(03 Sep 2022, 9:06 pm)streetdeckfan wrote How are the seats cushion wise? I've made my opinions clear on here before about the E400 seats, I find them to have too much cushion, with too little support. Now granted passengers aren't expected to sit there for an hour like they are on the E400s (I find the seats tolerable for short journeys).

As for the Type C charging, I think they're better off prioritising chargers that actually charge over a different plug standard. They seem to have such little current to each charger that they barely charge a phone, even the ones on the new StreetDecks and E400s. I'm not saying they need 100W USB-PD chargers to every seat (although that would be handy!), it would be nice to have a little bit more umph to them so it doesn't just maintain the level of battery.

(03 Sep 2022, 8:56 pm)Adrian wrote Tried out the new E12s today. Really good quality bus and I'd say a massive improvement on any other modern bus (maybe minus the GNE Spec E400MMC) I've travelled on recently. The improvement on seating from the E10s is a good move. The huge next stop screens look great too.

There's really nothing negative, but from a talking point, I noticed there is that there's a couple of bell-press buttons placed in a precarious position. On the back of the seats in front of the first step up, and I can see quite a few accidental knee-presses of those, which will sharp wind drivers up!

The only other thing was the USB charging points, and that we're still lacking USB-C charging. Given that the EU (I know, we're not in it!, but we'll get this by default) are moving towards USB-C being standard by 2024, it's surprising that the manufacturer hasn't had the foresight to offer them in these buses.

Both the Wallsend section and Gosforth section I travelled on seemed to be well-used into Newcastle. The Gosforth to Newcastle journey being full, despite two Arrivas and a Stagecoach being in front of it and not a notable football fan in sight.

(03 Sep 2022, 9:06 pm)streetdeckfan wrote How are the seats cushion wise? I've made my opinions clear on here before about the E400 seats, I find them to have too much cushion, with too little support. Now granted passengers aren't expected to sit there for an hour like they are on the E400s (I find the seats tolerable for short journeys).

As for the Type C charging, I think they're better off prioritising chargers that actually charge over a different plug standard. They seem to have such little current to each charger that they barely charge a phone, even the ones on the new StreetDecks and E400s. I'm not saying they need 100W USB-PD chargers to every seat (although that would be handy!), it would be nice to have a little bit more umph to them so it doesn't just maintain the level of battery.

(03 Sep 2022, 9:09 pm)Thomas12 wrote The new buses are nice but the reliability has been horrendous today. 

It was a regular thing when Riverside ran it before, so hopefully it isn’t going to continue. Haven’t got high hopes though.

(03 Sep 2022, 9:20 pm)Adrian wrote They feel decent to be honest. Comfortable enough and more back support than the Civics.

See, I think they do need to go towards USB-PD capable ports. I've often said in the past that it's largely pointless having USB charging for around the door type routes, because you maybe gain a couple % battery if you're lucky. It's really no quicker than the wireless charging.


Yes, I agree. The first one I intended to catch (from Wallsend) this morning, we got to Haymarket and turfed off there. Destination was marked up for Great Park and no communication to say it'd be anything other than that.

(03 Sep 2022, 9:36 pm)streetdeckfan wrote Last time I checked, I think my phone was only charging at 5W with the USB ports in the back of the seats, which is quite frankly pathetic, and pointless.
They need at least 10W to make them worth using, that would probably give about 25-30% on a 30 minute journey.

This is why I still have a preference for 240V sockets on buses, I personally think they're far more useful than a USB port. I carry around a 65W charger with me that I can use with my phone and laptop, so always use that over the USB sockets. And, if I bring the Warp (or whatever they're calling it these days) charger, I can fully charge both my phone and laptop on the journey up to Newcastle

(03 Sep 2022, 9:36 pm)streetdeckfan wrote Last time I checked, I think my phone was only charging at 5W with the USB ports in the back of the seats, which is quite frankly pathetic, and pointless.
They need at least 10W to make them worth using, that would probably give about 25-30% on a 30 minute journey.

This is why I still have a preference for 240V sockets on buses, I personally think they're far more useful than a USB port. I carry around a 65W charger with me that I can use with my phone and laptop, so always use that over the USB sockets. And, if I bring the Warp (or whatever they're calling it these days) charger, I can fully charge both my phone and laptop on the journey up to Newcastle

(03 Sep 2022, 9:48 pm)Adrian wrote 240V are great, but I imagine are a nightmare to maintain in a bus fleet. No matter how many stickers you put on them to say laptops and phones only, you'll inevitably get someone plugging their straighteners or something in and trip the circuit until it's reset again. At least on trains, the train manager generally has the ability to reset it in each coach.

(03 Sep 2022, 9:36 pm)streetdeckfan wrote Last time I checked, I think my phone was only charging at 5W with the USB ports in the back of the seats, which is quite frankly pathetic, and pointless.
They need at least 10W to make them worth using, that would probably give about 25-30% on a 30 minute journey.

This is why I still have a preference for 240V sockets on buses, I personally think they're far more useful than a USB port. I carry around a 65W charger with me that I can use with my phone and laptop, so always use that over the USB sockets. And, if I bring the Warp (or whatever they're calling it these days) charger, I can fully charge both my phone and laptop on the journey up to Newcastle

(03 Sep 2022, 10:00 pm)Unber43 wrote Where do Q3's do changeovers?

(06 Sep 2022, 5:04 pm)ne14ne1 wrote Hang on a second, so the Q3 Wallsend/St Peter’s Basin-bound which actually passes Haymarket Bus Station anyway, doesn’t call into the bus station, but the Q3 Great Park-bound which doesn’t naturally pass Haymarket Bus Station snakes back on itself so it can call there!?

(06 Sep 2022, 5:04 pm)ne14ne1 wrote Hang on a second, so the Q3 Wallsend/St Peter’s Basin-bound which actually passes Haymarket Bus Station anyway, doesn’t call into the bus station, but the Q3 Great Park-bound which doesn’t naturally pass Haymarket Bus Station snakes back on itself so it can call there!?

(06 Sep 2022, 5:04 pm)ne14ne1 wrote Hang on a second, so the Q3 Wallsend/St Peter’s Basin-bound which actually passes Haymarket Bus Station anyway, doesn’t call into the bus station, but the Q3 Great Park-bound which doesn’t naturally pass Haymarket Bus Station snakes back on itself so it can call there!?

(06 Sep 2022, 7:47 pm)Storx wrote The idea of that is because all the Great North Road services serve Haymarket and I'm not sure if it still is subsidised but it started as a subsidised service from the Haymarket - Great Park.

Heading South, the services don't head towards Wallsend etc from Haymarket so there's no point in serving it, most people get off on St Mary's Place anyway so it can save a few minutes

imo the Q3 should do the same route around Newcastle since it doesn't loop anymore so you can get a bus from say Newgate Street to the Quayside but there's no return service in the opposite direction so doesn't make much sense.

(07 Sep 2022, 8:53 am)ne14ne1 wrote I kinda get that logic but it’s a complete pain for passengers already onboard to have to trail around the loop instead of just serving John Dobson St and then turning right towards Jesmond.
When the 57/58 ran cross-city and served the Coast Rd it never looped around into Haymarket just because the other Coast Rd services picked up from there. 

I agree the Q3 route should be simplified to use Market St/Grainger St/Newgate St/Percy St in both directions. 

(07 Sep 2022, 11:03 am)Kuyoyo wrote Serving Haymarket and the route taken round the city stems from the original version of Quaylink - when the St Peters Basin service was the Q2 and terminated at Haymarket. Easier to access Haymarket arriving from St Mary's Place than it is from Percy Street (no traffic to cross). Let's not forget that it has always served Haymarket even prior to the change to serve Jesmond and Osbourne Road earlier in the year.

(08 Sep 2022, 8:09 am)RMF1254 wrote But by going into the Haymarket it will pick up passengers waiting for any service going up the Great North Road towards Brunton `Park.

(07 Sep 2022, 11:14 am)ne14ne1 wrote Yeah, just once it was sent via Osborne Rd you’d have thought it’d have been better to remove the loop back to straighten it out a bit and reduce journey times

(13 Sep 2022, 2:16 pm)F114TML wrote Don't know the details, but apparently one has already been in an accident. One of our drivers said it was parked up on an X24 stand, with a big gash taken out the side from the emergency door to the back, and the back panel was crooked.

(23 Sep 2022, 12:18 am)streetdeckfan wrote Not sure if this has already been mentioned, but on the NSA, how are the Q3s referred to, is it just Quaycity Q3, or do they do Quaycity Voltra Q3?