Menu
 
North East Buses Local Bus Scene Go North East Go North East: Service Suggestions v2

Go North East: Service Suggestions v2

Go North East: Service Suggestions v2

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
 
Pages (150) Previous 140 41 42150 Next
S813 FVK



6,030
08 May 2020, 7:44 am #801
I did the AM trip of the 689 a couple of years ago now and it was quite popular, albeit mostly with OAPs with their passes. I think being the only service through some of the intermediate villages helps.
S813 FVK
08 May 2020, 7:44 am #801

I did the AM trip of the 689 a couple of years ago now and it was quite popular, albeit mostly with OAPs with their passes. I think being the only service through some of the intermediate villages helps.

27 May 2020, 8:52 pm #802
Is there any routes that could be diverted through or extended to the team Valley.

My only idea, which is still a work in progress is this: [attachment=9395]

Twitter: @ASX_Terranova
Blog: https://asxterranova.home.blog/
ASX_Terranova
27 May 2020, 8:52 pm #802

Is there any routes that could be diverted through or extended to the team Valley.

My only idea, which is still a work in progress is this: [attachment=9395]


Twitter: @ASX_Terranova
Blog: https://asxterranova.home.blog/

peter



993
30 May 2020, 3:34 pm #803
Just a thought I had following the upcoming service changes from the 1st of June, it seems that the replacement of the 88/88a with the 9 and 26 hasn't really worked and as such I'd propose chopping and changing a few routes that are at a loose end as a result of the changes. The section of the 9 from Jarrow to Lukes Lane would be added on the 26 (essentially recreating the 88) allowing the H1/H2 hospital services to be withdrawn. Meanwhile the southern section of the 9 could be linked up with X6/7 now that they've been disconnected from the X20. Connections would be available between both services at Jarrow bus station with generous layovers to account for delays. 

Service 26 - South Shields - Jarrow - Lukes Lane
Essentially service 88/88a brought back but at the present half hourly frequencies, replaces services H1/H2. 

PVR 5
South Shields  54 24
Jarrow             31 01
Jarrow             35 05
Lukes Lane      59 29

Lukes Lane      00 30
Jarrow             26 56
Jarrow             30 00
South Shields  11  41

Service X6/7 - Peterlee - Sunderland - Jarrow 
The X6/7 extended to Jarrow in place of service 9. If the services are permanently removed from the X-lines network then would instead be numbered the 9A/B

PVR 6           X6 X7
Peterlee       03 38
Sunderland  38 08
Sunderland  42 12
Jarrow          26 56

                      X7 X6
Jarrow          36 06
Sunderland  18 48
Sunderland  22 52
Peterlee        52 26
peter
30 May 2020, 3:34 pm #803

Just a thought I had following the upcoming service changes from the 1st of June, it seems that the replacement of the 88/88a with the 9 and 26 hasn't really worked and as such I'd propose chopping and changing a few routes that are at a loose end as a result of the changes. The section of the 9 from Jarrow to Lukes Lane would be added on the 26 (essentially recreating the 88) allowing the H1/H2 hospital services to be withdrawn. Meanwhile the southern section of the 9 could be linked up with X6/7 now that they've been disconnected from the X20. Connections would be available between both services at Jarrow bus station with generous layovers to account for delays. 

Service 26 - South Shields - Jarrow - Lukes Lane
Essentially service 88/88a brought back but at the present half hourly frequencies, replaces services H1/H2. 

PVR 5
South Shields  54 24
Jarrow             31 01
Jarrow             35 05
Lukes Lane      59 29

Lukes Lane      00 30
Jarrow             26 56
Jarrow             30 00
South Shields  11  41

Service X6/7 - Peterlee - Sunderland - Jarrow 
The X6/7 extended to Jarrow in place of service 9. If the services are permanently removed from the X-lines network then would instead be numbered the 9A/B

PVR 6           X6 X7
Peterlee       03 38
Sunderland  38 08
Sunderland  42 12
Jarrow          26 56

                      X7 X6
Jarrow          36 06
Sunderland  18 48
Sunderland  22 52
Peterlee        52 26

30 May 2020, 7:26 pm #804
Service changes
Service 4- Extended to Metrocentre along 58 route to Gateshead and then X66 route to Metrocentre. Run by Riverside & Washington depots. Will run every 12 minutes. 
Service 11- Merge with service Q3 and will run every 20 minutes. Will now start on Whitley Bay Seafront. Run by Riverside & Percy Main depots.
Allocation
Service 4 (PVR 18)- 5283-5284, 5293-5297 & 5358-5368.
Service 11 (PVR 13)- 5381-5385, 5387-5388 & 8310-8315.
Vehicle movements
691-694 to Riverside to operate services M6/M7/M8
5238 to Riverside
5367-5368 to Riverside for Connections4
5377-5380 to be repainted into corporate liverey. 5380 will transfer to Percy Main
5381-5385 & 5387-5388 to Percy Main for service 11.
5391-5394 & 5452 to be repainted for Citylink service 57
5486 to Washington
michaelb
30 May 2020, 7:26 pm #804

Service changes
Service 4- Extended to Metrocentre along 58 route to Gateshead and then X66 route to Metrocentre. Run by Riverside & Washington depots. Will run every 12 minutes. 
Service 11- Merge with service Q3 and will run every 20 minutes. Will now start on Whitley Bay Seafront. Run by Riverside & Percy Main depots.
Allocation
Service 4 (PVR 18)- 5283-5284, 5293-5297 & 5358-5368.
Service 11 (PVR 13)- 5381-5385, 5387-5388 & 8310-8315.
Vehicle movements
691-694 to Riverside to operate services M6/M7/M8
5238 to Riverside
5367-5368 to Riverside for Connections4
5377-5380 to be repainted into corporate liverey. 5380 will transfer to Percy Main
5381-5385 & 5387-5388 to Percy Main for service 11.
5391-5394 & 5452 to be repainted for Citylink service 57
5486 to Washington

Storx



4,597
30 May 2020, 7:41 pm #805
(30 May 2020, 7:26 pm)michaelb Service changes
Service 4- Extended to Metrocentre along 58 route to Gateshead and then X66 route to Metrocentre. Run by Riverside & Washington depots. Will run every 12 minutes. 
Service 11- Merge with service Q3 and will run every 20 minutes. Will now start on Whitley Bay Seafront. Run by Riverside & Percy Main depots.
Allocation
Service 4 (PVR 18)- 5283-5284, 5293-5297 & 5358-5368.
Service 11 (PVR 13)- 5381-5385, 5387-5388 & 8310-8315.
Vehicle movements
691-694 to Riverside to operate services M6/M7/M8
5238 to Riverside
5367-5368 to Riverside for Connections4
5377-5380 to be repainted into corporate liverey. 5380 will transfer to Percy Main
5381-5385 & 5387-5388 to Percy Main for service 11.
5391-5394 & 5452 to be repainted for Citylink service 57
5486 to Washington

The 11 doesn't need to be every 20 minutes. With the Q3 I'd personally extend it to do the 41 loop to Battle Hill and keep it every 15 minutes.

Then extend the 42/42A to do the Howdon loop part of the 41.

The 41 in it's current form is a bit of a waste of time, without many people travelling throughout. It also makes the 42/42A have a bit of a point why it's branded Little Coasters since currently it doesn't serve the sea nor duplicates the Coaster at all.

Even known it's the newest brand by god is it an awful one and doesn't make sense especially now the 19 is part of it aswell where it's the only bus route in most of the places it serves that doesn't go to the coast. The branding doesn't even look good neither imo and also has the tagline, 'Frequent services in and around North Tyneside early until late 7 days a week' which isn't true since they don't run on evenings or Sundays as Little Coasters.
Storx
30 May 2020, 7:41 pm #805

(30 May 2020, 7:26 pm)michaelb Service changes
Service 4- Extended to Metrocentre along 58 route to Gateshead and then X66 route to Metrocentre. Run by Riverside & Washington depots. Will run every 12 minutes. 
Service 11- Merge with service Q3 and will run every 20 minutes. Will now start on Whitley Bay Seafront. Run by Riverside & Percy Main depots.
Allocation
Service 4 (PVR 18)- 5283-5284, 5293-5297 & 5358-5368.
Service 11 (PVR 13)- 5381-5385, 5387-5388 & 8310-8315.
Vehicle movements
691-694 to Riverside to operate services M6/M7/M8
5238 to Riverside
5367-5368 to Riverside for Connections4
5377-5380 to be repainted into corporate liverey. 5380 will transfer to Percy Main
5381-5385 & 5387-5388 to Percy Main for service 11.
5391-5394 & 5452 to be repainted for Citylink service 57
5486 to Washington

The 11 doesn't need to be every 20 minutes. With the Q3 I'd personally extend it to do the 41 loop to Battle Hill and keep it every 15 minutes.

Then extend the 42/42A to do the Howdon loop part of the 41.

The 41 in it's current form is a bit of a waste of time, without many people travelling throughout. It also makes the 42/42A have a bit of a point why it's branded Little Coasters since currently it doesn't serve the sea nor duplicates the Coaster at all.

Even known it's the newest brand by god is it an awful one and doesn't make sense especially now the 19 is part of it aswell where it's the only bus route in most of the places it serves that doesn't go to the coast. The branding doesn't even look good neither imo and also has the tagline, 'Frequent services in and around North Tyneside early until late 7 days a week' which isn't true since they don't run on evenings or Sundays as Little Coasters.

park5354



406
31 May 2020, 2:56 pm #806
Service 5

From Jarrow, extend to Newcastle via 27 route.

NEW service 6

South Shields-Jarrow (26 route), then direct to Campbell Park Road & Lukes Lane Estate, then via Finchale Road to Hebburn. At buses continue as service 9 to Boldon & Sunderland

New service 7

Renumbered from 27.

Service 9

At Lukes Lane, buses continue (as service 6) direct to Jarrow, then via 26 route to South Shields.

Service 27

renumbered to service 7.

Services 5 & 7 operated by Riverside using ex Red Arrow B9's, branded as VFM buses.

Services 6 & 9 operated by Deptford using Crusader branded Mercedes Citaros.

Services 5 & 7 Monday to Saturday daytimes, each operate every 30 mins (combined 15 mins Newcastle-Jarrow)
Sunday daytimes 2 per hour (7), hourly (5), combined every 20 mins Newcastle - Jarrow.
Evening services each run hourly, giving a bus every 30 mins Newcastle-Jarrow.

Services 6 & 9 each run every 30 mins, except after 20:00 when they run hourly.

Services H1 & H2 would be withdrawn.

Service 925 withdrawn.

Service 68 extended from Wrekenton to Birtley & Chester le Street

service 68 would serve Easedale Gardens in both directions.
Edited 31 May 2020, 2:59 pm by park5354.
park5354
31 May 2020, 2:56 pm #806

Service 5

From Jarrow, extend to Newcastle via 27 route.

NEW service 6

South Shields-Jarrow (26 route), then direct to Campbell Park Road & Lukes Lane Estate, then via Finchale Road to Hebburn. At buses continue as service 9 to Boldon & Sunderland

New service 7

Renumbered from 27.

Service 9

At Lukes Lane, buses continue (as service 6) direct to Jarrow, then via 26 route to South Shields.

Service 27

renumbered to service 7.

Services 5 & 7 operated by Riverside using ex Red Arrow B9's, branded as VFM buses.

Services 6 & 9 operated by Deptford using Crusader branded Mercedes Citaros.

Services 5 & 7 Monday to Saturday daytimes, each operate every 30 mins (combined 15 mins Newcastle-Jarrow)
Sunday daytimes 2 per hour (7), hourly (5), combined every 20 mins Newcastle - Jarrow.
Evening services each run hourly, giving a bus every 30 mins Newcastle-Jarrow.

Services 6 & 9 each run every 30 mins, except after 20:00 when they run hourly.

Services H1 & H2 would be withdrawn.


Service 925 withdrawn.

Service 68 extended from Wrekenton to Birtley & Chester le Street

service 68 would serve Easedale Gardens in both directions.

V514DFT



2,245
01 Jun 2020, 12:08 pm #807
Revert the 41 back to the way it was,42/42A to run to the Cobalt,that is all

Kind Regards
Tez
V514DFT
01 Jun 2020, 12:08 pm #807

Revert the 41 back to the way it was,42/42A to run to the Cobalt,that is all


Kind Regards
Tez

6049



259
02 Jun 2020, 5:39 pm #808
Some of these suggestions are good, but some of the services listed have been contracted out to other operators so GNE would probably find it difficult to put them into effect

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
6049
02 Jun 2020, 5:39 pm #808

Some of these suggestions are good, but some of the services listed have been contracted out to other operators so GNE would probably find it difficult to put them into effect

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk

02 Jun 2020, 6:41 pm #809
Extend 30 to Durham to Replace 13 (Sort of Old 712). Could also be merged with 31 or 32.

X7 Between Newcastle, Metrocentre, The Galleries, Lambton, Ayton, Chester-Le-Street, Pelton Fell, Blackhouse, Burnhope, Maiden Law and Lanchester (Sort of Old 752).

Twitter: @ASX_Terranova
Blog: https://asxterranova.home.blog/
ASX_Terranova
02 Jun 2020, 6:41 pm #809

Extend 30 to Durham to Replace 13 (Sort of Old 712). Could also be merged with 31 or 32.

X7 Between Newcastle, Metrocentre, The Galleries, Lambton, Ayton, Chester-Le-Street, Pelton Fell, Blackhouse, Burnhope, Maiden Law and Lanchester (Sort of Old 752).


Twitter: @ASX_Terranova
Blog: https://asxterranova.home.blog/

ii_Gaz



3
05 Jun 2020, 2:24 pm #810
55 extended back to Hartlepool (still via Wingate and StationTown)
ii_Gaz
05 Jun 2020, 2:24 pm #810

55 extended back to Hartlepool (still via Wingate and StationTown)

cbma06



2,669
05 Jun 2020, 2:39 pm #811
(05 Jun 2020, 2:24 pm)ii_Gaz 55 extended back to Hartlepool (still via Wingate and StationTown)



Keep the 55 as is, but have it as a 55 and 55A, with the short 55 renumbered as 55A but between Easington village and Peterlee via the 208 short and withdraw the short 208. Have the X6 going back to Hartlepool and have the X7 go to Hartlepool via east Durham college, A19, castle Eden and High Helseden.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


cbma06
05 Jun 2020, 2:39 pm #811

(05 Jun 2020, 2:24 pm)ii_Gaz 55 extended back to Hartlepool (still via Wingate and StationTown)



Keep the 55 as is, but have it as a 55 and 55A, with the short 55 renumbered as 55A but between Easington village and Peterlee via the 208 short and withdraw the short 208. Have the X6 going back to Hartlepool and have the X7 go to Hartlepool via east Durham college, A19, castle Eden and High Helseden.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



05 Jun 2020, 5:23 pm #812
(05 Jun 2020, 2:24 pm)ii_Gaz 55 extended back to Hartlepool (still via Wingate and StationTown)
That would be the longest journey in the world !! Honestly, the Sun -Hpool route is tedious enough without it going via even more of the back of beyond. No wonder it was scrapped .
Economic505
05 Jun 2020, 5:23 pm #812

(05 Jun 2020, 2:24 pm)ii_Gaz 55 extended back to Hartlepool (still via Wingate and StationTown)
That would be the longest journey in the world !! Honestly, the Sun -Hpool route is tedious enough without it going via even more of the back of beyond. No wonder it was scrapped .

ii_Gaz



3
06 Jun 2020, 9:52 am #813
(05 Jun 2020, 5:23 pm)Economic505 That would be the longest journey in the world !! Honestly, the Sun -Hpool route is tedious enough without it going via even more of the back of beyond. No wonder it was scrapped .
Tbh, they should have replaced 55 with somethingg, because a lot of people used that route. Now people have to use Arriva high prices.
ii_Gaz
06 Jun 2020, 9:52 am #813

(05 Jun 2020, 5:23 pm)Economic505 That would be the longest journey in the world !! Honestly, the Sun -Hpool route is tedious enough without it going via even more of the back of beyond. No wonder it was scrapped .
Tbh, they should have replaced 55 with somethingg, because a lot of people used that route. Now people have to use Arriva high prices.

cbma06



2,669
06 Jun 2020, 10:27 am #814
(06 Jun 2020, 9:52 am)ii_Gaz Tbh, they should have replaced 55 with somethingg, because a lot of people used that route. Now people have to use Arriva high prices.


Should extend the X6/X7 to Hartlepool via 2 separate routes, but I can see something happening in the near future with the X6/x7 as it’s already been dropped from the xlines brand into just a go north east corporate service, if the Potential is still there to make money I would drop the service numbers into a service 62/63 inline with existing services 60/61 in that corridor area


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


cbma06
06 Jun 2020, 10:27 am #814

(06 Jun 2020, 9:52 am)ii_Gaz Tbh, they should have replaced 55 with somethingg, because a lot of people used that route. Now people have to use Arriva high prices.


Should extend the X6/X7 to Hartlepool via 2 separate routes, but I can see something happening in the near future with the X6/x7 as it’s already been dropped from the xlines brand into just a go north east corporate service, if the Potential is still there to make money I would drop the service numbers into a service 62/63 inline with existing services 60/61 in that corridor area


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



cbma06



2,669
06 Jun 2020, 10:39 am #815
(05 Jun 2020, 5:23 pm)Economic505 That would be the longest journey in the world !! Honestly, the Sun -Hpool route is tedious enough without it going via even more of the back of beyond. No wonder it was scrapped .


Originally the Hartlepool to Houghton section used to be the old 231 then 21A which used to carry on to Chester then Newcastle, but when Chester streamlined there services into the 21 sequences, the houghton to Hartlepool section fell into the hands of Deptford and there extended the service to Sunderland limited stop then GNE screwed the service up with all different incarnations of the service


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


cbma06
06 Jun 2020, 10:39 am #815

(05 Jun 2020, 5:23 pm)Economic505 That would be the longest journey in the world !! Honestly, the Sun -Hpool route is tedious enough without it going via even more of the back of beyond. No wonder it was scrapped .


Originally the Hartlepool to Houghton section used to be the old 231 then 21A which used to carry on to Chester then Newcastle, but when Chester streamlined there services into the 21 sequences, the houghton to Hartlepool section fell into the hands of Deptford and there extended the service to Sunderland limited stop then GNE screwed the service up with all different incarnations of the service


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



Andreos1



14,228
06 Jun 2020, 10:55 am #816
(06 Jun 2020, 10:39 am)cbma06 Originally the Hartlepool to Houghton section used to be the old 231 then 21A which used to carry on to Chester then Newcastle, but when Chester streamlined there services into the 21 sequences, the houghton to Hartlepool section fell into the hands of Deptford and there extended the service to Sunderland limited stop then GNE screwed the service up with all different incarnations of the service


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm surprised they haven't integrated the Peterlee - Hartlepool section in to the minibus network.
The Sunderland - Hartlepool section via Seaham etc is boxed off. The X35/55 or whatever else it is known as isn't going to win on that. It's the bits in between and beyond and by removing the link south of Peterlee, I'd argue they've given up not only on the services, but the passengers in the area.
Train and ANE are clearly the winners. Train for the longer distance stuff to Tyneside, particularly with the new station opening up.

'Illegitimis non carborundum'
Andreos1
06 Jun 2020, 10:55 am #816

(06 Jun 2020, 10:39 am)cbma06 Originally the Hartlepool to Houghton section used to be the old 231 then 21A which used to carry on to Chester then Newcastle, but when Chester streamlined there services into the 21 sequences, the houghton to Hartlepool section fell into the hands of Deptford and there extended the service to Sunderland limited stop then GNE screwed the service up with all different incarnations of the service


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm surprised they haven't integrated the Peterlee - Hartlepool section in to the minibus network.
The Sunderland - Hartlepool section via Seaham etc is boxed off. The X35/55 or whatever else it is known as isn't going to win on that. It's the bits in between and beyond and by removing the link south of Peterlee, I'd argue they've given up not only on the services, but the passengers in the area.
Train and ANE are clearly the winners. Train for the longer distance stuff to Tyneside, particularly with the new station opening up.


'Illegitimis non carborundum'

06 Jun 2020, 12:50 pm #817
(06 Jun 2020, 10:39 am)cbma06 Originally the Hartlepool to Houghton section used to be the old 231 then 21A which used to carry on to Chester then Newcastle, but when Chester streamlined there services into the 21 sequences, the houghton to Hartlepool section fell into the hands of Deptford and there extended the service to Sunderland limited stop then GNE screwed the service up with all different incarnations of the service


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Back in the mid 1980, the 230 also existed, which was operated by Northern General and United. I guess the 23 is the successor service to the 230. During the Arriva train strikes, I had to use the 23, or a combo of the 22 and 24. Thank the train god that the trains returned!
Economic505
06 Jun 2020, 12:50 pm #817

(06 Jun 2020, 10:39 am)cbma06 Originally the Hartlepool to Houghton section used to be the old 231 then 21A which used to carry on to Chester then Newcastle, but when Chester streamlined there services into the 21 sequences, the houghton to Hartlepool section fell into the hands of Deptford and there extended the service to Sunderland limited stop then GNE screwed the service up with all different incarnations of the service


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Back in the mid 1980, the 230 also existed, which was operated by Northern General and United. I guess the 23 is the successor service to the 230. During the Arriva train strikes, I had to use the 23, or a combo of the 22 and 24. Thank the train god that the trains returned!

cbma06



2,669
06 Jun 2020, 1:11 pm #818
(06 Jun 2020, 12:50 pm)Economic505 Back in the mid 1980, the 230 also existed, which was operated by Northern General and United. I guess the 23 is the successor service to the 230. During the Arriva train strikes, I had to use the 23, or a combo of the 22 and 24. Thank the train god that the trains returned!


Yea the 230/231 were both jointly operated by northern and United, later the 230 went to United/Arriva and the 231 went to Northern

I wouldn’t be surprised if in the next few years that since northern pulled out of Hartlepool that Arriva reducing the 23 to hourly or withdrawal the 23 and force passengers to change at Peterlee bus station between the 22 and 24, does anyone know what the loading are like on the 23 and does the Hartlepool section still needs a 15 minute freq between the 23 and 24?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


cbma06
06 Jun 2020, 1:11 pm #818

(06 Jun 2020, 12:50 pm)Economic505 Back in the mid 1980, the 230 also existed, which was operated by Northern General and United. I guess the 23 is the successor service to the 230. During the Arriva train strikes, I had to use the 23, or a combo of the 22 and 24. Thank the train god that the trains returned!


Yea the 230/231 were both jointly operated by northern and United, later the 230 went to United/Arriva and the 231 went to Northern

I wouldn’t be surprised if in the next few years that since northern pulled out of Hartlepool that Arriva reducing the 23 to hourly or withdrawal the 23 and force passengers to change at Peterlee bus station between the 22 and 24, does anyone know what the loading are like on the 23 and does the Hartlepool section still needs a 15 minute freq between the 23 and 24?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



2bagstew



204
06 Jun 2020, 3:22 pm #819
(06 Jun 2020, 1:11 pm)cbma06 Yea the 230/231 were both jointly operated by northern and United, later the 230 went to United/Arriva and the 231 went to Northern

I wouldn’t be surprised if in the next few years that since northern pulled out of Hartlepool that Arriva reducing the 23 to hourly or withdrawal the 23 and force passengers to change at Peterlee bus station between the 22 and 24, does anyone know what the loading are like on the 23 and does the Hartlepool section still needs a 15 minute freq between the 23 and 24?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


I feel Arriva will use the fact that Northern have pulled out to reduce the section between Peterlee and Hartlepool to half hourly in the near future.
Off peak the 23 is lightly used on this section, more than often the 23 & 24 land together at the Peterlee bus station.


Sent from my iPhone 8+ using Tapatalk
2bagstew
06 Jun 2020, 3:22 pm #819

(06 Jun 2020, 1:11 pm)cbma06 Yea the 230/231 were both jointly operated by northern and United, later the 230 went to United/Arriva and the 231 went to Northern

I wouldn’t be surprised if in the next few years that since northern pulled out of Hartlepool that Arriva reducing the 23 to hourly or withdrawal the 23 and force passengers to change at Peterlee bus station between the 22 and 24, does anyone know what the loading are like on the 23 and does the Hartlepool section still needs a 15 minute freq between the 23 and 24?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


I feel Arriva will use the fact that Northern have pulled out to reduce the section between Peterlee and Hartlepool to half hourly in the near future.
Off peak the 23 is lightly used on this section, more than often the 23 & 24 land together at the Peterlee bus station.


Sent from my iPhone 8+ using Tapatalk

cbma06



2,669
06 Jun 2020, 3:50 pm #820
(06 Jun 2020, 3:22 pm)2bagstew I feel Arriva will use the fact that Northern have pulled out to reduce the section between Peterlee and Hartlepool to half hourly in the near future.
Off peak the 23 is lightly used on this section, more than often the 23 & 24 land together at the Peterlee bus station.


Sent from my iPhone 8+ using Tapatalk


Since Easington Colliery is served by half hourly frequency northern 208 service if and only if the 23 gets withdrawn, Arriva could divert all journeys on service 22 via Easington the same as evening journeys, or I don’t know how much time the x21/x22 gets in Peterlee bus station but if re arranged could extend along the daytime 22 route in a circle Easington Village then down to the colliery, along to Horden and back in Peterlee from Horden crossroads which will open new links and re established links back into Horden.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


cbma06
06 Jun 2020, 3:50 pm #820

(06 Jun 2020, 3:22 pm)2bagstew I feel Arriva will use the fact that Northern have pulled out to reduce the section between Peterlee and Hartlepool to half hourly in the near future.
Off peak the 23 is lightly used on this section, more than often the 23 & 24 land together at the Peterlee bus station.


Sent from my iPhone 8+ using Tapatalk


Since Easington Colliery is served by half hourly frequency northern 208 service if and only if the 23 gets withdrawn, Arriva could divert all journeys on service 22 via Easington the same as evening journeys, or I don’t know how much time the x21/x22 gets in Peterlee bus station but if re arranged could extend along the daytime 22 route in a circle Easington Village then down to the colliery, along to Horden and back in Peterlee from Horden crossroads which will open new links and re established links back into Horden.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



Pages (150) Previous 140 41 42150 Next
 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average