(25 Aug 2021, 1:52 pm)Keeiajs I know the 62/62A have been introduced however i don't think it is long until the 62A is changed to the 63 and extended to Durham. As that service has seen the most "uproar". & 265/202/208 were the busiest indiGO services.
(25 Aug 2021, 1:52 pm)Keeiajs I know the 62/62A have been introduced however i don't think it is long until the 62A is changed to the 63 and extended to Durham. As that service has seen the most "uproar". & 265/202/208 were the busiest indiGO services.
(25 Aug 2021, 2:39 pm)cbma06 265 turned into a 65 with frequency doubled and bigger busesI liked the 3 digit system. However now just go to the 60.... And I think the 67/69 should be renumbered 47/48.
202 covered by new 62
208 passengers will only have to change once from an hourly frequency to at least double frequency
I live in the east Durham area and I doubt that the 62A will be turned into a 63 and go to Durham, the 208 wasn’t pulling in enough customers to cover costs for an hourly daily service to Durham and can’t compete against Arriva 22/24, service 62 covers most the 202 and a added bonus extended to Sunderland , and don’t forget most of these Peterlee services were originally demmed un profitable by Arriva/United. GNE should be promoting the the connection part between 3 daily buses (55,X1) between Peterlee to Hetton Interchange and transfer to the half hourly service 65 to Durham, have to give Dan a Pat on his back about GNE with these bus changes, only other change I would do was put them in little purples brand and change the 3 digit system into a 2 digit system.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
(25 Aug 2021, 2:39 pm)cbma06 265 turned into a 65 with frequency doubled and bigger busesI liked the 3 digit system. However now just go to the 60.... And I think the 67/69 should be renumbered 47/48.
202 covered by new 62
208 passengers will only have to change once from an hourly frequency to at least double frequency
I live in the east Durham area and I doubt that the 62A will be turned into a 63 and go to Durham, the 208 wasn’t pulling in enough customers to cover costs for an hourly daily service to Durham and can’t compete against Arriva 22/24, service 62 covers most the 202 and a added bonus extended to Sunderland , and don’t forget most of these Peterlee services were originally demmed un profitable by Arriva/United. GNE should be promoting the the connection part between 3 daily buses (55,X1) between Peterlee to Hetton Interchange and transfer to the half hourly service 65 to Durham, have to give Dan a Pat on his back about GNE with these bus changes, only other change I would do was put them in little purples brand and change the 3 digit system into a 2 digit system.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
(25 Aug 2021, 3:15 pm)Keeiajs And I think the 67/69 should be renumbered 47/48.
(25 Aug 2021, 3:15 pm)Keeiajs And I think the 67/69 should be renumbered 47/48.
(25 Aug 2021, 3:30 pm)Keeiajs I mean if the 201/204/206/209/210 were re-numbered in the 60 digits they would have to.
I do think renumbering only works when the new number isn’t already taken and is an easy swap. Taking the Peterlee locals into 6x series, would be confusing if you had to renumber the existing Gateshead 67/69, and it comes down to what’s in a number really?
I’d have certainly renumbered the 204 & Q3 in these changes, any random spare number would have done. Simply “3” might have worked for the Q3, but not sure on Arriva and Stagecoach routes around there. Number 18 for instance for the 204.
(26 Aug 2021, 12:06 am)Drifter60 I do think renumbering only works when the new number isn’t already taken and is an easy swap. Taking the Peterlee locals into 6x series, would be confusing if you had to renumber the existing Gateshead 67/69, and it comes down to what’s in a number really?
I’d have certainly renumbered the 204 & Q3 in these changes, any random spare number would have done. Simply “3” might have worked for the Q3, but not sure on Arriva and Stagecoach routes around there. Number 18 for instance for the 204.
(26 Aug 2021, 12:06 am)Drifter60 I do think renumbering only works when the new number isn’t already taken and is an easy swap. Taking the Peterlee locals into 6x series, would be confusing if you had to renumber the existing Gateshead 67/69, and it comes down to what’s in a number really?
I’d have certainly renumbered the 204 & Q3 in these changes, any random spare number would have done. Simply “3” might have worked for the Q3, but not sure on Arriva and Stagecoach routes around there. Number 18 for instance for the 204.
(26 Aug 2021, 11:42 am)Keeiajs 204/204A - 65 the drivers could just switch buses.They aren’t in Durham at the same time. Only way to do it would be have the drivers come in on the 65 wait 25 minutes do the 204/204A then wait another 25 minutes for the following 65.
(26 Aug 2021, 12:06 am)Drifter60 I do think renumbering only works when the new number isn’t already taken and is an easy swap. Taking the Peterlee locals into 6x series, would be confusing if you had to renumber the existing Gateshead 67/69, and it comes down to what’s in a number really?
I’d have certainly renumbered the 204 & Q3 in these changes, any random spare number would have done. Simply “3” might have worked for the Q3, but not sure on Arriva and Stagecoach routes around there. Number 18 for instance for the 204.
(26 Aug 2021, 12:06 am)Drifter60 I do think renumbering only works when the new number isn’t already taken and is an easy swap. Taking the Peterlee locals into 6x series, would be confusing if you had to renumber the existing Gateshead 67/69, and it comes down to what’s in a number really?
I’d have certainly renumbered the 204 & Q3 in these changes, any random spare number would have done. Simply “3” might have worked for the Q3, but not sure on Arriva and Stagecoach routes around there. Number 18 for instance for the 204.
(26 Aug 2021, 11:41 am)User2613 Both look like they are standalone. Could the 204/204A be ran out of Chester instead?
(26 Aug 2021, 11:41 am)User2613 Both look like they are standalone. Could the 204/204A be ran out of Chester instead?
