Menu
 
North East Buses Local Bus Scene Go North East 28th January 2024 changes

28th January 2024 changes

28th January 2024 changes

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
 
Pages (8): Previous 1 2 38 Next
916
22 Dec 2023, 4:07 pm
#21
(22 Dec 2023, 4:07 pm)ne14ne1 Why?

Enthusiast foam
F114TML
22 Dec 2023, 4:07 pm #21

(22 Dec 2023, 4:07 pm)ne14ne1 Why?

Enthusiast foam

3563
22 Dec 2023, 5:52 pm
#22
(22 Dec 2023, 4:07 pm)F114TML Enthusiast foam

Realistically, branding needs to go IMO. Serves no purpose especially in the current climate.

Only routes that really need branded........

- XLines - Generic - Express buses across the North East
X10, X21, X30, X31

- CityLink
21, 56

- CoastCityLinks (in conjunction with Arriva)
306, 307, 308, 309

- CityConnect
Q3, 53, 54

Rest can go IMO including the X45 going back to 45 and 47 becoming the 46.
L469 YVK
22 Dec 2023, 5:52 pm #22

(22 Dec 2023, 4:07 pm)F114TML Enthusiast foam

Realistically, branding needs to go IMO. Serves no purpose especially in the current climate.

Only routes that really need branded........

- XLines - Generic - Express buses across the North East
X10, X21, X30, X31

- CityLink
21, 56

- CoastCityLinks (in conjunction with Arriva)
306, 307, 308, 309

- CityConnect
Q3, 53, 54

Rest can go IMO including the X45 going back to 45 and 47 becoming the 46.

22 Dec 2023, 6:09 pm
#23
(22 Dec 2023, 5:52 pm)L469 YVK Realistically, branding needs to go IMO. Serves no purpose especially in the current climate.

Only routes that really need branded........

- XLines - Generic - Express buses across the North East
X10, X21, X30, X31

- CityLink
21, 56

- CoastCityLinks (in conjunction with Arriva)
306, 307, 308, 309

- CityConnect
Q3, 53, 54

Rest can go IMO including the X45 going back to 45 and 47 becoming the 46.

On that logic, the 20s could be city link, too, completing the triangle.
BusLoverMum
22 Dec 2023, 6:09 pm #23

(22 Dec 2023, 5:52 pm)L469 YVK Realistically, branding needs to go IMO. Serves no purpose especially in the current climate.

Only routes that really need branded........

- XLines - Generic - Express buses across the North East
X10, X21, X30, X31

- CityLink
21, 56

- CoastCityLinks (in conjunction with Arriva)
306, 307, 308, 309

- CityConnect
Q3, 53, 54

Rest can go IMO including the X45 going back to 45 and 47 becoming the 46.

On that logic, the 20s could be city link, too, completing the triangle.

22 Dec 2023, 6:33 pm
#24
Quote:PB0003954/795
Variation GO NORTH EAST LIMITED 65 (65) Seaham Durham

Any ideas what is changing here? Hopefully back to hourly on Sundays


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
GrahamD83
22 Dec 2023, 6:33 pm #24

Quote:PB0003954/795
Variation GO NORTH EAST LIMITED 65 (65) Seaham Durham

Any ideas what is changing here? Hopefully back to hourly on Sundays


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

1526
22 Dec 2023, 9:43 pm
#25
(22 Dec 2023, 4:07 pm)F114TML Enthusiast foam

Thought so.
ne14ne1
22 Dec 2023, 9:43 pm #25

(22 Dec 2023, 4:07 pm)F114TML Enthusiast foam

Thought so.

23 Dec 2023, 2:09 pm
#26
(21 Dec 2023, 9:58 pm)Unber43 I think the X20 will be Sunderland - Barnes - Bede - Prospect - Bored Inn - NON STOP - Houghton - NON STOP - Durham

I'd be Bored in the Board Inn too.

After Houghton would likely do as before, via the Business Park and Rainton Arena then A690, The Sportsman and rejoin A690 after the business park stops that it used to serve.
54APhotography
23 Dec 2023, 2:09 pm #26

(21 Dec 2023, 9:58 pm)Unber43 I think the X20 will be Sunderland - Barnes - Bede - Prospect - Bored Inn - NON STOP - Houghton - NON STOP - Durham

I'd be Bored in the Board Inn too.

After Houghton would likely do as before, via the Business Park and Rainton Arena then A690, The Sportsman and rejoin A690 after the business park stops that it used to serve.

803
23 Dec 2023, 2:26 pm
#27
Can't wait to read "With funding from Nexus & The BSIP" we will be bringing back the X20.
Aaron21
23 Dec 2023, 2:26 pm #27

Can't wait to read "With funding from Nexus & The BSIP" we will be bringing back the X20.

Dan
Site Administrator
18141
23 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
#28
(23 Dec 2023, 2:26 pm)Aaron21 Can't wait to read "With funding from Nexus & The BSIP" we will be bringing back the X20.


Isn’t that the purpose of the Bus Service Improvement Plan?

I didn’t see you make this comment about Stagecoach’s X24/X34, or Arriva’s X16?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dan
23 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm #28

(23 Dec 2023, 2:26 pm)Aaron21 Can't wait to read "With funding from Nexus & The BSIP" we will be bringing back the X20.


Isn’t that the purpose of the Bus Service Improvement Plan?

I didn’t see you make this comment about Stagecoach’s X24/X34, or Arriva’s X16?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

1526
23 Dec 2023, 3:09 pm
#29
(23 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm)Dan Isn’t that the purpose of the Bus Service Improvement Plan?

I’ve been starting to wonder, (granted, not enough to actually dig it out and read it yet).
Surely the money will sharp go down if it can be used to simply RESTORE a service cut by commercial operators, rather than IMPROVING bus service/infrastructure already there - so we have something new to show for it.
ne14ne1
23 Dec 2023, 3:09 pm #29

(23 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm)Dan Isn’t that the purpose of the Bus Service Improvement Plan?

I’ve been starting to wonder, (granted, not enough to actually dig it out and read it yet).
Surely the money will sharp go down if it can be used to simply RESTORE a service cut by commercial operators, rather than IMPROVING bus service/infrastructure already there - so we have something new to show for it.

569
23 Dec 2023, 3:26 pm
#30
(23 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm)Dan Isn’t that the purpose of the Bus Service Improvement Plan?

I didn’t see you make this comment about Stagecoach’s X24/X34, or Arriva’s X16?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Some would say the difference is that Stagecoach aren't using public money to restore something that was previously a commercial service. It is a genuine improvement. 

Whereas in the examples given, it *APPEARS* that Arriva and GNE are wanting to use public money to pay for services which were clearly commercial before they were reduced for staffing reasons.  

It might be allowed by the letter of BSIP. But I don't think it's within the spirit of it, personally.
DeltaMan
23 Dec 2023, 3:26 pm #30

(23 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm)Dan Isn’t that the purpose of the Bus Service Improvement Plan?

I didn’t see you make this comment about Stagecoach’s X24/X34, or Arriva’s X16?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Some would say the difference is that Stagecoach aren't using public money to restore something that was previously a commercial service. It is a genuine improvement. 

Whereas in the examples given, it *APPEARS* that Arriva and GNE are wanting to use public money to pay for services which were clearly commercial before they were reduced for staffing reasons.  

It might be allowed by the letter of BSIP. But I don't think it's within the spirit of it, personally.

Dan
Site Administrator
18141
23 Dec 2023, 3:44 pm
#31
(23 Dec 2023, 3:26 pm)DeltaMan Some would say the difference is that Stagecoach aren't using public money to restore something that was previously a commercial service. It is a genuine improvement. 

Whereas in the examples given, it *APPEARS* that Arriva and GNE are wanting to use public money to pay for services which were clearly commercial before they were reduced for staffing reasons.  

It might be allowed by the letter of BSIP. But I don't think it's within the spirit of it, personally.

I’d say the restoration of the Arriva X16 and Go North East X20 services are genuine improvements based on the “current” network.

Local Authorities have strict subsidy control rules and governance policies, so can’t give out the money willy-nilly. They are ultimately responsible for whether a scheme goes ahead or not, and work in partnership with operators to deliver these.

At the same time, Local Authorities are also introducing new services - the 777 is a Northumberland County Council tender (won by Arriva), and Nexus have a similar tender live at the moment (not yet awarded to any operator).

Both combined - with more affordable fares - is a wise use of the BSIP funding.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dan
23 Dec 2023, 3:44 pm #31

(23 Dec 2023, 3:26 pm)DeltaMan Some would say the difference is that Stagecoach aren't using public money to restore something that was previously a commercial service. It is a genuine improvement. 

Whereas in the examples given, it *APPEARS* that Arriva and GNE are wanting to use public money to pay for services which were clearly commercial before they were reduced for staffing reasons.  

It might be allowed by the letter of BSIP. But I don't think it's within the spirit of it, personally.

I’d say the restoration of the Arriva X16 and Go North East X20 services are genuine improvements based on the “current” network.

Local Authorities have strict subsidy control rules and governance policies, so can’t give out the money willy-nilly. They are ultimately responsible for whether a scheme goes ahead or not, and work in partnership with operators to deliver these.

At the same time, Local Authorities are also introducing new services - the 777 is a Northumberland County Council tender (won by Arriva), and Nexus have a similar tender live at the moment (not yet awarded to any operator).

Both combined - with more affordable fares - is a wise use of the BSIP funding.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

803
23 Dec 2023, 3:55 pm
#32
(23 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm)Dan Isn’t that the purpose of the Bus Service Improvement Plan?

I didn’t see you make this comment about Stagecoach’s X24/X34, or Arriva’s X16?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Because there actually useful. What's wrong with the 20 to Langley Park alongside the 20A (of which changes have just been done for it)

If the 20A is withdrawn. We'll gne already wasting the money as mentioned here in changes for November 

Prince Bishops 20 | 20A

In partnership with Nexus and with financial support from the Government’s Bus Service Improvement Plan, these services will be increased to run every 30 minutes between Sunderland and Durham on evenings. Once per hour, these will be numbered as a 20, and once per hour as service 20A.

This means that, on Monday to Saturday evenings, we will be introducing later journeys to Chilton Moor and Rainton Bridge.
Aaron21
23 Dec 2023, 3:55 pm #32

(23 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm)Dan Isn’t that the purpose of the Bus Service Improvement Plan?

I didn’t see you make this comment about Stagecoach’s X24/X34, or Arriva’s X16?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Because there actually useful. What's wrong with the 20 to Langley Park alongside the 20A (of which changes have just been done for it)

If the 20A is withdrawn. We'll gne already wasting the money as mentioned here in changes for November 

Prince Bishops 20 | 20A

In partnership with Nexus and with financial support from the Government’s Bus Service Improvement Plan, these services will be increased to run every 30 minutes between Sunderland and Durham on evenings. Once per hour, these will be numbered as a 20, and once per hour as service 20A.

This means that, on Monday to Saturday evenings, we will be introducing later journeys to Chilton Moor and Rainton Bridge.

Dan
Site Administrator
18141
23 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm
#33
(23 Dec 2023, 3:55 pm)Aaron21 Because there actually useful. What's wrong with the 20 to Langley Park alongside the 20A (of which changes have just been done for it)

If the 20A is withdrawn. We'll gne already wasting the money as mentioned here in changes for November 

Prince Bishops 20 | 20A

In partnership with Nexus and with financial support from the Government’s Bus Service Improvement Plan, these services will be increased to run every 30 minutes between Sunderland and Durham on evenings. Once per hour, these will be numbered as a 20, and once per hour as service 20A.

This means that, on Monday to Saturday evenings, we will be introducing later journeys to Chilton Moor and Rainton Bridge.


Out of interest, why do you think a faster bus between Sunderland and Newcastle on Sundays is useful, and a fast bus between Newcastle and Morpeth useful, but not a faster bus between Sunderland and Durham?

What makes those two corridors more important for a fast link than Sunderland to Durham?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dan
23 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm #33

(23 Dec 2023, 3:55 pm)Aaron21 Because there actually useful. What's wrong with the 20 to Langley Park alongside the 20A (of which changes have just been done for it)

If the 20A is withdrawn. We'll gne already wasting the money as mentioned here in changes for November 

Prince Bishops 20 | 20A

In partnership with Nexus and with financial support from the Government’s Bus Service Improvement Plan, these services will be increased to run every 30 minutes between Sunderland and Durham on evenings. Once per hour, these will be numbered as a 20, and once per hour as service 20A.

This means that, on Monday to Saturday evenings, we will be introducing later journeys to Chilton Moor and Rainton Bridge.


Out of interest, why do you think a faster bus between Sunderland and Newcastle on Sundays is useful, and a fast bus between Newcastle and Morpeth useful, but not a faster bus between Sunderland and Durham?

What makes those two corridors more important for a fast link than Sunderland to Durham?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

803
23 Dec 2023, 4:31 pm
#34
(23 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm)Dan Out of interest, why do you think a faster bus between Sunderland and Newcastle on Sundays is useful, and a fast bus between Newcastle and Morpeth useful, but not a faster bus between Sunderland and Durham?

What makes those two corridors more important for a fast link than Sunderland to Durham?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If that was the case. Why was the X20 withdrawn in the first place with the 20 extended to Langley & the 20A introduced. If it was to cut cancelled services then that confusing to me. 

A fast service to Newcastle & Morpeth. Have you not been in Haymarket seeing queue stretch far for the X14/X15/X16/X18. Have you not seen the amount of times the line between Newcastle & Sunderland is closed. 

Do the public in Sunderland really miss the X20. Cause passengers loading on the 20/20A seem fine to me to Durham. 

Also do people really need a quick link to Durham from Sunderland. When I rode the X20 to Durham it didn't seem any quicker than the 20. That's just my opinion. But I shall sit and wait the response telling me that the X20 is more reliable or something like that
Aaron21
23 Dec 2023, 4:31 pm #34

(23 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm)Dan Out of interest, why do you think a faster bus between Sunderland and Newcastle on Sundays is useful, and a fast bus between Newcastle and Morpeth useful, but not a faster bus between Sunderland and Durham?

What makes those two corridors more important for a fast link than Sunderland to Durham?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If that was the case. Why was the X20 withdrawn in the first place with the 20 extended to Langley & the 20A introduced. If it was to cut cancelled services then that confusing to me. 

A fast service to Newcastle & Morpeth. Have you not been in Haymarket seeing queue stretch far for the X14/X15/X16/X18. Have you not seen the amount of times the line between Newcastle & Sunderland is closed. 

Do the public in Sunderland really miss the X20. Cause passengers loading on the 20/20A seem fine to me to Durham. 

Also do people really need a quick link to Durham from Sunderland. When I rode the X20 to Durham it didn't seem any quicker than the 20. That's just my opinion. But I shall sit and wait the response telling me that the X20 is more reliable or something like that

803
23 Dec 2023, 4:54 pm
#35
(16 Dec 2023, 4:02 pm)Storx Tenders for the Q3 and 35 are renewed in March 2024.

So I wanna put this here. If this consultation was a success and the Q3 is cut from Osborne Road. Does this drop the Pvr by 2 buses. If this was the case. With the new Great Park Road opened. Could this now be the chance for the Q3 to go to Kingston Park as I know this was mental a while ago
Aaron21
23 Dec 2023, 4:54 pm #35

(16 Dec 2023, 4:02 pm)Storx Tenders for the Q3 and 35 are renewed in March 2024.

So I wanna put this here. If this consultation was a success and the Q3 is cut from Osborne Road. Does this drop the Pvr by 2 buses. If this was the case. With the new Great Park Road opened. Could this now be the chance for the Q3 to go to Kingston Park as I know this was mental a while ago

23 Dec 2023, 5:24 pm
#36
(23 Dec 2023, 3:55 pm)Aaron21 Because there actually useful. What's wrong with the 20 to Langley Park alongside the 20A (of which changes have just been done for it)

If the 20A is withdrawn. We'll gne already wasting the money as mentioned here in changes for November 

Prince Bishops 20 | 20A

In partnership with Nexus and with financial support from the Government’s Bus Service Improvement Plan, these services will be increased to run every 30 minutes between Sunderland and Durham on evenings. Once per hour, these will be numbered as a 20, and once per hour as service 20A.

This means that, on Monday to Saturday evenings, we will be introducing later journeys to Chilton Moor and Rainton Bridge.
They already run on an evening as 20A
Retro Nero
23 Dec 2023, 5:24 pm #36

(23 Dec 2023, 3:55 pm)Aaron21 Because there actually useful. What's wrong with the 20 to Langley Park alongside the 20A (of which changes have just been done for it)

If the 20A is withdrawn. We'll gne already wasting the money as mentioned here in changes for November 

Prince Bishops 20 | 20A

In partnership with Nexus and with financial support from the Government’s Bus Service Improvement Plan, these services will be increased to run every 30 minutes between Sunderland and Durham on evenings. Once per hour, these will be numbered as a 20, and once per hour as service 20A.

This means that, on Monday to Saturday evenings, we will be introducing later journeys to Chilton Moor and Rainton Bridge.
They already run on an evening as 20A

14273
23 Dec 2023, 7:24 pm
#37
(23 Dec 2023, 3:44 pm)Dan I’d say the restoration of the Arriva X16 and Go North East X20 services are genuine improvements based on the “current” network.

Local Authorities have strict subsidy control rules and strict governance policies, so can’t give out the money willy-nilly. They are ultimately responsible for whether a scheme goes ahead or not, and work in partnership with operators to deliver these.

At the same time, Local Authorities are also introducing new services - the 777 is a Northumberland County Council tender (won by Arriva), and Nexus have a similar tender live at the moment (not yet awarded to any operator).

Both combined - with more affordable fares - is a wise use of the BSIP funding.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Welcome back Daniel. 

What about the Metrocentre P&R. Is that a wise use?

'Illegitimis non carborundum'
Andreos1
23 Dec 2023, 7:24 pm #37

(23 Dec 2023, 3:44 pm)Dan I’d say the restoration of the Arriva X16 and Go North East X20 services are genuine improvements based on the “current” network.

Local Authorities have strict subsidy control rules and strict governance policies, so can’t give out the money willy-nilly. They are ultimately responsible for whether a scheme goes ahead or not, and work in partnership with operators to deliver these.

At the same time, Local Authorities are also introducing new services - the 777 is a Northumberland County Council tender (won by Arriva), and Nexus have a similar tender live at the moment (not yet awarded to any operator).

Both combined - with more affordable fares - is a wise use of the BSIP funding.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Welcome back Daniel. 

What about the Metrocentre P&R. Is that a wise use?


'Illegitimis non carborundum'

Dan
Site Administrator
18141
23 Dec 2023, 7:51 pm
#38
(23 Dec 2023, 7:24 pm)Andreos1 Welcome back Daniel. 

What about the Metrocentre P&R. Is that a wise use?


Is there going to be a dedicated service, or has it been over-hyped in the media and is merely existing services calling at the coach park after they leave the interchange?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dan
23 Dec 2023, 7:51 pm #38

(23 Dec 2023, 7:24 pm)Andreos1 Welcome back Daniel. 

What about the Metrocentre P&R. Is that a wise use?


Is there going to be a dedicated service, or has it been over-hyped in the media and is merely existing services calling at the coach park after they leave the interchange?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

14273
23 Dec 2023, 8:06 pm
#39
(23 Dec 2023, 7:51 pm)Dan Is there going to be a dedicated service, or has it been over-hyped in the media and is merely existing services calling at the coach park after they leave the interchange?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So you're saying they're spaffing all this money up the wall for existing services?!

'Illegitimis non carborundum'
Andreos1
23 Dec 2023, 8:06 pm #39

(23 Dec 2023, 7:51 pm)Dan Is there going to be a dedicated service, or has it been over-hyped in the media and is merely existing services calling at the coach park after they leave the interchange?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So you're saying they're spaffing all this money up the wall for existing services?!


'Illegitimis non carborundum'

4177
23 Dec 2023, 8:12 pm
#40
(23 Dec 2023, 7:51 pm)Dan Is there going to be a dedicated service, or has it been over-hyped in the media and is merely existing services calling at the coach park after they leave the interchange?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's possibly the worst case for everyone though? 

P&R punters aren't guaranteed a seat on busy services into town in the morning, and actual GNE passengers might not get a seat on their bus home in the evening as they've been behind P&R users in the queue (all dependent on how well used the site is). 

Obviously it'll add time to all of the services that pass through the MetroCentre too, which I assume will either mean an increase in PVR on all services or reduced layover and thus reduced reliability?
mb134
23 Dec 2023, 8:12 pm #40

(23 Dec 2023, 7:51 pm)Dan Is there going to be a dedicated service, or has it been over-hyped in the media and is merely existing services calling at the coach park after they leave the interchange?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's possibly the worst case for everyone though? 

P&R punters aren't guaranteed a seat on busy services into town in the morning, and actual GNE passengers might not get a seat on their bus home in the evening as they've been behind P&R users in the queue (all dependent on how well used the site is). 

Obviously it'll add time to all of the services that pass through the MetroCentre too, which I assume will either mean an increase in PVR on all services or reduced layover and thus reduced reliability?

Pages (8): Previous 1 2 38 Next
 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average