(07 May 2015, 10:41 pm)Michael wrote Maybe not but still shows people support them.
They probables aim for the 2020 election
I despair at the prospect of people supporting them.
Skip to main content
(07 May 2015, 10:43 pm)MrFozz wrote They were talking about that on the BBC not long ago...UKIP's 2020 strategy
(07 May 2015, 10:43 pm)MrFozz wrote They were talking about that on the BBC not long ago...UKIP's 2020 strategy
(07 May 2015, 10:47 pm)Andreos1 wrote Hopefully we see the likes of TUSC in more areas next time out.
http://www.tusc.org.uk/policy
(07 May 2015, 10:49 pm)MrFozz wrote The TUSC dude in one of the Sunderland counts was overjoyed with the number of votes he received...A few hundred
(07 May 2015, 11:10 pm)MrFozz wrote Who are TUSC btw. ..are they Arthur Scargills lot
(07 May 2015, 11:13 pm)aureolin wrote Nope. It's a coalition of a load of trade unions and some of the socialist parties. The problem is that they're going to get whipped in every single seat, because they haven't the public support.ÂExcuse my language, but thay Gary Duncan looked a right twat taking selfies while Returning Officers was reading the result
(08 May 2015, 6:28 am)Kuyoyo wrote The policial landscape has changed overnight.....
The BBC are now predicting 325 seats for the Tories which effectively means they'll have a slender majority.
And a lot of commentators are already predicting a change in leader for both the Lim Dems and Labour.
(08 May 2015, 6:28 am)Kuyoyo wrote The policial landscape has changed overnight.....The BBC Forecast is now 329 to the Tories...
The BBC are now predicting 325 seats for the Tories which effectively means they'll have a slender majority.
And a lot of commentators are already predicting a change in leader for both the Lim Dems and Labour.
(08 May 2015, 6:28 am)Kuyoyo wrote The policial landscape has changed overnight.....
The BBC are now predicting 325 seats for the Tories which effectively means they'll have a slender majority.
And a lot of commentators are already predicting a change in leader for both the Lim Dems and Labour.
(08 May 2015, 7:00 am)MurdnunoC wrote Both leaders have to go really.ÂWould David have been a better leader than Ed...dont know a great deal about it, but the general feeling seemed to be that Ed stabbed his brother in the back...
The Lib Dem result is nothing short of humiliating and it shows they lost a lot of support by climbing into bed with the Conservatives. Many Lib Dem voters voiced their disapproval in 2010 and some tried to distance themselves from the coalition agreement when fighting local elections. Clegg's position is now untenable as leader.Â
As for Labour, well, wrong choice of leadership combined with policies which don't reflect their grassroots support.Â
(07 May 2015, 10:29 pm)MurdnunoC wrote I don't blame the SNP for ensuring another five years of Tory rule. I disagree with the principle of tactical voting. People should vote for whichever political candidate they feel represents them the best. If Scottish voters believe the SNP will represent their interests best then so be it - even if it has the inadvertent effect of enabling another period of Tory rule. Labour (and the Lib-Dems) should have done more to appeal to the Scottish electorate. If they failed to do this, it's on them, not the SNP.