Menu
 
North East Buses Local Bus Scene Go North East Go North East: Latest News & Discussion - September 2017

Go North East: Latest News & Discussion - September 2017

Go North East: Latest News & Discussion - September 2017

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
 
Pages (21) Previous 15 6 721 Next
citaro5284



3,234
05 Sep 2017, 11:48 am #101
(05 Sep 2017, 11:19 am)cbma06 One of the new buses for X9/X10 was out on route learning this morning , seen at 10:10 at A19 peterlee roundabout heading   north bound.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It is out testing the next stop system on it - it is 6308
citaro5284
05 Sep 2017, 11:48 am #101

(05 Sep 2017, 11:19 am)cbma06 One of the new buses for X9/X10 was out on route learning this morning , seen at 10:10 at A19 peterlee roundabout heading   north bound.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It is out testing the next stop system on it - it is 6308

Dan

Site Administrator

18,128
05 Sep 2017, 11:59 am #102
(05 Sep 2017, 11:48 am)citaro5284 It is out testing the next stop system on it - it is 6308

Some would suggest it was aptly showing Driver Training on the display! Angel
Dan
05 Sep 2017, 11:59 am #102

(05 Sep 2017, 11:48 am)citaro5284 It is out testing the next stop system on it - it is 6308

Some would suggest it was aptly showing Driver Training on the display! Angel

cbma06



2,669
05 Sep 2017, 12:21 pm #103
(05 Sep 2017, 11:22 am)S830OFT Indigo Peterlee 663 is on Coast Road next to Jesmond Depot. Anyone know why it's over in Newcastle?


I've heard that 705 been transferred to Peterlee, so looks like peterlee lost another solo from the original batch.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Edited 05 Sep 2017, 12:24 pm by cbma06.


cbma06
05 Sep 2017, 12:21 pm #103

(05 Sep 2017, 11:22 am)S830OFT Indigo Peterlee 663 is on Coast Road next to Jesmond Depot. Anyone know why it's over in Newcastle?


I've heard that 705 been transferred to Peterlee, so looks like peterlee lost another solo from the original batch.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



Dan

Site Administrator

18,128
05 Sep 2017, 12:48 pm #104
(05 Sep 2017, 12:21 pm)cbma06 I've heard that 705 been transferred to Peterlee, so looks like peterlee  lost another solo from the original batch.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It has transferred to Peterlee, but it's because the depot has gained additional work (not to allow another bus to be cascaded out).

Read more: http://northeastbuses.co.uk/fleet/item.php?operatorF=2&fleetnoF=705
Dan
05 Sep 2017, 12:48 pm #104

(05 Sep 2017, 12:21 pm)cbma06 I've heard that 705 been transferred to Peterlee, so looks like peterlee  lost another solo from the original batch.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It has transferred to Peterlee, but it's because the depot has gained additional work (not to allow another bus to be cascaded out).

Read more: http://northeastbuses.co.uk/fleet/item.php?operatorF=2&fleetnoF=705

cbma06



2,669
05 Sep 2017, 12:57 pm #105
(05 Sep 2017, 12:48 pm)Dan It has transferred to Peterlee, but it's because the depot has gained additional work (not to allow another bus to be cascaded out).

Read more: http://northeastbuses.co.uk/fleet/item.php?operatorF=2&fleetnoF=705


Cheers for the info Dan


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


cbma06
05 Sep 2017, 12:57 pm #105

(05 Sep 2017, 12:48 pm)Dan It has transferred to Peterlee, but it's because the depot has gained additional work (not to allow another bus to be cascaded out).

Read more: http://northeastbuses.co.uk/fleet/item.php?operatorF=2&fleetnoF=705


Cheers for the info Dan


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



Malarkey



6,064
05 Sep 2017, 1:40 pm #106
(05 Sep 2017, 12:48 pm)Dan It has transferred to Peterlee, but it's because the depot has gained additional work (not to allow another bus to be cascaded out).

Read more: http://northeastbuses.co.uk/fleet/item.php?operatorF=2&fleetnoF=705

Leaving Washington without a spare for the Indigo Network, which would explain why 6042 was on the 82 yesterday, which according to the news has been Withdrawn.

With the operation of scholars 452 and the 968 transferring from Deptford Depot to Peterlee, why did a Bus from Deptford not transfer to Peterlee instead?

Looking at the fleet list for Washington Depot, there only spares are 5324/5337 & 5338, as 6141/6142 form part of the allocation for the X1.

I do hope once the B5TL's enter service that Washington receive a few B7 Geminis from Riverside, saying that they look like they are Stanley bound. 
Malarkey
05 Sep 2017, 1:40 pm #106

(05 Sep 2017, 12:48 pm)Dan It has transferred to Peterlee, but it's because the depot has gained additional work (not to allow another bus to be cascaded out).

Read more: http://northeastbuses.co.uk/fleet/item.php?operatorF=2&fleetnoF=705

Leaving Washington without a spare for the Indigo Network, which would explain why 6042 was on the 82 yesterday, which according to the news has been Withdrawn.

With the operation of scholars 452 and the 968 transferring from Deptford Depot to Peterlee, why did a Bus from Deptford not transfer to Peterlee instead?

Looking at the fleet list for Washington Depot, there only spares are 5324/5337 & 5338, as 6141/6142 form part of the allocation for the X1.

I do hope once the B5TL's enter service that Washington receive a few B7 Geminis from Riverside, saying that they look like they are Stanley bound. 

Dan

Site Administrator

18,128
05 Sep 2017, 1:46 pm #107
(05 Sep 2017, 1:40 pm)Malarkey Leaving Washington without a spare for the Indigo Network, which would explain why 6042 was on the 82 yesterday, which according to the news has been Withdrawn.

With the operation of scholars 452 and the 968 transferring from Deptford Depot to Peterlee, why did a Bus from Deptford not transfer to Peterlee instead?

Looking at the fleet list for Washington Depot, there only spares are 5324/5337 & 5338, as 6141/6142 form part of the allocation for the X1.

I do hope once the B5TL's enter service that Washington receive a few B7 Geminis from Riverside, saying that they look like they are Stanley bound. 

Not quite.

Back in July, service 86 was revised to operate between Concord and The Galleries only (and hence the PVR of service 86 reduced to 1 vehicle, from 2). 705 was hence released for cascade back then, but used at Washington until 3rd September on a Miscellaneous Works board, so a double-deck vehicle could be released to Riverside for Metro Replacement.

As soon as the content of this Miscellaneous Works board was lost entirely on 3rd September, it was no longer required at Washington (which is why 705 transferred to Peterlee at the weekend).

So two spares for the X1 (currently 6141/42) - as before - with 3943 being allocated to scholars 885 and a peak-time X1 run.
Three spares for the 4 and 5/50 (5324, 5337 and 5338) - as before.
One spare for the indiGo Washington network - as before (but now covering a smaller PVR, so a higher spare vehicle percentage overall).

The B7TLs withdrawn from Washington are removed from the fleet as a result of the loss of Miscellaneous Works contracts, so no need for them to be replaced.
Dan
05 Sep 2017, 1:46 pm #107

(05 Sep 2017, 1:40 pm)Malarkey Leaving Washington without a spare for the Indigo Network, which would explain why 6042 was on the 82 yesterday, which according to the news has been Withdrawn.

With the operation of scholars 452 and the 968 transferring from Deptford Depot to Peterlee, why did a Bus from Deptford not transfer to Peterlee instead?

Looking at the fleet list for Washington Depot, there only spares are 5324/5337 & 5338, as 6141/6142 form part of the allocation for the X1.

I do hope once the B5TL's enter service that Washington receive a few B7 Geminis from Riverside, saying that they look like they are Stanley bound. 

Not quite.

Back in July, service 86 was revised to operate between Concord and The Galleries only (and hence the PVR of service 86 reduced to 1 vehicle, from 2). 705 was hence released for cascade back then, but used at Washington until 3rd September on a Miscellaneous Works board, so a double-deck vehicle could be released to Riverside for Metro Replacement.

As soon as the content of this Miscellaneous Works board was lost entirely on 3rd September, it was no longer required at Washington (which is why 705 transferred to Peterlee at the weekend).

So two spares for the X1 (currently 6141/42) - as before - with 3943 being allocated to scholars 885 and a peak-time X1 run.
Three spares for the 4 and 5/50 (5324, 5337 and 5338) - as before.
One spare for the indiGo Washington network - as before (but now covering a smaller PVR, so a higher spare vehicle percentage overall).

The B7TLs withdrawn from Washington are removed from the fleet as a result of the loss of Miscellaneous Works contracts, so no need for them to be replaced.

Malarkey



6,064
05 Sep 2017, 1:53 pm #108
(05 Sep 2017, 1:46 pm)Dan Not quite.

Back in July, service 86 was revised to operate between Concord and The Galleries only (and hence the PVR of service 86 reduced to 1 vehicle, from 2). 705 was hence released for cascade back then, but used at Washington until 3rd September on a Miscellaneous Works board, so a double-deck vehicle could be released to Riverside for Metro Replacement.

As soon as the content of this Miscellaneous Works board was lost entirely on 3rd September, it was no longer required at Washington (which is why 705 transferred to Peterlee at the weekend).

So two spares for the X1 (currently 6141/42) - as before - with 3943 being allocated to scholars 885 and a peak-time X1 run.
Three spares for the 4 and 5/50 (5324, 5337 and 5338) - as before.
One spare for the indiGo Washington network - as before (but now covering a smaller PVR, so a higher spare vehicle percentage overall).

The B7TLs withdrawn from Washington are removed from the fleet as a result of the loss of Miscellaneous Works contracts.

Forgot about the 86 dropping in PVR following the changes in July, now everything makes sense.
Malarkey
05 Sep 2017, 1:53 pm #108

(05 Sep 2017, 1:46 pm)Dan Not quite.

Back in July, service 86 was revised to operate between Concord and The Galleries only (and hence the PVR of service 86 reduced to 1 vehicle, from 2). 705 was hence released for cascade back then, but used at Washington until 3rd September on a Miscellaneous Works board, so a double-deck vehicle could be released to Riverside for Metro Replacement.

As soon as the content of this Miscellaneous Works board was lost entirely on 3rd September, it was no longer required at Washington (which is why 705 transferred to Peterlee at the weekend).

So two spares for the X1 (currently 6141/42) - as before - with 3943 being allocated to scholars 885 and a peak-time X1 run.
Three spares for the 4 and 5/50 (5324, 5337 and 5338) - as before.
One spare for the indiGo Washington network - as before (but now covering a smaller PVR, so a higher spare vehicle percentage overall).

The B7TLs withdrawn from Washington are removed from the fleet as a result of the loss of Miscellaneous Works contracts.

Forgot about the 86 dropping in PVR following the changes in July, now everything makes sense.

JP6004



1,833
05 Sep 2017, 1:55 pm #109
(05 Sep 2017, 1:46 pm)Dan Not quite.

Back in July, service 86 was revised to operate between Concord and The Galleries only (and hence the PVR of service 86 reduced to 1 vehicle, from 2). 705 was hence released for cascade back then, but used at Washington until 3rd September on a Miscellaneous Works board, so a double-deck vehicle could be released to Riverside for Metro Replacement.

As soon as the content of this Miscellaneous Works board was lost entirely on 3rd September, it was no longer required at Washington (which is why 705 transferred to Peterlee at the weekend).

So two spares for the X1 (currently 6141/42) - as before - with 3943 being allocated to scholars 885 and a peak-time X1 run.
Three spares for the 4 and 5/50 (5324, 5337 and 5338) - as before.
One spare for the indiGo Washington network - as before (but now covering a smaller PVR, so a higher spare vehicle percentage overall).

The B7TLs withdrawn from Washington are removed from the fleet as a result of the loss of Miscellaneous Works contracts, so no need for them to be replaced.

I thought PVR of X1 was 13 all week now, so wouldn't there be a B9 and both Onmnidekkas as spares?
JP6004
05 Sep 2017, 1:55 pm #109

(05 Sep 2017, 1:46 pm)Dan Not quite.

Back in July, service 86 was revised to operate between Concord and The Galleries only (and hence the PVR of service 86 reduced to 1 vehicle, from 2). 705 was hence released for cascade back then, but used at Washington until 3rd September on a Miscellaneous Works board, so a double-deck vehicle could be released to Riverside for Metro Replacement.

As soon as the content of this Miscellaneous Works board was lost entirely on 3rd September, it was no longer required at Washington (which is why 705 transferred to Peterlee at the weekend).

So two spares for the X1 (currently 6141/42) - as before - with 3943 being allocated to scholars 885 and a peak-time X1 run.
Three spares for the 4 and 5/50 (5324, 5337 and 5338) - as before.
One spare for the indiGo Washington network - as before (but now covering a smaller PVR, so a higher spare vehicle percentage overall).

The B7TLs withdrawn from Washington are removed from the fleet as a result of the loss of Miscellaneous Works contracts, so no need for them to be replaced.

I thought PVR of X1 was 13 all week now, so wouldn't there be a B9 and both Onmnidekkas as spares?

Malarkey



6,064
05 Sep 2017, 1:56 pm #110
6308 in full X9/X10 Livery - https://www.flickr.com/photos/nebp2/3690...ateposted/
Malarkey
05 Sep 2017, 1:56 pm #110

6308 in full X9/X10 Livery - https://www.flickr.com/photos/nebp2/3690...ateposted/

S830OFT



1,395
05 Sep 2017, 2:11 pm #111
6308 at Gateshead Interchange 
https://flic.kr/p/XQqEj9


S830OFT
05 Sep 2017, 2:11 pm #111

6308 at Gateshead Interchange 
https://flic.kr/p/XQqEj9



park5354



406
05 Sep 2017, 3:28 pm #112
(05 Sep 2017, 1:40 pm)Malarkey Leaving Washington without a spare for the Indigo Network, which would explain why 6042 was on the 82 yesterday, which according to the news has been Withdrawn.

With the operation of scholars 452 and the 968 transferring from Deptford Depot to Peterlee, why did a Bus from Deptford not transfer to Peterlee instead?

Looking at the fleet list for Washington Depot, there only spares are 5324/5337 & 5338, as 6141/6142 form part of the allocation for the X1.

I do hope once the B5TL's enter service that Washington receive a few B7 Geminis from Riverside, saying that they look like they are Stanley bound. 

Think 3941/42 are heading to Washington, 3963/64 to Chester, officially last weekend, but delayed slightly.
park5354
05 Sep 2017, 3:28 pm #112

(05 Sep 2017, 1:40 pm)Malarkey Leaving Washington without a spare for the Indigo Network, which would explain why 6042 was on the 82 yesterday, which according to the news has been Withdrawn.

With the operation of scholars 452 and the 968 transferring from Deptford Depot to Peterlee, why did a Bus from Deptford not transfer to Peterlee instead?

Looking at the fleet list for Washington Depot, there only spares are 5324/5337 & 5338, as 6141/6142 form part of the allocation for the X1.

I do hope once the B5TL's enter service that Washington receive a few B7 Geminis from Riverside, saying that they look like they are Stanley bound. 

Think 3941/42 are heading to Washington, 3963/64 to Chester, officially last weekend, but delayed slightly.

Ambassador



1,866
05 Sep 2017, 5:24 pm #113
(05 Sep 2017, 3:28 pm)park5354 Think 3941/42 are heading to Washington, 3963/64 to Chester, officially last weekend, but delayed slightly.

First it was 3888 now the old 724 girl herself 3963 back on old ground. 

All we need now is a Metrobus and the Chester nostalgia cycle is complete!

edit. Honorable mention to 3964, forgot that wore GNE swoop 21 branding!
Edited 05 Sep 2017, 5:27 pm by Ambassador.

Wistfully stuck in the 90s
Ambassador
05 Sep 2017, 5:24 pm #113

(05 Sep 2017, 3:28 pm)park5354 Think 3941/42 are heading to Washington, 3963/64 to Chester, officially last weekend, but delayed slightly.

First it was 3888 now the old 724 girl herself 3963 back on old ground. 

All we need now is a Metrobus and the Chester nostalgia cycle is complete!

edit. Honorable mention to 3964, forgot that wore GNE swoop 21 branding!


Wistfully stuck in the 90s

JP6004



1,833
05 Sep 2017, 5:33 pm #114
(05 Sep 2017, 2:11 pm)S830OFT 6308 at Gateshead Interchange 
https://flic.kr/p/XQqEj9

Really is fab looking brand
JP6004
05 Sep 2017, 5:33 pm #114

(05 Sep 2017, 2:11 pm)S830OFT 6308 at Gateshead Interchange 
https://flic.kr/p/XQqEj9

Really is fab looking brand

05 Sep 2017, 5:48 pm #115
It actually looks like the computer file for the design of the new X9 / X10 livery was corrupted when it was sent and mistakened for the new livery idea.

Please feel free to visit my Flickr page - https://www.flickr.com/photos/gjm-photogenic/
Who needs heroes anyway? Villians have more fun.
Rapidsnap
05 Sep 2017, 5:48 pm #115

It actually looks like the computer file for the design of the new X9 / X10 livery was corrupted when it was sent and mistakened for the new livery idea.


Please feel free to visit my Flickr page - https://www.flickr.com/photos/gjm-photogenic/
Who needs heroes anyway? Villians have more fun.

Andreos1



14,253
05 Sep 2017, 6:50 pm #116
(05 Sep 2017, 5:48 pm)Rapidsnap It actually looks like the computer file for the design of the new X9 / X10 livery was corrupted when it was sent and mistakened for the new livery idea.

I said similar on here the other week.

Genuinely thought the image had issues when I was trying to view it. Refreshed the image a couple of times until i realised there wasnt a glitch.

'Illegitimis non carborundum'
Andreos1
05 Sep 2017, 6:50 pm #116

(05 Sep 2017, 5:48 pm)Rapidsnap It actually looks like the computer file for the design of the new X9 / X10 livery was corrupted when it was sent and mistakened for the new livery idea.

I said similar on here the other week.

Genuinely thought the image had issues when I was trying to view it. Refreshed the image a couple of times until i realised there wasnt a glitch.


'Illegitimis non carborundum'

05 Sep 2017, 10:39 pm #117
For the cycle event at blyth yesterday i seen the 309s were terminating at Old Hartley. Why did the destination say New Hartley? Its a totally different place and the 309 goes no where near it
Jordan2104
05 Sep 2017, 10:39 pm #117

For the cycle event at blyth yesterday i seen the 309s were terminating at Old Hartley. Why did the destination say New Hartley? Its a totally different place and the 309 goes no where near it

Jamie M

Unregistered

 
06 Sep 2017, 12:17 am #118
(redacted)

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
Jamie M
06 Sep 2017, 12:17 am #118

(redacted)

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

Dan

Site Administrator

18,128
06 Sep 2017, 5:00 am #119
(05 Sep 2017, 10:39 pm)Jordan2104 For the cycle event at blyth yesterday i seen the 309s were terminating at Old Hartley. Why did the destination say New Hartley? Its a totally different place and the 309 goes no where near it

They were showing that, as, unlike two years ago, that is what the Service Delivery Centre requested was shown on the display. The SDC organises diversions and chooses what to show on the destination display at times like these.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Dan
06 Sep 2017, 5:00 am #119

(05 Sep 2017, 10:39 pm)Jordan2104 For the cycle event at blyth yesterday i seen the 309s were terminating at Old Hartley. Why did the destination say New Hartley? Its a totally different place and the 309 goes no where near it

They were showing that, as, unlike two years ago, that is what the Service Delivery Centre requested was shown on the display. The SDC organises diversions and chooses what to show on the destination display at times like these.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

06 Sep 2017, 8:44 am #120
(06 Sep 2017, 5:00 am)Dan They were showing that, as, unlike two years ago, that is what the Service Delivery Centre requested was shown on the display. The SDC organises diversions and chooses what to show on the destination display at times like these.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Ok but the 309 doesnt go to new hartley. It is old hartley where it goes
Jordan2104
06 Sep 2017, 8:44 am #120

(06 Sep 2017, 5:00 am)Dan They were showing that, as, unlike two years ago, that is what the Service Delivery Centre requested was shown on the display. The SDC organises diversions and chooses what to show on the destination display at times like these.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Ok but the 309 doesnt go to new hartley. It is old hartley where it goes

Pages (21) Previous 15 6 721 Next
 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average