(21 Aug 2013, 3:03 pm)gtomlinson wrote Maybe its relative perception, like how Waggonway pax will soon feel a 12 year old Solar is luxury

(21 Aug 2013, 3:37 pm)the pilot wrote Prepare for another 56 moan:
I'm and 4936 on its nine minute late departure from Sunderland and I have done issues. Firstly, somebody has stolen the used ticket bin but the passengers have just been leaving their tickets where it was because it says used tickets please... I'm hoping for some heavy breaking between Donwell and Wrekenton so we should see those tickets fly further than a new Boeing 787-8 (aviation humour, wrong thread, sorry). Secondly the side blind has malfunctioned and is stuck on Not In Service. Thirdly, the newspaper box is on the different side of the bus to all of the others. Fourthly, I've just been overtaken! Fifthly, there were three fabs at Park Lane when I left, proving that services cannot keep there time. Sixthly, (at Donwell, tickets have painted floor) there is a Fast Cats (or Cats Fast) on the 56 at Concord! Seventhly, 8234 is right behind it, two buses off the road and one of them is late. Eighthly, some youths on BMX bikes have just thrown some stones at the bus and the driver has just announced that the CCTV on this is not working, where is justice? I'll tell you!!! Justice is the lads from Nissan on the back seats hurling some abusive hand gestures at them! Hoorah! Which brings me to ninethly, why is there a huge gap between seat and backrest on the back seats? It bypasses all immensity of logic and sense!!! I DEMAND BETTER BUSES, A BETTER SCHEDULE, AND AN EXPRESS BECAUSE THIS TAKES FOREVER TO GET TO WREKENTON... Jeez!

(21 Aug 2013, 3:59 pm)Rob wrote Better buses = Check
Better schedule = Layover could be increased, but then you have the problem of buses queuing to get to a stand at either end of the route all day, every day. Alternative is to reduce the frequency, so does a bus every 15 minutes suit you better?
Express = Is there really demand for an express between Wrekenton and Sunderland?

(21 Aug 2013, 3:59 pm)Rob wrote Better buses = Check
Better schedule = Layover could be increased, but then you have the problem of buses queuing to get to a stand at either end of the route all day, every day. Alternative is to reduce the frequency, so does a bus every 15 minutes suit you better?
Express = Is there really demand for an express between Wrekenton and Sunderland?

(21 Aug 2013, 3:37 pm)the pilot wrote Thirdly, the newspaper box is on the different side of the bus to all of the others. Fourthly, I've just been overtaken!

(21 Aug 2013, 4:45 pm)Daniel wrote Why was the X2 withdrawn?

(21 Aug 2013, 4:48 pm)Andreos1 wrote To increase day ticket sales? To force people onto the 8 or 56?
Certainly wasn't because of low numbers, as stated above, it always carried good loads.

The route still exists (proving there is demand along the route), you just have to get an 8 and X1, rather than one bus for the entire journey.

(21 Aug 2013, 4:52 pm)Daniel wrote Perhaps I should have worded that differently... What was GNE's reasoning for withdrawing it (ie what did they say in the news article)?

(21 Aug 2013, 4:52 pm)Daniel wrote Perhaps I should have worded that differently... What was GNE's reasoning for withdrawing it (ie what did they say in the news article)?

(21 Aug 2013, 4:42 pm)the pilot wrote If you were to take the Seven Stars at Wrekenton as an example, you may recall that at one time the stop was served by a fifteen minutely 56, a 725 (which I believe became a 25? prior to being the X25) and the 28. Today it is only the 56 and the hourly 28. It would seem to me that the 56 could be run as an acceptable 15 minutely service in this area if the X25 was no longer run as an express.

(21 Aug 2013, 5:12 pm)big mac wrote I've never understood why the Chester-le-Street based services that serve Old Durham Road can't just serve all the stops between Gateshead and Wrekenton. What difference will it really make to the timing?

(21 Aug 2013, 5:12 pm)Andreos1 wrote Not sure to be honest, it might be on that time machine website that people keep putting links up from.

(21 Aug 2013, 5:20 pm)BJ10VUS wrote I think it could add quite a bit of extra time if the services were to stop at extra bus stops on Durham Road. The 56 and 57 already suffer quite badly from having to stop when the services are busy - it takes more time than you think, especially when people don't have their money ready etc.



I used the 'time machine' website to get the information I provided above

(21 Aug 2013, 5:52 pm)Andreos1 wrote Ah didn't see your reply.
Thought I had pressed the submit button, realised I hadn't and on checking, you had already given the answer, all be it the full one! :p

(21 Aug 2013, 5:20 pm)BJ10VUS wrote I think it could add quite a bit of extra time if the services were to stop at extra bus stops on Durham Road. The 56 and 57 already suffer quite badly from having to stop when the services are busy - it takes more time than you think, especially when people don't have their money ready etc.

(21 Aug 2013, 4:47 pm)BJ10VUS wrote Does it really matter which side the newspaper box is on? Also, the Washington bound 'M' services regularly get overtaken on the road between Follingsby Roundabout and Usworth College - it's a bus, not a Ferrari?

I agree that the 56 suffers from problems with timekeeping, but it's to be expected from a longer distance route that serves two city centres - especially during peak hours.

The Solars are sound vehicles most of the time and while the route could do with some bigger vehicles, they're hardly unpleasant.

The mess from tickets on the floor thing is hardly a reason for Go North East to invest in new buses for the route and also has nothing to do with the speed/reliability of the route - it just shows that some of the passengers have no respect for the buses they currently use by leaving mess.

(21 Aug 2013, 1:37 pm)Wellsey18 wrote what more were you expecting heated seats? Seats that fold into beds? At the end of the day its still a bus and its more how technologically it is different and these buses could be the start of a new revolution of buses and how they are built in the future, these are probably the best buses in the fleet the same with arrivas as well

(21 Aug 2013, 6:07 pm)the pilot wrote Overtaken by another 56... not a car.
The tickets on the floor are a product of a missing used ticket bin with a sign saying used tickets here.

(21 Aug 2013, 4:15 pm)Michael wrote Some1 asked on FB and they said 2 had broken down... when i was in park lane at about 12ish.. their was 3 parked up, 2 in sidings and 1 at stand.

(21 Aug 2013, 4:48 pm)Andreos1 wrote To increase day ticket sales? To force people onto the 8 or 56?
Certainly wasn't because of low numbers, as stated above, it always carried good loads.

The route still exists (proving there is demand along the route), you just have to get an 8 and X1, rather than one bus for the entire journey.

(21 Aug 2013, 7:55 pm)Adam Malarkey wrote It was replaced by the re-introduction of the Lime 8 between Washington and Sunderland, along with the 2A/2C which combined gave a greatly increased frequency.

(21 Aug 2013, 8:43 pm)aureolin wrote I'm afraid I disagree with that. Looking at circa 2003/2004, I've found the following info:

Galleries to Sunderland. 7 buses an hour.
X2 - 12 mins past the hour
185 - 17 mins past the hour
X8 - 25 mins past the hour
X4 - 37 mins past the hour
186 - 42 mins past the hour
638 - 48 mins past the hour
X6 - 55 mins past the hour

Source

Galleries to Newcastle. 5 buses an hour.
X2 - 9 mins past the hour
X90 - 23 mins past the hour
X4 - 34 mins past the hour
X5 - 44 mins past the hour
X94 - 55 mins past the hour

Source

Compared to now. You've got 6 2A/2C buses to Sunderland an hour, and 2 8's in addition. A total of 8 an hour. Newcastle has 6 X1's an hour. I wouldn't say removal of choice for the addition of one bus an hour each way is an improvement?