 Dec 2014, 4:25 pm)MarcTheA4 wrote [ -> ]Hmm...don't think I've ever made a serious post in this thread (), so here are my predictions...
'Lime' Services 8/78/78A - Current PVR of 13 + 2 Spares....15 vehicles
'X66' Service X66 - Current PVR of 4 (5 on Sat) + 1 Spare....6 vehicles
'Fab57' Service 57 - Current PVR of 5 + 1 Spare....6 vehicles
'Toon Link' Services 11/31/32/47 - Current PVR of 13 + 2 Spare....15 vehicles
'Prince Bishops' Services 20/20A/X20 - Current PVR of 12 + 2 Spare....14 vehicles
With the changes over in Sunderland, I think it will be hard to understand the PVR of the Laser and Prince Bishops, although with Service 36, the PVR should increase by the 2 the #71 had.
Well, there's my predictions!
(31 Dec 2014, 4:29 pm)Michael wrote [ -> ]20/20A will be 20 PVR and the 35/36 will be 15 PVR. =)
Ill also go for Lime, X66 (pretty much confirmed) and Toonlink, as for anymore, not sure
(31 Dec 2014, 4:25 pm)MarcTheA4 wrote [ -> ]Hmm...don't think I've ever made a serious post in this thread (), so here are my predictions...
'Lime' Services 8/78/78A - Current PVR of 13 + 2 Spares....15 vehicles
'X66' Service X66 - Current PVR of 4 (5 on Sat) + 1 Spare....6 vehicles
'Fab57' Service 57 - Current PVR of 5 + 1 Spare....6 vehicles
'Toon Link' Services 11/31/32/47 - Current PVR of 13 + 2 Spare....15 vehicles
'Prince Bishops' Services 20/20A/X20 - Current PVR of 12 + 2 Spare....14 vehicles
With the changes over in Sunderland, I think it will be hard to understand the PVR of the Laser and Prince Bishops, although with Service 36, the PVR should increase by the 2 the #71 had.
Well, there's my predictions!
(31 Dec 2014, 4:43 pm)Robert wrote [ -> ]Wouldnt think it would be needed to purchase spares for every single route. 53/54 and 58 share the 11.7m versa spares whether they are intentional or not. Obviously if its at ta depot where there are no spares to the same spec as the buses, then the spares would be needed (Lime). Im sure that the Prince Bishops would need branded spares anyway but if 4945 is away getting painted into what is supposedly a purple base, its pointless discussing the prince bishops gaining an investment.
(31 Dec 2014, 4:49 pm)cbma06 wrote [ -> ]"IF" service 20 and 27 get new double deckers then the crusaders silver citarios could be unbranded and branded up for the silver arrows as it has the same base coat?, also if the deckers come for service 20/20A then I would reduce the frequency to every 12 minutes similar what GNE are going to do with service 56. would of liked to see citarios on service X35/X36 though.
(31 Dec 2014, 4:46 pm)Dan wrote [ -> ]It's the 58 and X66 which share 5389 and 5390.
On Saturdays when the PVR of the X66 increases to 5, one of those should be allocated (when they aren't required for the Citylink).
If/when the "Prince Bishops" services receive investment, twenty branded vehicles would be ordered and two or three corporate liveried spares of the same specification would also be ordered.
(31 Dec 2014, 4:49 pm)cbma06 wrote [ -> ]"IF" service 20 and 27 get new double deckers then the crusaders silver citarios could be unbranded and branded up for the silver arrows as it has the same base coat?, also if the deckers come for service 20/20A then I would reduce the frequency to every 12 minutes similar what GNE are going to do with service 56. would of liked to see citarios on service X35/X36 though.
(31 Dec 2014, 4:49 pm)cbma06 wrote [ -> ]"IF" service 20 and 27 get new double deckers then the crusaders silver citarios could be unbranded and branded up for the silver arrows as it has the same base coat?, also if the deckers come for service 20/20A then I would reduce the frequency to every 12 minutes similar what GNE are going to do with service 56. would of liked to see citarios on service X35/X36 though.
(31 Dec 2014, 4:52 pm)Robert wrote [ -> ]Yes but 5389 and 5390 can also be used on Saltwell Park services 53/54 although in this case its not intentional. Why purchase extra vehicles when you can have spares and share them...
(31 Dec 2014, 10:33 am)Dan wrote [ -> ]Honestly, We've gone over this 101 times with other vehicles in the fleet...
Regularly seeing red spares on a route is not due to the fact that the branded allocation are unreliable. It's just a misconception due to the fact there are no branded spare vehicles. Matters will be made worse for the "Prince Bishops" services next month, when they cover a PVR of 20 with no branded spares...
I agree that the Volvo Hybrids may have been 'too slow' to stick to the timetable Go North East had for the 21 originally, but that's the reason why the timetables changed and the PVR increased by 2 vehicles (and hence now uses the two Volvo B7s - which were originally spares). To clear this up, the Angel B5s are staying where they are (for the next few years at least).
(31 Dec 2014, 4:59 pm)gtom wrote [ -> ]No Dan, but using the service and experiencing plenty of breakdowns, no-shows etc does show they are unreliable.
Yet again with the 21 GNE ballsed up the vehicle choice. You'd have thought they would have learnt their lesson and really thought things out, clearly not
(31 Dec 2014, 5:01 pm)MarcTheA4 wrote [ -> ]Should have kept the DAFs on from all those years ago!
(31 Dec 2014, 4:40 pm)MarcTheA4 wrote [ -> ]Thanks for that Michael!
So that's 35 vehicles in total for the 20s and 35s. Then 15 for the Lime brings it up to 50, and another 15 for the Toon Link makes it 65. 6 more for the X66 brings it to 71, and 5 for the 57 comes to 76.
Sounds about right.
Yeah, they'll want all the B10BLEs in corporate livery or withdrawn for next year, so it would make sense to get them all debranded and in the spares fleet.
(31 Dec 2014, 5:04 pm)cbma06 wrote [ -> ]Didn't notice the post about the crusader citarios could go onto silver arrows. bad hair day lol
(31 Dec 2014, 4:25 pm)MarcTheA4 wrote [ -> ]Hmm...don't think I've ever made a serious post in this thread (), so here are my predictions...
'Lime' Services 8/78/78A - Current PVR of 13 + 2 Spares....15 vehicles
'X66' Service X66 - Current PVR of 4 (5 on Sat) + 1 Spare....6 vehicles
'Fab57' Service 57 - Current PVR of 5 + 1 Spare....6 vehicles
'Toon Link' Services 11/31/32/47 - Current PVR of 13 + 2 Spare....15 vehicles
'Prince Bishops' Services 20/20A/X20 - Current PVR of 12 + 2 Spare....14 vehicles
With the changes over in Sunderland, I think it will be hard to understand the PVR of the Laser and Prince Bishops, although with Service 36, the PVR should increase by the 2 the #71 had.
Well, there's my predictions!
(31 Dec 2014, 4:59 pm)gtom wrote [ -> ]No Dan, but using the service and experiencing plenty of breakdowns, no-shows etc does show they are unreliable.
Yet again with the 21 GNE ballsed up the vehicle choice. You'd have thought they would have learnt their lesson and really thought things out, clearly not
(31 Dec 2014, 5:09 pm)Dan wrote [ -> ]I obviously cannot argue against direct experiences of breakdowns, but I wasn't aware that the Volvo Hybrids regularly did breakdown... They're still fairly new buses, and certainly should not be suffering problems so early in their predicted life span.
What I would say is slightly more plausible is that, like a lot of Wrightbus products, the "Angel" allocation are facing problems which are electrical rather than mechanical... So a bus may have to come off at Chester-le-Street to be replaced by a corporate liveried vehicle due to an issue with a light on the dash, or something similar...