Vehicle investment/refurbishment, bus specification & brand delivery
Vehicle investment/refurbishment, bus specification & brand delivery
(18 Jul 2020, 4:42 pm)mb134 Given that the B7RLE was available until 2013 I wonder if operators regret, looking back, opting for L94s and then Omnicities over sticking with one standard chassis/body type throughout.
(18 Jul 2020, 4:42 pm)mb134 Given that the B7RLE was available until 2013 I wonder if operators regret, looking back, opting for L94s and then Omnicities over sticking with one standard chassis/body type throughout.
(19 Jul 2020, 1:03 pm)cainebj Personally I don't think they would regret it. The markets shifted towards the late 2000s/early 2010s anyway to more lightweight and more fuel efficient vehicles, when reducing fuel consumption was all the rage for green credentials, so I think the shift towards the Versa and Streetlite rather than sticking to a "heavyweight" B7RLE option was going to be inevitable anyway. We saw that with the Citaros, a large number being ordered 2007/2008 and then only 1 small batch in 2010 and 1 small batch in 2013, the last "heavyweight" single decks ordered. Even in most other large companies there was a focus shift from the "heavyweight" offerings of MAN, Volvo and Scania to the "lightweight" full size single decks in the VDL Pulsar and the ADL Enviro 300, and then towards the Streetlite and E200MMC.
I think there's a passenger appeal element to it as well. Stagecoach for example have been quite good at just ordering the same old, and at times it gets to a point where a typical passenger cannot tell a brand new bus from say a 7 year old bus of the same type. Using Manchester as an example, a 64 plate E400 looks exactly the same as the 06 plates they had, so the investment in new buses would go unnoticed to a typical passenger and it becomes almost utilitarian. If GNE had done the same by sticking with Wright then you'd have had the same situation, but they changed to buying something completely different that stood out from the crowd, something that gets noticed as being a new bus to the typical passenger, especially at the time when GNE were introducing all of the different route brands. As a commercial operator you want it known that you are investing in the services to bring improvements, and nothing shows your investment better than the vehicles the passengers board.
The B7RLE wasn't available until 2003 either. Volvo replaced the B10BLE with the rather unpopular B7L, which wasn't very successful at all and was axed after only 2 years effectively. I'd take a guess that a commercial decision was taken at the time, based on knowledge they had then, to order the proven Scania L94UB for their full size single deck offering for 2001-2004 deliveries, rather than switching to the unproven B7L with its smaller engine in the same full sized bus. They had been buying B10BLEs so an unproven drop in engine size could have brought some doubts to real world suitability?
Scania replaced the L94UB with the similar K230UB for Euro4, which Wright still built on, but GNE had made the commercial decision to order the Omnicity rather than sticking with the Solar for standardisation.
Apologies for the long and slightly off topic post
(19 Jul 2020, 1:03 pm)cainebj Personally I don't think they would regret it. The markets shifted towards the late 2000s/early 2010s anyway to more lightweight and more fuel efficient vehicles, when reducing fuel consumption was all the rage for green credentials, so I think the shift towards the Versa and Streetlite rather than sticking to a "heavyweight" B7RLE option was going to be inevitable anyway. We saw that with the Citaros, a large number being ordered 2007/2008 and then only 1 small batch in 2010 and 1 small batch in 2013, the last "heavyweight" single decks ordered. Even in most other large companies there was a focus shift from the "heavyweight" offerings of MAN, Volvo and Scania to the "lightweight" full size single decks in the VDL Pulsar and the ADL Enviro 300, and then towards the Streetlite and E200MMC.
I think there's a passenger appeal element to it as well. Stagecoach for example have been quite good at just ordering the same old, and at times it gets to a point where a typical passenger cannot tell a brand new bus from say a 7 year old bus of the same type. Using Manchester as an example, a 64 plate E400 looks exactly the same as the 06 plates they had, so the investment in new buses would go unnoticed to a typical passenger and it becomes almost utilitarian. If GNE had done the same by sticking with Wright then you'd have had the same situation, but they changed to buying something completely different that stood out from the crowd, something that gets noticed as being a new bus to the typical passenger, especially at the time when GNE were introducing all of the different route brands. As a commercial operator you want it known that you are investing in the services to bring improvements, and nothing shows your investment better than the vehicles the passengers board.
The B7RLE wasn't available until 2003 either. Volvo replaced the B10BLE with the rather unpopular B7L, which wasn't very successful at all and was axed after only 2 years effectively. I'd take a guess that a commercial decision was taken at the time, based on knowledge they had then, to order the proven Scania L94UB for their full size single deck offering for 2001-2004 deliveries, rather than switching to the unproven B7L with its smaller engine in the same full sized bus. They had been buying B10BLEs so an unproven drop in engine size could have brought some doubts to real world suitability?
Scania replaced the L94UB with the similar K230UB for Euro4, which Wright still built on, but GNE had made the commercial decision to order the Omnicity rather than sticking with the Solar for standardisation.
Apologies for the long and slightly off topic post
(19 Jul 2020, 1:48 pm)Storx I understand your point here but personally I disagree. It's all good for those who live on the bus route who constantly gets the new buses ie. the 21, X1 etc but if your one of the unlucky people who live on one of the routes who don't ie. 6, 25 you end up having a worse service but paying the same fare. At least if everything is uniform there's no first class and second class services. It can leave a bit of a bitter taste when you pay more for a worse service which at the same time is less infrequent. You just have to look at Birtley for an example of that, one side has a 7 minute service with new Streetdecks, the other side a slow 30 minute service with old Omnicity's without any discount fares which exist for the Angel.
At least if you travel on Stagecoach you know whether you get an 07 plate Enviro or a 13 plate Enviro the level of service is the same or thereabouts. It's no co-incidence that GNE's core network is doing well but the rest of it is falling apart with constant changes and service reductions whereas Stagecoach has pretty much been stable.
(19 Jul 2020, 1:48 pm)Storx I understand your point here but personally I disagree. It's all good for those who live on the bus route who constantly gets the new buses ie. the 21, X1 etc but if your one of the unlucky people who live on one of the routes who don't ie. 6, 25 you end up having a worse service but paying the same fare. At least if everything is uniform there's no first class and second class services. It can leave a bit of a bitter taste when you pay more for a worse service which at the same time is less infrequent. You just have to look at Birtley for an example of that, one side has a 7 minute service with new Streetdecks, the other side a slow 30 minute service with old Omnicity's without any discount fares which exist for the Angel.
At least if you travel on Stagecoach you know whether you get an 07 plate Enviro or a 13 plate Enviro the level of service is the same or thereabouts. It's no co-incidence that GNE's core network is doing well but the rest of it is falling apart with constant changes and service reductions whereas Stagecoach has pretty much been stable.
(19 Jul 2020, 2:20 pm)streetdeckfan So you're saying you'd rather they didn't upgrade any route than keep upgrading a select few?
It makes sense to keep upgrading the routes that make money, the ones that can justify the the expense, then those vehicles which are only a few years old can get cascaded to routes that may not be able to justify it.
And do you not think if other routes could justify a 7 minute frequency with new StreetDecks they would have them? There's a reason certain routes are flagships, it's not because they handpicked routes to spend money on, it's because they're the most popular routes!
(19 Jul 2020, 2:20 pm)streetdeckfan So you're saying you'd rather they didn't upgrade any route than keep upgrading a select few?
It makes sense to keep upgrading the routes that make money, the ones that can justify the the expense, then those vehicles which are only a few years old can get cascaded to routes that may not be able to justify it.
And do you not think if other routes could justify a 7 minute frequency with new StreetDecks they would have them? There's a reason certain routes are flagships, it's not because they handpicked routes to spend money on, it's because they're the most popular routes!
(19 Jul 2020, 1:48 pm)Storx I understand your point here but personally I disagree. It's all good for those who live on the bus route who constantly gets the new buses ie. the 21, X1 etc but if your one of the unlucky people who live on one of the routes who don't ie. 6, 25 you end up having a worse service but paying the same fare. At least if everything is uniform there's no first class and second class services. It can leave a bit of a bitter taste when you pay more for a worse service which at the same time is less infrequent. You just have to look at Birtley for an example of that, one side has a 7 minute service with new Streetdecks, the other side a slow 30 minute service with old Omnicity's without any discount fares which exist for the Angel.Constantly get new buses? X1 hasn't had anything for 8years. I believe it was the Npower contract that paid for new buses on the X1 in 2011 due to the requirements of low floor DD. Due to increased passengers on X1, further 7 were bought to deal with demand the following year. The 21 never received a proper allocation of new buses until 2017, when the 15 B5H were introduced in 2012, the PVR was increased and allocated older DD to compensate. Made sense to acquire new buses that met PVR and allocate the B5H to the 1....that was well overdue an upgrade.
At least if you travel on Stagecoach you know whether you get an 07 plate Enviro or a 13 plate Enviro the level of service is the same or thereabouts. It's no co-incidence that GNE's core network is doing well but the rest of it is falling apart with constant changes and service reductions whereas Stagecoach has pretty much been stable.
(19 Jul 2020, 1:48 pm)Storx I understand your point here but personally I disagree. It's all good for those who live on the bus route who constantly gets the new buses ie. the 21, X1 etc but if your one of the unlucky people who live on one of the routes who don't ie. 6, 25 you end up having a worse service but paying the same fare. At least if everything is uniform there's no first class and second class services. It can leave a bit of a bitter taste when you pay more for a worse service which at the same time is less infrequent. You just have to look at Birtley for an example of that, one side has a 7 minute service with new Streetdecks, the other side a slow 30 minute service with old Omnicity's without any discount fares which exist for the Angel.Constantly get new buses? X1 hasn't had anything for 8years. I believe it was the Npower contract that paid for new buses on the X1 in 2011 due to the requirements of low floor DD. Due to increased passengers on X1, further 7 were bought to deal with demand the following year. The 21 never received a proper allocation of new buses until 2017, when the 15 B5H were introduced in 2012, the PVR was increased and allocated older DD to compensate. Made sense to acquire new buses that met PVR and allocate the B5H to the 1....that was well overdue an upgrade.
At least if you travel on Stagecoach you know whether you get an 07 plate Enviro or a 13 plate Enviro the level of service is the same or thereabouts. It's no co-incidence that GNE's core network is doing well but the rest of it is falling apart with constant changes and service reductions whereas Stagecoach has pretty much been stable.
(19 Jul 2020, 3:20 pm)JP6004 Constantly get new buses? X1 hasn't had anything for 8years. I believe it was the Npower contract that paid for new buses on the X1 in 2011 due to the requirements of low floor DD. Due to increased passengers on X1, further 7 were bought to deal with demand the following year. The 21 never received a proper allocation of new buses until 2017, when the 15 B5H were introduced in 2012, the PVR was increased and allocated older DD to compensate. Made sense to acquire new buses that met PVR and allocate the B5H to the 1....that was well overdue an upgrade.
Let's not forget the CAZ due to come in everything going into Newcastle has to be euro 6, meaning newcastle services need to take priority. No doubt there would of been an even distribution of new buses had this not been the case
(19 Jul 2020, 3:20 pm)JP6004 Constantly get new buses? X1 hasn't had anything for 8years. I believe it was the Npower contract that paid for new buses on the X1 in 2011 due to the requirements of low floor DD. Due to increased passengers on X1, further 7 were bought to deal with demand the following year. The 21 never received a proper allocation of new buses until 2017, when the 15 B5H were introduced in 2012, the PVR was increased and allocated older DD to compensate. Made sense to acquire new buses that met PVR and allocate the B5H to the 1....that was well overdue an upgrade.
Let's not forget the CAZ due to come in everything going into Newcastle has to be euro 6, meaning newcastle services need to take priority. No doubt there would of been an even distribution of new buses had this not been the case
(19 Jul 2020, 3:38 pm)Storx But is the X1 losing customers? It's not so why buy the new buses for them - 8 years isn't long at all. The 26/27 which they're getting dumped on haven't had new buses since god knows when - I really don't know. Anyone answer this? Why not give the X1 buses a decent mid-life refurb (so they're as new) and instead give the 26/27 some love instead for a change. Now all your doing is giving the X1 new buses which it doesn't really need (people would appreciate the mid life refurb as much) and the 26/27 are getting the, oh look the X1 has new buses AGAIN and we're getting the old buses dumped on us. It's the same with the 6 and 25. They're almost ignored lately and it's a creating a bad core and non-core services with GNE and the non-core services are a mess. This isn't just GNE; Arriva used to be bad for it aswell but not as much lately they've seemed to moved to a buy new buses and keep them on there until their dead approach which I prefer. You don't hear anyone complaining about the 'old' 59 plates at Blyth as they were there from new.
Have a flagship route in timetables and ticketing but it doesn't mean they need new buses all the time.
(19 Jul 2020, 3:38 pm)Storx But is the X1 losing customers? It's not so why buy the new buses for them - 8 years isn't long at all. The 26/27 which they're getting dumped on haven't had new buses since god knows when - I really don't know. Anyone answer this? Why not give the X1 buses a decent mid-life refurb (so they're as new) and instead give the 26/27 some love instead for a change. Now all your doing is giving the X1 new buses which it doesn't really need (people would appreciate the mid life refurb as much) and the 26/27 are getting the, oh look the X1 has new buses AGAIN and we're getting the old buses dumped on us. It's the same with the 6 and 25. They're almost ignored lately and it's a creating a bad core and non-core services with GNE and the non-core services are a mess. This isn't just GNE; Arriva used to be bad for it aswell but not as much lately they've seemed to moved to a buy new buses and keep them on there until their dead approach which I prefer. You don't hear anyone complaining about the 'old' 59 plates at Blyth as they were there from new.
Have a flagship route in timetables and ticketing but it doesn't mean they need new buses all the time.
(19 Jul 2020, 3:38 pm)Storx But is the X1 losing customers? It's not so why buy the new buses for them - 8 years isn't long at all. The 26/27 which they're getting dumped on haven't had new buses since god knows when - I really don't know. Anyone answer this? Why not give the X1 buses a decent mid-life refurb (so they're as new) and instead give the 26/27 some love instead for a change. Now all your doing is giving the X1 new buses which it doesn't really need (people would appreciate the mid life refurb as much) and the 26/27 are getting the, oh look the X1 has new buses AGAIN and we're getting the old buses dumped on us. It's the same with the 6 and 25. They're almost ignored lately and it's a creating a bad core and non-core services with GNE and the non-core services are a mess. This isn't just GNE; Arriva used to be bad for it aswell but not as much lately they've seemed to moved to a buy new buses and keep them on there until their dead approach which I prefer. You don't hear anyone complaining about the 'old' 59 plates at Blyth as they were there from new.Perhaps it's not as profitable running along the metro route as the X1 is, single decks have been allocated for years with frequency fluctuating between 10 to 15mins. My point is the contract tied with the 921 required low floor DD, therefore the money paid to GNE for the contract was in part used to upgrade half the allocation.
Have a flagship route in timetables and ticketing but it doesn't mean they need new buses all the time.
(19 Jul 2020, 3:38 pm)Storx But is the X1 losing customers? It's not so why buy the new buses for them - 8 years isn't long at all. The 26/27 which they're getting dumped on haven't had new buses since god knows when - I really don't know. Anyone answer this? Why not give the X1 buses a decent mid-life refurb (so they're as new) and instead give the 26/27 some love instead for a change. Now all your doing is giving the X1 new buses which it doesn't really need (people would appreciate the mid life refurb as much) and the 26/27 are getting the, oh look the X1 has new buses AGAIN and we're getting the old buses dumped on us. It's the same with the 6 and 25. They're almost ignored lately and it's a creating a bad core and non-core services with GNE and the non-core services are a mess. This isn't just GNE; Arriva used to be bad for it aswell but not as much lately they've seemed to moved to a buy new buses and keep them on there until their dead approach which I prefer. You don't hear anyone complaining about the 'old' 59 plates at Blyth as they were there from new.Perhaps it's not as profitable running along the metro route as the X1 is, single decks have been allocated for years with frequency fluctuating between 10 to 15mins. My point is the contract tied with the 921 required low floor DD, therefore the money paid to GNE for the contract was in part used to upgrade half the allocation.
Have a flagship route in timetables and ticketing but it doesn't mean they need new buses all the time.
(19 Jul 2020, 3:46 pm)streetdeckfan Because, as they've said, they're in the process of upgrading all the express routes.
Surprised you didn't bring up the fact that the 97s have just been upgraded with brand new vehicles, oh wait, that doesn't fit your agenda does it?
(19 Jul 2020, 3:46 pm)streetdeckfan Because, as they've said, they're in the process of upgrading all the express routes.
Surprised you didn't bring up the fact that the 97s have just been upgraded with brand new vehicles, oh wait, that doesn't fit your agenda does it?
(19 Jul 2020, 3:38 pm)Storx But is the X1 losing customers? It's not so why buy the new buses for them - 8 years isn't long at all. The 26/27 which they're getting dumped on haven't had new buses since god knows when - I really don't know. Anyone answer this? Why not give the X1 buses a decent mid-life refurb (so they're as new) and instead give the 26/27 some love instead for a change. Now all your doing is giving the X1 new buses which it doesn't really need (people would appreciate the mid life refurb as much) and the 26/27 are getting the, oh look the X1 has new buses AGAIN and we're getting the old buses dumped on us. It's the same with the 6 and 25. They're almost ignored lately and it's a creating a bad core and non-core services with GNE and the non-core services are a mess. This isn't just GNE; Arriva used to be bad for it aswell but not as much lately they've seemed to moved to a buy new buses and keep them on there until their dead approach which I prefer. You don't hear anyone complaining about the 'old' 59 plates at Blyth as they were there from new.
Have a flagship route in timetables and ticketing but it doesn't mean they need new buses all the time.
(19 Jul 2020, 4:05 pm)Storx Which still doesn't answer the point why the X1 needs new buses...
The point is and still is about 'upgrades'. You can only upgrade something that is bad or worse. Have a uniform fleet you can't upgrade it and if you do upgrade something do every bus and create a brand that's good throughout - not just your special few routes with the rest of the network falling apart. There's an obsession with new buses on here especially with certain companies but if you do a decent refurbishment then it's just the same to a normal passenger. Stagecoach don't have this problem as an 09 Enviro is the same as an 15 Enviro so you don't have the problem with one bus route has better buses than the other they all have good buses or bad buses (depending on whether you like Stagecoach's interior).
(19 Jul 2020, 3:38 pm)Storx But is the X1 losing customers? It's not so why buy the new buses for them - 8 years isn't long at all. The 26/27 which they're getting dumped on haven't had new buses since god knows when - I really don't know. Anyone answer this? Why not give the X1 buses a decent mid-life refurb (so they're as new) and instead give the 26/27 some love instead for a change. Now all your doing is giving the X1 new buses which it doesn't really need (people would appreciate the mid life refurb as much) and the 26/27 are getting the, oh look the X1 has new buses AGAIN and we're getting the old buses dumped on us. It's the same with the 6 and 25. They're almost ignored lately and it's a creating a bad core and non-core services with GNE and the non-core services are a mess. This isn't just GNE; Arriva used to be bad for it aswell but not as much lately they've seemed to moved to a buy new buses and keep them on there until their dead approach which I prefer. You don't hear anyone complaining about the 'old' 59 plates at Blyth as they were there from new.
Have a flagship route in timetables and ticketing but it doesn't mean they need new buses all the time.
(19 Jul 2020, 4:05 pm)Storx Which still doesn't answer the point why the X1 needs new buses...
The point is and still is about 'upgrades'. You can only upgrade something that is bad or worse. Have a uniform fleet you can't upgrade it and if you do upgrade something do every bus and create a brand that's good throughout - not just your special few routes with the rest of the network falling apart. There's an obsession with new buses on here especially with certain companies but if you do a decent refurbishment then it's just the same to a normal passenger. Stagecoach don't have this problem as an 09 Enviro is the same as an 15 Enviro so you don't have the problem with one bus route has better buses than the other they all have good buses or bad buses (depending on whether you like Stagecoach's interior).
(19 Jul 2020, 4:05 pm)Storx Which still doesn't answer the point why the X1 needs new buses...For a core profit making route the X1 is very low spec compared to other routes with same vehicles. The route itself is more demanding therefore more fuel thirsty. Having more efficient buses, saves on fuel, maintenance costs, increasing reliability, while also maintaining patronage and attracting new customers. As it is also being encompassed within Xlines premium routes and a company standard being set, if X1 was simply refurbed, it wouldn't fall under the full Xlines specification.
The point is and still is about 'upgrades'. You can only upgrade something that is bad or worse. Have a uniform fleet you can't upgrade it and if you do upgrade something do every bus and create a brand that's good throughout - not just your special few routes with the rest of the network falling apart. There's an obsession with new buses on here especially with certain companies but if you do a decent refurbishment then it's just the same to a normal passenger. Stagecoach don't have this problem as an 09 Enviro is the same as an 15 Enviro so you don't have the problem with one bus route has better buses than the other they all have good buses or bad buses (depending on whether you like Stagecoach's interior).
(19 Jul 2020, 4:05 pm)Storx Which still doesn't answer the point why the X1 needs new buses...For a core profit making route the X1 is very low spec compared to other routes with same vehicles. The route itself is more demanding therefore more fuel thirsty. Having more efficient buses, saves on fuel, maintenance costs, increasing reliability, while also maintaining patronage and attracting new customers. As it is also being encompassed within Xlines premium routes and a company standard being set, if X1 was simply refurbed, it wouldn't fall under the full Xlines specification.
The point is and still is about 'upgrades'. You can only upgrade something that is bad or worse. Have a uniform fleet you can't upgrade it and if you do upgrade something do every bus and create a brand that's good throughout - not just your special few routes with the rest of the network falling apart. There's an obsession with new buses on here especially with certain companies but if you do a decent refurbishment then it's just the same to a normal passenger. Stagecoach don't have this problem as an 09 Enviro is the same as an 15 Enviro so you don't have the problem with one bus route has better buses than the other they all have good buses or bad buses (depending on whether you like Stagecoach's interior).
(19 Jul 2020, 4:15 pm)Dan I disagree with your opinion.
Investment is clearly being focused around the company's new "X-lines" network, which obviously spirals predominantly out of Newcastle City Centre (so is required for the proposed Clean Air Zone, anyway). The investment into these routes means the buses currently allocated (of varying ages) cascade to replace much older buses, and there'll be a noticeable change on these services as it'll mean things like free Wi-Fi, power sockets and audio-visual announcements are introduced to some routes for the very first time.
Members of this forum have indicated in the past that they do not believe vehicle allocation is enough to convince customers to use the bus, but bus operators up and down the country have reported examples of patronage growth as a result of investment into new vehicles. I'm sure everyone will have a different opinion on this one and it could be argued that the investment into new vehicles has given marketing departments an opportunity to promote the service(s) more often which is the true reason for the growth, but the point here is that operators have reported this to be the case and as enthusiasts we probably have to believe that. With that in mind, a mere 1% of growth on a flagship route like the 21 is vastly different to 1% of growth on a much lesser route like the 25.
Go North East has to submit a business case for the purchase of new vehicles to its parent company, Go-Ahead Group, with fuel savings and potential patronage growth being two figures which will be included within this plan. I suspect it will be the same for other companies in a group PLC too. With the above point in mind, at Group level it makes much more sense to invest into a flagship route like the 21 if growth can come as a result of the investment. This is your main reason for key services being upgraded with brand new buses more often than lesser routes.
I would imagine customers on "Crusader" services 26/27 would welcome a permanent allocation of double-decks with open arms, given the unreliability of the Tyne & Wear Metro system, which often results in single-decks on services 26/27 being overcrowded or even full, leaving 'normal' bus passengers behind at bus stops. I don't believe for one minute they will envy customers on the X1 service and wish they had the buses from that route instead (let's face it, 95%+ of them won't use the X1 so won't know any different!)
I also disagree with your point about a good refurbishment comparing to the investment into a brand new bus. Are you suggesting that Go North East should have refurbished the old B7/Geminis on the X9/X10 services every five years instead of buying new buses? I'm sure passengers appreciate a bus looking pretty inside, when parked up at the side of the road...
(19 Jul 2020, 4:15 pm)Dan I disagree with your opinion.
Investment is clearly being focused around the company's new "X-lines" network, which obviously spirals predominantly out of Newcastle City Centre (so is required for the proposed Clean Air Zone, anyway). The investment into these routes means the buses currently allocated (of varying ages) cascade to replace much older buses, and there'll be a noticeable change on these services as it'll mean things like free Wi-Fi, power sockets and audio-visual announcements are introduced to some routes for the very first time.
Members of this forum have indicated in the past that they do not believe vehicle allocation is enough to convince customers to use the bus, but bus operators up and down the country have reported examples of patronage growth as a result of investment into new vehicles. I'm sure everyone will have a different opinion on this one and it could be argued that the investment into new vehicles has given marketing departments an opportunity to promote the service(s) more often which is the true reason for the growth, but the point here is that operators have reported this to be the case and as enthusiasts we probably have to believe that. With that in mind, a mere 1% of growth on a flagship route like the 21 is vastly different to 1% of growth on a much lesser route like the 25.
Go North East has to submit a business case for the purchase of new vehicles to its parent company, Go-Ahead Group, with fuel savings and potential patronage growth being two figures which will be included within this plan. I suspect it will be the same for other companies in a group PLC too. With the above point in mind, at Group level it makes much more sense to invest into a flagship route like the 21 if growth can come as a result of the investment. This is your main reason for key services being upgraded with brand new buses more often than lesser routes.
I would imagine customers on "Crusader" services 26/27 would welcome a permanent allocation of double-decks with open arms, given the unreliability of the Tyne & Wear Metro system, which often results in single-decks on services 26/27 being overcrowded or even full, leaving 'normal' bus passengers behind at bus stops. I don't believe for one minute they will envy customers on the X1 service and wish they had the buses from that route instead (let's face it, 95%+ of them won't use the X1 so won't know any different!)
I also disagree with your point about a good refurbishment comparing to the investment into a brand new bus. Are you suggesting that Go North East should have refurbished the old B7/Geminis on the X9/X10 services every five years instead of buying new buses? I'm sure passengers appreciate a bus looking pretty inside, when parked up at the side of the road...
(19 Jul 2020, 4:36 pm)Storx Can't argue with statistics tbh so not going to naive and argue a point to the ground and it kind of makes sense in the point really that even if you did want to get 25 new buses it wouldn't never happen anyway because of how companies work so won't argue about where new buses go.Thought u were
(19 Jul 2020, 4:36 pm)Storx Can't argue with statistics tbh so not going to naive and argue a point to the ground and it kind of makes sense in the point really that even if you did want to get 25 new buses it wouldn't never happen anyway because of how companies work so won't argue about where new buses go.Thought u were
(19 Jul 2020, 4:39 pm)JP6004 Thought u were
(19 Jul 2020, 4:39 pm)JP6004 Thought u were
(19 Jul 2020, 1:03 pm)cainebj The B7RLE wasn't available until 2003 either. Volvo replaced the B10BLE with the rather unpopular B7L, which wasn't very successful at all and was axed after only 2 years effectively. I'd take a guess that a commercial decision was taken at the time, based on knowledge they had then, to order the proven Scania L94UB for their full size single deck offering for 2001-2004 deliveries, rather than switching to the unproven B7L with its smaller engine in the same full sized bus. They had been buying B10BLEs so an unproven drop in engine size could have brought some doubts to real world suitability?
Scania replaced the L94UB with the similar K230UB for Euro4, which Wright still built on, but GNE had made the commercial decision to order the Omnicity rather than sticking with the Solar for standardisation.
Apologies for the long and slightly off topic post
(19 Jul 2020, 1:03 pm)cainebj The B7RLE wasn't available until 2003 either. Volvo replaced the B10BLE with the rather unpopular B7L, which wasn't very successful at all and was axed after only 2 years effectively. I'd take a guess that a commercial decision was taken at the time, based on knowledge they had then, to order the proven Scania L94UB for their full size single deck offering for 2001-2004 deliveries, rather than switching to the unproven B7L with its smaller engine in the same full sized bus. They had been buying B10BLEs so an unproven drop in engine size could have brought some doubts to real world suitability?
Scania replaced the L94UB with the similar K230UB for Euro4, which Wright still built on, but GNE had made the commercial decision to order the Omnicity rather than sticking with the Solar for standardisation.
Apologies for the long and slightly off topic post
(19 Jul 2020, 4:36 pm)Storx Can't argue with statistics tbh so not going to naive and argue a point to the ground and it kind of makes sense in the point really that even if you did want to get 25 new buses it wouldn't never happen anyway because of how companies work so won't argue about where new buses go.
I still think a good refurbishment in comparison to a new bus in the majority of cases is just as good though. I know a lot of people seem to want the 10 to get new buses but if you give them a as new refurbishment and a good marketing campaign then it'll be as good as buying new buses for them. Similar with the 56 and in a few years the time the 20, Coast and Country and Black Cat network. I just wish all 3 would spend a bit more on upgrading their older fleet as there is a few core routes around which are looking pretty tired imo 10, 56, 58, Quaylink to name a few for GNE and then create a more modern fleet throughout so when they do eventually move on they're not too far behind the new buses lets say the 21 has got.
The X9/X10 is a different route altogether though and it was more of buying the wrong bus for the route which you's have finally solved so no moaning there.
(19 Jul 2020, 4:47 pm)Storx I never thought about the business case side of things so they'd never get new buses for the 6 or 25 anyway. No point arguing for the sake of it and with the stats that new buses on the 25 would give the same gain as on the 21 from someone who works for the company then what's there to discuss. I just thought there would be more potential for bigger gains on the 25 etc since less people in the area it covers use it now so there's more potential but guessing you'd need to do more than new vehicles (which makes sense).
(19 Jul 2020, 4:36 pm)Storx Can't argue with statistics tbh so not going to naive and argue a point to the ground and it kind of makes sense in the point really that even if you did want to get 25 new buses it wouldn't never happen anyway because of how companies work so won't argue about where new buses go.
I still think a good refurbishment in comparison to a new bus in the majority of cases is just as good though. I know a lot of people seem to want the 10 to get new buses but if you give them a as new refurbishment and a good marketing campaign then it'll be as good as buying new buses for them. Similar with the 56 and in a few years the time the 20, Coast and Country and Black Cat network. I just wish all 3 would spend a bit more on upgrading their older fleet as there is a few core routes around which are looking pretty tired imo 10, 56, 58, Quaylink to name a few for GNE and then create a more modern fleet throughout so when they do eventually move on they're not too far behind the new buses lets say the 21 has got.
The X9/X10 is a different route altogether though and it was more of buying the wrong bus for the route which you's have finally solved so no moaning there.
(19 Jul 2020, 4:47 pm)Storx I never thought about the business case side of things so they'd never get new buses for the 6 or 25 anyway. No point arguing for the sake of it and with the stats that new buses on the 25 would give the same gain as on the 21 from someone who works for the company then what's there to discuss. I just thought there would be more potential for bigger gains on the 25 etc since less people in the area it covers use it now so there's more potential but guessing you'd need to do more than new vehicles (which makes sense).
(18 Jul 2020, 1:03 pm)Dan Doing the maths of how many new buses are coming into the fleet between now and October, I would not be surprised to see the withdrawal of Mercedes Citaros from the fleet this year.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
(18 Jul 2020, 1:03 pm)Dan Doing the maths of how many new buses are coming into the fleet between now and October, I would not be surprised to see the withdrawal of Mercedes Citaros from the fleet this year.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
(19 Jul 2020, 4:15 pm)Dan I disagree with your opinion.I have to agree with Dan on this one. Arriva's MAX services should've been what GoNE's X-Lines services are.
Investment is clearly being focused around the company's new "X-lines" network, which obviously spirals predominantly out of Newcastle City Centre (so is required for the proposed Clean Air Zone, anyway). The investment into these routes means the buses currently allocated (of varying ages) cascade to replace much older buses, and there'll be a noticeable change on these services as it'll mean things like free Wi-Fi, power sockets and audio-visual announcements are introduced to some routes for the very first time.
Members of this forum have indicated in the past that they do not believe vehicle allocation is enough to convince customers to use the bus, but bus operators up and down the country have reported examples of patronage growth as a result of investment into new vehicles. I'm sure everyone will have a different opinion on this one and it could be argued that the investment into new vehicles has given marketing departments an opportunity to promote the service(s) more often which is the true reason for the growth, but the point here is that operators have reported this to be the case and as enthusiasts we probably have to believe that. With that in mind, a mere 1% of growth on a flagship route like the 21 is vastly different to 1% of growth on a much lesser route like the 25.
Go North East has to submit a business case for the purchase of new vehicles to its parent company, Go-Ahead Group, with fuel savings and potential patronage growth being two figures which will be included within this plan. I suspect it will be the same for other companies in a group PLC too. With the above point in mind, at Group level it makes much more sense to invest into a flagship route like the 21 if growth can come as a result of the investment. This is your main reason for key services being upgraded with brand new buses more often than lesser routes.
I would imagine customers on "Crusader" services 26/27 would welcome a permanent allocation of double-decks with open arms, given the unreliability of the Tyne & Wear Metro system, which often results in single-decks on services 26/27 being overcrowded or even full, leaving 'normal' bus passengers behind at bus stops. I don't believe for one minute they will envy customers on the X1 service and wish they had the buses from that route instead (let's face it, 95%+ of them won't use the X1 so won't know any different!)
I also disagree with your point about a good refurbishment comparing to the investment into a brand new bus. Are you suggesting that Go North East should have refurbished the old B7/Geminis on the X9/X10 services every five years instead of buying new buses? I'm sure passengers appreciate a bus looking pretty inside, when parked up at the side of the road...
(19 Jul 2020, 4:15 pm)Dan I disagree with your opinion.I have to agree with Dan on this one. Arriva's MAX services should've been what GoNE's X-Lines services are.
Investment is clearly being focused around the company's new "X-lines" network, which obviously spirals predominantly out of Newcastle City Centre (so is required for the proposed Clean Air Zone, anyway). The investment into these routes means the buses currently allocated (of varying ages) cascade to replace much older buses, and there'll be a noticeable change on these services as it'll mean things like free Wi-Fi, power sockets and audio-visual announcements are introduced to some routes for the very first time.
Members of this forum have indicated in the past that they do not believe vehicle allocation is enough to convince customers to use the bus, but bus operators up and down the country have reported examples of patronage growth as a result of investment into new vehicles. I'm sure everyone will have a different opinion on this one and it could be argued that the investment into new vehicles has given marketing departments an opportunity to promote the service(s) more often which is the true reason for the growth, but the point here is that operators have reported this to be the case and as enthusiasts we probably have to believe that. With that in mind, a mere 1% of growth on a flagship route like the 21 is vastly different to 1% of growth on a much lesser route like the 25.
Go North East has to submit a business case for the purchase of new vehicles to its parent company, Go-Ahead Group, with fuel savings and potential patronage growth being two figures which will be included within this plan. I suspect it will be the same for other companies in a group PLC too. With the above point in mind, at Group level it makes much more sense to invest into a flagship route like the 21 if growth can come as a result of the investment. This is your main reason for key services being upgraded with brand new buses more often than lesser routes.
I would imagine customers on "Crusader" services 26/27 would welcome a permanent allocation of double-decks with open arms, given the unreliability of the Tyne & Wear Metro system, which often results in single-decks on services 26/27 being overcrowded or even full, leaving 'normal' bus passengers behind at bus stops. I don't believe for one minute they will envy customers on the X1 service and wish they had the buses from that route instead (let's face it, 95%+ of them won't use the X1 so won't know any different!)
I also disagree with your point about a good refurbishment comparing to the investment into a brand new bus. Are you suggesting that Go North East should have refurbished the old B7/Geminis on the X9/X10 services every five years instead of buying new buses? I'm sure passengers appreciate a bus looking pretty inside, when parked up at the side of the road...
(19 Jul 2020, 6:40 pm)L469 YVK I have to agree with Dan on this one. Arriva's MAX services should've been what GoNE's X-Lines services are.
I don't agree with everything GoNE do but as a whole, they do a decent job. At least "X-Lines" means "X-Lines" unlike Arriva who think a 52 plate tarted up ex-London B7TL rocked up on stand at Blyth ready to take the X7/X8/X9/X10/X11 is acceptable.
(19 Jul 2020, 6:40 pm)L469 YVK I have to agree with Dan on this one. Arriva's MAX services should've been what GoNE's X-Lines services are.
I don't agree with everything GoNE do but as a whole, they do a decent job. At least "X-Lines" means "X-Lines" unlike Arriva who think a 52 plate tarted up ex-London B7TL rocked up on stand at Blyth ready to take the X7/X8/X9/X10/X11 is acceptable.
(19 Jul 2020, 6:59 pm)mb134 While far from ideal, the B7TLs on those services have been refurbed to a good standard (and certainly don't feel their age inside) and meet the advertised spec. Not all of those routes will justify new vehicles, particularly the X9 which is usually quite quiet. If the vehicles are reliable, which I'm told they generally are, then I don't see a huge issue with using them on services which don't command new vehicles (or onto the 306, for example, to provide additional capacity).
Outside of the NE, Transdev are a particularly good example of refurbing old buses and putting them to task on branded routes. 2003 B7TLs branded for their "CityZap" services.
(19 Jul 2020, 6:59 pm)mb134 While far from ideal, the B7TLs on those services have been refurbed to a good standard (and certainly don't feel their age inside) and meet the advertised spec. Not all of those routes will justify new vehicles, particularly the X9 which is usually quite quiet. If the vehicles are reliable, which I'm told they generally are, then I don't see a huge issue with using them on services which don't command new vehicles (or onto the 306, for example, to provide additional capacity).
Outside of the NE, Transdev are a particularly good example of refurbing old buses and putting them to task on branded routes. 2003 B7TLs branded for their "CityZap" services.
