Menu
 
North East Buses Local Bus Scene Stagecoach North East Stagecoach North East: Latest News & Discussion - January 2016

Stagecoach North East: Latest News & Discussion - January 2016

Stagecoach North East: Latest News & Discussion - January 2016

 
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
 
Pages (4) 1 2 3 4 Next
01 Jan 2016, 12:23 am #1
Happy New Year!

Forum Moderator  |  Find us on facebook

[Image: 0a85ed5b4e97324e338555472f222830.png]
northern156
01 Jan 2016, 12:23 am #1

Happy New Year!


Forum Moderator  |  Find us on facebook

[Image: 0a85ed5b4e97324e338555472f222830.png]

Acky81



902
02 Jan 2016, 11:43 pm #2
Think it's about time the gas buses were painted. Check out our new ride is out dated in my opinion
Acky81
02 Jan 2016, 11:43 pm #2

Think it's about time the gas buses were painted. Check out our new ride is out dated in my opinion

Adrian



9,583
03 Jan 2016, 12:25 am #3
(02 Jan 2016, 11:43 pm)Acky81 Think it's about time the gas buses were painted. Check out our new ride is out dated in my opinion
I agree with that, but can't see it happening just yet. Ive a feeling we will also see another batch of gas buses in this year's order.

Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook
Adrian
03 Jan 2016, 12:25 am #3

(02 Jan 2016, 11:43 pm)Acky81 Think it's about time the gas buses were painted. Check out our new ride is out dated in my opinion
I agree with that, but can't see it happening just yet. Ive a feeling we will also see another batch of gas buses in this year's order.


Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook

Acky81



902
03 Jan 2016, 12:35 am #4
Why is service 12 always man operated in Sunderland
Edited 03 Jan 2016, 12:36 am by Acky81.
Acky81
03 Jan 2016, 12:35 am #4

Why is service 12 always man operated in Sunderland

Jimmi



10,969
03 Jan 2016, 12:40 am #5
(03 Jan 2016, 12:35 am)Acky81 Why is service 12 always man operated in Sunderland

There must be some sexism at Stagecoach for not putting women on that route

Joking of course! I'm not seriously suggesting that.
Edited 03 Jan 2016, 12:44 am by Jimmi.
Jimmi
03 Jan 2016, 12:40 am #5

(03 Jan 2016, 12:35 am)Acky81 Why is service 12 always man operated in Sunderland

There must be some sexism at Stagecoach for not putting women on that route

Joking of course! I'm not seriously suggesting that.

Acky81



902
03 Jan 2016, 1:21 am #6
Man vehicles
Acky81
03 Jan 2016, 1:21 am #6

Man vehicles

Michael



19,160
03 Jan 2016, 1:28 am #7
(03 Jan 2016, 12:25 am)Adrian I agree with that, but can't see it happening just yet. Ive a feeling we will also see another batch of gas buses in this year's order.

I hope so but i don't think we will unless the green bus fund is used.

The last thing i heard was its Newcastle and Hartlepools turn this year for new buses.
Edited 03 Jan 2016, 1:28 am by Michael.

Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.
Michael
03 Jan 2016, 1:28 am #7

(03 Jan 2016, 12:25 am)Adrian I agree with that, but can't see it happening just yet. Ive a feeling we will also see another batch of gas buses in this year's order.

I hope so but i don't think we will unless the green bus fund is used.

The last thing i heard was its Newcastle and Hartlepools turn this year for new buses.


Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.

03 Jan 2016, 11:56 am #8
(03 Jan 2016, 1:28 am)Michael I hope so but i don't think we will unless the green bus fund is used.

The last thing i heard was its Newcastle and Hartlepools turn this year for new buses.


If you exclude 10000 ( Which came from Stockport ) the last NEW buses delivered to the Newcastle Division were the 60 Reg batch of E400s which will be 6 years ago coming the summer.
I'm thinking E400MMCs for the 62/63 with the E400s from there displaced to Slatyfords MAN routes ( 30/31/10/11 ) with maybe a few E200MMC to dispose of older MANs ( 03/53 Regs )
The 55/06 Batch of MANs are still in good nick and could last another 6 years.

Hartlepool have bad luck when it comes to Brand new vehicles but I could see Stagecoach ordering atleast a few E200MMCs to displace the Remaining Darts. ( Didn't count how many Darts they have left )
South Tyne Lad
03 Jan 2016, 11:56 am #8

(03 Jan 2016, 1:28 am)Michael I hope so but i don't think we will unless the green bus fund is used.

The last thing i heard was its Newcastle and Hartlepools turn this year for new buses.


If you exclude 10000 ( Which came from Stockport ) the last NEW buses delivered to the Newcastle Division were the 60 Reg batch of E400s which will be 6 years ago coming the summer.
I'm thinking E400MMCs for the 62/63 with the E400s from there displaced to Slatyfords MAN routes ( 30/31/10/11 ) with maybe a few E200MMC to dispose of older MANs ( 03/53 Regs )
The 55/06 Batch of MANs are still in good nick and could last another 6 years.

Hartlepool have bad luck when it comes to Brand new vehicles but I could see Stagecoach ordering atleast a few E200MMCs to displace the Remaining Darts. ( Didn't count how many Darts they have left )

Dan

Site Administrator

18,114
03 Jan 2016, 12:00 pm #9
(03 Jan 2016, 11:56 am)South Tyne Lad Hartlepool have bad luck when it comes to Brand new vehicles but I could see Stagecoach ordering atleast a few E200MMCs to displace the Remaining Darts. ( Didn't count how many Darts they have left )

10 Dart SLF to cover a PVR of 9 on service 1. Hartlepool also have 34550 as a reserve vehicle.

It would make more sense from an engineering point of view to replace the Dart SLFs on this route with more Enviro 200 bodied MANs, cascaded from another depot. Walkergate have 6, Slatyford have 10, South Shields have 1, and Sunderland have 10, so you'd have to decide between upgrading Sunderland's 8 and 18/19 services or Slatyford's 6/7/8. Michael and I are bias, so we'd suggest Sunderland's 8 and 18/19. Wink
Dan
03 Jan 2016, 12:00 pm #9

(03 Jan 2016, 11:56 am)South Tyne Lad Hartlepool have bad luck when it comes to Brand new vehicles but I could see Stagecoach ordering atleast a few E200MMCs to displace the Remaining Darts. ( Didn't count how many Darts they have left )

10 Dart SLF to cover a PVR of 9 on service 1. Hartlepool also have 34550 as a reserve vehicle.

It would make more sense from an engineering point of view to replace the Dart SLFs on this route with more Enviro 200 bodied MANs, cascaded from another depot. Walkergate have 6, Slatyford have 10, South Shields have 1, and Sunderland have 10, so you'd have to decide between upgrading Sunderland's 8 and 18/19 services or Slatyford's 6/7/8. Michael and I are bias, so we'd suggest Sunderland's 8 and 18/19. Wink

Kuyoyo



6,853
03 Jan 2016, 12:09 pm #10
(03 Jan 2016, 11:56 am)South Tyne Lad If you exclude 10000 ( Which came from Stockport ) the last NEW buses delivered to the Newcastle Division were the 60 Reg batch of E400s which will be 6 years ago coming the summer.
I'm thinking E400MMCs for the 62/63 with the E400s from there displaced to Slatyfords MAN routes ( 30/31/10/11 ) with maybe a few E200MMC to dispose of older MANs ( 03/53 Regs )
The 55/06 Batch of MANs are still in good nick and could last another 6 years.

Hartlepool have bad luck when it comes to Brand new vehicles but I could see Stagecoach ordering atleast a few E200MMCs to displace the Remaining Darts. ( Didn't count how many Darts they have left )

Actually, the last new vehicles for Newcastle were 12061-86 - which arrived in Summer 2011. Yes, the last batch of vehicles new to Newcastle that were fully funded by Stagecoach were the 60-reg E400s.
However, you have to remember that from 2003 to 2011, Newcastle more-or-less received new vehicles every year. Compare that to Stockton, who until this past 2 years effectively had a 5 year gap between new vehicles. Hartlepool depot have only had 4 batches of new buses during Stagecoach ownership (10 B10Ms upon purchase in 1994, 5 more in 1997, the part-funded Darts in 2004 and the 19 MANViros in 2008). And that's just what I can remember of the top of my head. 

At the launch of Stockton's E300s, the MD stated that his aim for the next set of new vehicles was to start renewing the decker fleet at Newcastle. We shall see what happens. However, even with the end of the Macmillan contracts at Stockton, I wouldn't be too surprised if some of the oldest E400s don't end up moving south to assist with what will probably be very high peak time loadings from September (depending what Macmillan Academy plan on doing regarding the students that currently use the 200-205).
Kuyoyo
03 Jan 2016, 12:09 pm #10

(03 Jan 2016, 11:56 am)South Tyne Lad If you exclude 10000 ( Which came from Stockport ) the last NEW buses delivered to the Newcastle Division were the 60 Reg batch of E400s which will be 6 years ago coming the summer.
I'm thinking E400MMCs for the 62/63 with the E400s from there displaced to Slatyfords MAN routes ( 30/31/10/11 ) with maybe a few E200MMC to dispose of older MANs ( 03/53 Regs )
The 55/06 Batch of MANs are still in good nick and could last another 6 years.

Hartlepool have bad luck when it comes to Brand new vehicles but I could see Stagecoach ordering atleast a few E200MMCs to displace the Remaining Darts. ( Didn't count how many Darts they have left )

Actually, the last new vehicles for Newcastle were 12061-86 - which arrived in Summer 2011. Yes, the last batch of vehicles new to Newcastle that were fully funded by Stagecoach were the 60-reg E400s.
However, you have to remember that from 2003 to 2011, Newcastle more-or-less received new vehicles every year. Compare that to Stockton, who until this past 2 years effectively had a 5 year gap between new vehicles. Hartlepool depot have only had 4 batches of new buses during Stagecoach ownership (10 B10Ms upon purchase in 1994, 5 more in 1997, the part-funded Darts in 2004 and the 19 MANViros in 2008). And that's just what I can remember of the top of my head. 

At the launch of Stockton's E300s, the MD stated that his aim for the next set of new vehicles was to start renewing the decker fleet at Newcastle. We shall see what happens. However, even with the end of the Macmillan contracts at Stockton, I wouldn't be too surprised if some of the oldest E400s don't end up moving south to assist with what will probably be very high peak time loadings from September (depending what Macmillan Academy plan on doing regarding the students that currently use the 200-205).

Michael



19,160
03 Jan 2016, 12:15 pm #11
(03 Jan 2016, 12:00 pm)Dan 10 Dart SLF to cover a PVR of 9 on service 1. Hartlepool also have 34550 as a reserve vehicle.

It would make more sense from an engineering point of view to replace the Dart SLFs on this route with more Enviro 200 bodied MANs, cascaded from another depot. Walkergate have 6, Slatyford have 10, South Shields have 1, and Sunderland have 10, so you'd have to decide between upgrading Sunderland's 8 and 18/19 services or Slatyford's 6/7/8. Michael and I are bias, so we'd suggest Sunderland's 8 and 18/19. Wink

Defo!  Angel

Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.
Michael
03 Jan 2016, 12:15 pm #11

(03 Jan 2016, 12:00 pm)Dan 10 Dart SLF to cover a PVR of 9 on service 1. Hartlepool also have 34550 as a reserve vehicle.

It would make more sense from an engineering point of view to replace the Dart SLFs on this route with more Enviro 200 bodied MANs, cascaded from another depot. Walkergate have 6, Slatyford have 10, South Shields have 1, and Sunderland have 10, so you'd have to decide between upgrading Sunderland's 8 and 18/19 services or Slatyford's 6/7/8. Michael and I are bias, so we'd suggest Sunderland's 8 and 18/19. Wink

Defo!  Angel


Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.

Kuyoyo



6,853
03 Jan 2016, 12:21 pm #12
I don't see Hartlepool gaining anymore MAN E200s yet. Considering it's 8 years since Hartlepool last received any direct investment in vehicles, I wouldn't be too surprised if they gain direct investment this year.

The interesting bit about those Busways route are simple - bar Slatyford's 6/7/8, the Sunderland routes are the marginal routes at the depot. Compared to the 1, which is probably Hartlepool's second or third most-profitiable (which, given they only have 5 routes, might be seen as not much to sing about) and is the main direct interurban link between two major towns in the Tees Valley (which the 1 and 36 both link Hartlepool and Middlesbrough, the 36 is more a link between the 4 main towns).
Kuyoyo
03 Jan 2016, 12:21 pm #12

I don't see Hartlepool gaining anymore MAN E200s yet. Considering it's 8 years since Hartlepool last received any direct investment in vehicles, I wouldn't be too surprised if they gain direct investment this year.

The interesting bit about those Busways route are simple - bar Slatyford's 6/7/8, the Sunderland routes are the marginal routes at the depot. Compared to the 1, which is probably Hartlepool's second or third most-profitiable (which, given they only have 5 routes, might be seen as not much to sing about) and is the main direct interurban link between two major towns in the Tees Valley (which the 1 and 36 both link Hartlepool and Middlesbrough, the 36 is more a link between the 4 main towns).

Michael



19,160
03 Jan 2016, 12:30 pm #13
(03 Jan 2016, 12:21 pm)Kuyoyo I don't see Hartlepool gaining anymore MAN E200s yet. Considering it's 8 years since Hartlepool last received any direct investment in vehicles, I wouldn't be too surprised if they gain direct investment this year.

The interesting bit about those Busways route are simple - bar Slatyford's 6/7/8, the Sunderland routes are the marginal routes at the depot. Compared to the 1, which is probably Hartlepool's second or third most-profitiable (which, given they only have 5 routes, might be seen as not much to sing about) and is the main direct interurban link between two major towns in the Tees Valley (which the 1 and 36 both link Hartlepool and Middlesbrough, the 36 is more a link between the 4 main towns).

In the high lighted, what do you mean?, sorry if i sound thick haha.

I wonder which service is the most profitable in Sunderland, i would imagine the 18/19 is the lowest for profit.

Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.
Michael
03 Jan 2016, 12:30 pm #13

(03 Jan 2016, 12:21 pm)Kuyoyo I don't see Hartlepool gaining anymore MAN E200s yet. Considering it's 8 years since Hartlepool last received any direct investment in vehicles, I wouldn't be too surprised if they gain direct investment this year.

The interesting bit about those Busways route are simple - bar Slatyford's 6/7/8, the Sunderland routes are the marginal routes at the depot. Compared to the 1, which is probably Hartlepool's second or third most-profitiable (which, given they only have 5 routes, might be seen as not much to sing about) and is the main direct interurban link between two major towns in the Tees Valley (which the 1 and 36 both link Hartlepool and Middlesbrough, the 36 is more a link between the 4 main towns).

In the high lighted, what do you mean?, sorry if i sound thick haha.

I wonder which service is the most profitable in Sunderland, i would imagine the 18/19 is the lowest for profit.


Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.

Dan

Site Administrator

18,114
03 Jan 2016, 12:33 pm #14
(03 Jan 2016, 12:30 pm)Michael In the high lighted, what do you mean?, sorry if i sound thick haha.

I wonder which service is the most profitable in Sunderland, i would imagine the 18/19 is the lowest for profit.

That's what he means - they're the least profitable and hence least important services at Sunderland, making them the least likely contenders for investment, compared to service 1 in Hartlepool which is much more profitable.

Of course; our suggestions are just a bit of fun, backed up with our opinions of why we think it'd be good to happen (in this instance, fleet standardisation at Hartlepool Depot).
Dan
03 Jan 2016, 12:33 pm #14

(03 Jan 2016, 12:30 pm)Michael In the high lighted, what do you mean?, sorry if i sound thick haha.

I wonder which service is the most profitable in Sunderland, i would imagine the 18/19 is the lowest for profit.

That's what he means - they're the least profitable and hence least important services at Sunderland, making them the least likely contenders for investment, compared to service 1 in Hartlepool which is much more profitable.

Of course; our suggestions are just a bit of fun, backed up with our opinions of why we think it'd be good to happen (in this instance, fleet standardisation at Hartlepool Depot).

Michael



19,160
03 Jan 2016, 12:38 pm #15
(03 Jan 2016, 12:33 pm)Dan That's what he means - they're the least profitable and hence least important services at Sunderland, making them the least likely contenders for investment, compared to service 1 in Hartlepool which is much more profitable.

Of course; our suggestions are just a bit of fun, backed up with our opinions of why we think it'd be good to happen (in this instance, fleet standardisation at Hartlepool Depot).

Ohhhh lmao, now i sound thick! haha 

I would imagine the gas bus routes are the largest profitable services in Sunderland?

Let's hope we get more for fleet standardisation at Sunderland! Wink , if Sunderland get more gas buses, the next services on the list probables would be the 4 then the 10/11.
Edited 03 Jan 2016, 12:44 pm by Michael.

Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.
Michael
03 Jan 2016, 12:38 pm #15

(03 Jan 2016, 12:33 pm)Dan That's what he means - they're the least profitable and hence least important services at Sunderland, making them the least likely contenders for investment, compared to service 1 in Hartlepool which is much more profitable.

Of course; our suggestions are just a bit of fun, backed up with our opinions of why we think it'd be good to happen (in this instance, fleet standardisation at Hartlepool Depot).

Ohhhh lmao, now i sound thick! haha 

I would imagine the gas bus routes are the largest profitable services in Sunderland?

Let's hope we get more for fleet standardisation at Sunderland! Wink , if Sunderland get more gas buses, the next services on the list probables would be the 4 then the 10/11.


Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.

S813 FVK



6,030
03 Jan 2016, 12:57 pm #16
I think the Enviro 300s on the 100 could do with replacing. They've been on the route for coming up to 11 years now being hurled backwards and forwards between Newcastle and Metrocentre non-stop.
S813 FVK
03 Jan 2016, 12:57 pm #16

I think the Enviro 300s on the 100 could do with replacing. They've been on the route for coming up to 11 years now being hurled backwards and forwards between Newcastle and Metrocentre non-stop.

Kuyoyo



6,853
03 Jan 2016, 1:06 pm #17
(03 Jan 2016, 12:57 pm)S813 FVK I think the Enviro 300s on the 100 could do with replacing. They've been on the route for coming up to 11 years now being hurled backwards and forwards between Newcastle and Metrocentre non-stop.

I think the problem there is - the E300s are the longer variation (12.8m I think). That means, to replace them with normal single deckers would either mean reducing capacity on the route or requiring more vehicles and modify the timetable to offer the same or an increased capacity. I doubt the 100 will ever be upgraded to E400 operation simply because it would reduce the number of routing options. Plus, it's then the question of where 27506-10 can be used when replaced off the 100.
Kuyoyo
03 Jan 2016, 1:06 pm #17

(03 Jan 2016, 12:57 pm)S813 FVK I think the Enviro 300s on the 100 could do with replacing. They've been on the route for coming up to 11 years now being hurled backwards and forwards between Newcastle and Metrocentre non-stop.

I think the problem there is - the E300s are the longer variation (12.8m I think). That means, to replace them with normal single deckers would either mean reducing capacity on the route or requiring more vehicles and modify the timetable to offer the same or an increased capacity. I doubt the 100 will ever be upgraded to E400 operation simply because it would reduce the number of routing options. Plus, it's then the question of where 27506-10 can be used when replaced off the 100.

Jimmi



10,969
03 Jan 2016, 1:11 pm #18
(03 Jan 2016, 12:57 pm)S813 FVK I think the Enviro 300s on the 100 could do with replacing. They've been on the route for coming up to 11 years now being hurled backwards and forwards between Newcastle and Metrocentre non-stop.
I'd say that they still seem alright on the 100 so they should be fine for a few more years yet. Wonder what you could get in years to come to replace them with given the higher capacity of them Enviro 300s does seem to be needed at times.
Jimmi
03 Jan 2016, 1:11 pm #18

(03 Jan 2016, 12:57 pm)S813 FVK I think the Enviro 300s on the 100 could do with replacing. They've been on the route for coming up to 11 years now being hurled backwards and forwards between Newcastle and Metrocentre non-stop.
I'd say that they still seem alright on the 100 so they should be fine for a few more years yet. Wonder what you could get in years to come to replace them with given the higher capacity of them Enviro 300s does seem to be needed at times.

Dan

Site Administrator

18,114
03 Jan 2016, 1:22 pm #19
(03 Jan 2016, 1:06 pm)Kuyoyo I think the problem there is - the E300s are the longer variation (12.8m I think). That means, to replace them with normal single deckers would either mean reducing capacity on the route or requiring more vehicles and modify the timetable to offer the same or an increased capacity. I doubt the 100 will ever be upgraded to E400 operation simply because it would reduce the number of routing options. Plus, it's then the question of where 27506-10 can be used when replaced off the 100.

Stagecoach would probably reduce capacity on the route.

Like Go North East's X66 service, there are times of the day when you can see the bus completely empty, meaning that lower capacity (and more fuel-efficient) vehicles can be allocated with no issues. Problems arise at peak times, but with a bus every few minutes on a "turn up and go" frequency, it's not really an issue.
Dan
03 Jan 2016, 1:22 pm #19

(03 Jan 2016, 1:06 pm)Kuyoyo I think the problem there is - the E300s are the longer variation (12.8m I think). That means, to replace them with normal single deckers would either mean reducing capacity on the route or requiring more vehicles and modify the timetable to offer the same or an increased capacity. I doubt the 100 will ever be upgraded to E400 operation simply because it would reduce the number of routing options. Plus, it's then the question of where 27506-10 can be used when replaced off the 100.

Stagecoach would probably reduce capacity on the route.

Like Go North East's X66 service, there are times of the day when you can see the bus completely empty, meaning that lower capacity (and more fuel-efficient) vehicles can be allocated with no issues. Problems arise at peak times, but with a bus every few minutes on a "turn up and go" frequency, it's not really an issue.

Kuyoyo



6,853
03 Jan 2016, 2:23 pm #20
(03 Jan 2016, 1:22 pm)Dan Stagecoach would probably reduce capacity on the route.

Like Go North East's X66 service, there are times of the day when you can see the bus completely empty, meaning that lower capacity (and more fuel-efficient) vehicles can be allocated with no issues. Problems arise at peak times, but with a bus every few minutes on a "turn up and go" frequency, it's not really an issue.

Which would then still leave where 27506-10 would be cascaded to. I think that, rather than the issue of dropping capacity on the 100, might be the reason why they've not been replaced on there yet.
Kuyoyo
03 Jan 2016, 2:23 pm #20

(03 Jan 2016, 1:22 pm)Dan Stagecoach would probably reduce capacity on the route.

Like Go North East's X66 service, there are times of the day when you can see the bus completely empty, meaning that lower capacity (and more fuel-efficient) vehicles can be allocated with no issues. Problems arise at peak times, but with a bus every few minutes on a "turn up and go" frequency, it's not really an issue.

Which would then still leave where 27506-10 would be cascaded to. I think that, rather than the issue of dropping capacity on the 100, might be the reason why they've not been replaced on there yet.

Pages (4) 1 2 3 4 Next
 
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average