(22 Feb 2015, 10:05 pm)Dan wrote I was quite young at the time so don't clearly remember, but I was living over that way at the time and think I vaguely remember the 12 being introduced as a competitive service to rival the "Magic Roundabout" 33 service? When it was first launched, I think they had 50p singles on the 12, which was better than the 33 which was around a £1.00 for a single.
I can't recall why the 33 was binned though... I remember having the 35 in the area at this time too, as I used the first bus of the day at about 5am down to town on a regular basis. Did the 35 directly replace the 33 or was it different? Do remember loving the Mercs compared to the MPDs, though, and this seemed to be when the Polish drivers all disappeared!
Don't think Stagecoach has changed the 12 since it was first implemented, which is surprising given how few seem to use it, but I may be wrong.
(22 Feb 2015, 12:28 pm)aureolin wrote It's concerning how Customer Services can play judge, jury and executioner, when logistically, it would be pretty much impossible to gather the facts in such a short period of time. They've stated "our driver has fallen short of our standards", yet further on in the response it seems to imply that the driver has yet to be asked for their side of the story? If they've used AVL data alone as gospel, then it's a dangerous game to get into.I had skipped through the follow up to Tom's letter, not reading the follow up responses.
(22 Feb 2015, 10:52 pm)Andreos1 wrote I had skipped through the follow up to Tom's letter, not reading the follow up responses.
I have just raised a similar point in the QCS thread re the driver to all intents and purposes, being found guilty without a trial.
Quite concerning to see this happen.
(22 Feb 2015, 10:52 pm)Andreos1 wrote I had skipped through the follow up to Tom's letter, not reading the follow up responses.
I have just raised a similar point in the QCS thread re the driver to all intents and purposes, being found guilty without a trial.
Quite concerning to see this happen.
(23 Feb 2015, 9:44 am)Dan wrote The latest "SimpliCity" branded Optare Versa V1110/Optare to enter the paintshop is 8326 (NK11 GWX), rather than 8325 as one would have expected. Guess it doesn't make too much of a difference what order they go in, though!
(23 Feb 2015, 11:57 am)Racer_Experience wrote The the fleet news as follows
All Saltmeadows vehicles transferred to Riverside 4907 Chester le Street to Riverside
4845 Riverside to Chester le Street
4964 Washington to Riverside
3828 3829 sold
(23 Feb 2015, 12:02 pm)Racer_Experience wrote When is 8306-09 and 8319 getting repainted then branded to join its sisters in Simplicity branding when I was down in Washington a few weeks ago with Michael.K we saw a Gold Citaro on 2 wonder what they are gonna be called would be nice to call it something like Golden Arrows or Laser again in a revised brand I used to love the 1st incarnation of the Laser when I once ridden on one from Hetton-le-Hole to South Shields I was impressed this was back in 2008 only a few weeks old
(23 Feb 2015, 12:14 pm)Dan wrote 8306 - 8309 were all repainted in October 2013, and 8319 followed in January 2014 at the end of Go North East's centenary year. These vehicles will not be repainted again as they (irritatingly) didn't ever receive branding whilst allocated to service 39.It's about time the former drifter vehicles will now get branded and 8319 might be a minor change to the vehicle in regards to route compared to last time
8325 should be repainted w/c 2nd March, and 8327 should follow on w/c 9th March. Similar to the recent Scania L94UB/Wright Solar repaints for "Prince Bishops" services 20/20a, After all vehicles have been repainted, 8306 - 8309 and 8319 - 8327 will receive branding for services 2/2A, which is thought to be "SimpliCity".
I am not sure when 5298 - 5309 and 5325 - 5327 will be branded for services 35/36, but I would suggest that it would make sense to repaint these vehicles prior to branding them again, as 5298 - 5309 were last repainted in December 2011. This could well mean that there will be plain gold buses running around for a good few weeks yet. There's no excuse for not branding 5320 - 5324, though, so I'd anticipate that screen services will be in to brand these as soon as the livery design has been finalised and the vinyls ordered.
(23 Feb 2015, 4:39 pm)Malarkey wrote Should of left The Galleries at around 16:21 on the 2A towards Silksworth Dan if you want a Photo.
(23 Feb 2015, 4:40 pm)Robert wrote This may be completely untrue but ill post it on here anyway:
There has supposedly been a disagreement with Go North East and Elddis transport. This has possibly resulted in GNE moving all Ventre operations (and the Sunday operation of 15) back down to Stanley from Consett.
(23 Feb 2015, 4:46 pm)Dan wrote The first part is untrue - the second part is.
Following on from the merger of Saltmeadows and Riverside last weekend, all of Go North East's operations out of Consett Depot should transfer to Stanley tonight, after the vehicles finish service today.
(23 Feb 2015, 4:46 pm)Dan wrote Cheers - I'm having a much needed day off from taking photos, though. Will catch up with it (and hopefully others) tomorrow.
The first part is untrue - the second part is.
Following on from the merger of Saltmeadows and Riverside last weekend, all of Go North East's operations out of Consett Depot should transfer to Stanley tonight, after the vehicles finish service today.
(23 Feb 2015, 5:03 pm)Malarkey wrote Just while on the Subject of Vehicle Transfers due the closing of Saltmeadows etc, Will Riverside be operating the evening 85/86 instead of Washington, as to me that is a hell of a lot of Dead Mileage to cover to do so, would be it not easier just to have Washington operate the 85/86 in the evening as they do during the day, or Alternatively have Deptford or Chester operate it instead on an evening.
(23 Feb 2015, 5:07 pm)citaro5284 wrote Everything that Saltmeadows operated will be operated from Riverside. You have to remember that the bus board workings are given to the operator by Nexus, so it is up to them if they want the work operated differently.
(23 Feb 2015, 5:07 pm)citaro5284 wrote Everything that Saltmeadows operated will be operated from Riverside. You have to remember that the bus board workings are given to the operator by Nexus, so it is up to them if they want the work operated differently.I can certainly see it changing in the future mind, having 2 Drivers drive a combined 18 Miles before even operating the evening 85/86 then another combined 18 Miles back to is hardly economical is it, even if it didnt change and it remained at Riverside per Nexus requests then I would expect a reduction in the frequency of the service to just 1 Bus an Hour as it simply isnt viable at all.
(23 Feb 2015, 5:18 pm)Malarkey wrote I can certainly see it changing in the future mind, having 2 Drivers drive a combined 18 Miles before even operating the evening 85/86 then another combined 18 Miles back to is hardly economical is it, even if it didnt change and it remained at Riverside per Nexus requests then I would expect a reduction in the frequency of the service to just 1 Bus an Hour as it simply isnt viable at all.
(23 Feb 2015, 7:57 am)Dan wrote I wonder if this is the reason why Arriva takes so long to reply to complaints?
Although Arriva also has access to an AVL system, perhaps they are interviewing drivers before giving customers any feedback..? This results in a response time of about a month, and hardly ideal for the customer who probably just wants to know that the company is aware there is a problem and they will work to fix it.
If this is the case, I think I'd prefer the response time to be within 12 hours and let the company deal with everything after they've told me that they're going to progress the complaint further. The difference is a customer being happy with the response (Tom) and being incredibly peeved by the time they had to wait (see multiple instances of this in the Customer Services thread - myself and aureolin have shared a few alone).
(23 Feb 2015, 4:53 pm)Michael wrote
Seems they're getting rid of low cost units... Peterlee's to go next?
(23 Feb 2015, 6:51 pm)aureolin wrote I guess there's more sense in the Consett/Stanley and Saltmeadows/Riverside, rather than Peterlee/Deptford, because of the distance. I'd love to see Peterlee expanded into a main depot though, with an aim to increase footprint in County Durham.
(23 Feb 2015, 4:53 pm)Michael wrote
Seems they're getting rid of low cost units... Peterlee's to go next?
(23 Feb 2015, 7:10 pm)Racer_Experience wrote I say Peterlee too then Consett then Crook I don't class Hexham a low cost unit or outstation as its roughly the same size as Washington
Peterlee - Werehouse
Consett - Eldis Truck depot
Crook - Weardale Motor Services depot
Crook has 2 brands Ok Way and Pronto
Peterlee has 2 East Durham and Wear Tees Express
Consett just the 1 Venture I still don't get it why can't 45/46 be kept there as 45/46 doesn't serve Stanley
(23 Feb 2015, 7:03 pm)Michael wrote Me too, where is County Durham which hasn't got a bus service? (not from the area), They may get 15 Solo SR's this year to...