Menu
 
North East Buses Local Bus Scene Go North East Go North East: Latest News & Discussion - July 2016

Go North East: Latest News & Discussion - July 2016

Go North East: Latest News & Discussion - July 2016

 
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
 
Pages (29): Previous 127 28 29 Next
Jamie M

Unregistered

 
31 Jul 2016, 12:58 pm #541
(31 Jul 2016, 12:52 pm)Dan Yes, I agree.

I hope that Nexus haven't bitten off more than they can chew, though. They weren't exactly well-known for having the bus stop liners updated in time for changes prior to this new arrangement!
County durham/Northumberland's are really too basic, but at least C.D supply via points and group by route number - not just a raw spat out list of chronological times on an A4 piece of paper. Should be standardised to avoid confusion.
Jamie M
31 Jul 2016, 12:58 pm #541

(31 Jul 2016, 12:52 pm)Dan Yes, I agree.

I hope that Nexus haven't bitten off more than they can chew, though. They weren't exactly well-known for having the bus stop liners updated in time for changes prior to this new arrangement!
County durham/Northumberland's are really too basic, but at least C.D supply via points and group by route number - not just a raw spat out list of chronological times on an A4 piece of paper. Should be standardised to avoid confusion.

V514DFT



2,226
31 Jul 2016, 1:14 pm #542
(31 Jul 2016, 11:00 am)peter You're a tad behind with that one! Has been since January 2015!  Big Grin
(Assuming you mean 5323??)

No definately 5332 it looked to fresh to be january last year
V514DFT
31 Jul 2016, 1:14 pm #542

(31 Jul 2016, 11:00 am)peter You're a tad behind with that one! Has been since January 2015!  Big Grin
(Assuming you mean 5323??)

No definately 5332 it looked to fresh to be january last year

31 Jul 2016, 1:53 pm #543
(31 Jul 2016, 12:58 pm)Designline I don't know if it is a mistake by go north east or if the destination screen is wrong but I saw a few buses in ashington with 19A to north shields

I haven't seen this recently, and I live on the 19 route. 

Why would the files have "19A" programmed in and why would the driver have typed "19A" into the console, for a start?
omnicity4659
31 Jul 2016, 1:53 pm #543

(31 Jul 2016, 12:58 pm)Designline I don't know if it is a mistake by go north east or if the destination screen is wrong but I saw a few buses in ashington with 19A to north shields

I haven't seen this recently, and I live on the 19 route. 

Why would the files have "19A" programmed in and why would the driver have typed "19A" into the console, for a start?

31 Jul 2016, 1:55 pm #544
(31 Jul 2016, 1:14 pm)V514DFT No definately 5332 it looked to fresh to be january last year

5332 was definately last year.  Wink

It was branded for Blaydon Racers in mistake, but was quickly debranded.
omnicity4659
31 Jul 2016, 1:55 pm #544

(31 Jul 2016, 1:14 pm)V514DFT No definately 5332 it looked to fresh to be january last year

5332 was definately last year.  Wink

It was branded for Blaydon Racers in mistake, but was quickly debranded.

Malarkey



6,060
31 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm #545
(31 Jul 2016, 11:00 am)peter You're a tad behind with that one! Has been since January 2015!  Big Grin
(Assuming you mean 5323??)

5323 is still Silver.
Malarkey
31 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm #545

(31 Jul 2016, 11:00 am)peter You're a tad behind with that one! Has been since January 2015!  Big Grin
(Assuming you mean 5323??)

5323 is still Silver.

MVK 500R



106
31 Jul 2016, 2:20 pm #546
Decided to bite the bullet, gonna ride the Q3 from Wallsend to the Quayside. As I work there it'll be a good test run for tomorrow.

Sent from my Xperia Z5 Premium
MVK 500R
31 Jul 2016, 2:20 pm #546

Decided to bite the bullet, gonna ride the Q3 from Wallsend to the Quayside. As I work there it'll be a good test run for tomorrow.

Sent from my Xperia Z5 Premium

V514DFT



2,226
31 Jul 2016, 2:29 pm #547
(31 Jul 2016, 1:55 pm)GX03 SVC 5332 was definately last year.  Wink

It was branded for Blaydon Racers in mistake, but was quickly debranded.

Has it recently been in for a 'refresh' its paintwork looks brand new
V514DFT
31 Jul 2016, 2:29 pm #547

(31 Jul 2016, 1:55 pm)GX03 SVC 5332 was definately last year.  Wink

It was branded for Blaydon Racers in mistake, but was quickly debranded.

Has it recently been in for a 'refresh' its paintwork looks brand new

31 Jul 2016, 2:33 pm #548
(31 Jul 2016, 1:53 pm)GX03 SVC I haven't seen this recently, and I live on the 19 route. 

Why would the files have "19A" programmed in and why would the driver have typed "19A" into the console, for a start?

so it is not usual as I saw it at ashington but it was only on a selection of buses and also to mention that I am still finding out what is normal down here as I have only lived in the north east for a minimal of 3 months.
Designline
31 Jul 2016, 2:33 pm #548

(31 Jul 2016, 1:53 pm)GX03 SVC I haven't seen this recently, and I live on the 19 route. 

Why would the files have "19A" programmed in and why would the driver have typed "19A" into the console, for a start?

so it is not usual as I saw it at ashington but it was only on a selection of buses and also to mention that I am still finding out what is normal down here as I have only lived in the north east for a minimal of 3 months.

G-CPTN



961
31 Jul 2016, 4:43 pm #549
Good and bad with the new timetables on the busstops - it's easier to see the time of the next bus of a particular route and destination, but less easy to see when the next bus regardless of destination. Sometimes 'any bus' will do.
G-CPTN
31 Jul 2016, 4:43 pm #549

Good and bad with the new timetables on the busstops - it's easier to see the time of the next bus of a particular route and destination, but less easy to see when the next bus regardless of destination. Sometimes 'any bus' will do.

31 Jul 2016, 4:54 pm #550
(31 Jul 2016, 4:43 pm)G-CPTN Good and bad with the new timetables on the busstops - it's easier to see the time of the next bus of a particular route and destination, but less easy to see when the next bus regardless of destination. Sometimes 'any bus' will do.

I echo your points here. I live at a bus stop which is mostly used to travel into Ashington, and there are now 4/5 service 'boxes' you need to check to find out the times.
omnicity4659
31 Jul 2016, 4:54 pm #550

(31 Jul 2016, 4:43 pm)G-CPTN Good and bad with the new timetables on the busstops - it's easier to see the time of the next bus of a particular route and destination, but less easy to see when the next bus regardless of destination. Sometimes 'any bus' will do.

I echo your points here. I live at a bus stop which is mostly used to travel into Ashington, and there are now 4/5 service 'boxes' you need to check to find out the times.

Tom



6,138
31 Jul 2016, 5:12 pm #551
(31 Jul 2016, 12:45 pm)MVK 500R Q3 has just passed me on The Avenue in Wallsend devoid of passengers. Makes me wonder if anyone actually knows of the changes.

Sent from my Xperia Z5 Premium

Yeah I saw one on the way back and it only had 2 passengers on so not great but it would help if they actually put timetables up!!

Sadly didn't get to ride it as I wasn't on a outing today but hopefully will tomorrow.
Tom
31 Jul 2016, 5:12 pm #551

(31 Jul 2016, 12:45 pm)MVK 500R Q3 has just passed me on The Avenue in Wallsend devoid of passengers. Makes me wonder if anyone actually knows of the changes.

Sent from my Xperia Z5 Premium

Yeah I saw one on the way back and it only had 2 passengers on so not great but it would help if they actually put timetables up!!

Sadly didn't get to ride it as I wasn't on a outing today but hopefully will tomorrow.

BusLoverMum



5,277
31 Jul 2016, 6:38 pm #552
(31 Jul 2016, 12:58 pm)Jamie M County durham/Northumberland's are really too basic, but at least C.D supply via points and group by route number - not just a raw spat out list of chronological times on an A4 piece of paper. Should be standardised to avoid confusion.

We still have the retro chronological timetable at our Durham-bound stop. The ones in the village were changed piecemeal some time after our local changes and this one never got done.
BusLoverMum
31 Jul 2016, 6:38 pm #552

(31 Jul 2016, 12:58 pm)Jamie M County durham/Northumberland's are really too basic, but at least C.D supply via points and group by route number - not just a raw spat out list of chronological times on an A4 piece of paper. Should be standardised to avoid confusion.

We still have the retro chronological timetable at our Durham-bound stop. The ones in the village were changed piecemeal some time after our local changes and this one never got done.

V514DFT



2,226
31 Jul 2016, 7:22 pm #553
630 is up at bells now
V514DFT
31 Jul 2016, 7:22 pm #553

630 is up at bells now

Michael



19,145
31 Jul 2016, 7:26 pm #554
(31 Jul 2016, 12:17 pm)GX03 SVC OmniDekkas YN04 GJU and YN04 GJV are currently making their way to Go North East.

Thanks for sharing the info.

Just seen a picture of them on Facebook parked up at Wetherby Services

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=...1320905796&set=gm.1121756047888505&type=3&theater

Thanks to Alan Magill for the photo
Edited 31 Jul 2016, 7:31 pm by Michael.

Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.
Michael
31 Jul 2016, 7:26 pm #554

(31 Jul 2016, 12:17 pm)GX03 SVC OmniDekkas YN04 GJU and YN04 GJV are currently making their way to Go North East.

Thanks for sharing the info.

Just seen a picture of them on Facebook parked up at Wetherby Services

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=...1320905796&set=gm.1121756047888505&type=3&theater

Thanks to Alan Magill for the photo


Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.

V514DFT



2,226
31 Jul 2016, 8:08 pm #555
(31 Jul 2016, 7:26 pm)Michael Thanks for sharing the info.

Just seen a picture of them on Facebook parked up at Wetherby Services

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=...1320905796&set=gm.1121756047888505&type=3&theater

Thanks to Alan Magill for the photo

What will their fleet numbers be
V514DFT
31 Jul 2016, 8:08 pm #555

(31 Jul 2016, 7:26 pm)Michael Thanks for sharing the info.

Just seen a picture of them on Facebook parked up at Wetherby Services

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=...1320905796&set=gm.1121756047888505&type=3&theater

Thanks to Alan Magill for the photo

What will their fleet numbers be

Michael



19,145
31 Jul 2016, 8:18 pm #556
(31 Jul 2016, 8:08 pm)V514DFT What will their fleet numbers be

Probables be 6141/6142 unless they put them down as 6134/6135 since there is now a gap in the list due to GX03 SSZ and GX03 STZ  becoming 3995/96 since they were swapped from 6134/6135.

Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.
Michael
31 Jul 2016, 8:18 pm #556

(31 Jul 2016, 8:08 pm)V514DFT What will their fleet numbers be

Probables be 6141/6142 unless they put them down as 6134/6135 since there is now a gap in the list due to GX03 SSZ and GX03 STZ  becoming 3995/96 since they were swapped from 6134/6135.


Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.

Tom



6,138
31 Jul 2016, 8:21 pm #557
Why were 6134/6135 swapped to 3995/3996? Sorry if it's been mentioned before but I can't remember it.
Tom
31 Jul 2016, 8:21 pm #557

Why were 6134/6135 swapped to 3995/3996? Sorry if it's been mentioned before but I can't remember it.

31 Jul 2016, 8:25 pm #558
(31 Jul 2016, 8:21 pm)Tom Why were 6134/6135 swapped to 3995/3996? Sorry if it's been mentioned before but I can't remember it.

Because they were formerly open top

4842
Best bus ever
biglugs@yahoo.com
31 Jul 2016, 8:25 pm #558

(31 Jul 2016, 8:21 pm)Tom Why were 6134/6135 swapped to 3995/3996? Sorry if it's been mentioned before but I can't remember it.

Because they were formerly open top


4842
Best bus ever

Kuyoyo



6,849
31 Jul 2016, 8:27 pm #559
(31 Jul 2016, 8:21 pm)Tom Why were 6134/6135 swapped to 3995/3996? Sorry if it's been mentioned before but I can't remember it.

They are slightly taller than the other as they were formerly convertible open toppers.

(31 Jul 2016, 8:25 pm)biglugs@yahoo.com Because they were formerly open top

They were convertible open toppers not full open toppers.
Kuyoyo
31 Jul 2016, 8:27 pm #559

(31 Jul 2016, 8:21 pm)Tom Why were 6134/6135 swapped to 3995/3996? Sorry if it's been mentioned before but I can't remember it.

They are slightly taller than the other as they were formerly convertible open toppers.

(31 Jul 2016, 8:25 pm)biglugs@yahoo.com Because they were formerly open top

They were convertible open toppers not full open toppers.

Tom



6,138
31 Jul 2016, 8:30 pm #560
(31 Jul 2016, 8:27 pm)Kuyoyo They are slightly taller than the other as they were formerly convertible open toppers.


They were convertible open toppers not full open toppers.

Cheers Smile
Tom
31 Jul 2016, 8:30 pm #560

(31 Jul 2016, 8:27 pm)Kuyoyo They are slightly taller than the other as they were formerly convertible open toppers.


They were convertible open toppers not full open toppers.

Cheers Smile

Pages (29): Previous 127 28 29 Next
 
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average