(26 Apr 2016, 1:18 pm)JP6004 Possibly. Would make sense to have the same brand for same corridor. Similar to what they have done for the 5 & 50
(26 Apr 2016, 1:18 pm)JP6004 Possibly. Would make sense to have the same brand for same corridor. Similar to what they have done for the 5 & 50
(26 Apr 2016, 1:28 pm)Michael Would be a good idea, especially when they'll be a service every 7/8 minutes combined with the 2/2A, running between Chester Road, City Centre, Grangetown and Tunstall Village.
I'm sure the people of the 34/34A won't mind having Scania's....
(26 Apr 2016, 1:28 pm)Michael Would be a good idea, especially when they'll be a service every 7/8 minutes combined with the 2/2A, running between Chester Road, City Centre, Grangetown and Tunstall Village.
I'm sure the people of the 34/34A won't mind having Scania's....
(26 Apr 2016, 2:14 pm)Dan I doubt the 34/34A services will be downgraded.
(26 Apr 2016, 2:14 pm)Dan I doubt the 34/34A services will be downgraded.
(26 Apr 2016, 2:28 pm)citaro5284 I just love Michael's guessing games
(26 Apr 2016, 2:17 pm)JP6004 With that being said - 3 to riverside (1 for 88) and one to remain at Deptford...
(26 Apr 2016, 2:17 pm)JP6004 With that being said - 3 to riverside (1 for 88) and one to remain at Deptford...
(26 Apr 2016, 2:33 pm)cbma06 Why don't you and Dan announce to other members on this forum what will be getting used on service 39 etc..., at least Michael is suggesting what could go on and he doesn't even work for GNE.
(26 Apr 2016, 2:33 pm)cbma06 Why don't you and Dan announce to other members on this forum what will be getting used on service 39 etc..., at least Michael is suggesting what could go on and he doesn't even work for GNE.
PB0002400/448 - GO NORTHERN LTD T/A GO NORTH EAST, 117 QUEEN STREET, GATESHEAD, NE8 2UA
Variation Accepted by SN: Operating between Sunderland Park Lane Interchange and Sunderland Park Lane Interchange given service number 135/136 effective from 22-May-2016. To amend Timetable.
(26 Apr 2016, 3:15 pm)NK53 TKT PB0002400/448 - GO NORTHERN LTD T/A GO NORTH EAST, 117 QUEEN STREET, GATESHEAD, NE8 2UA
Variation Accepted by SN: Operating between Sunderland Park Lane Interchange and Sunderland Park Lane Interchange given service number 135/136 effective from 22-May-2016. To amend Timetable.
(26 Apr 2016, 3:15 pm)NK53 TKT PB0002400/448 - GO NORTHERN LTD T/A GO NORTH EAST, 117 QUEEN STREET, GATESHEAD, NE8 2UA
Variation Accepted by SN: Operating between Sunderland Park Lane Interchange and Sunderland Park Lane Interchange given service number 135/136 effective from 22-May-2016. To amend Timetable.
(26 Apr 2016, 2:37 pm)Dan The Versa couldn't be used on the 88 even if it was branded for this purpose - one board on the 88 has a Misc Works portion which requires the capacity of a full size single deck, hence the allocation of a Scania L94.
(26 Apr 2016, 2:37 pm)Dan The Versa couldn't be used on the 88 even if it was branded for this purpose - one board on the 88 has a Misc Works portion which requires the capacity of a full size single deck, hence the allocation of a Scania L94.
(26 Apr 2016, 3:14 pm)Michael Just to add, it seems daft having the 2/2A/39 on the same timetable when it looks like the 39 won't be using Versa's!
(26 Apr 2016, 3:14 pm)Michael Just to add, it seems daft having the 2/2A/39 on the same timetable when it looks like the 39 won't be using Versa's!
(26 Apr 2016, 3:37 pm)Dan That's just the VOSA timetable for when the service was being planned and registered.
I would imagine it would be easier to plan the coordinated 7/8 minute frequency if it was all on the same timetable.
(26 Apr 2016, 3:37 pm)Dan That's just the VOSA timetable for when the service was being planned and registered.
I would imagine it would be easier to plan the coordinated 7/8 minute frequency if it was all on the same timetable.
(26 Apr 2016, 3:42 pm)Michael It is but i bet most people would be expecting a purple bus on the 39 if the timetable shows a picture of one.
(26 Apr 2016, 3:42 pm)Michael It is but i bet most people would be expecting a purple bus on the 39 if the timetable shows a picture of one.
(26 Apr 2016, 3:45 pm)Dan But the 39 timetable won't show an image of a purple bus?
The timetable which has been uploaded to the website is the one which went to VOSA. When the company's commercial department were working on the changes, they would have wanted to see the 2 and the 39 timetable together so that they could provide the streamlined frequency.
I'm not sure what indication there has been to suggest that the actual published timetable will have the 2 and 39 on it?
(26 Apr 2016, 3:45 pm)Dan But the 39 timetable won't show an image of a purple bus?
The timetable which has been uploaded to the website is the one which went to VOSA. When the company's commercial department were working on the changes, they would have wanted to see the 2 and the 39 timetable together so that they could provide the streamlined frequency.
I'm not sure what indication there has been to suggest that the actual published timetable will have the 2 and 39 on it?
(26 Apr 2016, 3:42 pm)Michael It is but i bet most people would be expecting a purple bus on the 39 if the timetable shows a picture of one.
(26 Apr 2016, 3:42 pm)Michael It is but i bet most people would be expecting a purple bus on the 39 if the timetable shows a picture of one.
(26 Apr 2016, 3:48 pm)Michael Oh right, oh well that's alright then!
The timetable which GNE uploaded, as now explained it was the one sent to VOSA, like myself, a few other members didn't know that the timetable uploaded was the one sent to VOSA, i always thought it was just a GNE temporary style for timetables.
(26 Apr 2016, 3:48 pm)Michael Oh right, oh well that's alright then!
The timetable which GNE uploaded, as now explained it was the one sent to VOSA, like myself, a few other members didn't know that the timetable uploaded was the one sent to VOSA, i always thought it was just a GNE temporary style for timetables.