Menu
 
North East Buses Local Bus Scene Arriva North East Arriva North East: Latest News & Discussion - April 2015

Arriva North East: Latest News & Discussion - April 2015

Arriva North East: Latest News & Discussion - April 2015

 
  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average
 
Pages (28) Previous 126 27 28 Next
29 Apr 2015, 6:42 pm #521
With regard to the X12 timekeeping, the roadworks in the main street at Chester Le St cause a massive amount of delay, particularly Northbound  as it has to get along the dual carriageway and across the roundabout at Ropery Lane and then along Picktree Lane where the traffic is bad at most times then left at the roundabout to pick up in S Burns before getting back on route.
Thankfully normal route should operate from Monday.
Coppercap40
29 Apr 2015, 6:42 pm #521

With regard to the X12 timekeeping, the roadworks in the main street at Chester Le St cause a massive amount of delay, particularly Northbound  as it has to get along the dual carriageway and across the roundabout at Ropery Lane and then along Picktree Lane where the traffic is bad at most times then left at the roundabout to pick up in S Burns before getting back on route.
Thankfully normal route should operate from Monday.

Adrian



9,583
29 Apr 2015, 6:45 pm #522
(29 Apr 2015, 6:42 pm)Coppercap40 With regard to the X12 timekeeping, the roadworks in the main street at Chester Le St cause a massive amount of delay, particularly Northbound  as it has to get along the dual carriageway and across the roundabout at Ropery Lane and then along Picktree Lane where the traffic is bad at most times then left at the roundabout to pick up in S Burns before getting back on route.
Thankfully normal route should operate from Monday.

The timekeeping has been an issue long before the roadworks started. It does cause a delay, but I wouldn't say it's a massive delay?

Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook
Adrian
29 Apr 2015, 6:45 pm #522

(29 Apr 2015, 6:42 pm)Coppercap40 With regard to the X12 timekeeping, the roadworks in the main street at Chester Le St cause a massive amount of delay, particularly Northbound  as it has to get along the dual carriageway and across the roundabout at Ropery Lane and then along Picktree Lane where the traffic is bad at most times then left at the roundabout to pick up in S Burns before getting back on route.
Thankfully normal route should operate from Monday.

The timekeeping has been an issue long before the roadworks started. It does cause a delay, but I wouldn't say it's a massive delay?


Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook

29 Apr 2015, 7:04 pm #523
(29 Apr 2015, 6:45 pm)aureolin The timekeeping has been an issue long before the roadworks started. It does cause a delay, but I wouldn't say it's a massive delay?
I was on the 1300 from Gateshead this afternoon and we arrived Durham on time at 1345, coming back on the 1621 we left about 5 late but we were about 20 late arriving into Gateshead,
the delays at Ropery lane and Picktree lane might have had something to do with the cricket, but the queues at all the roundabouts were lengthy.
Coppercap40
29 Apr 2015, 7:04 pm #523

(29 Apr 2015, 6:45 pm)aureolin The timekeeping has been an issue long before the roadworks started. It does cause a delay, but I wouldn't say it's a massive delay?
I was on the 1300 from Gateshead this afternoon and we arrived Durham on time at 1345, coming back on the 1621 we left about 5 late but we were about 20 late arriving into Gateshead,
the delays at Ropery lane and Picktree lane might have had something to do with the cricket, but the queues at all the roundabouts were lengthy.

Kuyoyo



6,853
29 Apr 2015, 8:02 pm #524
Anybody waiting for a full fleet of MAX-branded vehicles on the X12 will have to wait - 7620/27 are the only other confirmed examples branded and none of Stockton's Pulsars have been treated (1443 is presently off the road - hence the appearance of standard examples recently). 7627 was however the only one out in service today (note the now-standard Durham way of leaving the non-MAX standard fleetnumbers and legals in place

.jpg
ANE-7627.JPG
Size 660.06 KB / Downloads 41
Kuyoyo
29 Apr 2015, 8:02 pm #524

Anybody waiting for a full fleet of MAX-branded vehicles on the X12 will have to wait - 7620/27 are the only other confirmed examples branded and none of Stockton's Pulsars have been treated (1443 is presently off the road - hence the appearance of standard examples recently). 7627 was however the only one out in service today (note the now-standard Durham way of leaving the non-MAX standard fleetnumbers and legals in place

.jpg
ANE-7627.JPG
Size 660.06 KB / Downloads 41

Jimmi



10,969
30 Apr 2015, 8:51 am #525
Enviro 400's are out on the 7 today.

They look to be on boards close together as I have seen three go in the Darlington direction.
Edited 30 Apr 2015, 8:51 am by Jimmi.
Jimmi
30 Apr 2015, 8:51 am #525

Enviro 400's are out on the 7 today.

They look to be on boards close together as I have seen three go in the Darlington direction.

30 Apr 2015, 9:14 am #526
(29 Apr 2015, 8:02 pm)Kuyoyo Anybody waiting for a full fleet of MAX-branded vehicles on the X12 will have to wait - 7620/27 are the only other confirmed examples branded and none of Stockton's Pulsars have been treated (1443 is presently off the road - hence the appearance of standard examples recently). 7627 was however the only one out in service today (note the now-standard Durham way of leaving the non-MAX standard fleetnumbers and legals in place

It's the vinyl company that have left the fleet numbers in place.

7620 and 7627 were both out in service yesterday.  7620 was on the 1720ish arrival into Middlesbrough.
palatine3833
30 Apr 2015, 9:14 am #526

(29 Apr 2015, 8:02 pm)Kuyoyo Anybody waiting for a full fleet of MAX-branded vehicles on the X12 will have to wait - 7620/27 are the only other confirmed examples branded and none of Stockton's Pulsars have been treated (1443 is presently off the road - hence the appearance of standard examples recently). 7627 was however the only one out in service today (note the now-standard Durham way of leaving the non-MAX standard fleetnumbers and legals in place

It's the vinyl company that have left the fleet numbers in place.

7620 and 7627 were both out in service yesterday.  7620 was on the 1720ish arrival into Middlesbrough.

Jimmi



10,969
30 Apr 2015, 3:29 pm #527
All five Enviro 400's were out in service on the 7 today (here is a photo of 7536)
[Image: 17134807840_6cdd95f494.jpg]Arriva North East: 7536 / NK15 ACO by Jimmi's Bus Photos, on Flickr

Sorry for the poor image quality on my photos today.
Jimmi
30 Apr 2015, 3:29 pm #527

All five Enviro 400's were out in service on the 7 today (here is a photo of 7536)
[Image: 17134807840_6cdd95f494.jpg]Arriva North East: 7536 / NK15 ACO by Jimmi's Bus Photos, on Flickr

Sorry for the poor image quality on my photos today.

Jimmi



10,969
30 Apr 2015, 4:24 pm #528
I have been for a ride on two of the Sapphire 7 Enviro 400's.

I thought they performed well on the route, even did well at getting up Durham Road heading into Ferryhill on the Darlington bound journey and seemed fast enough getting down the A167.

Thought the seats were okay.

One thing I was not impressed with was that on the journey to Durham where I sat a bit of rain managed to come through the closed window and blow in my face. Also on the journey home I couldn't connect to the WiFi.

There was a few issues with the next stop announcements and I thought the announcements on the journey home were quite loud, nearly had a heart attack when I first heard the announcements on the journey home.

Anyway other than the window that let in a bit of water I quite liked my rides on the two Enivro's I had this afternoon which is good as I will probably be using these a fair bit, it's also nice sitting upstairs with only a small amount of passengers also sat upstairs during the daytime
Jimmi
30 Apr 2015, 4:24 pm #528

I have been for a ride on two of the Sapphire 7 Enviro 400's.

I thought they performed well on the route, even did well at getting up Durham Road heading into Ferryhill on the Darlington bound journey and seemed fast enough getting down the A167.

Thought the seats were okay.

One thing I was not impressed with was that on the journey to Durham where I sat a bit of rain managed to come through the closed window and blow in my face. Also on the journey home I couldn't connect to the WiFi.

There was a few issues with the next stop announcements and I thought the announcements on the journey home were quite loud, nearly had a heart attack when I first heard the announcements on the journey home.

Anyway other than the window that let in a bit of water I quite liked my rides on the two Enivro's I had this afternoon which is good as I will probably be using these a fair bit, it's also nice sitting upstairs with only a small amount of passengers also sat upstairs during the daytime

Kuyoyo



6,853
30 Apr 2015, 8:27 pm #529
Updated Arriva allocation effective from 1st May 2015 or 17th May 2015

Durham
E400 7538/9 into service, replacing DAF DB250 7477/8 to disposal (both may be reallocated elsewhere within the division)
Pulsars 1517-21 transfer from Darlington, replacing Pulsars 1422/3/4 to Stockton and 1461/2 to Darlington
StreetLites 1595-1601 officially into service, replacing Pulsars 1409/10/7/8/20/1/64 to Stockton
Solo 2503 transfers from Darlington for additional required minibus for the 57A

Darlington
E400 7534-7/40 into service, replacing Pulsars 1517-21 to Durham
StreetLites 1593/4 into service, replacing MPD 1794 and Solo 2504 into disposal
Pulsar 1461/2 transfer from Durham, replacing Dart SLF 1305 into disposal and MPD 1799 into reserve
Solo 2505 withdrawn for disposal and Solo 2503 to Durham as a result of a PVR reduction

Stockton
Pulsar 1409/10/7/8/20-4/64 from Durham, replacing B10BLE 4501/2/5/6/8/9/12 and Cadets 1901/5/6 for disposal
Kuyoyo
30 Apr 2015, 8:27 pm #529

Updated Arriva allocation effective from 1st May 2015 or 17th May 2015

Durham
E400 7538/9 into service, replacing DAF DB250 7477/8 to disposal (both may be reallocated elsewhere within the division)
Pulsars 1517-21 transfer from Darlington, replacing Pulsars 1422/3/4 to Stockton and 1461/2 to Darlington
StreetLites 1595-1601 officially into service, replacing Pulsars 1409/10/7/8/20/1/64 to Stockton
Solo 2503 transfers from Darlington for additional required minibus for the 57A

Darlington
E400 7534-7/40 into service, replacing Pulsars 1517-21 to Durham
StreetLites 1593/4 into service, replacing MPD 1794 and Solo 2504 into disposal
Pulsar 1461/2 transfer from Durham, replacing Dart SLF 1305 into disposal and MPD 1799 into reserve
Solo 2505 withdrawn for disposal and Solo 2503 to Durham as a result of a PVR reduction

Stockton
Pulsar 1409/10/7/8/20-4/64 from Durham, replacing B10BLE 4501/2/5/6/8/9/12 and Cadets 1901/5/6 for disposal

Tom



6,138
30 Apr 2015, 8:30 pm #530
Are the 56, 57, 57A and 86 all going to be standalone then?
Tom
30 Apr 2015, 8:30 pm #530

Are the 56, 57, 57A and 86 all going to be standalone then?

Kuyoyo



6,853
30 Apr 2015, 8:32 pm #531
(30 Apr 2015, 8:30 pm)Tom Are the 56, 57, 57A and 86 all going to be standalone then?

No, that's how it's worded on the allocation changes sheet - without major retimings and moving the 86 to Tindale Crescent, they couldn't operate standalone.
Kuyoyo
30 Apr 2015, 8:32 pm #531

(30 Apr 2015, 8:30 pm)Tom Are the 56, 57, 57A and 86 all going to be standalone then?

No, that's how it's worded on the allocation changes sheet - without major retimings and moving the 86 to Tindale Crescent, they couldn't operate standalone.

Tom



6,138
30 Apr 2015, 8:33 pm #532
(30 Apr 2015, 8:32 pm)Kuyoyo No, that's how it's worded on the allocation changes sheet - without major retimings and moving the 86 to Tindale Crescent, they couldn't operate standalone.

Ah okay thanks. 
Tom
30 Apr 2015, 8:33 pm #532

(30 Apr 2015, 8:32 pm)Kuyoyo No, that's how it's worded on the allocation changes sheet - without major retimings and moving the 86 to Tindale Crescent, they couldn't operate standalone.

Ah okay thanks. 

Jimmi



10,969
30 Apr 2015, 8:46 pm #533
I imagine that the reason why it says additional mini bus working for service 57A will be because it will no longer extend to/from Durham Johnston School on school days anymore (these journeys are currently double decker operated).
Edited 30 Apr 2015, 8:46 pm by Jimmi.
Jimmi
30 Apr 2015, 8:46 pm #533

I imagine that the reason why it says additional mini bus working for service 57A will be because it will no longer extend to/from Durham Johnston School on school days anymore (these journeys are currently double decker operated).

Tom



6,138
30 Apr 2015, 8:51 pm #534
(30 Apr 2015, 8:46 pm)Jimmi I imagine that the reason why it says additional mini bus working for service 57A will be because it will no longer extend to/from Durham Johnston School on school days anymore (these journeys are currently double decker operated).

Ah right cheers Jimmi. 
I need to ride to Lowlanders quickly as they seem to be getting withdrawn quickly. 
Tom
30 Apr 2015, 8:51 pm #534

(30 Apr 2015, 8:46 pm)Jimmi I imagine that the reason why it says additional mini bus working for service 57A will be because it will no longer extend to/from Durham Johnston School on school days anymore (these journeys are currently double decker operated).

Ah right cheers Jimmi. 
I need to ride to Lowlanders quickly as they seem to be getting withdrawn quickly. 

Jimmi



10,969
30 Apr 2015, 8:55 pm #535
(30 Apr 2015, 8:51 pm)Tom Ah right cheers Jimmi. 
I need to ride to Lowlanders quickly as they seem to be getting withdrawn quickly. 
Non of the Lowlander's have been withdrawn yet I believe.

Can't have too much longer left though.
Jimmi
30 Apr 2015, 8:55 pm #535

(30 Apr 2015, 8:51 pm)Tom Ah right cheers Jimmi. 
I need to ride to Lowlanders quickly as they seem to be getting withdrawn quickly. 
Non of the Lowlander's have been withdrawn yet I believe.

Can't have too much longer left though.

Tom



6,138
30 Apr 2015, 8:58 pm #536
(30 Apr 2015, 8:55 pm)Jimmi Non of the Lowlander's have been withdrawn yet I believe.

Can't have too much longer left though.

Yeah I got the wrong fleet no, its two ALX400's. Quite surprised really!
Tom
30 Apr 2015, 8:58 pm #536

(30 Apr 2015, 8:55 pm)Jimmi Non of the Lowlander's have been withdrawn yet I believe.

Can't have too much longer left though.

Yeah I got the wrong fleet no, its two ALX400's. Quite surprised really!

MrPottski



424
30 Apr 2015, 9:00 pm #537
I can't believe 2505 is moving on again! That bus has had more homes than the council!
MrPottski
30 Apr 2015, 9:00 pm #537

I can't believe 2505 is moving on again! That bus has had more homes than the council!

Jimmi



10,969
30 Apr 2015, 9:05 pm #538
(30 Apr 2015, 9:00 pm)MrPottski I can't believe 2505 is moving on again! That bus has had more homes than the council!
It says 2505 is getting withdrawn.

Surprised that Durham are getting 2503 mind, wonder which service it will most likely appear on.
Jimmi
30 Apr 2015, 9:05 pm #538

(30 Apr 2015, 9:00 pm)MrPottski I can't believe 2505 is moving on again! That bus has had more homes than the council!
It says 2505 is getting withdrawn.

Surprised that Durham are getting 2503 mind, wonder which service it will most likely appear on.

MrPottski



424
30 Apr 2015, 9:15 pm #539
(30 Apr 2015, 9:05 pm)Jimmi It says 2505 is getting withdrawn.

Surprised that Durham are getting 2503 mind, wonder which service it will most likely appear on.
Of course, I meant 2503, silly arse that I am!
MrPottski
30 Apr 2015, 9:15 pm #539

(30 Apr 2015, 9:05 pm)Jimmi It says 2505 is getting withdrawn.

Surprised that Durham are getting 2503 mind, wonder which service it will most likely appear on.
Of course, I meant 2503, silly arse that I am!

MrPottski



424
30 Apr 2015, 9:17 pm #540
One thing I noticed with them is their size. I was following 7534 up North Road late this afternoon and it was being followed by J&C Coaches Paramount, and there wasn't much difference in height. Quite small in comparison to other deckers
MrPottski
30 Apr 2015, 9:17 pm #540

One thing I noticed with them is their size. I was following 7534 up North Road late this afternoon and it was being followed by J&C Coaches Paramount, and there wasn't much difference in height. Quite small in comparison to other deckers

Pages (28) Previous 126 27 28 Next
 
  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average