(09 Jan 2017, 12:06 pm)Jimmi wrote Damn! Got my times completely wrong and will probably end up just missing it.
Thanks for letting me know.
5442 should be out too so you might still have a chance of catching one.
Skip to main content
(09 Jan 2017, 12:34 pm)Jimmi wrote 5443 has been replaced by 604.Drivers of the depot were told not to use these for the past few days. Stanley is short (6127 and 52?? Off road + others), so I wouldn't be surprised if it was just to make numbers meet. Maybe there was some testing, but I'm not sure. Seems a bit odd to send them into service where they aren't fully ready and there's only 2-3 of them at the depot.
(09 Jan 2017, 12:34 pm)Jimmi wrote 5443 has been replaced by 604.CORRECTION: Must of been 5442 that was removed after performing the 11:50 16A from Durham.
(09 Jan 2017, 12:48 pm)Jamie M wrote Drivers of the depot were told not to use these for the past few days. Stanley is short (6127 and 52?? Off road + others), so I wouldn't be surprised if it was just to make numbers meet. Maybe there was some testing, but I'm not sure. Seems a bit odd to send them into service where they aren't fully ready and there's only 2-3 of them at the depot.
Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
(09 Jan 2017, 1:18 pm)Adrian wrote It's certainly unusual for brand new buses to be sent out in service, prior to branding being applied. In fact, I can't recall another time in recent years where this has happened? I may be wrong mind.
(09 Jan 2017, 1:18 pm)Adrian wrote It's certainly unusual for brand new buses to be sent out in service, prior to branding being applied. In fact, I can't recall another time in recent years where this has happened? I may be wrong mind.
(09 Jan 2017, 3:51 pm)S813 FVK wrote 681, 689 and 690 have all been sent out without branding.
(09 Jan 2017, 3:57 pm)Adrian wrote True, but I'd say that is a bit different. 681, 689 and 690 weren't for a branded route, and the route they're allocated to remains unbranded five month later.
(09 Jan 2017, 3:57 pm)Adrian wrote True, but I'd say that is a bit different. 681, 689 and 690 weren't for a branded route, and the route they're allocated to remains unbranded five month later.
(09 Jan 2017, 4:02 pm)South Tyne Lad wrote The South Tyne Versa's ran around in unbranded Purple on the 88/88A in late 2013 following displacement from the Saltwell Park, 8295,8300 and 8301 ran in Saltwell Park Green around the same time too.
8299 had serious work done to it around that period, As I only recall it being on the 88/88A was a few months after the rest of the batch arrived, Also in debranded Green.
(09 Jan 2017, 4:04 pm)S813 FVK wrote The discussion regards new vehicles, not cascaded vehicles from a new route.
(09 Jan 2017, 5:34 pm)Arcticrossy92 wrote Thought I'd seen one of the new streetlites parked in Consett bus station about 10 minutes ago, I was slightly confused and thought it was a dirty red kite!
(09 Jan 2017, 5:47 pm)Dan wrote Mind I knew you wouldn't resist an opportunity to bang the link to your photo on here
(09 Jan 2017, 5:51 pm)Michael wrote Have they officially replaced any Citaro's at Stanley yet?, if so can u confirm where the Citaro's are going?.
Yes it's been said to Deptford for the 9 and X5 but wasn't officially confirmed.
(09 Jan 2017, 5:54 pm)Dan wrote No.
Today was a lucky catch for those Streetlites. They may be out in service again tomorrow over the scholars peak, depending on the availability of other buses, but unlikely to be back out in service again now until branded.
One was removed from service today but was re-allocated to services 6 and X70/X71 this afternoon so that the decker could be used for scholars.
(09 Jan 2017, 5:58 pm)S813 FVK wrote I was happy to see one - the new bus smell drifted out of the bus when it pulled into the stop this morning. I'd have much preferred to have got on that instead of 6032.
I have also decided that I hate the 16/16A timetable - since i finish early on a Tuesday, i was going to get the 15 up to Consett and get the 16 from there to South Stanley. It, however, departs just minutes earlier than the 15s arrival. I would have liked to have had a ride on one but nevermind.
(09 Jan 2017, 5:58 pm)S813 FVK wrote I was happy to see one - the new bus smell drifted out of the bus when it pulled into the stop this morning. I'd have much preferred to have got on that instead of 6032.
I have also decided that I hate the 16/16A timetable - since i finish early on a Tuesday, i was going to get the 15 up to Consett and get the 16 from there to South Stanley. It, however, departs just minutes earlier than the 15s arrival. I would have liked to have had a ride on one but nevermind.
(09 Jan 2017, 6:12 pm)Dan wrote I reckon they must have known you finish early on a Tuesday and thought "We'll not have that S813 FVK sitting on our brand new buses, we'll schedule it so it leaves just minutes before the 15 arrives"
(09 Jan 2017, 6:26 pm)Jimmi wrote Connections are a bit tight but achievable, but you could get the 15 to Ledgate then catch the 16 from there heading in either direction.
Should have seen me trying to work out where 5443 was, in the end I decided to catch the 11:00 15 to Consett, got off in Ledgate to discover spare Citaro and 6011 on 16's, so jumped on 6011 to Consett. Was going to wait for the 12:04 departure for Durham but having got a reporting that 5442 was on the way to Stanley on the 16A, I jumped on the 78 instead but sadly 5442 got removed just before I got there but thankfully 5443 was on the board I thought it was on. Working out was tricky because when I saw your post it said 1 hour ago which was not so helpful.
(09 Jan 2017, 4:04 pm)S813 FVK wrote The discussion regards new vehicles, not cascaded vehicles from a new route.When GNE took over Hexham depot a small batch of Mercedes Benz Citaros were eventually purchased, these being 5328 etc (BJ10---). They were delivered in silver and ran for a good few weeks unbranded because at that time, the Newcastle to Hexham service was still the ex Arriva 602. The citaros were not branded until the 602 became the 10, at which timenthey were given full Ten branding