(23 Dec 2023, 3:26 pm)DeltaMan wrote Some would say the difference is that Stagecoach aren't using public money to restore something that was previously a commercial service. It is a genuine improvement. 

Whereas in the examples given, it *APPEARS* that Arriva and GNE are wanting to use public money to pay for services which were clearly commercial before they were reduced for staffing reasons.  

It might be allowed by the letter of BSIP. But I don't think it's within the spirit of it, personally.

(23 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm)Dan wrote Isn’t that the purpose of the Bus Service Improvement Plan?

I didn’t see you make this comment about Stagecoach’s X24/X34, or Arriva’s X16?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(23 Dec 2023, 3:55 pm)Aaron21 wrote Because there actually useful. What's wrong with the 20 to Langley Park alongside the 20A (of which changes have just been done for it)

If the 20A is withdrawn. We'll gne already wasting the money as mentioned here in changes for November 

Prince Bishops 20 | 20A

In partnership with Nexus and with financial support from the Government’s Bus Service Improvement Plan, these services will be increased to run every 30 minutes between Sunderland and Durham on evenings. Once per hour, these will be numbered as a 20, and once per hour as service 20A.

This means that, on Monday to Saturday evenings, we will be introducing later journeys to Chilton Moor and Rainton Bridge.

(23 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm)Dan wrote Out of interest, why do you think a faster bus between Sunderland and Newcastle on Sundays is useful, and a fast bus between Newcastle and Morpeth useful, but not a faster bus between Sunderland and Durham?

What makes those two corridors more important for a fast link than Sunderland to Durham?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(16 Dec 2023, 4:02 pm)Storx wrote Tenders for the Q3 and 35 are renewed in March 2024.

(23 Dec 2023, 3:55 pm)Aaron21 wrote Because there actually useful. What's wrong with the 20 to Langley Park alongside the 20A (of which changes have just been done for it)

If the 20A is withdrawn. We'll gne already wasting the money as mentioned here in changes for November 

Prince Bishops 20 | 20A

In partnership with Nexus and with financial support from the Government’s Bus Service Improvement Plan, these services will be increased to run every 30 minutes between Sunderland and Durham on evenings. Once per hour, these will be numbered as a 20, and once per hour as service 20A.

This means that, on Monday to Saturday evenings, we will be introducing later journeys to Chilton Moor and Rainton Bridge.

(23 Dec 2023, 3:44 pm)Dan wrote I’d say the restoration of the Arriva X16 and Go North East X20 services are genuine improvements based on the “current” network.

Local Authorities have strict subsidy control rules and strict governance policies, so can’t give out the money willy-nilly. They are ultimately responsible for whether a scheme goes ahead or not, and work in partnership with operators to deliver these.

At the same time, Local Authorities are also introducing new services - the 777 is a Northumberland County Council tender (won by Arriva), and Nexus have a similar tender live at the moment (not yet awarded to any operator).

Both combined - with more affordable fares - is a wise use of the BSIP funding.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(23 Dec 2023, 7:24 pm)Andreos1 wrote Welcome back Daniel. 

What about the Metrocentre P&R. Is that a wise use?

(23 Dec 2023, 7:51 pm)Dan wrote Is there going to be a dedicated service, or has it been over-hyped in the media and is merely existing services calling at the coach park after they leave the interchange?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(23 Dec 2023, 7:51 pm)Dan wrote Is there going to be a dedicated service, or has it been over-hyped in the media and is merely existing services calling at the coach park after they leave the interchange?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(23 Dec 2023, 8:12 pm)mb134 wrote That's possibly the worst case for everyone though? 

P&R punters aren't guaranteed a seat on busy services into town in the morning, and actual GNE passengers might not get a seat on their bus home in the evening as they've been behind P&R users in the queue (all dependent on how well used the site is). 

Obviously it'll add time to all of the services that pass through the MetroCentre too, which I assume will either mean an increase in PVR on all services or reduced layover and thus reduced reliability?

(23 Dec 2023, 9:47 pm)DaveFromUpNorth wrote Re: park and Ride Newcastle to Metrocentre

Wouldn't this be an excellent time to bring back to life the Service 100  run as it did before  except at the metrocentre it stops at the coach park and not in the interchange

Restoring a number that people know especially with car drivers could be the key.

At least if it does go to metrocentre it keeps the customers already on congested transport an opportunity for a seat

(23 Dec 2023, 4:54 pm)Aaron21 wrote So I wanna put this here. If this consultation was a success and the Q3 is cut from Osborne Road. Does this drop the Pvr by 2 buses. If this was the case. With the new Great Park Road opened. Could this now be the chance for the Q3 to go to Kingston Park as I know this was mental a while ago

(23 Dec 2023, 10:09 pm)Storx wrote Honestly not too sure, I'd assume Nexus will just save the money though. There's currently 3 subsidies on the Q3, I believe. One is obviously Osbourne Road (no longer paid), the Wallsend extension but not sure what the third is, Great Park I'd assume. If Nexus want to pay for it, it could happen otherwise I can't see it.

Personally the best thing Nexus could do is redirect the 342 via the Great Park rather than Hazlerigg and no-where, I'm surprised it hasn't happened yet tbh. Would offer some handy links for more people. Should be doable without any PVR changes, I'd assume most people from Dudley etc would prefer those links, unless they like going dogging.

(23 Dec 2023, 10:54 pm)Thomas12 wrote Q3 is a disgraceful service considering it has that many subsidies, never turns up half of the time.

(24 Dec 2023, 6:51 pm)Michael wrote Wonder if the X20 will be every 30 mins then the 20/20A every 20 mins each so they would combine for a service every 10 mins on certain sections of the route.

(24 Dec 2023, 6:59 pm)Storx wrote Confused here, you mean them staying both every 30 minutes and combining for 6 BPH?

(23 Dec 2023, 11:18 pm)logidoodah wrote considering it is run by some of the newest buses in the road too!

(23 Dec 2023, 9:47 pm)DaveFromUpNorth wrote Re: park and Ride Newcastle to Metrocentre

Wouldn't this be an excellent time to bring back to life the Service 100  run as it did before  except at the metrocentre it stops at the coach park and not in the interchange

Restoring a number that people know especially with car drivers could be the key.

At least if it does go to metrocentre it keeps the customers already on congested transport an opportunity for a seat

(24 Dec 2023, 6:51 pm)Michael wrote Wonder if the X20 will be every 30 mins then the 20/20A every 30 mins each so they would combine for a service every 10 mins on certain sections of the route.

Edit: Typo!

(24 Dec 2023, 9:31 pm)Iamtheone8483748 wrote So will the X20 not be running on evenings & sundays?

(24 Dec 2023, 9:27 pm)Retro Nero wrote Service 20 will be every 15 minutes day time with 2 per hour interworking with service 65 and every hour evenings and Sunday. 

Service 20A running on an evening and Sunday 1 per hour.

Service X20 running every 30 minutes with peak times serving Doxford International.

(24 Dec 2023, 9:54 pm)Michael wrote Shame the 20A is dropped again during the day, I take it, the 20 or X20 will be diverted that way during the day?

Edit:

Will X20 be timed between the 20 to make it every 7 mins between Park Lane and Barnes Park for example.

(24 Dec 2023, 10:08 pm)Retro Nero wrote X20 will serve Dairy Lane & Rainton Bridge.

(23 Dec 2023, 10:09 pm)Storx wrote Honestly not too sure, I'd assume Nexus will just save the money though. There's currently 3 subsidies on the Q3, I believe. One is obviously Osbourne Road (no longer paid), the Wallsend extension but not sure what the third is, Great Park I'd assume. If Nexus want to pay for it, it could happen otherwise I can't see it.

Personally the best thing Nexus could do is redirect the 342 via the Great Park rather than Hazlerigg and no-where, I'm surprised it hasn't happened yet tbh. Would offer some handy links for more people. Should be doable without any PVR changes, I'd assume most people from Dudley etc would prefer those links, unless they like going dogging.

(23 Dec 2023, 3:26 pm)DeltaMan wrote Some would say the difference is that Stagecoach aren't using public money to restore something that was previously a commercial service. It is a genuine improvement. 

Whereas in the examples given, it *APPEARS* that Arriva and GNE are wanting to use public money to pay for services which were clearly commercial before they were reduced for staffing reasons.  

It might be allowed by the letter of BSIP. But I don't think it's within the spirit of it, personally.

(22 Dec 2023, 5:52 pm)L469 YVK wrote Realistically, branding needs to go IMO. Serves no purpose especially in the current climate.

Only routes that really need branded........

- XLines - Generic - Express buses across the North East
X10, X21, X30, X31

- CityLink
21, 56

- CoastCityLinks (in conjunction with Arriva)
306, 307, 308, 309

- CityConnect
Q3, 53, 54

Rest can go IMO including the X45 going back to 45 and 47 becoming the 46.

(23 Dec 2023, 2:26 pm)Aaron21 wrote Can't wait to read "With funding from Nexus & The BSIP" we will be bringing back the X20.